BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-23113High confidence

io_uring/io-wq: check IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT inside work run loop

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-019113 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 8 Sep 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.12% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.69-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.170-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.8-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.8-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
SSA-019113 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-019113: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.6
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring/io-wq: check IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT inside work run loop Currently this is checked before running the pending work. Normally this is quite fine, as work items either end up blocking (which will create a new worker for other items), or they complete fairly quickly. But syzbot reports an issue where io-wq takes seemingly forever to exit, and with a bit of debugging, this turns out to be because it queues a bunch of big (2GB - 4096b) reads with a /dev/msr* file. Since this file type doesn't support ->read_iter(), loop_rw_iter() ends up handling them. Each read returns 16MB of data read, which takes 20 (!!) seconds. With a bunch of these pending, processing the whole chain can take a long time. Easily longer than the syzbot uninterruptible sleep timeout of 140 seconds. This then triggers a complaint off the io-wq exit path: INFO: task syz.4.135:6326 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted syzkaller #0 Blocked by coredump. "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz.4.135 state:D stack:26824 pid:6326 tgid:6324 ppid:5957 task_flags:0x400548 flags:0x00080000 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5256 [inline] __schedule+0x1139/0x6150 kernel/sched/core.c:6863 __schedule_loop kernel/sched/core.c:6945 [inline] schedule+0xe7/0x3a0 kernel/sched/core.c:6960 schedule_timeout+0x257/0x290 kernel/time/sleep_timeout.c:75 do_wait_for_common kernel/sched/completion.c:100 [inline] __wait_for_common+0x2fc/0x4e0 kernel/sched/completion.c:121 io_wq_exit_workers io_uring/io-wq.c:1328 [inline] io_wq_put_and_exit+0x271/0x8a0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1356 io_uring_clean_tctx+0x10d/0x190 io_uring/tctx.c:203 io_uring_cancel_generic+0x69c/0x9a0 io_uring/cancel.c:651 io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:19 [inline] do_exit+0x2ce/0x2bd0 kernel/exit.c:911 do_group_exit+0xd3/0x2a0 kernel/exit.c:1112 get_signal+0x2671/0x26d0 kernel/signal.c:3034 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x8f/0x7e0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 __exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:41 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x8c/0x540 kernel/entry/common.c:75 __exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:226 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:256 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work include/linux/entry-common.h:159 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode include/linux/entry-common.h:194 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x4ee/0xf80 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:100 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7fa02738f749 RSP: 002b:00007fa0281ae0e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000ca RAX: fffffffffffffe00 RBX: 00007fa0275e6098 RCX: 00007fa02738f749 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000080 RDI: 00007fa0275e6098 RBP: 00007fa0275e6090 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007fa0275e6128 R14: 00007fff14e4fcb0 R15: 00007fff14e4fd98 There's really nothing wrong here, outside of processing these reads will take a LONG time. However, we can speed up the exit by checking the IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT inside the io_worker_handle_work() loop, as syzbot will exit the ring after queueing up all of these reads. Then once the first item is processed, io-wq will simply cancel the rest. That should avoid syzbot running into this complaint again.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
SSA-082556 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 7 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-082556: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.5
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring/io-wq: check IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT inside work run loop Currently this is checked before running the pending work. Normally this is quite fine, as work items either end up blocking (which will create a new worker for other items), or they complete fairly quickly. But syzbot reports an issue where io-wq takes seemingly forever to exit, and with a bit of debugging, this turns out to be because it queues a bunch of big (2GB - 4096b) reads with a /dev/msr* file. Since this file type doesn't support ->read_iter(), loop_rw_iter() ends up handling them. Each read returns 16MB of data read, which takes 20 (!!) seconds. With a bunch of these pending, processing the whole chain can take a long time. Easily longer than the syzbot uninterruptible sleep timeout of 140 seconds. This then triggers a complaint off the io-wq