BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2026-100610High confidence

Flowise through 3.1.4 Missing Authorization via upsert-history

FlowiseAI · Flowise

Official source article: GitHub GHSA-JVX3-MJPW-R4GH ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

7.7HighCVSS 4.0
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Fix not verified
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Critical, raised one band.upgradedsince 26 Sep 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
  • EPSS is 0.27% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs FlowiseAI Flowise and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-87705

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

Flowise through 3.1.4 exposes GET /api/v1/upsert-history/:id and PATCH /api/v1/upsert-history without route-level permission checks, and the backing service performs no workspace or ownership validation. getAllUpsertHistory() returns UpsertHistory rows selected solely by an attacker-supplied chatflowid, and patchDeleteUpsertHistory() deletes rows by an attacker-supplied array of record UUIDs. As a result, any authenticated low-privilege user or valid API key can read or delete document-store upsert history belonging to other users and other workspaces whenever the target chatflowId (which is exposed publicly in /chatbot/<chatflowId> share links) or row ids are known. The retrievable flowData and result fields contain embedding, record-manager and vector-store node configuration, including per-node paramValues. No patched version is available.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
7.7 · CVSS 4.0
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Fix not verified
01

What, why and how

Flowise through 3.1.4 exposes GET /api/v1/upsert-history/:id and PATCH /api/v1/upsert-history without route-level permission checks, and the backing service performs no workspace or ownership validation. getAllUpsertHistory() returns UpsertHistory rows selected solely by an attacker-supplied chatflowid, and patchDeleteUpsertHistory() deletes rows by an attacker-supplied array of record UUIDs. As a result, any authenticated low-privilege user or valid API key can read or delete document-store upsert history belonging to other users and other workspaces whenever the target chatflowId (which is exposed publicly in /chatbot/<chatflowId> share links) or row ids are known. The retrievable flowData and result fields contain embedding, record-manager and vector-store node configuration, including per-node paramValues. No patched version is available.

What

Flowise through 3.1.4 exposes GET /api/v1/upsert-history/:id and PATCH /api/v1/upsert-history without route-level permission checks, and the backing service performs no workspace or ownership validation. getAllUpsertHistory() returns UpsertHistory rows selected solely by an attacker-supplied chatflowid, and patchDeleteUpsertHistory() deletes rows by an attacker-supplied array of record UUIDs. As a result, any authenticated low-privilege user or valid API key can read or delete document-store upsert history belonging to other users and other workspaces whenever the target chatflowId (which is exposed publicly in /chatbot/<chatflowId> share links) or row ids are known. The retrievable flowData and result fields contain embedding, record-manager and vector-store node configuration, including per-node paramValues. No patched version is available.

Why

The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

Flowise through 3.1.4 exposes GET /api/v1/upsert-history/:id and PATCH /api/v1/upsert-history without route-level permission checks, and the backing service performs no workspace or ownership validation. getAllUpsertHistory() returns UpsertHistory rows selected solely by an attacker-supplied chatflowid, and patchDeleteUpsertHistory() deletes rows by an attacker-supplied array of record UUIDs. As a result, any authenticated low-privilege user or valid API key can read or delete document-store upsert history belonging to other users and other workspaces whenever the target chatflowId (which is exposed publicly in /chatbot/<chatflowId> share links) or row ids are known. The retrievable flowData and result fields contain embedding, record-manager and vector-store node configuration, including per-node paramValues. No patched version is available.

Why

The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Reference recorded

CISA Vulnrichment records proof-of-concept exploitation in its SSVC data. BlackTree has not independently executed or validated exploit material.

Likely attack path
a network path → Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Not a CVSS 4.0 base metric
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-639 ↗

CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key. The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 4.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.ATPresentAttack requirements: A particular deployment or execution condition must be present.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.VCHighVulnerable-system confidentiality: A successful attack can cause a major loss.VIHighVulnerable-system integrity: A successful attack can cause a major loss.VAHighVulnerable-system availability: A successful attack can cause a major loss.SCNoneSubsequent-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SINoneSubsequent-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SANoneSubsequent-system availability: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkCWE-639Public exploit reference
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-87705Official EUVD mapping

Flowise through 3.1.4 exposes GET /api/v1/upsert-history/:id and PATCH /api/v1/upsert-history without route-level permission checks, and the backing service performs no workspace or ownership validation. getAllUpsertHistory() returns UpsertHistory rows selected solely by an attacker-supplied chatflowid, and patchDeleteUpsertHistory() deletes rows by an attacker-supplied array of record UUIDs. As a result, any authenticated low-privilege user or valid API key can read or delete document-store upsert history belonging to other users and other workspaces whenever the target chatflowId (which is exposed publicly in /chatbot/<chatflowId> share links) or row ids are known. The retrievable flowData and result fields contain embedding, record-manager and vector-store node configuration, including per-node paramValues. No patched version is available.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-3313Flowise: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Flowise ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, Benutzerkonten zu übernehmen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen und Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen.

