BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-22993High confidence

idpf: Fix RSS LUT NULL ptr issue after soft reset

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

20 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-4301

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: idpf: Fix RSS LUT NULL ptr issue after soft reset During soft reset, the RSS LUT is freed and not restored unless the interface is up. If an ethtool command that accesses the rss lut is attempted immediately after reset, it will result in NULL ptr dereference. Also, there is no need to reset the rss lut if the soft reset does not involve queue count change. After soft reset, set the RSS LUT to default values based on the updated queue count only if the reset was a result of a queue count change and the LUT was not configured by the user. In all other cases, don't touch the LUT. Steps to reproduce: ** Bring the interface down (if up) ifconfig eth1 down ** update the queue count (eg., 27->20) ethtool -L eth1 combined 20 ** display the RSS LUT ethtool -x eth1 [82375.558338] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 [82375.558373] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [82375.558391] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page [82375.558408] PGD 0 P4D 0 [82375.558421] Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI <snip> [82375.558516] RIP: 0010:idpf_get_rxfh+0x108/0x150 [idpf] [82375.558786] Call Trace: [82375.558793] <TASK> [82375.558804] rss_prepare.isra.0+0x187/0x2a0 [82375.558827] rss_prepare_data+0x3a/0x50 [82375.558845] ethnl_default_doit+0x13d/0x3e0 [82375.558863] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x11f/0x180 [82375.558886] genl_rcv_msg+0x1ad/0x2b0 [82375.558902] ? __pfx_ethnl_default_doit+0x10/0x10 [82375.558920] ? __pfx_genl_rcv_msg+0x10/0x10 [82375.558937] netlink_rcv_skb+0x58/0x100 [82375.558957] genl_rcv+0x2c/0x50 [82375.558971] netlink_unicast+0x289/0x3e0 [82375.558988] netlink_sendmsg+0x215/0x440 [82375.559005] __sys_sendto+0x234/0x240 [82375.559555] __x64_sys_sendto+0x28/0x30 [82375.560068] x64_sys_call+0x1909/0x1da0 [82375.560576] do_syscall_64+0x7a/0xfa0 [82375.561076] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x60/0xb0 [82375.561567] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e <snip>

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: idpf: Fix RSS LUT NULL ptr issue after soft reset During soft reset, the RSS LUT is freed and not restored unless the interface is up. If an ethtool command that accesses the rss lut is attempted immediately after reset, it will result in NULL ptr dereference. Also, there is no need to reset the rss lut if the soft reset does not involve queue count change. After soft reset, set the RSS LUT to default values based on the updated queue count only if the reset was a result of a queue count change and the LUT was not configured by the user. In all other cases, don't touch the LUT. Steps to reproduce: ** Bring the interface down (if up) ifconfig eth1 down ** update the queue count (eg., 27->20) ethtool -L eth1 combined 20 ** display the RSS LUT ethtool -x eth1 [82375.558338] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 [82375.558373] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [82375.558391] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page [82375.558408] PGD 0 P4D 0 [82375.558421] Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI <snip> [82375.558516] RIP: 0010:idpf_get_rxfh+0x108/0x150 [idpf] [82375.558786] Call Trace: [82375.558793] <TASK> [82375.558804] rss_prepare.isra.0+0x187/0x2a0 [82375.558827] rss_prepare_data+0x3a/0x50 [82375.558845] ethnl_default_doit+0x13d/0x3e0 [82375.558863] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x11f/0x180 [82375.558886] genl_rcv_msg+0x1ad/0x2b0 [82375.558902] ? __pfx_ethnl_default_doit+0x10/0x10 [82375.558920] ? __pfx_genl_rcv_msg+0x10/0x10 [82375.558937] netlink_rcv_skb+0x58/0x100 [82375.558957] genl_rcv+0x2c/0x50 [82375.558971] netlink_unicast+0x289/0x3e0 [82375.558988] netlink_sendmsg+0x215/0x440 [82375.559005] __sys_sendto+0x234/0x240 [82375.559555] __x64_sys_sendto+0x28/0x30 [82375.560068] x64_sys_call+0x1909/0x1da0 [82375.560576] do_syscall_64+0x7a/0xfa0 [82375.561076] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x60/0xb0 [82375.561567] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e <snip>

