BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-23154High confidence

net: fix segmentation of forwarding fraglist GRO

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-019113 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 8 Sep 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.12% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.69-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.170-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
SSA-019113 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-019113: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.6
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: fix segmentation of forwarding fraglist GRO This patch enhances GSO segment handling by properly checking the SKB_GSO_DODGY flag for frag_list GSO packets, addressing low throughput issues observed when a station accesses IPv4 servers via hotspots with an IPv6-only upstream interface. Specifically, it fixes a bug in GSO segmentation when forwarding GRO packets containing a frag_list. The function skb_segment_list cannot correctly process GRO skbs that have been converted by XLAT, since XLAT only translates the header of the head skb. Consequently, skbs in the frag_list may remain untranslated, resulting in protocol inconsistencies and reduced throughput. To address this, the patch explicitly sets the SKB_GSO_DODGY flag for GSO packets in XLAT's IPv4/IPv6 protocol translation helpers (bpf_skb_proto_4_to_6 and bpf_skb_proto_6_to_4). This marks GSO packets as potentially modified after protocol translation. As a result, GSO segmentation will avoid using skb_segment_list and instead falls back to skb_segment for packets with the SKB_GSO_DODGY flag. This ensures that only safe and fully translated frag_list packets are processed by skb_segment_list, resolving protocol inconsistencies and improving throughput when forwarding GRO packets converted by XLAT.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
SSA-082556 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 7 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-082556: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.5
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: fix segmentation of forwarding fraglist GRO This patch enhances GSO segment handling by properly checking the SKB_GSO_DODGY flag for frag_list GSO packets, addressing low throughput issues observed when a station accesses IPv4 servers via hotspots with an IPv6-only upstream interface. Specifically, it fixes a bug in GSO segmentation when forwarding GRO packets containing a frag_list. The function skb_segment_list cannot correctly process GRO skbs that have been converted by XLAT, since XLAT only translates the header of the head skb. Consequently, skbs in the frag_list may remain untranslated, resulting in protocol inconsistencies and reduced throughput. To address this, the patch explicitly sets the SKB_GSO_DODGY flag for GSO packets in XLAT's IPv4/IPv6 protocol translation helpers (bpf_skb_proto_4_to_6 and bpf_skb_proto_6_to_4). This marks GSO packets as potentially modified after protocol translation. As a result, GSO segmentation will avoid using skb_segment_list and instead falls back to skb_segment for packets with the SKB_GSO_DODGY flag. This ensures that only safe and fully translated frag_list packets are processed by skb_segment_list, resolving protocol inconsistencies and improving throughput when forwarding GRO packets converted by XLAT.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-5883

