BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2025-71144High confidence

mptcp: ensure context reset on disconnect()

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 17 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 23 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.13% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 17 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

21 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 17 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.69-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.164-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-2482

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 17 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mptcp: ensure context reset on disconnect() After the blamed commit below, if the MPC subflow is already in TCP_CLOSE status or has fallback to TCP at mptcp_disconnect() time, mptcp_do_fastclose() skips setting the `send_fastclose flag` and the later __mptcp_close_ssk() does not reset anymore the related subflow context. Any later connection will be created with both the `request_mptcp` flag and the msk-level fallback status off (it is unconditionally cleared at MPTCP disconnect time), leading to a warning in subflow_data_ready(): WARNING: CPU: 26 PID: 8996 at net/mptcp/subflow.c:1519 subflow_data_ready (net/mptcp/subflow.c:1519 (discriminator 13)) Modules linked in: CPU: 26 UID: 0 PID: 8996 Comm: syz.22.39 Not tainted 6.18.0-rc7-05427-g11fc074f6c36 #1 PREEMPT(voluntary) Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 RIP: 0010:subflow_data_ready (net/mptcp/subflow.c:1519 (discriminator 13)) Code: 90 0f 0b 90 90 e9 04 fe ff ff e8 b7 1e f5 fe 89 ee bf 07 00 00 00 e8 db 19 f5 fe 83 fd 07 0f 84 35 ff ff ff e8 9d 1e f5 fe 90 <0f> 0b 90 e9 27 ff ff ff e8 8f 1e f5 fe 4c 89 e7 48 89 de e8 14 09 RSP: 0018:ffffc9002646fb30 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88813b218000 RCX: ffffffff825c8435 RDX: ffff8881300b3580 RSI: ffffffff825c8443 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 000000000000000b R08: ffffffff825c8435 R09: 000000000000000b R10: 0000000000000005 R11: 0000000000000007 R12: ffff888131ac0000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f88330af6c0(0000) GS:ffff888a93dd2000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f88330aefe8 CR3: 000000010ff59000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> tcp_data_ready (net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:5356) tcp_data_queue (net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:5445) tcp_rcv_state_process (net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:7165) tcp_v4_do_rcv (net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1955) __release_sock (include/net/sock.h:1158 (discriminator 6) net/core/sock.c:3180 (discriminator 6)) release_sock (net/core/sock.c:3737) mptcp_sendmsg (net/mptcp/protocol.c:1763 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1857) inet_sendmsg (net/ipv4/af_inet.c:853 (discriminator 7)) __sys_sendto (net/socket.c:727 (discriminator 15) net/socket.c:742 (discriminator 15) net/socket.c:2244 (discriminator 15)) __x64_sys_sendto (net/socket.c:2247) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 (discriminator 1) arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 (discriminator 1)) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130) RIP: 0033:0x7f883326702d Address the issue setting an explicit `fastclosing` flag at fastclose time, and checking such flag after mptcp_do_fastclose().

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mptcp: ensure context reset on disconnect() After the blamed commit below, if the MPC subflow is already in TCP_CLOSE status or has fallback to TCP at mptcp_disconnect() time, mptcp_do_fastclose() skips setting the `send_fastclose flag` and the later __mptcp_close_ssk() does not reset anymore the related subflow context. Any later connection will be created with both the `request_mptcp` flag and the msk-level fallback status off (it is unconditionally cleared at MPTCP disconnect time), leading to a warning in subflow_data_ready(): WARNING: CPU: 26 PID: 8996 at net/mptcp/subflow.c:1519 subflow_data_ready (net/mptcp/subflow.c:1519 (discriminator 13)) Modules linked in: CPU: 26 UID: 0 PID: 8996 Comm: syz.22.39 Not tainted 6.18.0-rc7-05427-g11fc074f6c36 #1 PREEMPT(voluntary) Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 RIP: 0010:subflow_data_ready (net/mptcp/subflow.c:1519 (discriminator 13)) Code: 90 0f 0b 90 90 e9 04 fe ff ff e8 b7 1e f5 fe 89 ee bf 07 00 00 00 e8 db 19 f5 fe 83 fd 07 0f 84 35 ff ff ff e8 9d 1e f5 fe 90 <0f> 0b 90 e9 27 ff ff ff e8 8f 1e f5 fe 4c 89 e7 48 89 de e8 14 09 RSP: 0018:ffffc9002646fb30 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88813b218000 RCX: ffffffff825c8435 RDX: ffff8881300b3580 RSI: ffffffff825c8443 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 000000000000000b R08: ffffffff825c8435 R09: 000000000000000b R10: 0000000000000005 R11: 0000000000000007 R12: ffff888131ac0000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f88330af6c0(0000) GS:ffff888a93dd2000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f88330aefe8 CR3: 000000010ff59000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> tcp_data_ready (net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:5356) tcp_data_queue (net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:5445) tcp_rcv_state_process (net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:7165) tcp_v4_do_rcv (net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1955) __release_sock (include/net/sock.h:1158 (discriminator 6) net/core/sock.c:3180 (discriminator 6)) release_sock (net/core/sock.c:3737) mptcp_sendmsg (net/mptcp/protocol.c:1763 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1857) inet_sendmsg (net/ipv4/af_inet.c:853 (discriminator 7)) __sys_sendto (net/socket.c:727 (discriminator 15) net/socket.c:742 (discriminator 15) net/socket.c:2244 (discriminator 15)) __x64_sys_sendto (net/socket.c:2247) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 (discriminator 1) arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 (discriminator 1)) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130) RIP: 0033:0x7f883326702d Address the issue setting an explicit `fastclosing` flag at fastclose time, and checking such flag after mptcp_do_fastclose().

