BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-23102High confidence

arm64/fpsimd: signal: Fix restoration of SVE context

Linux · Linux

7.1HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.14% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.162-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.8-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.8-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-5440

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: arm64/fpsimd: signal: Fix restoration of SVE context When SME is supported, Restoring SVE signal context can go wrong in a few ways, including placing the task into an invalid state where the kernel may read from out-of-bounds memory (and may potentially take a fatal fault) and/or may kill the task with a SIGKILL. (1) Restoring a context with SVE_SIG_FLAG_SM set can place the task into an invalid state where SVCR.SM is set (and sve_state is non-NULL) but TIF_SME is clear, consequently resuting in out-of-bounds memory reads and/or killing the task with SIGKILL. This can only occur in unusual (but legitimate) cases where the SVE signal context has either been modified by userspace or was saved in the context of another task (e.g. as with CRIU), as otherwise the presence of an SVE signal context with SVE_SIG_FLAG_SM implies that TIF_SME is already set. While in this state, task_fpsimd_load() will NOT configure SMCR_ELx (leaving some arbitrary value configured in hardware) before restoring SVCR and attempting to restore the streaming mode SVE registers from memory via sve_load_state(). As the value of SMCR_ELx.LEN may be larger than the task's streaming SVE vector length, this may read memory outside of the task's allocated sve_state, reading unrelated data and/or triggering a fault. While this can result in secrets being loaded into streaming SVE registers, these values are never exposed. As TIF_SME is clear, fpsimd_bind_task_to_cpu() will configure CPACR_ELx.SMEN to trap EL0 accesses to streaming mode SVE registers, so these cannot be accessed directly at EL0. As fpsimd_save_user_state() verifies the live vector length before saving (S)SVE state to memory, no secret values can be saved back to memory (and hence cannot be observed via ptrace, signals, etc). When the live vector length doesn't match the expected vector length for the task, fpsimd_save_user_state() will send a fatal SIGKILL signal to the task. Hence the task may be killed after executing userspace for some period of time. (2) Restoring a context with SVE_SIG_FLAG_SM clear does not clear the task's SVCR.SM. If SVCR.SM was set prior to restoring the context, then the task will be left in streaming mode unexpectedly, and some register state will be combined inconsistently, though the task will be left in legitimate state from the kernel's PoV. This can only occur in unusual (but legitimate) cases where ptrace has been used to set SVCR.SM after entry to the sigreturn syscall, as syscall entry clears SVCR.SM. In these cases, the the provided SVE register data will be loaded into the task's sve_state using the non-streaming SVE vector length and the FPSIMD registers will be merged into this using the streaming SVE vector length. Fix (1) by setting TIF_SME when setting SVCR.SM. This also requires ensuring that the task's sme_state has been allocated, but as this could contain live ZA state, it should not be zeroed. Fix (2) by clearing SVCR.SM when restoring a SVE signal context with SVE_SIG_FLAG_SM clear. For consistency, I've pulled the manipulation of SVCR, TIF_SVE, TIF_SME, and fp_type earlier, immediately after the allocation of sve_state/sme_state, before the restore of the actual register state. This makes it easier to ensure that these are always modified consistently, even if a fault is taken while reading the register data from the signal context. I do not expect any software to depend on the exact state restored when a fault is taken while reading the context.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: arm64/fpsimd: signal: Fix restoration of SVE context When SME is supported, Restoring SVE signal context can go wrong in a few ways, including placing the task into an invalid state where the kernel may read from out-of-bounds memory (and may potentially take a fatal fault) and/or may kill the task with a SIGKILL. (1) Restoring a context with SVE_SIG_FLAG_SM set can place the task into an invalid state where SVCR.SM is set (and sve_state is non-NULL) but TIF_SME is clear, consequently resuting in out-of-bounds memory reads and/or killing the task with SIGKILL. This can only occur in unusual (but legitimate) cases where the SVE signal context has either been modified by userspace or was saved in the context of another task (e.g. as with CRIU), as otherwise the presence of an SVE signal context with SVE_SIG_FLAG_SM implies that TIF_SME is already set. While in this state, task_fpsimd_load() will NOT configure SMCR_ELx (leaving some arbitrary value configured in hardware) before restoring SVCR and attempting to restore the streaming mode SVE registers from memory via sve_load_state(). As the value of SMCR_ELx.LEN may be larger than the task's streaming SVE vector length, this may read memory outside of the task's allocated sve_state, reading unrelated data and/or triggering a fault. While this can result in secrets being loaded into streaming SVE registers, these values are never exposed. As TIF_SME is clear, fpsimd_bind_task_to_cpu() will configure CPACR_ELx.SMEN to trap EL0 accesses to streaming mode SVE registers, so these cannot be accessed directly at EL0. As fpsimd_save_user_state() verifies the live vector length before saving (S)SVE state to memory, no secret values can be saved back to memory (and hence cannot be observed via ptrace, signals, etc). When the live vector length doesn't match the expected vector length for the task, fpsimd_save_user_state() will send a fatal SIGKILL signal to the task. Hence the task may be killed after executing userspace for some period of time. (2) Restoring a context with SVE_SIG_FLAG_SM clear does not clear the task's SVCR.SM. If SVCR.SM was set prior to restoring the context, then the task will be left in streaming mode unexpectedly, and some register state will be combined inconsistently, though the task will be left in legitimate state from the kernel's PoV. This can only occur in unusual (but legitimate) cases where ptrace has been used to set SVCR.SM after entry to the sigreturn syscall, as syscall entry clears SVCR.SM. In these cases, the the provided SVE register data will be loaded into the task's sve_state using the non-streaming SVE vector length and the FPSIMD registers will be merged into this using the streaming SVE vector length. Fix (1) by setting TIF_SME when setting SVCR.SM. This also requires ensuring that the task's sme_state has been allocated, but as this could contain live ZA state, it should not be zeroed. Fix (2) by clearing SVCR.SM when restoring a SVE signal context with SVE_SIG_FLAG_SM clear. For consistency, I've pulled the manipulation of SVCR, TIF_SVE, TIF_SME, and fp_type earlier, immediately after the allocation of sve_state/sme_state, before the restore of the actual register state. This makes it easier to ensure that these are always modified consistently, even if a fault is taken while reading the register data from the signal context. I do not expect any software to depend on the exact state restored when a fault is taken while reading the context.

