Evidence used
- No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
- The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
- EPSS is 0.37% for the current model date.
BlackTreeCVE IntelligenceFull vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-14178High confidence
openGauss存在非法内存访问导致DoS漏洞
openGauss-server · openGauss-server-7.0.0-RC2
5.9MediumCVSS 3.1
Scheduled
Patch availableMedium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.
R
Open reassessment dashboard →Operational reassessment
Published severity in operational context
Published severityMedium→Operational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged
Compensating controls
- Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
- Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
- Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.
Verification
- Confirm that the asset runs openGauss-server openGauss-server-7.0.0-RC2 and falls inside the recorded affected range.
- Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
- Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
- Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.
Patch available01
What, why and how
openGauss 在处理带 NLS 参数的 to_timestamp 调用时，to_timestamp_with_fmt_nls() 会将 nls_fmt_str 保存到 u_sess->parser_cxt.nls_fmt_str。在 seqscan + sort 执行路径下，该字符串原本被分配在 SeqScan 的表达式上下文中；当 SeqScan 完成后，该内存上下文会被 reset，但后续结果输出阶段 timestamp_out() 仍会通过 CheckNlsFormat() 访问 u_sess->parser_cxt.nls_fmt_str，导致访问已释放内存。攻击者在具备数据库 SQL 执行权限的情况下，可构造特定 to_timestamp(..., ..., nlsparam) 查询触发 heap-use-after-free。在 ASan/Memcheck 环境下表现为数据库服务退出；在实际运行环境中可能造成后端进程异常退出，影响数据库服务可用性，形成拒绝服务风险。该问题在openGauss-server-7.0.0-RC1版本和openGauss-server-7.0.0-RC2版本存在，目前已在openGauss-server-7.0.0-RC3版本修复。由于 openGauss-server-7.0.0-RC1版本和openGauss-server-7.0.0-RC2均为创新版本，不会发布针对性补丁包，涉及版本升级至 openGauss-server-7.0.0-RC3或更新版本即可。
What
openGauss 在处理带 NLS 参数的 to_timestamp 调用时，to_timestamp_with_fmt_nls() 会将 nls_fmt_str 保存到 u_sess->parser_cxt.nls_fmt_str。在 seqscan + sort 执行路径下，该字符串原本被分配在 SeqScan 的表达式上下文中；当 SeqScan 完成后，该内存上下文会被 reset，但后续结果输出阶段 timestamp_out() 仍会通过 CheckNlsFormat() 访问 u_sess->parser_cxt.nls_fmt_str，导致访问已释放内存。攻击者在具备数据库 SQL 执行权限的情况下，可构造特定 to_timestamp(..., ..., nlsparam) 查询触发 heap-use-after-free。在 ASan/Memcheck 环境下表现为数据库服务退出；在实际运行环境中可能造成后端进程异常退出，影响数据库服务可用性，形成拒绝服务风险。该问题在openGauss-server-7.0.0-RC1版本和openGauss-server-7.0.0-RC2版本存在，目前已在openGauss-server-7.0.0-RC3版本修复。由于 openGauss-server-7.0.0-RC1版本和openGauss-server-7.0.0-RC2均为创新版本，不会发布针对性补丁包，涉及版本升级至 openGauss-server-7.0.0-RC3或更新版本即可。
Why
The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.
How
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
What
openGauss 在处理带 NLS 参数的 to_timestamp 调用时，to_timestamp_with_fmt_nls() 会将 nls_fmt_str 保存到 u_sess->parser_cxt.nls_fmt_str。在 seqscan + sort 执行路径下，该字符串原本被分配在 SeqScan 的表达式上下文中；当 SeqScan 完成后，该内存上下文会被 reset，但后续结果输出阶段 timestamp_out() 仍会通过 CheckNlsFormat() 访问 u_sess->parser_cxt.nls_fmt_str，导致访问已释放内存。攻击者在具备数据库 SQL 执行权限的情况下，可构造特定 to_timestamp(..., ..., nlsparam) 查询触发 heap-use-after-free。在 ASan/Memcheck 环境下表现为数据库服务退出；在实际运行环境中可能造成后端进程异常退出，影响数据库服务可用性，形成拒绝服务风险。该问题在openGauss-server-7.0.0-RC1版本和openGauss-server-7.0.0-RC2版本存在，目前已在openGauss-server-7.0.0-RC3版本修复。由于 openGauss-server-7.0.0-RC1版本和openGauss-server-7.0.0-RC2均为创新版本，不会发布针对性补丁包，涉及版本升级至 openGauss-server-7.0.0-RC3或更新版本即可。
Why
The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.
How
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
02
Exploit reality and attack path
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
Observed exploitation No confirmed evidence
?
Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
Public PoC / exploit material None recorded
?
Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.
- Likely attack path
- a network path → Use After Free → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
- Attack surface
- Network
- Privileges required
- None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
- User interaction
- None
- Attack complexity
- High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
- Security boundary
- Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
- Weakness
?
CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness. - CWE-416 ↗
CWE-416: Use After Free. The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory belongs to the code that operates on the new pointer.
- CVSS vector
?
CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity. CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HCommon Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.- Post-exploitation / living off the land
- No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
03
Patch and workaround
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
- Status
?
Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change. - Patch available
- Affected
- Action
- Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
- Workaround
- No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04
Evidence and provenance
Published 30 Jun 2026 · Last source change 30 Jun 2026, 14:40 UTC · CWE-416 · Use After Free
CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
?
The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-40326
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD not scheduled
Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.
Material change intelligence
View recent updates ↗What changed after publication
No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
- CVE
- Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
- CVSS
- Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
- EPSS
- Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
- CWE
- Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
- CNA
- CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
- CISA ADP
- Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
- NVD
- National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
- CERT / CSIRT
- A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
- PoC
- Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
- CSAF
- Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
- LoTL
- Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.