exit path: INFO: task syz.4.135:6326 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted syzkaller #0 Blocked by coredump. "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz.4.135 state:D stack:26824 pid:6326 tgid:6324 ppid:5957 task_flags:0x400548 flags:0x00080000 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5256 [inline] __schedule+0x1139/0x6150 kernel/sched/core.c:6863 __schedule_loop kernel/sched/core.c:6945 [inline] schedule+0xe7/0x3a0 kernel/sched/core.c:6960 schedule_timeout+0x257/0x290 kernel/time/sleep_timeout.c:75 do_wait_for_common kernel/sched/completion.c:100 [inline] __wait_for_common+0x2fc/0x4e0 kernel/sched/completion.c:121 io_wq_exit_workers io_uring/io-wq.c:1328 [inline] io_wq_put_and_exit+0x271/0x8a0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1356 io_uring_clean_tctx+0x10d/0x190 io_uring/tctx.c:203 io_uring_cancel_generic+0x69c/0x9a0 io_uring/cancel.c:651 io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:19 [inline] do_exit+0x2ce/0x2bd0 kernel/exit.c:911 do_group_exit+0xd3/0x2a0 kernel/exit.c:1112 get_signal+0x2671/0x26d0 kernel/signal.c:3034 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x8f/0x7e0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 __exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:41 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x8c/0x540 kernel/entry/common.c:75 __exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:226 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:256 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work include/linux/entry-common.h:159 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode include/linux/entry-common.h:194 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x4ee/0xf80 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:100 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7fa02738f749 RSP: 002b:00007fa0281ae0e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000ca RAX: fffffffffffffe00 RBX: 00007fa0275e6098 RCX: 00007fa02738f749 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000080 RDI: 00007fa0275e6098 RBP: 00007fa0275e6090 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007fa0275e6128 R14: 00007fff14e4fcb0 R15: 00007fff14e4fd98 There's really nothing wrong here, outside of processing these reads will take a LONG time. However, we can speed up the exit by checking the IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT inside the io_worker_handle_work() loop, as syzbot will exit the ring after queueing up all of these reads. Then once the first item is processed, io-wq will simply cancel the rest. That should avoid syzbot running into this complaint again.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-6115

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring/io-wq: check IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT inside work run loop Currently this is checked before running the pending work. Normally this is quite fine, as work items either end up blocking (which will create a new worker for other items), or they complete fairly quickly. But syzbot reports an issue where io-wq takes seemingly forever to exit, and with a bit of debugging, this turns out to be because it queues a bunch of big (2GB - 4096b) reads with a /dev/msr* file. Since this file type doesn't support ->read_iter(), loop_rw_iter() ends up handling them. Each read returns 16MB of data read, which takes 20 (!!) seconds. With a bunch of these pending, processing the whole chain can take a long time. Easily longer than the syzbot uninterruptible sleep timeout of 140 seconds. This then triggers a complaint off the io-wq exit path: INFO: task syz.4.135:6326 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted syzkaller #0 Blocked by coredump. "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz.4.135 state:D stack:26824 pid:6326 tgid:6324 ppid:5957 task_flags:0x400548 flags:0x00080000 Call Trace: <TASK> context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5256 [inline] __schedule+0x1139/0x6150 kernel/sched/core.c:6863 __schedule_loop kernel/sched/core.c:6945 [inline] schedule+0xe7/0x3a0 kernel/sched/core.c:6960 schedule_timeout+0x257/0x290 kernel/time/sleep_timeout.c:75 do_wait_for_common kernel/sched/completion.c:100 [inline] __wait_for_common+0x2fc/0x4e0 kernel/sched/completion.c:121 io_wq_exit_workers io_uring/io-wq.c:1328 [inline] io_wq_put_and_exit+0x271/0x8a0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1356 io_uring_clean_tctx+0x10d/0x190 io_uring/tctx.c:203 io_uring_cancel_generic+0x69c/0x9a0 io_uring/cancel.c:651 io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:19 [inline] do_exit+0x2ce/0x2bd0 kernel/exit.c:911 do_group_exit+0xd3/0x2a0 kernel/exit.c:1112 get_signal+0x2671/0x26d0 kernel/signal.c:3034 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x8f/0x7e0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 __exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:41 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x8c/0x540 kernel/entry/common.c:75 __exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:226 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:256 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work include/linux/entry-common.h:159 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode include/linux/entry-common.h:194 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x4ee/0xf80 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:100 