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: arm64/fpsimd: signal: Fix restoration of SVE context When SME is supported, Restoring SVE signal context can go wrong in a few ways, including placing the task into an invalid state where the kernel may read from out-of-bounds memory (and may potentially take a fatal fault) and/or may kill the task with a SIGKILL. (1) Restoring a context with SVE_SIG_FLAG_SM set can place the task into an invalid state where SVCR.SM is set (and sve_state is non-NULL) but TIF_SME is clear, consequently resuting in out-of-bounds memory reads and/or killing the task with SIGKILL. This can only occur in unusual (but legitimate) cases where the SVE signal context has either been modified by userspace or was saved in the context of another task (e.g. as with CRIU), as otherwise the presence of an SVE signal context with SVE_SIG_FLAG_SM implies that TIF_SME is already set. While in this state, task_fpsimd_load() will NOT configure SMCR_ELx (leaving some arbitrary value configured in hardware) before restoring SVCR and attempting to restore the streaming mode SVE registers from memory via sve_load_state(). As the value of SMCR_ELx.LEN may be larger than the task's streaming SVE vector length, this may read memory outside of the task's allocated sve_state, reading unrelated data and/or triggering a fault. While this can result in secrets being loaded into streaming SVE registers, these values are never exposed. As TIF_SME is clear, fpsimd_bind_task_to_cpu() will configure CPACR_ELx.SMEN to trap EL0 accesses to streaming mode SVE registers, so these cannot be accessed directly at EL0. As fpsimd_save_user_state() verifies the live vector length before saving (S)SVE state to memory, no secret values can be saved back to memory (and hence cannot be observed via ptrace, signals, etc). When the live vector length doesn't match the expected vector length for the task, fpsimd_save_user_state() will send a fatal SIGKILL signal to the task. Hence the task may be killed after executing userspace for some period of time. (2) Restoring a context with SVE_SIG_FLAG_SM clear does not clear the task's SVCR.SM. If SVCR.SM was set prior to restoring the context, then the task will be left in streaming mode unexpectedly, and some register state will be combined inconsistently, though the task will be left in legitimate state from the kernel's PoV. This can only occur in unusual (but legitimate) cases where ptrace has been used to set SVCR.SM after entry to the sigreturn syscall, as syscall entry clears SVCR.SM. In these cases, the the provided SVE register data will be loaded into the task's sve_state using the non-streaming SVE vector length and the FPSIMD registers will be merged into this using the streaming SVE vector length. Fix (1) by setting TIF_SME when setting SVCR.SM. This also requires ensuring that the task's sme_state has been allocated, but as this could contain live ZA state, it should not be zeroed. Fix (2) by clearing SVCR.SM when restoring a SVE signal context with SVE_SIG_FLAG_SM clear. For consistency, I've pulled the manipulation of SVCR, TIF_SVE, TIF_SME, and fp_type earlier, immediately after the allocation of sve_state/sme_state, before the restore of the actual register state. This makes it easier to ensure that these are always modified consistently, even if a fault is taken while reading the register data from the signal context. I do not expect any software to depend on the exact state restored when a fault is taken while reading the context.

