BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-22741High confidence

Static resource cache poisoning in Spring MVC and WebFlux

VMware · Spring Framework

3.1LowCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Low technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Fix not verified
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityLowOperational priority:Low, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.24% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs VMware Spring Framework and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelibspring-javaAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelibspring-javaAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelibspring-javaAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelibspring-javaAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · esm-appslibspring-javaUnder evaluationCanonical reports that the package might be affected and still needs evaluation or fixing.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Open-source package ranges16 source-attributed ranges

These OSV and GitHub advisory ranges apply only to the named package and ecosystem. A listed fixed version is not a universal product patch or proof that an update is installed.

Ecosystem and packageAffected rangeFirst fixed versionEvidence
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-webfluxECOSYSTEM: introduced 7.0.0; fixed 7.0.77.0.7OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-webfluxECOSYSTEM: introduced 6.2.0; fixed 6.2.186.2.18OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-webfluxECOSYSTEM: introduced 6.1.0; last affected 6.1.26Not statedOSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-webfluxECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; last affected 5.3.47Not statedOSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-webmvcECOSYSTEM: introduced 7.0.0; fixed 7.0.77.0.7OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-webmvcECOSYSTEM: introduced 6.2.0; fixed 6.2.186.2.18OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-webmvcECOSYSTEM: introduced 6.1.0; last affected 6.1.26Not statedOSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
Mavenorg.springframework:spring-webmvcECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; last affected 5.3.47Not statedOSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
mavenorg.springframework:spring-webflux>= 7.0.0, <= 7.0.67.0.7GitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 2 Jul 2026
mavenorg.springframework:spring-webflux>= 6.2.0, <= 6.2.176.2.18GitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 2 Jul 2026
mavenorg.springframework:spring-webflux>= 6.1.0, <= 6.1.26Not statedGitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 2 Jul 2026
mavenorg.springframework:spring-webflux<= 5.3.47Not statedGitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 2 Jul 2026
mavenorg.springframework:spring-webmvc>= 7.0.0, <= 7.0.67.0.7GitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 2 Jul 2026
mavenorg.springframework:spring-webmvc>= 6.2.0, <= 6.2.176.2.18GitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 2 Jul 2026
mavenorg.springframework:spring-webmvc>= 6.1.0, <= 6.1.26Not statedGitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 2 Jul 2026
mavenorg.springframework:spring-webmvc<= 5.3.47Not statedGitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 2 Jul 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-26206

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Low technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Fix not verified
01

What, why and how

Spring MVC and WebFlux applications are vulnerable to cache poisoning when resolving static resources. More precisely, an application can be vulnerable when all the following are true: * the application is using Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux * the application is configuring the  resource chain support https://docs.spring.io/spring-framework/reference/web/webmvc/mvc-config/static-resources.html#page-title  with caching enabled * the application adds support for encoded resources resolution * the resource cache must be empty when the attacker has access to the application When all the conditions above are met, the attacker can send malicious requests and poison the resource cache with resources using the wrong encoding. This can cause a denial of service by breaking the front-end application for clients.

What

Spring MVC and WebFlux applications are vulnerable to cache poisoning when resolving static resources. More precisely, an application can be vulnerable when all the following are true: * the application is using Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux * the application is configuring the  resource chain support https://docs.spring.io/spring-framework/reference/web/webmvc/mvc-config/static-resources.html#page-title  with caching enabled * the application adds support for encoded resources resolution * the resource cache must be empty when the attacker has access to the application When all the conditions above are met, the attacker can send malicious requests and poison the resource cache with resources using the wrong encoding. This can cause a denial of service by breaking the front-end application for clients.

Why

The code uses a cache that contains sensitive information, but the cache can be read by an actor outside of the intended control sphere.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

Spring MVC and WebFlux applications are vulnerable to cache poisoning when resolving static resources. More precisely, an application can be vulnerable when all the following are true: * the application is using Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux * the application is configuring the  resource chain support https://docs.spring.io/spring-framework/reference/web/webmvc/mvc-config/static-resources.html#page-title  with caching enabled * the application adds support for encoded resources resolution * the resource cache must be empty when the attacker has access to the application When all the conditions above are met, the attacker can send malicious requests and poison the resource cache with resources using the wrong encoding. This can cause a denial of service by breaking the front-end application for clients.

Why

The code uses a cache that contains sensitive information, but the cache can be read by an actor outside of the intended control sphere.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Use of Cache Containing Sensitive Information → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-524 ↗

CWE-524: Use of Cache Containing Sensitive Information. The code uses a cache that contains sensitive information, but the cache can be read by an actor outside of the intended control sphere.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.ALowAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-524
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2260IBM Operational Decision Manager: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM Operational Decision Manager ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, um Informationen offenzulegen, um Dateien zu manipulieren, und um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1177VMware Tanzu Spring Framework: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in VMware Tanzu Spring Framework ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260506Security Bulletin 06 May 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 06 May 2026, published on 6 May 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1206Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2026-16439 Référence CVE CVE-2026-16441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-16441 Référence CVE CVE-2026-19290 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-19290 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22007 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22007 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22008 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22013 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22013 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22016 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22018 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22021 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22741 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22745 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22746 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22751 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23490 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23490 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23865 Référence CVE CVE-2026-24051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25639 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1165Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

rd?id=CVE-2026-1718 Référence CVE CVE-2026-18096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-18096 Référence CVE CVE-2026-18097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-18097 Référence CVE CVE-2026-18401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-18401 Référence CVE CVE-2026-18446 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-18446 Référence CVE CVE-2026-18499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-18499 Référence CVE CVE-2026-19880 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-19880 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22610 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22610 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22740 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22741 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22745 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22748 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2332 Référence CVE CVE-2026-2482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2482 Référence CVE CVE-2026-25639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25639 Référence CVE CVE-2026-27830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27830 Référence CVE CVE-2026-27970 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27970 Référence CVE CVE-2026-28338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0457Multiples vulnérabilités dans Spring Framework

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans Spring Framework. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-014053VMwareのSpring Frameworkにおける重要な情報を含むキャッシュの使用に関する脆弱性

Spring MVCおよびWebFluxアプリケーションには、静的リソースの解決時にキャッシュポイズニングの脆弱性があります。具体的には、以下のすべての条件が満たされる場合にアプリケーションが脆弱になります。・アプリケーションがSpring MVCまたはSpring WebFluxを使用していること・アプリケーションがリソースチェーンサポート(https://docs.spring.io/spring-framework/reference/web/webmvc/mvc-config/static-resources.html#page-title)をキャッシュ有効で設定していること・アプリケーションがエンコードされたリソース解決をサポートしていること・攻撃者がアプリケーションにアクセス可能なときにリソースキャッシュが空であること。上記の条件がすべて満たされる場合、攻撃者は悪意のあるリクエストを送信して誤ったエンコーディングのリソースでリソースキャッシュを汚染できます。これにより、クライアント側のフロントエンドアプリケーションが破損し、サービス拒否(DoS)が発生する可能性があります。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix not verified
Affected
Spring Framework: 7.0.0 < 7.0.7, 6.2.0 < 6.2.18, 6.1.0 < 6.1.27, 5.3.0 < 5.3.48
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
No verified patch reference is present in the current structured sources. Check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 29 Apr 2026 · Last source change 29 Apr 2026, 14:01 UTC · CWE-524 · Use of Cache Containing Sensitive Information

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-26206
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-22741 · cve.blacktree.nl