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7fa02738f749 RSP: 002b:00007fa0281ae0e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000ca RAX: fffffffffffffe00 RBX: 00007fa0275e6098 RCX: 00007fa02738f749 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000080 RDI: 00007fa0275e6098 RBP: 00007fa0275e6090 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007fa0275e6128 R14: 00007fff14e4fcb0 R15: 00007fff14e4fd98 There's really nothing wrong here, outside of processing these reads will take a LONG time. However, we can speed up the exit by checking the IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT inside the io_worker_handle_work() loop, as syzbot will exit the ring after queueing up all of these reads. Then once the first item is processed, io-wq will simply cancel the rest. That should avoid syzbot running into this complaint again.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
0.0
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring/io-wq: check IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT inside work run loop Currently this is checked before running the pending work. Normally this is quite fine, as work items either end up blocking (which will create a new worker for other items), or they complete fairly quickly. But syzbot reports an issue where io-wq takes seemingly forever to exit, and with a bit of debugging, this turns out to be because it queues a bunch of big (2GB - 4096b) reads with a /dev/msr* file. Since this file type doesn't support ->read_iter(), loop_rw_iter() ends up handling them. Each read returns 16MB of data read, which takes 20 (!!) seconds. With a bunch of these pending, processing the whole chain can take a long time. Easily longer than the syzbot uninterruptible sleep timeout of 140 seconds. This then triggers a complaint off the io-wq exit path: INFO: task syz.4.135:6326 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted syzkaller #0 Blocked by coredump. "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz.4.135 state:D stack:26824 pid:6326 tgid:6324 ppid:5957 task_flags:0x400548 flags:0x00080000 Call Trace: <TASK> context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5256 [inline] __schedule+0x1139/0x6150 kernel/sched/core.c:6863 __schedule_loop kernel/sched/core.c:6945 [inline] schedule+0xe7/0x3a0 kernel/sched/core.c:6960 schedule_timeout+0x257/0x290 kernel/time/sleep_timeout.c:75 do_wait_for_common kernel/sched/completion.c:100 [inline] __wait_for_common+0x2fc/0x4e0 kernel/sched/completion.c:121 io_wq_exit_workers io_uring/io-wq.c:1328 [inline] io_wq_put_and_exit+0x271/0x8a0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1356 io_uring_clean_tctx+0x10d/0x190 io_uring/tctx.c:203 io_uring_cancel_generic+0x69c/0x9a0 io_uring/cancel.c:651 io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:19 [inline] do_exit+0x2ce/0x2bd0 kernel/exit.c:911 do_group_exit+0xd3/0x2a0 kernel/exit.c:1112 get_signal+0x2671/0x26d0 kernel/signal.c:3034 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x8f/0x7e0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 __exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:41 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x8c/0x540 kernel/entry/common.c:75 __exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:226 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:256 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work include/linux/entry-common.h:159 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode include/linux/entry-common.h:194 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x4ee/0xf80 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:100 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7fa02738f749 RSP: 002b:00007fa0281ae0e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000ca RAX: fffffffffffffe00 RBX: 00007fa0275e6098 RCX: 00007fa02738f749 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000080 RDI: 00007fa0275e6098 RBP: 00007fa0275e6090 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007fa0275e6128 R14: 00007fff14e4fcb0 R15: 00007fff14e4fd98 There's really nothing wrong here, outside of processing these reads will take a LONG time. However, we can speed up the exit by checking the IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT inside the io_worker_handle_work() loop, as syzbot will exit the ring after queueing up all of these reads. Then once the first item is processed, io-wq will simply cancel the rest. That should avoid syzbot running into this complaint again.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring/io-wq: check IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT inside work run loop Currently this is checked before running the pending work. Normally this is quite fine, as work items either end up blocking (which will create a new worker for other items), or they complete fairly quickly. But syzbot reports an issue where io-wq takes seemingly forever to exit, and with a bit of debugging, this turns out to be because it queues a bunch of big (2GB - 4096b) reads with a /dev/msr* file. Since this file type doesn't support ->read_iter(), loop_rw_iter() ends up handling them. Each read returns 16MB of data read, which takes 20 (!!) seconds. With a bunch of these pending, processing the whole chain can take a long time. Easily longer than the syzbot uninterruptible sleep timeout of 140 seconds. This then triggers a complaint off the io-wq exit path: INFO: task syz.4.135:6326 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted syzkaller #0 Blocked by coredump. "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz.4.135 state:D stack:26824 pid:6326 tgid:6324 ppid:5957 task_flags:0x400548 flags:0x00080000 Call Trace: <TASK> context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5256 [inline] __schedule+0x1139/0x6150 kernel/sched/core.c:6863 __schedule_loop kernel/sched/core.c:6945 [inline] schedule+0xe7/0x3a0 kernel/sched/core.c:6960 schedule_timeout+0x257/0x290 kernel/time/sleep_timeout.c:75 do_wait_for_common kernel/sched/completion.c:100 [inline] __wait_for_common+0x2fc/0x4e0 kernel/sched/completion.c:121 io_wq_exit_workers io_uring/io-wq.c:1328 [inline] io_wq_put_and_exit+0x271/0x8a0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1356 io_uring_clean_tctx+0x10d/0x190 io_uring/tctx.c:203 io_uring_cancel_generic+0x69c/0x9a0 io_uring/cancel.c:651 io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:19 [inline] do_exit+0x2ce/0x2bd0 kernel/exit.c:911 do_group_exit+0xd3/0x2a0 kernel/exit.c:1112 get_signal+0x2671/0x26d0 kernel/signal.c:3034 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x8f/0x7e0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 __exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:41 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x8c/0x540 kernel/entry/common.c:75 __exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:226 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:256 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work include/linux/entry-common.h:159 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode include/linux/entry-common.h:194 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x4ee/0xf80 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:100 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7fa02738f749 RSP: 002b:00007fa0281ae0e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000ca RAX: fffffffffffffe00 RBX: 00007fa0275e6098 RCX: 00007fa02738f749 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000080 RDI: 00007fa0275e6098 RBP: 00007fa0275e6090 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007fa0275e6128 R14: 00007fff14e4fcb0 R15: 00007fff14e4fd98 There's really nothing wrong here, outside of processing these reads will take a LONG time. However, we can speed up the exit by checking the IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT inside the io_worker_handle_work() loop, as syzbot will exit the ring after queueing up all of these reads. Then once the first item is processed, io-wq will simply cancel the rest. That should avoid syzbot running into this complaint again.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring/io-wq: check IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT inside work run loop Currently this is checked before running the pending work. Normally this is quite fine, as work items either end up blocking (which will create a new worker for other items), or they complete fairly quickly. But syzbot reports an issue where io-wq takes seemingly forever to exit, and with a bit of debugging, this turns out to be because it queues a bunch of big (2GB - 4096b) reads with a /dev/msr* file. Since this file type doesn't support ->read_iter(), loop_rw_iter() ends up handling them. Each read returns 16MB of data read, which takes 20 (!!) seconds. With a bunch of these pending, processing the whole chain can take a long time. Easily longer than the syzbot uninterruptible sleep timeout of 140 seconds. This then triggers a complaint off the io-wq exit path: INFO: task syz.4.135:6326 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted syzkaller #0 Blocked by coredump. "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz.4.135 state:D stack:26824 pid:6326 tgid:6324 ppid:5957 task_flags:0x400548 flags:0x00080000 Call Trace: <TASK> context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5256 [inline] __schedule+0x1139/0x6150 kernel/sched/core.c:6863 __schedule_loop kernel/sched/core.c:6945 [inline] schedule+0xe7/0x3a0 kernel/sched/core.c:6960 schedule_timeout+0x257/0x290 kernel/time/sleep_timeout.c:75 do_wait_for_common kernel/sched/completion.c:100 [inline] __wait_for_common+0x2fc/0x4e0 kernel/sched/completion.c:121 io_wq_exit_workers io_uring/io-wq.c:1328 [inline] io_wq_put_and_exit+0x271/0x8a0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1356 io_uring_clean_tctx+0x10d/0x190 io_uring/tctx.c:203 io_uring_cancel_generic+0x69c/0x9a0 io_uring/cancel.c:651 io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:19 [inline] do_exit+0x2ce/0x2bd0 kernel/exit.c:911 do_group_exit+0xd3/0x2a0 kernel/exit.c:1112 get_signal+0x2671/0x26d0 kernel/signal.c:3034 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x8f/0x7e0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 __exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:41 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x8c/0x540 kernel/entry/common.c:75 __exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:226 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:256 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work include/linux/entry-common.h:159 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode include/linux/entry-common.h:194 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x4ee/0xf80 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:100 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7fa02738f749 RSP: 002b:00007fa0281ae0e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000ca RAX: fffffffffffffe00 RBX: 00007fa0275e6098 RCX: 00007fa02738f749 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000080 RDI: 00007fa0275e6098 RBP: 00007fa0275e6090 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007fa0275e6128 R14: 00007fff14e4fcb0 R15: 00007fff14e4fd98 There's really nothing wrong here, outside of processing these reads will take a LONG time. However, we can speed up the exit by checking the IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT inside the io_worker_handle_work() loop, as syzbot will exit the ring after queueing up all of these reads. Then once the first item is processed, io-wq will simply cancel the rest. That should avoid syzbot running into this complaint again.