BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-20131High confidence

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software and Cisco Security Cloud Control (SCC) Firewall Management Deserialization of Untrusted Data Vulnerability

Cisco · Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC)

Official source article: Cisco CISCO-SA-FMC-RCE-NKHNULJH ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

10.0CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Mitigate now

CISA confirms exploitation in the wild and lists 2026-03-22 as the remediation due date.

Mitigation available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • CISA confirms exploitation in the wild.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 43.17% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Apply the linked authoritative mitigation while planning the permanent fix.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-9444

CISA KEV mirrored by ENISA

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary Java code as root on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insecure deserialization of a user-supplied Java byte stream. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted serialized Java object to the web-based management interface of an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the device and elevate privileges to root. Note: If the FMC management interface does not have public internet access, the attack surface that is associated with this vulnerability is reduced.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Recorded by ENISA since 19 Mar 2026. Evidence sources: cisa_kev.
ENISA score
10.0 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
3 linked advisory records
Explicit mitigation evidence

Only statements that explicitly mention a fix, patch, update, workaround or mitigation are shown here.

  • csaf_ncscnl · NCSC-2026-0076Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
Recommended actionMitigate now

CISA confirms exploitation in the wild and lists 2026-03-22 as the remediation due date.

Mitigation available
01

What, why and how

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software and Cisco Security Cloud Control (SCC) Firewall Management contain a deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability in the web-based management interface that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary Java code as root on an affected device.

What

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software and Cisco Security Cloud Control (SCC) Firewall Management contain a deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability in the web-based management interface that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary Java code as root on an affected device.

Why

Attacker-influenced serialised data is reconstructed as trusted objects, which can invoke dangerous application behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software and Cisco Security Cloud Control (SCC) Firewall Management contain a deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability in the web-based management interface that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary Java code as root on an affected device.

Why

Attacker-influenced serialised data is reconstructed as trusted objects, which can invoke dangerous application behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Confirmed in the wild

CISA added this CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue on 2026-03-19. Known ransomware campaign use is recorded.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Deserialization of Untrusted Data → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Changed: exploitation can affect a different security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-502 ↗

CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data. The product deserializes untrusted data without sufficiently ensuring that the resulting data will be valid.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SChangedScope: The attack can affect a component governed by a different security authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-502CISA KEV
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-9444Known-exploited evidence recorded

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary Java code as root on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insecure deserialization of a user-supplied Java byte stream. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted serialized Java object to the web-based management interface of an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the device and elevate privileges to root. Note: If the FMC management interface does not have public internet access, the attack surface that is associated with this vulnerability is reduced.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0610Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center und Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense ausnutzen, um Root-Rechte zu erlangen, beliebigen Code mit Root-Rechten auszuführen, SQL-Injection durchzuführen und vertrauliche Daten offenzulegen sowie Daten zu manipulieren.

Official advisory ↗
Canadian Centre for Cyber Security · English · AV26-197Cisco security advisory (AV26-197) – Update 3

On March 4, 2026, Cisco published security advisories to address vulnerabilities in the following products. Included were critical updates for the following: On March 18, 2026, Cisco stated that CVE-2026-20131 is being actively exploited.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260311Security Bulletin 11 Mar 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 11 Mar 2026, published on 11 March 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0242Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Cisco

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Cisco. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory ↗
CSIRT Italia · Italian · risolte-vulnerabilita-in-prodotti-cisco-19Risolte vulnerabilità in prodotti Cisco

Cisco ha rilasciato aggiornamenti di sicurezza che risolvono diverse nuove vulnerabilità, di cui due con gravità “critica” e 15 con gravità “alta”, riguardanti vari prodotti Secure Firewall.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-008359シスコシステムズのCisco Secure Firewall Management Centerにおける信頼できないデータのデシリアライゼーションに関する脆弱性

