BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-106062High confidence

Gimp: gimp: heap buffer overflow in dds loader on crafted directdraw surface file

Red Hat · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Fix not verified
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.15% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcegimpAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 8 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcegimpAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 8 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcegimpAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 8 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcegimpAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 8 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2026-106062 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2026-106062
26 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • gimp as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • gimp-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • gimp-lang as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • libgimp-2_0-0 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • libgimpui-2_0-0 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • gimp as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP7
  • gimp-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP7
  • gimp-lang as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP7
  • gimp-plugin-aa as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP7
  • libgimp-2_0-0 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP7
  • libgimpui-2_0-0 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP7
  • gimp as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7
Summary
A heap-based buffer overflow was found in GIMP's DirectDraw Surface (DDS) loader. When loading a crafted DDS image, buffer sizes derived from width, height, and pitch can be computed using 32-bit arithmetic that overflows. The allocated buffer is too small for the amount of pixel data written through GEGL (CWE-787), following integer overflow in size calculations (CWE-190). This may allow heap corruption and, in the worst case, arbitrary code execution in the context of the GIMP process.
Remediation
No remediation text is recorded.
CVE-2026-106062 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitygimp: GIMP: heap buffer overflow in DDS loader on crafted DirectDraw Surface file
36 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • gimp-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • gimp-devel-tools as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • gimp-libs as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • gimp.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • gimp as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • gimp-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • gimp-devel-tools as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • gimp-help-browser as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • gimp-libs as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • gimp.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • gimp as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • gimp-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Summary
A heap-based buffer overflow was found in GIMP’s DirectDraw Surface (DDS) loader. When loading a crafted DDS image, buffer sizes derived from width, height, and pitch can be computed using 32-bit arithmetic that overflows. The allocated buffer is too small for the amount of pixel data written through GEGL (CWE-787), following integer overflow in size calculations (CWE-190). This may allow heap corruption and, in the worst case, arbitrary code execution in the context of the GIMP process.
Remediation
To mitigate this do not open DDS files from untrusted sources (CME-1311). Exploitation may be harder on hardened systems (Full RELRO/PIE, ASLR, FORTIFY_SOURCE, heap allocator protections) but the vulnerability remains.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-93983

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

A heap-based buffer overflow was found in GIMP’s DirectDraw Surface (DDS) loader. When loading a crafted DDS image, buffer sizes derived from width, height, and pitch can be computed using 32-bit arithmetic that overflows. The allocated buffer is too small for the amount of pixel data written through GEGL, following integer overflow in size calculations. This may allow heap corruption and, in the worst case, arbitrary code execution in the context of the GIMP process.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
7.8 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Fix not verified
01

What, why and how

A heap-based buffer overflow was found in GIMP’s DirectDraw Surface (DDS) loader. When loading a crafted DDS image, buffer sizes derived from width, height, and pitch can be computed using 32-bit arithmetic that overflows. The allocated buffer is too small for the amount of pixel data written through GEGL, following integer overflow in size calculations. This may allow heap corruption and, in the worst case, arbitrary code execution in the context of the GIMP process.

What

A heap-based buffer overflow was found in GIMP’s DirectDraw Surface (DDS) loader. When loading a crafted DDS image, buffer sizes derived from width, height, and pitch can be computed using 32-bit arithmetic that overflows. The allocated buffer is too small for the amount of pixel data written through GEGL, following integer overflow in size calculations. This may allow heap corruption and, in the worst case, arbitrary code execution in the context of the GIMP process.

Why

The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary. This may result in read or write operations on unexpected memory locations that could be linked to other variables, data structures, or internal program data.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

What

A heap-based buffer overflow was found in GIMP’s DirectDraw Surface (DDS) loader. When loading a crafted DDS image, buffer sizes derived from width, height, and pitch can be computed using 32-bit arithmetic that overflows. The allocated buffer is too small for the amount of pixel data written through GEGL, following integer overflow in size calculations. This may allow heap corruption and, in the worst case, arbitrary code execution in the context of the GIMP process.

Why

The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary. This may result in read or write operations on unexpected memory locations that could be linked to other variables, data structures, or internal program data.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer → execute code or commands in the affected security context
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-119 ↗

CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary. This may result in read or write operations on unexpected memory locations that could be linked to other variables, data structures, or internal program data.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
After compromise, an attacker may use built-in shells, scripting engines, scheduled tasks and native network utilities for discovery, persistence or movement. This is a plausible LoTL path, not evidence that it has occurred for every attack.
UnauthenticatedRemote code executionCWE-119
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-93983Official EUVD mapping

A heap-based buffer overflow was found in GIMP’s DirectDraw Surface (DDS) loader. When loading a crafted DDS image, buffer sizes derived from width, height, and pitch can be computed using 32-bit arithmetic that overflows. The allocated buffer is too small for the amount of pixel data written through GEGL, following integer overflow in size calculations. This may allow heap corruption and, in the worst case, arbitrary code execution in the context of the GIMP process.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-3789GIMP: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in GIMP ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, Daten zu manipulieren und möglicherweise beliebigen Code auszuführen.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix not verified
Affected
  • gimp as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • gimp-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • gimp-lang as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • libgimp-2_0-0 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • libgimpui-2_0-0 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7
  • gimp as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP7
  • gimp-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP7
  • gimp-lang as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP7
  • gimp-plugin-aa as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP7
  • libgimp-2_0-0 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP7
  • libgimpui-2_0-0 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP7
  • gimp as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7
  • gimp-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7
  • gimp-lang as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7
  • libgimp-2_0-0 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7
  • libgimpui-2_0-0 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7
  • gimp as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7
  • gimp-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7
  • gimp-lang as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7
  • libgimp-2_0-0 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7
  • libgimpui-2_0-0 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7
  • gimp as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 15 SP7
  • gimp-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 15 SP7
  • gimp-lang as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 15 SP7
  • libgimp-2_0-0 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 15 SP7
  • libgimpui-2_0-0 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 15 SP7
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
No verified patch reference is present in the current structured sources. Check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 6 Oct 2026 · Last source change 8 Oct 2026, 07:53 UTC · CWE-119 · Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-10-07
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-93983
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD awaiting enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2026-93983 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2026-93983"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  2. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-106062 · cve.blacktree.nl