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-6115Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring/io-wq: check IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT inside work run loop Currently this is checked before running the pending work. Normally this is quite fine, as work items either end up blocking (which will create a new worker for other items), or they complete fairly quickly. But syzbot reports an issue where io-wq takes seemingly forever to exit, and with a bit of debugging, this turns out to be because it queues a bunch of big (2GB - 4096b) reads with a /dev/msr* file. Since this file type doesn't support ->read_iter(), loop_rw_iter() ends up handling them. Each read returns 16MB of data read, which takes 20 (!!) seconds. With a bunch of these pending, processing the whole chain can take a long time. Easily longer than the syzbot uninterruptible sleep timeout of 140 seconds. This then triggers a complaint off the io-wq exit path: INFO: task syz.4.135:6326 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted syzkaller #0 Blocked by coredump. "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz.4.135 state:D stack:26824 pid:6326 tgid:6324 ppid:5957 task_flags:0x400548 flags:0x00080000 Call Trace: <TASK> context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5256 [inline] __schedule+0x1139/0x6150 kernel/sched/core.c:6863 __schedule_loop kernel/sched/core.c:6945 [inline] schedule+0xe7/0x3a0 kernel/sched/core.c:6960 schedule_timeout+0x257/0x290 kernel/time/sleep_timeout.c:75 do_wait_for_common kernel/sched/completion.c:100 [inline] __wait_for_common+0x2fc/0x4e0 kernel/sched/completion.c:121 io_wq_exit_workers io_uring/io-wq.c:1328 [inline] io_wq_put_and_exit+0x271/0x8a0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1356 io_uring_clean_tctx+0x10d/0x190 io_uring/tctx.c:203 io_uring_cancel_generic+0x69c/0x9a0 io_uring/cancel.c:651 io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:19 [inline] do_exit+0x2ce/0x2bd0 kernel/exit.c:911 do_group_exit+0xd3/0x2a0 kernel/exit.c:1112 get_signal+0x2671/0x26d0 kernel/signal.c:3034 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x8f/0x7e0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337 __exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:41 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x8c/0x540 kernel/entry/common.c:75 __exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:226 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:256 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work include/linux/entry-common.h:159 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode include/linux/entry-common.h:194 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x4ee/0xf80 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:100 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7fa02738f749 RSP: 002b:00007fa0281ae0e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000ca RAX: fffffffffffffe00 RBX: 00007fa0275e6098 RCX: 00007fa02738f749 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000080 RDI: 00007fa0275e6098 RBP: 00007fa0275e6090 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007fa0275e6128 R14: 00007fff14e4fcb0 R15: 00007fff14e4fd98 There's really nothing wrong here, outside of processing these reads will take a LONG time. However, we can speed up the exit by checking the IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT inside the io_worker_handle_work() loop, as syzbot will exit the ring after queueing up all of these reads. Then once the first item is processed, io-wq will simply cancel the rest. That should avoid syzbot running into this complaint again.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0421Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260218Security Bulletin 18 Feb 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 18 Feb 2026, published on 18 February 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1255Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

