BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-10535High confidence

IBM® Db2® is vulnerable to buffer overflow in setgid helper db2flacc which can lead to privilege escalation and instance compromise from an unprivileged shell

IBM · Db2

8.4HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.16% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs IBM Db2 and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-51250

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.4 is vulnerable to buffer overflow in setgid helper db2flacc.

What

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.4 is vulnerable to buffer overflow in setgid helper db2flacc.

Why

A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.4 is vulnerable to buffer overflow in setgid helper db2flacc.

Why

A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Stack-based Buffer Overflow → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-121 ↗

CWE-121: Stack-based Buffer Overflow. A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
UnauthenticatedCWE-121
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2601IBM DB2: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM DB2 ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen oder einen Denial of Service zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260805Security Bulletin 5 Aug 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 5 Aug 2026, published on 5 August 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1094Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ord?id=CVE-2025-62718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-64718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-64718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66168 Référence CVE CVE-2025-69873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69873 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71089 Référence CVE CVE-2026-0540 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0540 Référence CVE CVE-2026-10050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10050 Référence CVE CVE-2026-10051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10051 Référence CVE CVE-2026-10535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10535 Référence CVE CVE-2026-10842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10842 Référence CVE CVE-2026-10846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10846 Référence CVE CVE-2026-10879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10879 Référence CVE CVE-2026-11525 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11525 Référence CVE CVE-2026-11541 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11541 Référence CVE CVE-2026-11806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11806 Référence CVE CVE-2026-11897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11897 Référence CVE CVE-2026-12143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1032Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

rd?id=CVE-2024-3651 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13465 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-36372 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36372 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66614 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68161 Référence CVE CVE-2026-10109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-10534 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10534 Référence CVE CVE-2026-10535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10535 Référence CVE CVE-2026-10543 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10543 Référence CVE CVE-2026-10695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10695 Référence CVE CVE-2026-11541 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11541 Référence CVE CVE-2026-11546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11546 Référence CVE CVE-2026-11714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11714 Référence CVE CVE-2026-11806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11806 Référence CVE CVE-2026-11906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11906 Référence CVE CVE-2026-12143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0986Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2025-39981 Référence CVE CVE-2025-53906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53906 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68183 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68366 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116 Référence CVE CVE-2026-10025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10025 Référence CVE CVE-2026-10109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10109 Référence CVE CVE-2026-10535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10535 Référence CVE CVE-2026-10695 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10695 Référence CVE CVE-2026-10842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10842 Référence CVE CVE-2026-11897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11897 Référence CVE CVE-2026-11906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11906 Référence CVE CVE-2026-13367 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-13367 Référence CVE CVE-2026-13476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-13476 Référence CVE CVE-2026-14446 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14446 Référence CVE CVE-2026-14512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0901Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ord?id=CVE-2025-67724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-67725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-67725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-67726 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-67726 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68458 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68470 Référence CVE CVE-2025-69873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69873 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71176 Référence CVE CVE-2026-0540 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0540 Référence CVE CVE-2026-10535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10535 Référence CVE CVE-2026-10842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-10842 Référence CVE CVE-2026-11595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11595 Référence CVE CVE-2026-11708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11708 Référence CVE CVE-2026-11712 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11712 Référence CVE CVE-2026-12143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-12143 Référence CVE CVE-2026-14501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14501 Référence CVE CVE-2026-21441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21441 Référence CVE CVE-2026-21860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-027112IBMのIBM DB2におけるスタックベースのバッファオーバーフローの脆弱性

IBM Db2 11.5.0から11.5.9、および12.1.0から12.1.4には、setgidヘルパーdb2flaccにおけるバッファオーバーフローの脆弱性があります。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Db2: 11.5.0 ≤ 11.5.9, 12.1.0 ≤ 12.1.4
Fixed
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 30 Jul 2026 · Last source change 31 Jul 2026, 03:56 UTC · CWE-121 · Stack-based Buffer Overflow

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-51250
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-10535 · cve.blacktree.nl