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: idpf: Fix RSS LUT NULL ptr issue after soft reset During soft reset, the RSS LUT is freed and not restored unless the interface is up. If an ethtool command that accesses the rss lut is attempted immediately after reset, it will result in NULL ptr dereference. Also, there is no need to reset the rss lut if the soft reset does not involve queue count change. After soft reset, set the RSS LUT to default values based on the updated queue count only if the reset was a result of a queue count change and the LUT was not configured by the user. In all other cases, don't touch the LUT. Steps to reproduce: ** Bring the interface down (if up) ifconfig eth1 down ** update the queue count (eg., 27->20) ethtool -L eth1 combined 20 ** display the RSS LUT ethtool -x eth1 [82375.558338] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 [82375.558373] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [82375.558391] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page [82375.558408] PGD 0 P4D 0 [82375.558421] Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI <snip> [82375.558516] RIP: 0010:idpf_get_rxfh+0x108/0x150 [idpf] [82375.558786] Call Trace: [82375.558793] <TASK> [82375.558804] rss_prepare.isra.0+0x187/0x2a0 [82375.558827] rss_prepare_data+0x3a/0x50 [82375.558845] ethnl_default_doit+0x13d/0x3e0 [82375.558863] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x11f/0x180 [82375.558886] genl_rcv_msg+0x1ad/0x2b0 [82375.558902] ? __pfx_ethnl_default_doit+0x10/0x10 [82375.558920] ? __pfx_genl_rcv_msg+0x10/0x10 [82375.558937] netlink_rcv_skb+0x58/0x100 [82375.558957] genl_rcv+0x2c/0x50 [82375.558971] netlink_unicast+0x289/0x3e0 [82375.558988] netlink_sendmsg+0x215/0x440 [82375.559005] __sys_sendto+0x234/0x240 [82375.559555] __x64_sys_sendto+0x28/0x30 [82375.560068] x64_sys_call+0x1909/0x1da0 [82375.560576] do_syscall_64+0x7a/0xfa0 [82375.561076] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x60/0xb0 [82375.561567] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e <snip>

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → NULL Pointer Dereference → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2026-0215Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1093Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-22981 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22982 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22985 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22986 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22987 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22989 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22990 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22991 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22992 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22993 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22994 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22996 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22997 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22998 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22999 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23000 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23001 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71203 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71221 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71269 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71287 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71288 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71288 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22981 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22985 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22993 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23004 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23118 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23138 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23154 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23157 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-22982 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22984 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22985 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22986 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22987 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22989 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22990 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22991 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22992 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22993 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22994 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22996 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22997 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22998 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22999 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23000 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23001 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2026-22982 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22984 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22985 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22986 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22987 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22989 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22990 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22991 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22992 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22993 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22994 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22994 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22996 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22997 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22998 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22999 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23000 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23001 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0548Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-71221 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71265 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71267 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71267 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71269 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22981 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22985 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22986 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22993 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23004 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23070 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23100 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23104 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23138 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0369Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-22979 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22982 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22984 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22985 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22988 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22989 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22990 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22991 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22992 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22993 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22996 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22997 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22998 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22999 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23000 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23001 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23003 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0247Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-22982 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22984 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22985 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22986 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22988 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22989 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22990 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22991 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22992 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22993 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22996 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22997 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22999 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23000 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23001 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23002 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23005 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0225Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-22976 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22977 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22978 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22984 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22985 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22988 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22990 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22991 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22992 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22993 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22996 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22997 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22999 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23000 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23001 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23005 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23006 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0170Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2026-22976 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22977 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22978 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22984 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22985 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22988 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22990 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22991 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22992 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22992 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22993 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22996 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22997 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22999 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23000 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23001 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23001 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23005 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23006 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
02cbfba1add5bd9088c7d14c6b93b77a6ea8f3bb < a09380354d2f14759b9dd45de1bc2f6bf49e651b; 02cbfba1add5bd9088c7d14c6b93b77a6ea8f3bb < ab92fa4dd81beaaed4e93a851f7a37c9b2d9776f; 02cbfba1add5bd9088c7d14c6b93b77a6ea8f3bb < ebecca5b093895da801b3eba1a55b4ec4027d196; 6.7
Fixed
< 6.7; 6.12.80 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.6 ≤ 6.18.*; 6.19 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 23 Jan 2026 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 21:57 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-4301
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-22993 · cve.blacktree.nl