Official advisory ↗
CSIRT Italia · Italian · flowiseai-poc-pubbliche-per-lo-sfruttamento-di-6-vulnerabilitaFlowiseAI: PoC pubbliche per lo sfruttamento di 6 vulnerabilità

Nel dettaglio, la vulnerabilità identificata tramite la CVE-2026-100610, di tipo "Privilege Escalation", e con CVSS 4.0 pari a 7.7, è dovuta ad una gestione non adeguata dei parametri forniti in input dall'utente e all'assenza di adeguati controlli di autorizzazione. Un attaccante remoto autenticato con privilegi ridotti potrebbe sfruttare tale vulnerabilità tramite richieste HTTP opportunamente predisposte al fine di accedere o eliminare dati appartenenti ad altri utenti e spazi di lavoro, con possibile esposizione di configurazioni e informazioni sensibili. La vulnerabilità identificata tramite la CVE-2026-100609, di tipo "Information Disclosure", e con CVSS 4.0 pari a 7.6, è dovuta ad una gestione non adeguata dei parametri forniti in input dall'utente e all'assenza di adeguati controlli sull'appartenenza delle credenziali allo spazio di lavoro dell'utente richiedente. Un attaccante remoto autenticato potrebbe sfruttare tale vulnerabilità tramite richieste HTTP opportunamente predisposte al fine di indurre il sistema a decifrare e utilizzare credenziali appartenenti ad altri spazi di lavoro, con conseguente accesso non autorizzato a risorse associate. La vulnerabilità identificata tramite la CVE-2026-100608, di tipo "Authentication Bypass", e con CVSS 4.0 pari a 8.7, è dovuta all'assenza di adeguati controlli di autorizzazione e di separazione tra spazi di lavoro nella console di amministrazione delle code. Un attaccante remoto autenticato con privilegi ridotti potrebbe sfruttare tale vulnerabilità tramite richieste HTTP opportunamente predisposte al fine di eludere i meccanismi di autorizzazione, accedere alle code e ai relativi dati di più spazi di lavoro e compiere operazioni di gestione sugli stessi, con possibile esposizione di credenziali, configurazioni, dati delle conversazioni e altre informazioni sensibili. La vulnerabilità identificata tramite la CVE-2026-100607, e con CVSS 4.0 pari a 9.2, è dovuta ad una gestione non adeguata dell'associazione tra identità utente e metodo di autenticazione. Un attaccante remoto non autenticato potrebbe sfruttare tale vulnerabilità tramite richieste HTTPS opportunamente predisposte al fine di autenticarsi utilizzando l'indirizzo di posta elettronica di un utente esistente e ottenere accesso al relativo account, inclusi flussi, credenziali e chiavi API. La vulnerabilità identificata tramite la CVE-2026-100606, di tipo "Authentication Bypass", e con CVSS 4.0 pari a 9.2, interessa Flowise in modalità Enterprise con autenticazione SSO abilitata. Questa vulnerabilità è dovuta ad una gestione non adeguata dei parametri forniti in input dall'utente nel processo di autenticazione e attivazione degli account invitati. Un attaccante remoto non autenticato, in grado di autenticarsi presso un fornitore SSO configurato utilizzando l'indirizzo di posta elettronica di un utente invitato, potrebbe sfruttare tale vulnerabilità tramite richieste HTTPS opportunamente predisposte al fine di eludere i meccanismi previsti per la verifica dell'invito, attivare l'account e ottenere l'accesso all'organizzazione associata. La vulnerabilità identificata tramite la CVE-2026-100605, e con CVSS 4.0 pari a 7.5, è dovuta all'assenza di adeguati controlli di autorizzazione sulle funzionalità di gestione dei messaggi delle conversazioni. Un attaccante remoto autenticato, in possesso di una chiave API con privilegi ridotti, potrebbe sfruttare tale vulnerabilità tramite richieste HTTP opportunamente predisposte al fine di accedere alle cronologie delle conversazioni, ai prompt e alle risposte dei modelli, nonché eliminare messaggi senza disporre delle autorizzazioni richieste.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix not verified
Affected
Flowise: ≤ 3.1.4
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
No verified patch reference is present in the current structured sources. Check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 26 Sept 2026 · Last source change 28 Sept 2026, 19:07 UTC · CWE-639 · Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-09-27
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-87705
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD not scheduled

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. ENISA EUVD mappingEUVD-2026-87705 was added to the official ENISA EUVD mapping for this CVE.
    Before
    not recorded
    After
    {"euvdId":"EUVD-2026-87705"}
    ENISA EUVD ↗
  2. Public exploit evidencePublic exploit evidence changed from No public exploit to Public exploit reference.
    Before
    No public exploit
    After
    Public exploit reference
    CVE.org ↗
  3. Catalogue recordCVE added to the BlackTree catalogue.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2026-100610 · cve.blacktree.nl