BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2025-71142High confidence

cpuset: fix warning when disabling remote partition

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 11 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 14 Sep 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.13% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 11 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

15 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 11 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-aws-6.17Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracle-6.17Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-2471

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cpuset: fix warning when disabling remote partition A warning was triggered as follows: WARNING: kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:1651 at remote_partition_disable+0xf7/0x110 RIP: 0010:remote_partition_disable+0xf7/0x110 RSP: 0018:ffffc90001947d88 EFLAGS: 00000206 RAX: 0000000000007fff RBX: ffff888103b6e000 RCX: 0000000000006f40 RDX: 0000000000006f00 RSI: ffffc90001947da8 RDI: ffff888103b6e000 RBP: ffff888103b6e000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffff88810b2e2728 R12: ffffc90001947da8 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffc90001947da8 R15: ffff8881081f1c00 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f55c8bbe0b2 CR3: 000000010b14c000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: <TASK> update_prstate+0x2d3/0x580 cpuset_partition_write+0x94/0xf0 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x147/0x200 vfs_write+0x35d/0x500 ksys_write+0x66/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x6b/0x390 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7f55c8cd4887 Reproduction steps (on a 16-CPU machine): # cd /sys/fs/cgroup/ # mkdir A1 # echo +cpuset > A1/cgroup.subtree_control # echo "0-14" > A1/cpuset.cpus.exclusive # mkdir A1/A2 # echo "0-14" > A1/A2/cpuset.cpus.exclusive # echo "root" > A1/A2/cpuset.cpus.partition # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu15/online # echo member > A1/A2/cpuset.cpus.partition When CPU 15 is offlined, subpartitions_cpus gets cleared because no CPUs remain available for the top_cpuset, forcing partitions to share CPUs with the top_cpuset. In this scenario, disabling the remote partition triggers a warning stating that effective_xcpus is not a subset of subpartitions_cpus. Partitions should be invalidated in this case to inform users that the partition is now invalid(cpus are shared with top_cpuset). To fix this issue: 1. Only emit the warning only if subpartitions_cpus is not empty and the effective_xcpus is not a subset of subpartitions_cpus. 2. During the CPU hotplug process, invalidate partitions if subpartitions_cpus is empty.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
0.0
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 11 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cpuset: fix warning when disabling remote partition A warning was triggered as follows: WARNING: kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:1651 at remote_partition_disable+0xf7/0x110 RIP: 0010:remote_partition_disable+0xf7/0x110 RSP: 0018:ffffc90001947d88 EFLAGS: 00000206 RAX: 0000000000007fff RBX: ffff888103b6e000 RCX: 0000000000006f40 RDX: 0000000000006f00 RSI: ffffc90001947da8 RDI: ffff888103b6e000 RBP: ffff888103b6e000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffff88810b2e2728 R12: ffffc90001947da8 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffc90001947da8 R15: ffff8881081f1c00 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f55c8bbe0b2 CR3: 000000010b14c000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: <TASK> update_prstate+0x2d3/0x580 cpuset_partition_write+0x94/0xf0 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x147/0x200 vfs_write+0x35d/0x500 ksys_write+0x66/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x6b/0x390 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7f55c8cd4887 Reproduction steps (on a 16-CPU machine): # cd /sys/fs/cgroup/ # mkdir A1 # echo +cpuset > A1/cgroup.subtree_control # echo "0-14" > A1/cpuset.cpus.exclusive # mkdir A1/A2 # echo "0-14" > A1/A2/cpuset.cpus.exclusive # echo "root" > A1/A2/cpuset.cpus.partition # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu15/online # echo member > A1/A2/cpuset.cpus.partition When CPU 15 is offlined, subpartitions_cpus gets cleared because no CPUs remain available for the top_cpuset, forcing partitions to share CPUs with the top_cpuset. In this scenario, disabling the remote partition triggers a warning stating that effective_xcpus is not a subset of subpartitions_cpus. Partitions should be invalidated in this case to inform users that the partition is now invalid(cpus are shared with top_cpuset). To fix this issue: 1. Only emit the warning only if subpartitions_cpus is not empty and the effective_xcpus is not a subset of subpartitions_cpus. 2. During the CPU hotplug process, invalidate partitions if subpartitions_cpus is empty.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cpuset: fix warning when disabling remote partition A warning was triggered as follows: WARNING: kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:1651 at remote_partition_disable+0xf7/0x110 RIP: 0010:remote_partition_disable+0xf7/0x110 RSP: 0018:ffffc90001947d88 EFLAGS: 00000206 RAX: 0000000000007fff RBX: ffff888103b6e000 RCX: 0000000000006f40 RDX: 0000000000006f00 RSI: ffffc90001947da8 RDI: ffff888103b6e000 RBP: ffff888103b6e000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffff88810b2e2728 R12: ffffc90001947da8 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffc90001947da8 R15: ffff8881081f1c00 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f55c8bbe0b2 CR3: 000000010b14c000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: <TASK> update_prstate+0x2d3/0x580 cpuset_partition_write+0x94/0xf0 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x147/0x200 vfs_write+0x35d/0x500 ksys_write+0x66/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x6b/0x390 