BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-23107High confidence

arm64/fpsimd: signal: Allocate SSVE storage when restoring ZA

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.15% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.69-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.162-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.8-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.8-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-5434

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: arm64/fpsimd: signal: Allocate SSVE storage when restoring ZA The code to restore a ZA context doesn't attempt to allocate the task's sve_state before setting TIF_SME. Consequently, restoring a ZA context can place a task into an invalid state where TIF_SME is set but the task's sve_state is NULL. In legitimate but uncommon cases where the ZA signal context was NOT created by the kernel in the context of the same task (e.g. if the task is saved/restored with something like CRIU), we have no guarantee that sve_state had been allocated previously. In these cases, userspace can enter streaming mode without trapping while sve_state is NULL, causing a later NULL pointer dereference when the kernel attempts to store the register state: | # ./sigreturn-za | Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000 | Mem abort info: | ESR = 0x0000000096000046 | EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits | SET = 0, FnV = 0 | EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 | FSC = 0x06: level 2 translation fault | Data abort info: | ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000046, ISS2 = 0x00000000 | CM = 0, WnR = 1, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 | GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 | user pgtable: 4k pages, 52-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000101f47c00 | [0000000000000000] pgd=08000001021d8403, p4d=0800000102274403, pud=0800000102275403, pmd=0000000000000000 | Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000046 [#1] SMP | Modules linked in: | CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 153 Comm: sigreturn-za Not tainted 6.19.0-rc1 #1 PREEMPT | Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) | pstate: 214000c9 (nzCv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) | pc : sve_save_state+0x4/0xf0 | lr : fpsimd_save_user_state+0xb0/0x1c0 | sp : ffff80008070bcc0 | x29: ffff80008070bcc0 x28: fff00000c1ca4c40 x27: 63cfa172fb5cf658 | x26: fff00000c1ca5228 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000 | x23: 0000000000000000 x22: fff00000c1ca4c40 x21: fff00000c1ca4c40 | x20: 0000000000000020 x19: fff00000ff6900f0 x18: 0000000000000000 | x17: fff05e8e0311f000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 028fca8f3bdaf21c | x14: 0000000000000212 x13: fff00000c0209f10 x12: 0000000000000020 | x11: 0000000000200b20 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : fff00000ff69dcc0 | x8 : 00000000000003f2 x7 : 0000000000000001 x6 : fff00000c1ca5b48 | x5 : fff05e8e0311f000 x4 : 0000000008000000 x3 : 0000000000000000 | x2 : 0000000000000001 x1 : fff00000c1ca5970 x0 : 0000000000000440 | Call trace: | sve_save_state+0x4/0xf0 (P) | fpsimd_thread_switch+0x48/0x198 | __switch_to+0x20/0x1c0 | __schedule+0x36c/0xce0 | schedule+0x34/0x11c | exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x124/0x188 | el0_interrupt+0xc8/0xd8 | __el0_irq_handler_common+0x18/0x24 | el0t_64_irq_handler+0x10/0x1c | el0t_64_irq+0x198/0x19c | Code: 54000040 d51b4408 d65f03c0 d503245f (e5bb5800) | ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Fix this by having restore_za_context() ensure that the task's sve_state is allocated, matching what we do when taking an SME trap. Any live SVE/SSVE state (which is restored earlier from a separate signal context) must be preserved, and hence this is not zeroed.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: arm64/fpsimd: signal: Allocate SSVE storage when restoring ZA The code to restore a ZA context doesn't attempt to allocate the task's sve_state before setting TIF_SME. Consequently, restoring a ZA context can place a task into an invalid state where TIF_SME is set but the task's sve_state is NULL. In legitimate but uncommon cases where the ZA signal context was NOT created by the kernel in the context of the same task (e.g. if the task is saved/restored with something like CRIU), we have no guarantee that sve_state had been allocated previously. In these cases, userspace can enter streaming mode without trapping while sve_state is NULL, causing a later NULL pointer dereference when the kernel attempts to store the register state: | # ./sigreturn-za | Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000 | Mem abort info: | ESR = 0x0000000096000046 | EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits | SET = 0, FnV = 0 | EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 | FSC = 0x06: level 2 translation fault | Data abort info: | ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000046, ISS2 = 0x00000000 | CM = 0, WnR = 1, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 | GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 | user pgtable: 4k pages, 52-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000101f47c00 | [0000000000000000] pgd=08000001021d8403, p4d=0800000102274403, pud=0800000102275403, pmd=0000000000000000 | Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000046 [#1] SMP | Modules linked in: | CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 153 Comm: sigreturn-za Not tainted 6.19.0-rc1 #1 PREEMPT | Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) | pstate: 214000c9 (nzCv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) | pc : sve_save_state+0x4/0xf0 | lr : fpsimd_save_user_state+0xb0/0x1c0 | sp : ffff80008070bcc0 | x29: ffff80008070bcc0 x28: fff00000c1ca4c40 x27: 63cfa172fb5cf658 | x26: fff00000c1ca5228 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000 | x23: 0000000000000000 x22: fff00000c1ca4c40 x21: fff00000c1ca4c40 | x20: 0000000000000020 x19: fff00000ff6900f0 x18: 0000000000000000 | x17: fff05e8e0311f000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 028fca8f3bdaf21c | x14: 0000000000000212 x13: fff00000c0209f10 x12: 0000000000000020 | x11: 0000000000200b20 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : fff00000ff69dcc0 | x8 : 00000000000003f2 x7 : 0000000000000001 x6 : fff00000c1ca5b48 | x5 : fff05e8e0311f000 x4 : 0000000008000000 x3 : 0000000000000000 | x2 : 0000000000000001 x1 : fff00000c1ca5970 x0 : 0000000000000440 | Call trace: | sve_save_state+0x4/0xf0 (P) | fpsimd_thread_switch+0x48/0x198 | __switch_to+0x20/0x1c0 | __schedule+0x36c/0xce0 | schedule+0x34/0x11c | exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x124/0x188 | el0_interrupt+0xc8/0xd8 | __el0_irq_handler_common+0x18/0x24 | el0t_64_irq_handler+0x10/0x1c | el0t_64_irq+0x198/0x19c | Code: 54000040 d51b4408 d65f03c0 d503245f (e5bb5800) | ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Fix this by having restore_za_context() ensure that the task's sve_state is allocated, matching what we do when taking an SME trap. Any live SVE/SSVE state (which is restored earlier from a separate signal context) must be preserved, and hence this is not zeroed.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: arm64/fpsimd: signal: Allocate SSVE storage when restoring ZA The code to restore a ZA context doesn't attempt to allocate the task's sve_state before setting TIF_SME. Consequently, restoring a ZA context can place a task into an invalid state where TIF_SME is set but the task's sve_state is NULL. In legitimate but uncommon cases where the ZA signal context was NOT created by the kernel in the context of the same task (e.g. if the task is saved/restored with something like CRIU), we have no guarantee that sve_state had been allocated previously. In these cases, userspace can enter streaming mode without trapping while sve_state is NULL, causing a later NULL pointer dereference when the kernel attempts to store the register state: | # ./sigreturn-za | Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000 | Mem abort info: | ESR = 0x0000000096000046 | EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits | SET = 0, FnV = 0 | EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 | FSC = 0x06: level 2 translation fault | Data abort info: | ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000046, ISS2 = 0x00000000 | CM = 0, WnR = 1, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 | GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 | user pgtable: 4k pages, 52-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000101f47c00 | [0000000000000000] pgd=08000001021d8403, p4d=0800000102274403, pud=0800000102275403, pmd=0000000000000000 | Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000046 [#1] SMP | Modules linked in: | CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 153 Comm: sigreturn-za Not tainted 6.19.0-rc1 #1 PREEMPT | Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) | pstate: 214000c9 (nzCv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) | pc : sve_save_state+0x4/0xf0 | lr : fpsimd_save_user_state+0xb0/0x1c0 | sp : ffff80008070bcc0 | x29: ffff80008070bcc0 x28: fff00000c1ca4c40 x27: 63cfa172fb5cf658 | x26: fff00000c1ca5228 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000 | x23: 0000000000000000 x22: fff00000c1ca4c40 x21: fff00000c1ca4c40 | x20: 0000000000000020 x19: fff00000ff6900f0 x18: 0000000000000000 | x17: fff05e8e0311f000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 028fca8f3bdaf21c | x14: 0000000000000212 x13: fff00000c0209f10 x12: 0000000000000020 | x11: 0000000000200b20 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : fff00000ff69dcc0 | x8 : 00000000000003f2 x7 : 0000000000000001 x6 : fff00000c1ca5b48 | x5 : fff05e8e0311f000 x4 : 0000000008000000 x3 : 0000000000000000 | x2 : 0000000000000001 x1 : fff00000c1ca5970 x0 : 0000000000000440 | Call trace: | sve_save_state+0x4/0xf0 (P) | fpsimd_thread_switch+0x48/0x198 | __switch_to+0x20/0x1c0 | __schedule+0x36c/0xce0 | schedule+0x34/0x11c | exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x124/0x188 | el0_interrupt+0xc8/0xd8 | __el0_irq_handler_common+0x18/0x24 | el0t_64_irq_handler+0x10/0x1c | el0t_64_irq+0x198/0x19c | Code: 54000040 d51b4408 d65f03c0 d503245f (e5bb5800) | ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Fix this by having restore_za_context() ensure that the task's sve_state is allocated, matching what we do when taking an SME trap. Any live SVE/SSVE state (which is restored earlier from a separate signal context) must be preserved, and hence this is not zeroed.