Patch only the product branches with a verified fix
Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 14 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.
Published severityMedium→Operational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged
Evidence used
No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
EPSS is 0.27% for the current model date.
Compensating controls
Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.
Verification
Confirm that the asset runs Unknown vim and falls inside the recorded affected range.
Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Cross-source reconciliation
Remediation availability differs by product scope
Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 14 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.
Red Hat Product Security: 14 affected or under-investigation product states without a fixed product state in the same current advisory
Distribution package intelligence
Release-specific package status
Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.
4 package states
Repository candidate not checked
A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.
Distribution release
Source package
Vendor state
Fixed version
Evidence
Debian trixietrixie · source
vim
Not affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).
Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.
1 current
CVE-2025-9390 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securityvim: vim xxd xxd.c main buffer overflow
14 known affected
The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.
vim-X11 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
vim-common as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
vim-enhanced as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
vim-filesystem as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
vim-minimal as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
vim.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
vim-X11 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
vim-common as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
vim-enhanced as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
vim-filesystem as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
vim-minimal as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
vim.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Summary
A vulnerability was found in the xxd component of Vim in the main function of src/xxd/xxd.c. This flaw allows a local attacker to trigger a buffer overflow, which leads to a denial of service.
Remediation
Upgrade to Vim version 9.1.1616 or later to address this issue.
Optional official sources
National CERT insights ?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.
Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.
Official European source
ENISA European Vulnerability Database
Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.
1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier
EUVD-2025-28843
No EUVD known-exploited evidence
ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.
EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix
Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 14 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.
Fix availability varies by product
01
What, why and how
A security flaw has been discovered in vim up to 9.1.1615. Affected by this vulnerability is the function main of the file src/xxd/xxd.c of the component xxd. The manipulation results in buffer overflow. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. Upgrading to version 9.1.1616 addresses this issue. The patch is identified as eeef7c77436a78cd27047b0f5fa6925d56de3cb0. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.
What
A security flaw has been discovered in vim up to 9.1.1615. Affected by this vulnerability is the function main of the file src/xxd/xxd.c of the component xxd. The manipulation results in buffer overflow. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. Upgrading to version 9.1.1616 addresses this issue. The patch is identified as eeef7c77436a78cd27047b0f5fa6925d56de3cb0. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.
Why
The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.
How
An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
What
A security flaw has been discovered in vim up to 9.1.1615. Affected by this vulnerability is the function main of the file src/xxd/xxd.c of the component xxd. The manipulation results in buffer overflow. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. Upgrading to version 9.1.1616 addresses this issue. The patch is identified as eeef7c77436a78cd27047b0f5fa6925d56de3cb0. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.
Why
The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.
How
An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
02
Exploit reality and attack path
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
Observed exploitation ?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.No confirmed evidence
No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
Public PoC / exploit material ?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.Reference recorded
A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.
Likely attack path
local access → Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Not a CVSS 4.0 base metric
Weakness ?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow'). The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.
CVSS vector ?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
Common Vulnerability Scoring System 4.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.ATNoneAttack requirements: No additional deployment or execution condition is required.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.VCLowVulnerable-system confidentiality: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.VILowVulnerable-system integrity: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.VALowVulnerable-system availability: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.SCNoneSubsequent-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SINoneSubsequent-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SANoneSubsequent-system availability: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-120Public exploit reference
A
Official authority intelligence
Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-28843Official EUVD mapping
0 linked advisory records.
Official EUVD record ↗BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1897vim: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service
Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in vim ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.
Official advisory ↗Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250828Security Bulletin 27 Aug 2025
The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 27 Aug 2025, published on 28 August 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware
.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9086
Référence CVE CVE-2025-9092
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9092
Référence CVE CVE-2025-9165
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9165
Référence CVE CVE-2025-9230
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9230
Référence CVE CVE-2025-9231
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9231
Référence CVE CVE-2025-9232
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9232
Référence CVE CVE-2025-9288
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9288
Référence CVE CVE-2025-9340
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9340
Référence CVE CVE-2025-9341
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9341
Référence CVE CVE-2025-9390
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9390
Référence CVE CVE-2025-9403
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9403
Référence CVE CVE-2025-9640
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9640
Référence CVE CVE-2025-9714
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9714
Référence CVE CVE-2025-9900
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9900
Gestion détaillée du document
le 06 novembre 2025
Version initiale
Alertes
Avis
Bulletins d’actualités
Mentions légales
Conditions générales
À propos
Contact
cyber.gouv.fr
service-public.fr
legifrance.gouv.fr
info.gouv.fr
france.fr
info.gouv.fr/risques
Premier Ministre / Secrétariat Général de la Défe
Official advisory ↗JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-013886Vim における古典的バッファオーバーフローの脆弱性
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Status ?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Upgrade to Vim version 9.1.1616 or later to address this issue.
04
Evidence and provenance
Published 24 Aug 2025 · Last source change 25 Aug 2025, 18:30 UTC · CWE-120 · Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')
CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source ?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-28843
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched
Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.
Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
Before
vim-X11 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; vim-common as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; vim-enhanced as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; vim-filesystem as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; vim-minimal as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; vim.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; vim-X11 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; vim-common as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; vim-enhanced as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; vim-filesystem as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; vim-minimal as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; vim.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
After
vim-X11 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; vim-common as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; vim-enhanced as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; vim-filesystem as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; vim-minimal as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; vim.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6; vim-X11 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; vim-common as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; vim-enhanced as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; vim-filesystem as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; vim-minimal as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; vim.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7; openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-8 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4; openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.