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: fix segmentation of forwarding fraglist GRO This patch enhances GSO segment handling by properly checking the SKB_GSO_DODGY flag for frag_list GSO packets, addressing low throughput issues observed when a station accesses IPv4 servers via hotspots with an IPv6-only upstream interface. Specifically, it fixes a bug in GSO segmentation when forwarding GRO packets containing a frag_list. The function skb_segment_list cannot correctly process GRO skbs that have been converted by XLAT, since XLAT only translates the header of the head skb. Consequently, skbs in the frag_list may remain untranslated, resulting in protocol inconsistencies and reduced throughput. To address this, the patch explicitly sets the SKB_GSO_DODGY flag for GSO packets in XLAT's IPv4/IPv6 protocol translation helpers (bpf_skb_proto_4_to_6 and bpf_skb_proto_6_to_4). This marks GSO packets as potentially modified after protocol translation. As a result, GSO segmentation will avoid using skb_segment_list and instead falls back to skb_segment for packets with the SKB_GSO_DODGY flag. This ensures that only safe and fully translated frag_list packets are processed by skb_segment_list, resolving protocol inconsistencies and improving throughput when forwarding GRO packets converted by XLAT.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
0.0
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: fix segmentation of forwarding fraglist GRO This patch enhances GSO segment handling by properly checking the SKB_GSO_DODGY flag for frag_list GSO packets, addressing low throughput issues observed when a station accesses IPv4 servers via hotspots with an IPv6-only upstream interface. Specifically, it fixes a bug in GSO segmentation when forwarding GRO packets containing a frag_list. The function skb_segment_list cannot correctly process GRO skbs that have been converted by XLAT, since XLAT only translates the header of the head skb. Consequently, skbs in the frag_list may remain untranslated, resulting in protocol inconsistencies and reduced throughput. To address this, the patch explicitly sets the SKB_GSO_DODGY flag for GSO packets in XLAT's IPv4/IPv6 protocol translation helpers (bpf_skb_proto_4_to_6 and bpf_skb_proto_6_to_4). This marks GSO packets as potentially modified after protocol translation. As a result, GSO segmentation will avoid using skb_segment_list and instead falls back to skb_segment for packets with the SKB_GSO_DODGY flag. This ensures that only safe and fully translated frag_list packets are processed by skb_segment_list, resolving protocol inconsistencies and improving throughput when forwarding GRO packets converted by XLAT.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: fix segmentation of forwarding fraglist GRO This patch enhances GSO segment handling by properly checking the SKB_GSO_DODGY flag for frag_list GSO packets, addressing low throughput issues observed when a station accesses IPv4 servers via hotspots with an IPv6-only upstream interface. Specifically, it fixes a bug in GSO segmentation when forwarding GRO packets containing a frag_list. The function skb_segment_list cannot correctly process GRO skbs that have been converted by XLAT, since XLAT only translates the header of the head skb. Consequently, skbs in the frag_list may remain untranslated, resulting in protocol inconsistencies and reduced throughput. To address this, the patch explicitly sets the SKB_GSO_DODGY flag for GSO packets in XLAT's IPv4/IPv6 protocol translation helpers (bpf_skb_proto_4_to_6 and bpf_skb_proto_6_to_4). This marks GSO packets as potentially modified after protocol translation. As a result, GSO segmentation will avoid using skb_segment_list and instead falls back to skb_segment for packets with the SKB_GSO_DODGY flag. This ensures that only safe and fully translated frag_list packets are processed by skb_segment_list, resolving protocol inconsistencies and improving throughput when forwarding GRO packets converted by XLAT.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: fix segmentation of forwarding fraglist GRO This patch enhances GSO segment handling by properly checking the SKB_GSO_DODGY flag for frag_list GSO packets, addressing low throughput issues observed when a station accesses IPv4 servers via hotspots with an IPv6-only upstream interface. Specifically, it fixes a bug in GSO segmentation when forwarding GRO packets containing a frag_list. The function skb_segment_list cannot correctly process GRO skbs that have been converted by XLAT, since XLAT only translates the header of the head skb. Consequently, skbs in the frag_list may remain untranslated, resulting in protocol inconsistencies and reduced throughput. To address this, the patch explicitly sets the SKB_GSO_DODGY flag for GSO packets in XLAT's IPv4/IPv6 protocol translation helpers (bpf_skb_proto_4_to_6 and bpf_skb_proto_6_to_4). This marks GSO packets as potentially modified after protocol translation. As a result, GSO segmentation will avoid using skb_segment_list and instead falls back to skb_segment for packets with the SKB_GSO_DODGY flag. This ensures that only safe and fully translated frag_list packets are processed by skb_segment_list, resolving protocol inconsistencies and improving throughput when forwarding GRO packets converted by XLAT.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-5883Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: fix segmentation of forwarding fraglist GRO This patch enhances GSO segment handling by properly checking the SKB_GSO_DODGY flag for frag_list GSO packets, addressing low throughput issues observed when a station accesses IPv4 servers via hotspots with an IPv6-only upstream interface. Specifically, it fixes a bug in GSO segmentation when forwarding GRO packets containing a frag_list. The function skb_segment_list cannot correctly process GRO skbs that have been converted by XLAT, since XLAT only translates the header of the head skb. Consequently, skbs in the frag_list may remain untranslated, resulting in protocol inconsistencies and reduced throughput. To address this, the patch explicitly sets the SKB_GSO_DODGY flag for GSO packets in XLAT's IPv4/IPv6 protocol translation helpers (bpf_skb_proto_4_to_6 and bpf_skb_proto_6_to_4). This marks GSO packets as potentially modified after protocol translation. As a result, GSO segmentation will avoid using skb_segment_list and instead falls back to skb_segment for packets with the SKB_GSO_DODGY flag. This ensures that only safe and fully translated frag_list packets are processed by skb_segment_list, resolving protocol inconsistencies and improving throughput when forwarding GRO packets converted by XLAT.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0421Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260218Security Bulletin 18 Feb 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 18 Feb 2026, published on 18 February 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1093Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23144 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23146 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23147 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23148 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23151 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23152 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23154 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23160 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23162 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71288 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22981 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22985 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22993 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23004 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23118 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23138 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23154 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23171 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23207 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23244 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23245 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23144 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23146 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23147 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23148 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23151 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23152 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23154 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23160 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23162 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23143 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23144 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23146 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23147 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23148 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23151 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23152 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23154 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23158 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23159 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23160 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23161 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23162 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0880Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

025-71123, CVE-2025-71131, CVE-2025-71161, CVE-2025-71162, CVE-2025-71163, CVE-2025-71185, CVE-2025-71186, CVE-2025-71189, CVE-2025-71190, CVE-2025-71191, CVE-2025-71197, CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71265, CVE-2025-71266, CVE-2025-71267, CVE-2026-3497, CVE-2026-22977, CVE-2026-22979, CVE-2026-22980, CVE-2026-22982, CVE-2026-22992, CVE-2026-22994, CVE-2026-23003, CVE-2026-23005, CVE-2026-23010, CVE-2026-23011, CVE-2026-23019, CVE-2026-23026, CVE-2026-23038, CVE-2026-23054, CVE-2026-23060, CVE-2026-23083, CVE-2026-23084, CVE-2026-23086, CVE-2026-23087, CVE-2026-23095, CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23103, CVE-2026-23110, CVE-2026-23111, CVE-2026-23113, CVE-2026-23154, CVE-2026-23204, CVE-2026-23231, CVE-2026-23242, CVE-2026-23243, CVE-2026-23245, CVE-2026-23270, CVE-2026-23271, CVE-2026-23273, CVE-2026-23274, CVE-2026-23277, CVE-2026-23284, CVE-2026-23287, CVE-2026-23290, CVE-2026-23293, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23319, CVE-2026-23321, CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23340, CVE-2026-23343, CVE-2026-23351, CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23365, CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23370, CVE-2026-23378, CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23392, CVE-2026-23397, CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23414, CVE-2026-23422, CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438, CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23449, CVE-2026