pdate/announcement/2026/suse-su-202623966-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:23967-1 du 29 septembre 2026 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202623967-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:23968-1 du 29 septembre 2026 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202623968-1 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68214 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68358 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23306 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23306 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23348 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31418 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31530 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31530 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31531 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43125 Référence CVE CVE-2026-43163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71267 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71274 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71287 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71289 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71289 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71292 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71292 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71304 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23031 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23100 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23169 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23204 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23220 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23221 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23222 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1093Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23106 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23115 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23118 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0985Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71267 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71267 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71274 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71287 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71292 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71292 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71304 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23031 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23100 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23169 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23169 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23204 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23220 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23221 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23222 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23106 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23115 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23118 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23106 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23115 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23118 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0880Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

025-71120, CVE-2025-71123, CVE-2025-71131, CVE-2025-71161, CVE-2025-71162, CVE-2025-71163, CVE-2025-71185, CVE-2025-71186, CVE-2025-71189, CVE-2025-71190, CVE-2025-71191, CVE-2025-71197, CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71265, CVE-2025-71266, CVE-2025-71267, CVE-2026-3497, CVE-2026-22977, CVE-2026-22979, CVE-2026-22980, CVE-2026-22982, CVE-2026-22992, CVE-2026-22994, CVE-2026-23003, CVE-2026-23005, CVE-2026-23010, CVE-2026-23011, CVE-2026-23019, CVE-2026-23026, CVE-2026-23038, CVE-2026-23054, CVE-2026-23060, CVE-2026-23083, CVE-2026-23084, CVE-2026-23086, CVE-2026-23087, CVE-2026-23095, CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23103, CVE-2026-23110, CVE-2026-23111, CVE-2026-23113, CVE-2026-23154, CVE-2026-23204, CVE-2026-23231, CVE-2026-23242, CVE-2026-23243, CVE-2026-23245, CVE-2026-23270, CVE-2026-23271, CVE-2026-23273, CVE-2026-23274, CVE-2026-23277, CVE-2026-23284, CVE-2026-23287, CVE-2026-23290, CVE-2026-23293, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23319, CVE-2026-23321, CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23340, CVE-2026-23343, CVE-2026-23351, CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23365, CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23370, CVE-2026-23378, CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23392, CVE-2026-23397, CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23414, CVE-2026-23422, CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438, CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23100 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23124 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23125 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0787Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23124 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23125 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0746Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23124 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23125 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0663Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23124 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23125 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0638Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23123 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23124 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23125 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0547Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-68265 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71067 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71221 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71265 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71267 