BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2025-71225High confidence

md: suspend array while updating raid_disks via sysfs

Linux · Linux

5.3MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 Jun 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.09% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.73-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-207829

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: md: suspend array while updating raid_disks via sysfs In raid1_reshape(), freeze_array() is called before modifying the r1bio memory pool (conf->r1bio_pool) and conf->raid_disks, and unfreeze_array() is called after the update is completed. However, freeze_array() only waits until nr_sync_pending and (nr_pending - nr_queued) of all buckets reaches zero. When an I/O error occurs, nr_queued is increased and the corresponding r1bio is queued to either retry_list or bio_end_io_list. As a result, freeze_array() may unblock before these r1bios are released. This can lead to a situation where conf->raid_disks and the mempool have already been updated while queued r1bios, allocated with the old raid_disks value, are later released. Consequently, free_r1bio() may access memory out of bounds in put_all_bios() and release r1bios of the wrong size to the new mempool, potentially causing issues with the mempool as well. Since only normal I/O might increase nr_queued while an I/O error occurs, suspending the array avoids this issue. Note: Updating raid_disks via ioctl SET_ARRAY_INFO already suspends the array. Therefore, we suspend the array when updating raid_disks via sysfs to avoid this issue too.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: md: suspend array while updating raid_disks via sysfs In raid1_reshape(), freeze_array() is called before modifying the r1bio memory pool (conf->r1bio_pool) and conf->raid_disks, and unfreeze_array() is called after the update is completed. However, freeze_array() only waits until nr_sync_pending and (nr_pending - nr_queued) of all buckets reaches zero. When an I/O error occurs, nr_queued is increased and the corresponding r1bio is queued to either retry_list or bio_end_io_list. As a result, freeze_array() may unblock before these r1bios are released. This can lead to a situation where conf->raid_disks and the mempool have already been updated while queued r1bios, allocated with the old raid_disks value, are later released. Consequently, free_r1bio() may access memory out of bounds in put_all_bios() and release r1bios of the wrong size to the new mempool, potentially causing issues with the mempool as well. Since only normal I/O might increase nr_queued while an I/O error occurs, suspending the array avoids this issue. Note: Updating raid_disks via ioctl SET_ARRAY_INFO already suspends the array. Therefore, we suspend the array when updating raid_disks via sysfs to avoid this issue too.

Why

The product checks the state of a resource before using that resource, but the resource's state can change between the check and the use in a way that invalidates the results of the check.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: md: suspend array while updating raid_disks via sysfs In raid1_reshape(), freeze_array() is called before modifying the r1bio memory pool (conf->r1bio_pool) and conf->raid_disks, and unfreeze_array() is called after the update is completed. However, freeze_array() only waits until nr_sync_pending and (nr_pending - nr_queued) of all buckets reaches zero. When an I/O error occurs, nr_queued is increased and the corresponding r1bio is queued to either retry_list or bio_end_io_list. As a result, freeze_array() may unblock before these r1bios are released. This can lead to a situation where conf->raid_disks and the mempool have already been updated while queued r1bios, allocated with the old raid_disks value, are later released. Consequently, free_r1bio() may access memory out of bounds in put_all_bios() and release r1bios of the wrong size to the new mempool, potentially causing issues with the mempool as well. Since only normal I/O might increase nr_queued while an I/O error occurs, suspending the array avoids this issue. Note: Updating raid_disks via ioctl SET_ARRAY_INFO already suspends the array. Therefore, we suspend the array when updating raid_disks via sysfs to avoid this issue too.

Why

The product checks the state of a resource before using that resource, but the resource's state can change between the check and the use in a way that invalidates the results of the check.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-367 ↗

CWE-367: Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition. The product checks the state of a resource before using that resource, but the resource's state can change between the check and the use in a way that invalidates the results of the check.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CLowConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-367
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0462Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260225Security Bulletin 25 Feb 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 25 Feb 2026, published on 25 February 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0831Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71195 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71196 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71197 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71198 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71199 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71199 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71224 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71225 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71235 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71236 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0787Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71195 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71196 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71197 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71198 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71199 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71199 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71224 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71225 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71268 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22976 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22977 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22978 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22979 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22980 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22982 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0746Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71195 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71196 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71197 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71198 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71199 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71199 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71224 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71225 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71268 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22976 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22977 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22978 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22979 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22980 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22982 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0663Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71195 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71196 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71197 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71198 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71199 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71199 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71224 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71225 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71268 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22976 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22977 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22978 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22979 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22980 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22982 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0638Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71195 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71196 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71197 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71198 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71199 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71199 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71224 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71225 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71268 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22976 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22977 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22978 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22979 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22980 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22982 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0369Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-71194 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71195 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71196 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71197 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71198 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71199 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71199 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71224 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71225 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71234 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71235 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71236 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7709 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0329Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-71194 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71195 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71196 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71197 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71198 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71199 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71199 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71224 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71225 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71234 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71235 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71236 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22979 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22979 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-71199 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71202 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71203 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71204 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71221 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71224 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71225 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71235 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71236 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-71199 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71202 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71203 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71204 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71221 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71224 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71225 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71235 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71236 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0192Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

/2026/msg00050.html Référence CVE CVE-2025-40082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71203 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71204 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71224 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71225 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71228 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71234 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71235 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-008045LinuxのLinux KernelにおけるTime-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) 競合状態の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルのmdデバイスに存在する脆弱性です。sysfsを経由してraid_disksを更新中に配列をサスペンドしない場合、r1bioの解放処理で範囲外メモリアクセスが発生し、メモリプールに不具合が生じる可能性があります。この問題は配列をサスペンドすることで回避できます。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: e2d59925221cd562e07fee38ec8839f7209ae603 < 165d1359f945b72c5f90088f60d48ff46115269e, e2d59925221cd562e07fee38ec8839f7209ae603 < 0107b18cd8ac17eb3e54786adc05a85cdbb6ef22, e2d59925221cd562e07fee38ec8839f7209ae603 < 2cc583653bbe050bacd1cadcc9776d39bf449740, 1b9203bb4c658c0242afa6fdb025c71d2fc3ad76, 8ccf6cfb157419847f3cb2bfdfbcdbd39860e8e9, 3.4.59 < 3.5, 3.9.7 < 3.10, 3.10
Fixed
Linux: < 3.10, 6.12.70 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.10 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 18 Feb 2026 · Last source change 11 Jun 2026, 18:44 UTC · CWE-367 · Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-207829
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-71225 · cve.blacktree.nl