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) ソフトウェアのWebベース管理インターフェイスに存在する脆弱性により、認証されていないリモート攻撃者が影響を受けるデバイス上で任意のJavaコードをroot権限で実行できる可能性があります。この脆弱性は、ユーザーが提供したJavaバイトストリームの安全でないデシリアライズに起因します。攻撃者は、この脆弱性を悪用して、細工されたシリアライズ済みJavaオブジェクトを影響を受けるデバイスのWebベース管理インターフェイスに送信できます。成功した場合、攻撃者はデバイス上で任意のコードを実行し、権限をrootに昇格させることが可能です。注:FMC管理インターフェイスがパブリックインターネットにアクセスできない場合、本脆弱性に関連する攻撃対象範囲は縮小されます。

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-6734美 CISA 발표 주요 Exploit 정보공유(Update. 2026-03-19)

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software and Cisco Security Cloud Control (SCC) Firewall Management Deserialization of Untrusted Data Vulnerability

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-6720Cisco 제품 보안 업데이트 권고

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software, Cisco Security Cloud Control (SCC) Firewall Management에서 발생하는 역직렬화로 인한 원격 코드 실행 취약점(CVE-2026-20131) [2][4]

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2026-0076Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center

De kwetsbaarheid met kenmerk CVE-2026-20079 bevindt zich in de webinterface van Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center. Een ongeauthenticeerde externe kwaadwillende kan de authenticatiecontroles omzeilen door een onjuist systeemproces dat bij het opstarten is aangemaakt te misbruiken. De kwaadwillende kan deze kwetsbaarheid misbruiken door speciaal geprepareerde HTTP-verzoeken naar een getroffen apparaat te sturen. Een succesvolle exploit kan de aanvaller in staat stellen verschillende scripts en commando’s uit te voeren die root-toegang tot het apparaat mogelijk maken. De kwetsbaarheid met kenmerk CVE-2026-20131 bevindt zich in de webinterface van Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center. Deze kwetsbaarheid stelt ongeauthenticeerde externe kwaadwillende in staat om willekeurige Java-code uit te voeren met root-rechten. De kwetsbaarheid wordt veroorzaakt door de onveilige deserialisatie van door de gebruiker aangeleverde Java-byte-stromen. Een kwaadwillende kan deze kwetsbaarheid misbruiken door een speciaal geprepareerd, geserialiseerd Java-object naar de webgebaseerde beheerinterface van een getroffen apparaat te sturen. Een succesvolle exploit kan de aanvaller in staat stellen om willekeurige code op het apparaat uit te voeren en de rechten te verhogen tot root-niveau. Als de beheerinterface van Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center geen publieke internettoegang heeft, wordt het aanvalsoppervlak verkleind. Het is niet gebruikelijk om een managementinterface direct publiekelijk aan het internet bloot te stellen. Indien jouw organisatie gebruikmaakt van Cisco Security Cloud Control Firewall Management, dan betreft dit een SaaS-dienst (Software-as-a-Service) die door Cisco Systems automatisch wordt bijgewerkt als onderdeel van regulier onderhoud. Er is in dat geval geen actie van de gebruiker vereist. Het NCSC verwacht op korte termijn een publieke PoC en grootschalige pogingen tot misbruik. Het NCSC adviseert met klem de update zo spoedig mogelijk te installeren. Update 19-03-26: Uit onderzoek van Amazon threat intelligence blijkt dat CVE-2026-20131 vermoedelijk al sinds 26 januari actief is misbruikt voor het uitrollen van Interlock ransomware. Daarnaast is er inmiddels een publieke PoC verschenen voor kwetsbaarheid CVE-2026-20079. Het is daarom van groot belang om - indien dit nog niet gedaan is - te updaten naar de nieuwste versie van Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center. **UPDATE 11-09-26:** Cisco meldt dat succesvolle exploitatie van de kwetsbaarheid met kenmerk CVE-2026-20079 is waargenomen. Organisaties wordt geadviseerd de updates van Cisco direct toe te passen en kwetsbare systemen te controleren op aanwijzingen van misbruik. Raadpleeg de Talos blog voor aanvullende aanbevelingen. **EINDE UPDATE**