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7f55c8cd4887 Reproduction steps (on a 16-CPU machine): # cd /sys/fs/cgroup/ # mkdir A1 # echo +cpuset > A1/cgroup.subtree_control # echo "0-14" > A1/cpuset.cpus.exclusive # mkdir A1/A2 # echo "0-14" > A1/A2/cpuset.cpus.exclusive # echo "root" > A1/A2/cpuset.cpus.partition # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu15/online # echo member > A1/A2/cpuset.cpus.partition When CPU 15 is offlined, subpartitions_cpus gets cleared because no CPUs remain available for the top_cpuset, forcing partitions to share CPUs with the top_cpuset. In this scenario, disabling the remote partition triggers a warning stating that effective_xcpus is not a subset of subpartitions_cpus. Partitions should be invalidated in this case to inform users that the partition is now invalid(cpus are shared with top_cpuset). To fix this issue: 1. Only emit the warning only if subpartitions_cpus is not empty and the effective_xcpus is not a subset of subpartitions_cpus. 2. During the CPU hotplug process, invalidate partitions if subpartitions_cpus is empty.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cpuset: fix warning when disabling remote partition A warning was triggered as follows: WARNING: kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:1651 at remote_partition_disable+0xf7/0x110 RIP: 0010:remote_partition_disable+0xf7/0x110 RSP: 0018:ffffc90001947d88 EFLAGS: 00000206 RAX: 0000000000007fff RBX: ffff888103b6e000 RCX: 0000000000006f40 RDX: 0000000000006f00 RSI: ffffc90001947da8 RDI: ffff888103b6e000 RBP: ffff888103b6e000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffff88810b2e2728 R12: ffffc90001947da8 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffc90001947da8 R15: ffff8881081f1c00 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f55c8bbe0b2 CR3: 000000010b14c000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: <TASK> update_prstate+0x2d3/0x580 cpuset_partition_write+0x94/0xf0 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x147/0x200 vfs_write+0x35d/0x500 ksys_write+0x66/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x6b/0x390 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7f55c8cd4887 Reproduction steps (on a 16-CPU machine): # cd /sys/fs/cgroup/ # mkdir A1 # echo +cpuset > A1/cgroup.subtree_control # echo "0-14" > A1/cpuset.cpus.exclusive # mkdir A1/A2 # echo "0-14" > A1/A2/cpuset.cpus.exclusive # echo "root" > A1/A2/cpuset.cpus.partition # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu15/online # echo member > A1/A2/cpuset.cpus.partition When CPU 15 is offlined, subpartitions_cpus gets cleared because no CPUs remain available for the top_cpuset, forcing partitions to share CPUs with the top_cpuset. In this scenario, disabling the remote partition triggers a warning stating that effective_xcpus is not a subset of subpartitions_cpus. Partitions should be invalidated in this case to inform users that the partition is now invalid(cpus are shared with top_cpuset). To fix this issue: 1. Only emit the warning only if subpartitions_cpus is not empty and the effective_xcpus is not a subset of subpartitions_cpus. 2. During the CPU hotplug process, invalidate partitions if subpartitions_cpus is empty.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-2471Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cpuset: fix warning when disabling remote partition A warning was triggered as follows: WARNING: kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:1651 at remote_partition_disable+0xf7/0x110 RIP: 0010:remote_partition_disable+0xf7/0x110 RSP: 0018:ffffc90001947d88 EFLAGS: 00000206 RAX: 0000000000007fff RBX: ffff888103b6e000 RCX: 0000000000006f40 RDX: 0000000000006f00 RSI: ffffc90001947da8 RDI: ffff888103b6e000 RBP: ffff888103b6e000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffff88810b2e2728 R12: ffffc90001947da8 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffc90001947da8 R15: ffff8881081f1c00 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f55c8bbe0b2 CR3: 000000010b14c000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: <TASK> update_prstate+0x2d3/0x580 cpuset_partition_write+0x94/0xf0 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x147/0x200 vfs_write+0x35d/0x500 ksys_write+0x66/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x6b/0x390 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7f55c8cd4887 Reproduction steps (on a 16-CPU machine): # cd /sys/fs/cgroup/ # mkdir A1 # echo +cpuset > A1/cgroup.subtree_control # echo "0-14" > A1/cpuset.cpus.exclusive # mkdir A1/A2 # echo "0-14" > A1/A2/cpuset.cpus.exclusive # echo "root" > A1/A2/cpuset.cpus.partition # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu15/online # echo member > A1/A2/cpuset.cpus.partition When CPU 15 is offlined, subpartitions_cpus gets cleared because no CPUs remain available for the top_cpuset, forcing partitions to share CPUs with the top_cpuset. In this scenario, disabling the remote partition triggers a warning stating that effective_xcpus is not a subset of subpartitions_cpus. Partitions should be invalidated in this case to inform users that the partition is now invalid(cpus are shared with top_cpuset). To fix this issue: 1. Only emit the warning only if subpartitions_cpus is not empty and the effective_xcpus is not a subset of subpartitions_cpus. 2. During the CPU hotplug process, invalidate partitions if subpartitions_cpus is empty.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0119Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260121Security Bulletin 21 Jan 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 21 Jan 2026, published on 21 January 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0861Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-54505 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68214 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71134 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71224 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71224 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0695Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