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71267 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71269 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23100 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23154 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23204 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23231 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23242 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0548Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2026-22981 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22985 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22986 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22993 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23004 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23100 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23138 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23141 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23154 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23204 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23207 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23210 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23210 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0369Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23125 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23128 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23129 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23131 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0329Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23129 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23133 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23135 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23139 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23100 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23118 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23124 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23125 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23126 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23100 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23118 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23124 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23125 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23126 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-007923LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。io_uring/io-wqでは、work実行ループ内でIO_WQ_BIT_EXITがチェックされます。現状では、保留中の作業を実行する前にこのチェックが行われており、通常は問題ありません。作業項目はブロックするか(新しいワーカーを作成し)、比較的短時間で完了します。しかし、syzbotはio-wqの終了が非常に遅い問題を報告しており、調査の結果、これは/dev/msr*ファイルに対して多数の大きな(2GBから4096バイト)読み込みをキューに入れていることが原因でした。このファイルタイプは-read_iter()をサポートしていないため、loop_rw_iter()で処理されます。各読み込みは16MBのデータを返し、20秒もかかります。これらが多数保留されると全処理に長時間がかかり、syzbotの140秒の割り込み不能スリープタイムアウトを超えてしまいます。これがio-wq終了パスで以下の警告を引き起こします。INFO: task syz.4.135:6326 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted syzkaller #0 Blocked by coredump。このメッセージは"echo 0 /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs"で無効化されます。問題の根本はこれらの読み込み処理に非常に長い時間がかかることですが、io_worker_handle_work()ループ内でIO_WQ_BIT_EXITをチェックすることで終了処理が高速化されます。syzbotは全ての読み込みをキューにした後にリングを終了するため、最初の作業処理時にio-wqは残りをキャンセルし、この問題を回避できます。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.12, 5.15.203 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.167 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.122 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.68 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.8 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 14 Feb 2026 · Last source change 8 Sept 2026, 08:45 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-6115
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    c60eb049f4a19ddddcd3ee97a9c79ab8066a6a03 < 27e47500fac23d15b7dc93ff650bc4844d2581bd; c60eb049f4a19ddddcd3ee97a9c79ab8066a6a03 < d05d99573f81a091547b1778b9a50120f5d6c68a; c60eb049f4a19ddddcd3ee97a9c79ab8066a6a03 < 85eb83694a91c89d9abe615d717c0053c3efa714; c60eb049f4a19ddddcd3ee97a9c79ab8066a6a03 < 2e8ca1078b14142db2ce51cbd18ff9971560046b; c60eb049f4a19ddddcd3ee97a9c79ab8066a6a03 < bdf0bf73006ea8af9327cdb85cfdff4c23a5f966; c60eb049f4a19ddddcd3ee97a9c79ab8066a6a03 < 10dc959398175736e495f71c771f8641e1ca1907; 5.12 · Fixed: < 5.12; 5.15.203 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.167 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.122 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.68 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.8 ≤ 6.18.*; 6.19 ≤ *
    After
    Linux: c60eb049f4a19ddddcd3ee97a9c79ab8066a6a03 < 27e47500fac23d15b7dc93ff650bc4844d2581bd, c60eb049f4a19ddddcd3ee97a9c79ab8066a6a03 < d05d99573f81a091547b1778b9a50120f5d6c68a, c60eb049f4a19ddddcd3ee97a9c79ab8066a6a03 < 85eb83694a91c89d9abe615d717c0053c3efa714, c60eb049f4a19ddddcd3ee97a9c79ab8066a6a03 < 2e8ca1078b14142db2ce51cbd18ff9971560046b, c60eb049f4a19ddddcd3ee97a9c79ab8066a6a03 < bdf0bf73006ea8af9327cdb85cfdff4c23a5f966, c60eb049f4a19ddddcd3ee97a9c79ab8066a6a03 < 10dc959398175736e495f71c771f8641e1ca1907, 5.12 · Fixed: Linux: < 5.12, 5.15.203 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.167 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.122 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.68 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.8 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-23113 · cve.blacktree.nl