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Mitigation available
Affected
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC): 7.0.0, 7.0.0.1, 7.0.1, 7.1.0, 6.4.0.13, 7.0.1.1, 6.4.0.14, 7.1.0.1, 7.0.2, 6.4.0.15, 7.2.0, 7.0.2.1, 7.0.3, 7.1.0.2, 7.2.0.1, 7.0.4, 7.2.1, 7.0.5, 6.4.0.16, 7.3.0, 7.2.2, 7.3.1, 7.2.3, 7.1.0.3, 7.2.3.1, 7.2.4, 7.0.6, 7.2.4.1, 7.2.5, 7.3.1.1, 7.4.0, 6.4.0.17, 7.0.6.1, 7.2.5.1, 7.4.1, 7.2.6, 7.4.1.1, 7.0.6.2, 6.4.0.18, 7.2.7, 7.2.5.2, 7.3.1.2, 7.2.8, 7.6.0, 7.4.2, 7.2.8.1, 7.0.6.3, 7.4.2.1, 7.2.9, 7.0.7, 7.7.0, 7.4.2.2, 7.2.10, 7.6.1, 7.4.2.3, 7.0.8, 7.6.2, 7.7.10, 7.2.10.1, 7.0.8.1, 7.6.2.1, 7.2.10.2, 7.7.10.1, 7.4.2.4, 7.4.3, 7.7.11, 7.6.4, 10.0.0, 7.4.4, 7.4.5
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
The Cyber Centre encourages users and administrators to review the provided web links, perform the suggested recommendations, and apply the necessary updates when available.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 4 Mar 2026 · Last source change 14 Aug 2026, 03:55 UTC · CWE-502 · Deserialization of Untrusted Data

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-9444
Product sourceCISA KEV
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Mitigation available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Mitigation available
    Canadian Centre for Cyber Security ↗
  2. BlackTree coverageBlackTree article coverage changed from no BlackTree article to 1 BlackTree article.
    Before
    no BlackTree article
    After
    1 BlackTree article
    BlackTree editorial ↗
  3. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: removed remediation: cyber.gc.ca/cisco-security-advisory-av26-197.
    Before
    remediation: cyber.gc.ca/cisco-security-advisory-av26-197 · vendor advisory: sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/cisco-sa-fmc-rce-NKhnULJh
    After
    vendor advisory: sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/cisco-sa-fmc-rce-NKhnULJh
    psirt@cisco.com ↗
  4. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Mitigation available to Awaiting fix.
    Before
    Mitigation available
    After
    Awaiting fix
    psirt@cisco.com ↗
  5. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    7.0.0; 7.0.0.1; 7.0.1; 7.1.0; 6.4.0.13; 7.0.1.1; 6.4.0.14; 7.1.0.1 · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
    After
    Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC): 7.0.0, 7.0.0.1, 7.0.1, 7.1.0, 6.4.0.13, 7.0.1.1, 6.4.0.14, 7.1.0.1, 7.0.2, 6.4.0.15, 7.2.0, 7.0.2.1, 7.0.3, 7.1.0.2, 7.2.0.1, 7.0.4, 7.2.1, 7.0.5, 6.4.0.16, 7.3.0, 7.2.2, 7.3.1, 7.2.3, 7.1.0.3, 7.2.3.1, 7.2.4, 7.0.6, 7.2.4.1, 7.2.5, 7.3.1.1, 7.4.0, 6.4.0.17, 7.0.6.1, 7.2.5.1, 7.4.1, 7.2.6, 7.4.1.1, 7.0.6.2, 6.4.0.18, 7.2.7, 7.2.5.2, 7.3.1.2, 7.2.8, 7.6.0, 7.4.2, 7.2.8.1, 7.0.6.3, 7.4.2.1, 7.2.9, 7.0.7, 7.7.0, 7.4.2.2, 7.2.10, 7.6.1, 7.4.2.3, 7.0.8, 7.6.2, 7.7.10, 7.2.10.1, 7.0.8.1, 7.6.2.1, 7.2.10.2, 7.7.10.1, 7.4.2.4, 7.4.3, 7.7.11, 7.6.4, 10.0.0, 7.4.4, 7.4.5 · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-20131 · cve.blacktree.nl