BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-19625High confidence

IBM Enterprise Build of Quarkus is affected by multiple vulnerabilities

IBM · Enterprise Build of Quarkus

5.3MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-19625 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securityquarkus-oidc: Quarkus OIDC: Cross-tenant authentication bypass via shared token-introspection cache
3 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • exploit-intelligence-tech-preview/agent-client-rhel9 as a component of Exploit Intelligence
  • quarkus-oidc as a component of Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3
  • quarkus-oidc as a component of Red Hat build of Quarkus
Summary
A flaw was found in Quarkus OIDC. A shared token-introspection cache can be exploited by a remote attacker to bypass authentication across different tenants. This allows unauthorized access to resources or data, leading to a cross-tenant authentication bypass.
Remediation
Affected
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-74190

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

When a Quarkus application has multiple endpoints secured by individual OIDC provider tenants, such as "/oidc-provider1" that is secured by the OIDC Provider 1 and "/oidc-provider2" that is secured by the OIDC Provider 2, and an optional token introspection cache is also enabled, then a valid token issued by the OIDC Provider 1 that can be used to access "/oidc-provider1" can also be used to access "/oidc-provider2" that is secured by another OIDC Provider 2.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
5.3 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

When a Quarkus application has multiple endpoints secured by individual OIDC provider tenants, such as "/oidc-provider1" that is secured by the OIDC Provider 1 and "/oidc-provider2" that is secured by the OIDC Provider 2, and an optional token introspection cache is also enabled, then a valid token issued by the OIDC Provider 1 that can be used to access "/oidc-provider1" can also be used to access "/oidc-provider2" that is secured by another OIDC Provider 2.

What

When a Quarkus application has multiple endpoints secured by individual OIDC provider tenants, such as "/oidc-provider1" that is secured by the OIDC Provider 1 and "/oidc-provider2" that is secured by the OIDC Provider 2, and an optional token introspection cache is also enabled, then a valid token issued by the OIDC Provider 1 that can be used to access "/oidc-provider1" can also be used to access "/oidc-provider2" that is secured by another OIDC Provider 2.

Why

The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

When a Quarkus application has multiple endpoints secured by individual OIDC provider tenants, such as "/oidc-provider1" that is secured by the OIDC Provider 1 and "/oidc-provider2" that is secured by the OIDC Provider 2, and an optional token introspection cache is also enabled, then a valid token issued by the OIDC Provider 1 that can be used to access "/oidc-provider1" can also be used to access "/oidc-provider2" that is secured by another OIDC Provider 2.

Why

The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Access Control → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-284 ↗

CWE-284: Improper Access Control. The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CLowConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.ANoneAvailability impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
Stolen credentials, tokens and legitimate administration functions may provide continued access without deploying a large custom toolset.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-284
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-74190Official EUVD mapping

When a Quarkus application has multiple endpoints secured by individual OIDC provider tenants, such as "/oidc-provider1" that is secured by the OIDC Provider 1 and "/oidc-provider2" that is secured by the OIDC Provider 2, and an optional token introspection cache is also enabled, then a valid token issued by the OIDC Provider 1 that can be used to access "/oidc-provider1" can also be used to access "/oidc-provider2" that is secured by another OIDC Provider 2.

Official EUVD record ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Fixed
The issues are addressed in IBM Enterprise Build of Quarkus 3.27.5.SP1 and 3.33.3.SP1. To update your project to IBM Enterprise Build of Quarkus 3.27.5.SP1 or 3.33.3.SP1, follow the instructions in the product documentation https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/quarkus/3.27.x .
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 8 Sept 2026 · Last source change 10 Sept 2026, 14:59 UTC · CWE-284 · Improper Access Control

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-09
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-74190
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD awaiting enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2026-74190 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2026-74190"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  2. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-74190↗Vendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-19625 · cve.blacktree.nl