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Out-of-bounds Read → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-125 ↗

CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read. The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-125
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0324Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260211Security Bulletin 11 Feb 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 11 Feb 2026, published on 11 February 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1093Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23093 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23095 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23100 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23106 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23093 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23095 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23100 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23106 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23093 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23095 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23100 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23106 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23093 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23095 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23100 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0787Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23093 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23095 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0746Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23093 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23095 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0663Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23093 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23095 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0638Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-23091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23093 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23095 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0369Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-23088 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23095 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0329Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-23086 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23095 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23111 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0167Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2026-23090 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23093 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23095 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Gestion détaillée du document le 13 février 2026 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gou

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0166Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2026-23091 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23093 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23094 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23095 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23098 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23102 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23107 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110 Gestion détaillée du document le 13 février 2026 Version initiale Alertes Avis Bulletins d’actualités Mentions légales Conditions générales À propos Contact cyber.gouv.fr service-public.fr legifrance.gouv.fr info.gou

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-008344LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける境界外読み取りに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました:arm64/fpsimd: signal: SVEコンテキストの復元の修正です。SMEがサポートされている場合、SVEシグナルコンテキストの復元がいくつかの方法で誤動作し、カーネルが境界外メモリを読み取る可能性があります。また、無効な状態にタスクを置き(致命的なフォルトを引き起こす可能性があります)たり、タスクをSIGKILLで終了させる可能性もあります。(1)SVE_SIG_FLAG_SMが設定された状態でコンテキストを復元すると、SVCR.SMがセットされ(かつsve_stateがNULLでなく)、TIF_SMEがクリアされている無効な状態にタスクが置かれます。その結果、境界外メモリの読み取りやSIGKILLによるタスクの終了が発生します。これは、SVEシグナルコンテキストがユーザースペースによって変更されているか、別のタスクのコンテキストで保存されている(例:CRIU)などの異例ながら正当なケースでのみ発生します。通常、SVE_SIG_FLAG_SMがあるSVE信号コンテキストではTIF_SMEが既にセットされています。この状態では、task_fpsimd_load()はSVCRの復元前にSMCR_ELxを設定せず(ハードウェアに任意の値を残したまま)、その後sve_load_state()を介してメモリからストリーミングモードのSVEレジスタを復元しようとします。SMCR_ELx.LENの値がタスクのストリーミングSVEベクトル長より大きいため、タスクの割り当てられたsve_state外のメモリを読み取ってしまい、無関係なデータの読み込みやフォルトを引き起こす可能性があります。これによりストリーミングSVEレジスタに秘密情報が読み込まれる可能性がありますが、これらの値は決して公開されません。TIF_SMEがクリアされているため、fpsimd_bind_task_to_cpu()はCPACR_ELx.SMENを設定してEL0でのストリーミングモードSVEレジスタへのアクセスをトラップし、直接アクセスできないようにしています。さらにfpsimd_save_user_state()は保存前に生のベクトル長を検証するため、秘密値がメモリに保存されてptraceやシグナルなどを通じて観測されることはありません。生のベクトル長がタスクの予期されるベクトル長と一致しない場合、fpsimd_save_user_state()はタスクに致命的なSIGKILLを送信します。そのためタスクはユーザースペースの実行後しばらくして終了される可能性があります。(2)SVE_SIG_FLAG_SMがクリアされた状態でコンテキストを復元すると、タスクのSVCR.SMをクリアしません。復元前にSVCR.SMが設定されていた場合、タスクは予期せずストリーミングモードのままとなり、一部のレジスタ状態が一貫性なく組み合わされますが、カーネルの観点ではタスクは正当な状態にあります。これはsigreturnシステムコールへの入り口でSVCR.SMはクリアされますが、その後ptraceでSVCR.SMが設定されたような異例ながら正当なケースでのみ発生します。これらの場合、提供されたSVEレジスタデータは非ストリーミングSVEベクトル長を使ってタスクのsve_stateにロードされ、FPSIMDレジスタはストリーミングSVEベクトル長を使ってマージされます。本修正では(1)についてSVCR.SMを設定するときにTIF_SMEを設定し、タスクのsme_stateが割り当て済みであることを保証しますが、ライブのZA状態が含まれる可能性があるためゼロクリアは行いません。(2)についてはSVE_SIG_FLAG_SMがクリアされたSVEシグナルコンテキストを復元する際にSVCR.SMをクリアします。また一貫性を保つために、sve_state/sme_stateの割り当て直後、レジスタ状態の復元直前にSVCR、TIF_SVE、TIF_SME、fp_typeの操作を移動しました。これにより信号コンテキストからのレジスタデータ読み込み中にフォルトが発生しても、これらの状態が一貫して修正されることを確実にしました。フォルト発生時の正確な状態に依存するソフトウェアは想定していません。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 85ed24dad2904f7c141911d91b7807ab02694b5e < 9bc3adba8c35119be80ab20217027720446742f2, 85ed24dad2904f7c141911d91b7807ab02694b5e < ce820dd4e6e2d711242dc4331713b9bb4fe06d09, 85ed24dad2904f7c141911d91b7807ab02694b5e < 7b5a52cf252a0d2e89787b645290ad288878f332, 85ed24dad2904f7c141911d91b7807ab02694b5e < d2907cbe9ea0a54cbe078076f9d089240ee1e2d9, 5.19
Fixed
Linux: < 5.19, 6.1.162 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.123 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.18.8 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 4 Feb 2026 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 22:00 UTC · CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds Read

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-5440
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-23102 · cve.blacktree.nl