BlackTreeIndependent security intelligenceAsseco · InfoMedica Plus
Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.
Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.
Fix not verifiedAsseco InfoMedica is a comprehensive solution used to manage both administrative and medical tasks in the healthcare sector. A low privileged user is able to obtain encoded passwords of all other accounts (including main administrator) due to lack of granularity in access control. Chained exploitation of this vulnerability and CVE-2025-8307 allows an attacker to escalate privileges. This vulnerability has been fixed in versions 4.50.1 and 5.38.0
Asseco InfoMedica is a comprehensive solution used to manage both administrative and medical tasks in the healthcare sector. A low privileged user is able to obtain encoded passwords of all other accounts (including main administrator) due to lack of granularity in access control. Chained exploitation of this vulnerability and CVE-2025-8307 allows an attacker to escalate privileges. This vulnerability has been fixed in versions 4.50.1 and 5.38.0
The product implements access controls via a policy or other feature with the intention to disable or restrict accesses (reads and/or writes) to assets in a system from untrusted agents. However, implemented access controls lack required granularity, which renders the control policy too broad because it allows accesses from unauthorized agents to the security-sensitive assets.
An attacker operating through an adjacent network may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
Asseco InfoMedica is a comprehensive solution used to manage both administrative and medical tasks in the healthcare sector. A low privileged user is able to obtain encoded passwords of all other accounts (including main administrator) due to lack of granularity in access control. Chained exploitation of this vulnerability and CVE-2025-8307 allows an attacker to escalate privileges. This vulnerability has been fixed in versions 4.50.1 and 5.38.0
The product implements access controls via a policy or other feature with the intention to disable or restrict accesses (reads and/or writes) to assets in a system from untrusted agents. However, implemented access controls lack required granularity, which renders the control policy too broad because it allows accesses from unauthorized agents to the security-sensitive assets.
An attacker operating through an adjacent network may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.
CWE-1220: Insufficient Granularity of Access Control. The product implements access controls via a policy or other feature with the intention to disable or restrict accesses (reads and/or writes) to assets in a system from untrusted agents. However, implemented access controls lack required granularity, which renders the control policy too broad because it allows accesses from unauthorized agents to the security-sensitive assets.
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NCommon Vulnerability Scoring System 4.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Published 8 Jan 2026 · Last source change 8 Jan 2026, 14:23 UTC · CWE-1220 · Insufficient Granularity of Access Control
Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.
No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.