BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-15467High confidence

Trustyai-service-operator: trustyai-service-operator: lmevaljob sidecar containers bypass protected environment variable filtering, allowing trust_remote_code policy override

Red Hat · Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25

8.1HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2026-15467 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitytrustyai-service-operator: trustyai-service-operator: LMEvalJob sidecar containers bypass protected environment variable filtering, allowing TRUST_REMOTE_CODE policy override
16 fixed

The vendor explicitly identifies these products or versions as containing the fix.

  • registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-service-operator-rhel9@sha256:3019f93c5fb0e513bd701599a90917ce6f590eaf0f43a1fdf40511905bd61833_amd64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25
  • registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-service-operator-rhel9@sha256:7da55c15dc59a26873e29f8b85550d24ee454d0e453aa08be7660efbcbb6c72a_arm64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25
  • registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-service-operator-rhel9@sha256:a443c0830f20172529e64227fb217270f0657ecaa85355e1e78b7b42041ad1cb_ppc64le as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25
  • registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-service-operator-rhel9@sha256:aca243fe44cb3f07c1b64d9c4c52c7261199b47c34c6e28e7b7a39bcc0b2d54a_s390x as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25
  • registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-service-operator-rhel9@sha256:159c598a60a7dc3a171e023fdb5d5e1e8e698ead21a477da14c5b8e0391bf53d_amd64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3
  • registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-service-operator-rhel9@sha256:83c1ad7911c900905fd7f15ed1e43d5daf7e46a3134825b45fea2ca636aab93f_ppc64le as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3
  • registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-service-operator-rhel9@sha256:c1126b6cdaad68b9ec92ea16c056119b8fdcad00c796465a19cb8cc971139bcd_arm64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3
  • registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-service-operator-rhel9@sha256:dd945b07a139578fba52a5edebd3073f30bed9b36dc7837b736f9ed33c365330_s390x as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3
  • registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-service-operator-rhel9@sha256:1a5ca89ba55b2135f92c885fb70745743e5f6e0dbc592989da20a3243378ab2f_s390x as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.4
  • registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-service-operator-rhel9@sha256:3c33d0af817074e1b5e0283b3795e9fc8ae7462511b5e6e696301c23ac2fc524_s390x as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.4
  • registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-service-operator-rhel9@sha256:401136911bf9ec14d4123f6dca2813a2cb67281ece7ee25ca825431725d19425_amd64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.4
  • registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-service-operator-rhel9@sha256:79dbabf88daf5d0cc9f210e77c69a2615ac60b9bc5ccc264d8c60027124564c5_arm64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.4
Summary
A flaw was found in the trustyai-service-operator's LMEvalJob controller. An authenticated user within the cluster can exploit this vulnerability by configuring a sidecar container to bypass existing security policies. This allows the user to enable and execute untrusted remote code, leading to arbitrary code execution within the cluster.
Remediation
For Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25.10 see the following documentation, which will be updated shortly for this release, for important instructions on how to upgrade your cluster and fully apply this errata update: https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_openshift_ai/
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-55809

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

A flaw was found in the trustyai-service-operator's LMEvalJob controller. An authenticated user within the cluster can exploit this vulnerability by configuring a sidecar container to bypass existing security policies. This allows the user to enable and execute untrusted remote code, leading to arbitrary code execution within the cluster.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
8.1 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

A flaw was found in the trustyai-service-operator's LMEvalJob controller. An authenticated user within the cluster can exploit this vulnerability by configuring a sidecar container to bypass existing security policies. This allows the user to enable and execute untrusted remote code, leading to arbitrary code execution within the cluster.

What

A flaw was found in the trustyai-service-operator's LMEvalJob controller. An authenticated user within the cluster can exploit this vulnerability by configuring a sidecar container to bypass existing security policies. This allows the user to enable and execute untrusted remote code, leading to arbitrary code execution within the cluster.

Why

A product incorrectly assigns a privilege to a particular actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

What

A flaw was found in the trustyai-service-operator's LMEvalJob controller. An authenticated user within the cluster can exploit this vulnerability by configuring a sidecar container to bypass existing security policies. This allows the user to enable and execute untrusted remote code, leading to arbitrary code execution within the cluster.