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → NULL Pointer Dereference → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476 ↗

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0324Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260211Security Bulletin 11 Feb 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 11 Feb 2026, published on 11 February 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1093Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23100 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23106 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23115 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23100 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23106 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23115 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23100 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23106 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23114 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23115 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23100 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23121 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0787Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23095 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0746Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23095 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0663Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23095 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0638Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23095 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23120 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0369Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-23091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23095 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0329Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-23091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23095 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0167Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-23095 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Gestion détaillée du document le 13 février 2026 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Défense et de la Sécurité Nationale / Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0166Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2026-23095 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Gestion détaillée du document le 13 février 2026 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gouv.fr france.fr info.gouv.fr/risques Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Défense et de la Sécurité Nationale / Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-008339LinuxのLinux KernelにおけるNULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。arm64/fpsimdのsignalで、ZA復元時にSSVEストレージを割り当てます。ZAコンテキストを復元するコードは、TIF_SMEを設定する前にタスクのsve_stateを割り当てようとはしません。その結果、ZAコンテキストを復元すると、TIF_SMEが設定されているにもかかわらずタスクのsve_stateがNULLであるという無効な状態になる可能性があります。通常は珍しい正当なケース(例:CRIUのような方法でタスクが保存・復元された場合)では、カーネルが同じタスクのコンテキストでZAシグナルコンテキストを作成していないため、sve_stateが事前に割り当てられている保証はありません。この場合、ユーザー空間はsve_stateがNULLのままトラップせずにストリーミングモードに入る可能性があり、その後カーネルがレジスタ状態を保存しようとした際にNULLポインタ逆参照が発生します。具体的には、カーネルはsigreturn-za実行時にNULLポインタ逆参照による内部エラー(Oops)を報告します。この問題は、restore_za_context()関数がタスクのsve_stateを割り当てることを保証するよう修正したことで解決しました。これはSMEトラップを処理する際に行っている処理と同様です。なお、既に存在するSVE/SSVE状態(別のシグナルコンテキストから先に復元されたもの)は保持され、ゼロクリアはされません。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 39782210eb7e87634d96cacb6ece370bc59d74ba < c5a5b150992ebab779c1ce54f54676786e47e94c, 39782210eb7e87634d96cacb6ece370bc59d74ba < 19b2c3f3ca1b4b6dccd2a42aca2692d8c79c4214, 39782210eb7e87634d96cacb6ece370bc59d74ba < 0af233d66eff90fb8f3e0fc09f2316bba0b72bb9, 39782210eb7e87634d96cacb6ece370bc59d74ba < 70f7f54566afc23f2c71bf1411af81f5d8009e0f, 39782210eb7e87634d96cacb6ece370bc59d74ba < ea8ccfddbce0bee6310da4f3fc560ad520f5e6b4, 5.19
Fixed
Linux: < 5.19, 6.1.162 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.122 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.68 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.8 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 4 Feb 2026 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 22:00 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-5434
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-23107 · cve.blacktree.nl