tin de sécurité Ubuntu USN-8374-1 du 02 juin 2026 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8374-1 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71134 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71139 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71155 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23274 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23351 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23394 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0663Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68803 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71134 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71139 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71162 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71180 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0638Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68803 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71090 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71134 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71139 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71144 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71144 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71155 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71162 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71180 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0247Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-71130 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71137 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0225Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-71130 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71137 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0170Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-71130 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71137 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71138 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71143 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71143 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71145 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71154 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71156 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-008638LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。cpuset: リモートパーティション無効化時の警告を修正しました。警告は以下のように発生していました:WARNING: kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:1651 at remote_partition_disable+0xf7/0x110 以下略。再現手順(16CPUマシンの場合)は次の通りです。# cd /sys/fs/cgroup/ # mkdir A1 # echo +cpuset A1/cgroup.subtree_control # echo "0-14" A1/cpuset.cpus.exclusive # mkdir A1/A2 # echo "0-14" A1/A2/cpuset.cpus.exclusive # echo "root" A1/A2/cpuset.cpus.partition # echo 0 /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu15/online # echo member A1/A2/cpuset.cpus.partition。CPU 15がオフラインになると、top_cpusetで利用可能なCPUがなくなり、subpartitions_cpusがクリアされます。その結果、パーティションはtop_cpusetとCPUを共有せざるを得ません。この状態でリモートパーティションを無効化すると、effective_xcpusがsubpartitions_cpusの部分集合でないという警告が発生します。この場合、パーティションは無効として扱われ、ユーザーにパーティションが無効であること(CPUはtop_cpusetと共有されていること)を通知する必要があります。本問題の修正内容は以下の通りです。1. subpartitions_cpusが空でなく、かつeffective_xcpusがsubpartitions_cpusの部分集合でない場合にのみ警告を出す。2. CPUホットプラグ処理中にsubpartitions_cpusが空の場合はパーティションを無効化する。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: patch: 6.18.4, f62a5d39368e34a966c8df63e1f05eed7fe9c5de < 5d8b9d38a7676be7bb5e7d57f92156a98dab39fb, 93f045741dac64facf90c2216f9a1d0876d122c4 < 71953da7c979983917a4597bcad2c1ea6b8cc226, patch: 0, patch: 6.19, 6.15, f62a5d39368e34a966c8df63e1f05eed7fe9c5de < aa7d3a56a20f07978d9f401e13637a6479b13bd0
Fixed
Linux: < 6.15, 6.18.4 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 14 Jan 2026 · Last source change 14 Sept 2026, 11:58 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-2471
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    f62a5d39368e34a966c8df63e1f05eed7fe9c5de < 5d8b9d38a7676be7bb5e7d57f92156a98dab39fb; f62a5d39368e34a966c8df63e1f05eed7fe9c5de < aa7d3a56a20f07978d9f401e13637a6479b13bd0; 6.15 · Fixed: < 6.15; 6.18.4 ≤ 6.18.*; 6.19 ≤ *
    After
    Linux: 93f045741dac64facf90c2216f9a1d0876d122c4 < 71953da7c979983917a4597bcad2c1ea6b8cc226, f62a5d39368e34a966c8df63e1f05eed7fe9c5de < 5d8b9d38a7676be7bb5e7d57f92156a98dab39fb, f62a5d39368e34a966c8df63e1f05eed7fe9c5de < aa7d3a56a20f07978d9f401e13637a6479b13bd0, 6.15 · Fixed: Linux: < 6.15, 6.18.4 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-71142 · cve.blacktree.nl