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0547Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-71161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71221 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71265 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71267 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71267 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71269 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23100 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23154 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23204 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23242 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23243 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23245 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0548Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2026-22993 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23004 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23100 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23138 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23154 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23204 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23207 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23210 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23210 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23226 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0497Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-23074 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23088 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23125 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23136 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23138 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23140 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23154 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23169 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23187 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23191 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23193 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23193 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23201 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23202 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0369Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-23133 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23135 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23139 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23146 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23151 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23152 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23154 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23155 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23156 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23163 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23166 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23167 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23167 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23169 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23170 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2026-23126 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23128 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23133 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23137 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23138 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23146 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23154 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23164 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23167 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23167 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23169 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23170 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23170 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23171 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23176 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23178 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2026-23126 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23128 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23133 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23137 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23138 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23145 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23146 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23150 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23154 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23164 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23167 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23167 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23169 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23170 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23170 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23171 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23176 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23178 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-007882LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。net: 転送時のfraglist GROのセグメンテーションに関する修正です。このパッチはGSOセグメント処理を強化し、frag_list GSOパケットに対してSKB_GSO_DODGYフラグを適切にチェックすることで、IPv6専用のアップストリームインターフェース経由でホットスポットからIPv4サーバにアクセスする際に観測される低スループット問題を解決します。具体的には、frag_listを含むGROパケットを転送する際のGSOセグメンテーションのバグを修正します。関数skb_segment_listは、XLATによって変換されたGRO skbを正しく処理できません。なぜなら、XLATはヘッドskbのヘッダーのみを変換するため、frag_list内のskbは未変換のまま残る可能性があり、その結果プロトコルの不整合とスループットの低下を引き起こすからです。この問題に対処するため、パッチはXLATのIPv4/IPv6プロトコル変換ヘルパー(bpf_skb_proto_4_to_6およびbpf_skb_proto_6_to_4)でGSOパケットに明示的にSKB_GSO_DODGYフラグを設定します。これにより、プロトコル変換後に変更される可能性のあるGSOパケットとしてマークされます。その結果、GSOセグメンテーションはSKB_GSO_DODGYフラグ付きパケットに対してskb_segment_listの使用を避け、代わりにskb_segmentを使用します。これにより、安全かつ完全に変換されたfrag_listパケットのみがskb_segment_listによって処理されるため、XLATで変換されたGROパケットの転送時におけるプロトコル不整合が解消され、スループットが向上します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.6, 6.1.167 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.130 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.69 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.9 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 14 Feb 2026 · Last source change 8 Sept 2026, 08:45 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-5883
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    9fd1ff5d2ac7181844735806b0a703c942365291 < 9122d7280b2303e835cdfec156bd932ac1f586ed; 9fd1ff5d2ac7181844735806b0a703c942365291 < 2cbef9ea5a0ac51863ede35c45f26931a85d3888; 9fd1ff5d2ac7181844735806b0a703c942365291 < 3e62db1e3140449608975e29e0979cc5f3b1cc07; 9fd1ff5d2ac7181844735806b0a703c942365291 < 3d48d59235c494d34e32052f768393111c0806ef; 9fd1ff5d2ac7181844735806b0a703c942365291 < 426ca15c7f6cb6562a081341ca88893a50c59fa2; 5.6 · Fixed: < 5.6; 6.1.167 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.130 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.69 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.9 ≤ 6.18.*; 6.19 ≤ *
    After
    Linux: 9fd1ff5d2ac7181844735806b0a703c942365291 < 9122d7280b2303e835cdfec156bd932ac1f586ed, 9fd1ff5d2ac7181844735806b0a703c942365291 < 2cbef9ea5a0ac51863ede35c45f26931a85d3888, 9fd1ff5d2ac7181844735806b0a703c942365291 < 3e62db1e3140449608975e29e0979cc5f3b1cc07, 9fd1ff5d2ac7181844735806b0a703c942365291 < 3d48d59235c494d34e32052f768393111c0806ef, 9fd1ff5d2ac7181844735806b0a703c942365291 < 426ca15c7f6cb6562a081341ca88893a50c59fa2, 5.6 · Fixed: Linux: < 5.6, 6.1.167 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.130 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.69 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.9 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-23154 · cve.blacktree.nl