Why

A product incorrectly assigns a privilege to a particular actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Incorrect Privilege Assignment → execute code or commands in the affected security context
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-266 ↗

CWE-266: Incorrect Privilege Assignment. A product incorrectly assigns a privilege to a particular actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.ANoneAvailability impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
After compromise, an attacker may use built-in shells, scripting engines, scheduled tasks and native network utilities for discovery, persistence or movement. This is a plausible LoTL path, not evidence that it has occurred for every attack.
NetworkRemote code executionCWE-266
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-55809Official EUVD mapping

A flaw was found in the trustyai-service-operator's LMEvalJob controller. An authenticated user within the cluster can exploit this vulnerability by configuring a sidecar container to bypass existing security policies. This allows the user to enable and execute untrusted remote code, leading to arbitrary code execution within the cluster.

Official EUVD record
BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2026-2750Red Hat OpenShift: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat OpenShift ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, um Informationen offenzulegen, und um Dateien zu manipulieren.

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
See the vendor and CVE records for the affected range.
Fixed
registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-service-operator-rhel9@sha256:3019f93c5fb0e513bd701599a90917ce6f590eaf0f43a1fdf40511905bd61833_amd64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25; registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-service-operator-rhel9@sha256:7da55c15dc59a26873e29f8b85550d24ee454d0e453aa08be7660efbcbb6c72a_arm64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25; registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-service-operator-rhel9@sha256:a443c0830f20172529e64227fb217270f0657ecaa85355e1e78b7b42041ad1cb_ppc64le as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25; registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-service-operator-rhel9@sha256:aca243fe44cb3f07c1b64d9c4c52c7261199b47c34c6e28e7b7a39bcc0b2d54a_s390x as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25; registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-service-operator-rhel9@sha256:159c598a60a7dc3a171e023fdb5d5e1e8e698ead21a477da14c5b8e0391bf53d_amd64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3; registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-service-operator-rhel9@sha256:83c1ad7911c900905fd7f15ed1e43d5daf7e46a3134825b45fea2ca636aab93f_ppc64le as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3; registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-service-operator-rhel9@sha256:c1126b6cdaad68b9ec92ea16c056119b8fdcad00c796465a19cb8cc971139bcd_arm64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3; registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-service-operator-rhel9@sha256:dd945b07a139578fba52a5edebd3073f30bed9b36dc7837b736f9ed33c365330_s390x as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3; registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-service-operator-rhel9@sha256:1a5ca89ba55b2135f92c885fb70745743e5f6e0dbc592989da20a3243378ab2f_s390x as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.4; registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-service-operator-rhel9@sha256:3c33d0af817074e1b5e0283b3795e9fc8ae7462511b5e6e696301c23ac2fc524_s390x as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.4; registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-service-operator-rhel9@sha256:401136911bf9ec14d4123f6dca2813a2cb67281ece7ee25ca825431725d19425_amd64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.4; registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-service-operator-rhel9@sha256:79dbabf88daf5d0cc9f210e77c69a2615ac60b9bc5ccc264d8c60027124564c5_arm64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.4; registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-service-operator-rhel9@sha256:814e3ecbfee9b9121b2f1b9d1d75bb190b627d485eb1114c3c2ded11b699d64b_arm64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.4; registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-service-operator-rhel9@sha256:a557a55432d276334a562b40c856db05bdb44ba859b88013925e777b01dbc10b_ppc64le as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.4; registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-service-operator-rhel9@sha256:ad9a9804dd79e3d21d255f987c89d19246dfc6a72bb1b15fceb2dd0d357a63cd_ppc64le as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.4; registry.redhat.io/rhoai/odh-trustyai-service-operator-rhel9@sha256:fdb87c9b5c7a1ca2ae18c14e21c4636f334c402b8a862a49e611ef3032feb552_amd64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.4
Action
For Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25.10 see the following documentation, which will be updated shortly for this release, for important instructions on how to upgrade your cluster and fully apply this errata update: https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_openshift_ai/
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 10 Aug 2026 · Last source change 27 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC · CWE-266 · Incorrect Privilege Assignment

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-55809
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD awaiting enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected versions. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    See the vendor and CVE records for the affected range. · Fixed: 1785187119 < *; 1785187521 < *; 1784993206 < *
    After
    See the vendor and CVE records for the affected range. · Fixed: 1785187119 < *; 1785187521 < *; 1784993206 < *; 1786614608 < *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-55809↗Vendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-15467 · cve.blacktree.nl