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mptcp: ensure context reset on disconnect() After the blamed commit below, if the MPC subflow is already in TCP_CLOSE status or has fallback to TCP at mptcp_disconnect() time, mptcp_do_fastclose() skips setting the `send_fastclose flag` and the later __mptcp_close_ssk() does not reset anymore the related subflow context. Any later connection will be created with both the `request_mptcp` flag and the msk-level fallback status off (it is unconditionally cleared at MPTCP disconnect time), leading to a warning in subflow_data_ready(): WARNING: CPU: 26 PID: 8996 at net/mptcp/subflow.c:1519 subflow_data_ready (net/mptcp/subflow.c:1519 (discriminator 13)) Modules linked in: CPU: 26 UID: 0 PID: 8996 Comm: syz.22.39 Not tainted 6.18.0-rc7-05427-g11fc074f6c36 #1 PREEMPT(voluntary) Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 RIP: 0010:subflow_data_ready (net/mptcp/subflow.c:1519 (discriminator 13)) Code: 90 0f 0b 90 90 e9 04 fe ff ff e8 b7 1e f5 fe 89 ee bf 07 00 00 00 e8 db 19 f5 fe 83 fd 07 0f 84 35 ff ff ff e8 9d 1e f5 fe 90 <0f> 0b 90 e9 27 ff ff ff e8 8f 1e f5 fe 4c 89 e7 48 89 de e8 14 09 RSP: 0018:ffffc9002646fb30 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88813b218000 RCX: ffffffff825c8435 RDX: ffff8881300b3580 RSI: ffffffff825c8443 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 000000000000000b R08: ffffffff825c8435 R09: 000000000000000b R10: 0000000000000005 R11: 0000000000000007 R12: ffff888131ac0000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f88330af6c0(0000) GS:ffff888a93dd2000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f88330aefe8 CR3: 000000010ff59000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> tcp_data_ready (net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:5356) tcp_data_queue (net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:5445) tcp_rcv_state_process (net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:7165) tcp_v4_do_rcv (net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1955) __release_sock (include/net/sock.h:1158 (discriminator 6) net/core/sock.c:3180 (discriminator 6)) release_sock (net/core/sock.c:3737) mptcp_sendmsg (net/mptcp/protocol.c:1763 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1857) inet_sendmsg (net/ipv4/af_inet.c:853 (discriminator 7)) __sys_sendto (net/socket.c:727 (discriminator 15) net/socket.c:742 (discriminator 15) net/socket.c:2244 (discriminator 15)) __x64_sys_sendto (net/socket.c:2247) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 (discriminator 1) arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 (discriminator 1)) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130) RIP: 0033:0x7f883326702d Address the issue setting an explicit `fastclosing` flag at fastclose time, and checking such flag after mptcp_do_fastclose().

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0119Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260121Security Bulletin 21 Jan 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 21 Jan 2026, published on 21 January 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0861Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68214 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71134 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71224 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0787Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71137 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0695Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

/notices/USN-8374-1 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71134 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71139 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71155 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23274 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23394 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31419 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0663Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71134 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71139 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71162 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71180 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71182 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0638Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71134 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71139 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71162 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71180 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71182 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71137 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0545Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71137 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0522Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71137 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71154 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0495Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71137 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0453Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71137 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0328Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-37822 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37920 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38201 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38643 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39763 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68358 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71224 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71235 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71236 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0291Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-37822 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37920 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38201 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38643 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39763 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40251 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68358 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71224 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71235 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71236 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0166Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-71132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71134 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71137 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71151 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71153 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-005679LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。mptcpにおけるdisconnect()時のコンテキストリセットが保証されない問題です。問題のあるコミット以降、MPCサブフローが既にTCP_CLOSE状態にあるか、mptcp_disconnect()時にTCPへのフォールバックが行われている場合に、mptcp_do_fastclose()がsend_fastcloseフラグの設定をスキップし、その後の__mptcp_close_ssk()が関連するサブフローコンテキストをリセットしなくなっていました。その結果、後続の接続はrequest_mptcpフラグとmskレベルのフォールバック状態の両方がオフの状態(MPTCP切断時に無条件でクリアされる)で作成され、subflow_data_ready()で警告が発生します。対応として、fastclose時に明示的にfastclosingフラグを設定し、mptcp_do_fastclose()後にそのフラグをチェックするように修正しました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 9ea05fabce31ff93a0adae8221c58bc6d7b832f3 < 226fff52e7ed9fc8cd63327133739b3d92537ffd, 3a13454fd098ed51e733958488f8ec62859a9ed8 < 5c7c7135468f3fc6379cde9777a2c18bfe92d82f, f6fb2cbc91a81178dea23d463503b4525a76825d < 1c7c3a9314d8a7fc0e9a508606466a967c8e774a, ae155060247be8dcae3802a95bd1bdf93ab3215d < f1a77dfc3b045c3dd5f6e64189b9f52b90399f07, ae155060247be8dcae3802a95bd1bdf93ab3215d < 86730ac255b0497a272704de9a1df559f5d6602e, c4f7b0916b95fd2226e5ab98882482b08f52e1c0, 6.1.159 < 6.1.164, 6.6.119 < 6.6.120, 6.12.60 < 6.12.65, 6.17.10 < 6.18, 6.18
Fixed
Linux: < 6.18, 6.1.164 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.120 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.65 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.5 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 14 Jan 2026 · Last source change 23 May 2026, 16:03 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-2482
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-71144 · cve.blacktree.nl