BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2025-71126High confidence

mptcp: avoid deadlock on fallback while reinjecting

Linux · Linux

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.26% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.69-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.162-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fde-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidia-6.14Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-2478

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mptcp: avoid deadlock on fallback while reinjecting Jakub reported an MPTCP deadlock at fallback time: WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.18.0-rc7-virtme #1 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- mptcp_connect/20858 is trying to acquire lock: ff1100001da18b60 (&msk->fallback_lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __mptcp_try_fallback+0xd8/0x280 but task is already holding lock: ff1100001da18b60 (&msk->fallback_lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __mptcp_retrans+0x352/0xaa0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&msk->fallback_lock); lock(&msk->fallback_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 3 locks held by mptcp_connect/20858: #0: ff1100001da18290 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x114/0x1bc0 #1: ff1100001db40fd0 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __mptcp_retrans+0x2cb/0xaa0 #2: ff1100001da18b60 (&msk->fallback_lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __mptcp_retrans+0x352/0xaa0 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 20858 Comm: mptcp_connect Not tainted 6.18.0-rc7-virtme #1 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x6f/0xa0 print_deadlock_bug.cold+0xc0/0xcd validate_chain+0x2ff/0x5f0 __lock_acquire+0x34c/0x740 lock_acquire.part.0+0xbc/0x260 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x38/0x50 __mptcp_try_fallback+0xd8/0x280 mptcp_sendmsg_frag+0x16c2/0x3050 __mptcp_retrans+0x421/0xaa0 mptcp_release_cb+0x5aa/0xa70 release_sock+0xab/0x1d0 mptcp_sendmsg+0xd5b/0x1bc0 sock_write_iter+0x281/0x4d0 new_sync_write+0x3c5/0x6f0 vfs_write+0x65e/0xbb0 ksys_write+0x17e/0x200 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0xfd0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7fa5627cbc5e Code: 4d 89 d8 e8 14 bd 00 00 4c 8b 5d f8 41 8b 93 08 03 00 00 59 5e 48 83 f8 fc 74 11 c9 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 8b 45 10 0f 05 <c9> c3 83 e2 39 83 fa 08 75 e7 e8 13 ff ff ff 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa RSP: 002b:00007fff1fe14700 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000005 RCX: 00007fa5627cbc5e RDX: 0000000000001f9c RSI: 00007fff1fe16984 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 00007fff1fe14710 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007fff1fe16920 R13: 0000000000002000 R14: 0000000000001f9c R15: 0000000000001f9c The packet scheduler could attempt a reinjection after receiving an MP_FAIL and before the infinite map has been transmitted, causing a deadlock since MPTCP needs to do the reinjection atomically from WRT fallback. Address the issue explicitly avoiding the reinjection in the critical scenario. Note that this is the only fallback critical section that could potentially send packets and hit the double-lock.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mptcp: avoid deadlock on fallback while reinjecting Jakub reported an MPTCP deadlock at fallback time: WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.18.0-rc7-virtme #1 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- mptcp_connect/20858 is trying to acquire lock: ff1100001da18b60 (&msk->fallback_lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __mptcp_try_fallback+0xd8/0x280 but task is already holding lock: ff1100001da18b60 (&msk->fallback_lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __mptcp_retrans+0x352/0xaa0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&msk->fallback_lock); lock(&msk->fallback_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 3 locks held by mptcp_connect/20858: #0: ff1100001da18290 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x114/0x1bc0 #1: ff1100001db40fd0 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __mptcp_retrans+0x2cb/0xaa0 #2: ff1100001da18b60 (&msk->fallback_lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __mptcp_retrans+0x352/0xaa0 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 20858 Comm: mptcp_connect Not tainted 6.18.0-rc7-virtme #1 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x6f/0xa0 print_deadlock_bug.cold+0xc0/0xcd validate_chain+0x2ff/0x5f0 __lock_acquire+0x34c/0x740 lock_acquire.part.0+0xbc/0x260 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x38/0x50 __mptcp_try_fallback+0xd8/0x280 mptcp_sendmsg_frag+0x16c2/0x3050 __mptcp_retrans+0x421/0xaa0 mptcp_release_cb+0x5aa/0xa70 release_sock+0xab/0x1d0 mptcp_sendmsg+0xd5b/0x1bc0 sock_write_iter+0x281/0x4d0 new_sync_write+0x3c5/0x6f0 vfs_write+0x65e/0xbb0 ksys_write+0x17e/0x200 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0xfd0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7fa5627cbc5e Code: 4d 89 d8 e8 14 bd 00 00 4c 8b 5d f8 41 8b 93 08 03 00 00 59 5e 48 83 f8 fc 74 11 c9 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 8b 45 10 0f 05 <c9> c3 83 e2 39 83 fa 08 75 e7 e8 13 ff ff ff 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa RSP: 002b:00007fff1fe14700 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000005 RCX: 00007fa5627cbc5e RDX: 0000000000001f9c RSI: 00007fff1fe16984 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 00007fff1fe14710 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007fff1fe16920 R13: 0000000000002000 R14: 0000000000001f9c R15: 0000000000001f9c The packet scheduler could attempt a reinjection after receiving an MP_FAIL and before the infinite map has been transmitted, causing a deadlock since MPTCP needs to do the reinjection atomically from WRT fallback. Address the issue explicitly avoiding the reinjection in the critical scenario. Note that this is the only fallback critical section that could potentially send packets and hit the double-lock.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mptcp: avoid deadlock on fallback while reinjecting Jakub reported an MPTCP deadlock at fallback time: WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.18.0-rc7-virtme #1 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- mptcp_connect/20858 is trying to acquire lock: ff1100001da18b60 (&msk->fallback_lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __mptcp_try_fallback+0xd8/0x280 but task is already holding lock: ff1100001da18b60 (&msk->fallback_lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __mptcp_retrans+0x352/0xaa0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&msk->fallback_lock); lock(&msk->fallback_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 3 locks held by mptcp_connect/20858: #0: ff1100001da18290 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x114/0x1bc0 #1: ff1100001db40fd0 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __mptcp_retrans+0x2cb/0xaa0 #2: ff1100001da18b60 (&msk->fallback_lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __mptcp_retrans+0x352/0xaa0 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 20858 Comm: mptcp_connect Not tainted 6.18.0-rc7-virtme #1 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x6f/0xa0 print_deadlock_bug.cold+0xc0/0xcd validate_chain+0x2ff/0x5f0 __lock_acquire+0x34c/0x740 lock_acquire.part.0+0xbc/0x260 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x38/0x50 __mptcp_try_fallback+0xd8/0x280 mptcp_sendmsg_frag+0x16c2/0x3050 __mptcp_retrans+0x421/0xaa0 mptcp_release_cb+0x5aa/0xa70 release_sock+0xab/0x1d0 mptcp_sendmsg+0xd5b/0x1bc0 sock_write_iter+0x281/0x4d0 new_sync_write+0x3c5/0x6f0 vfs_write+0x65e/0xbb0 ksys_write+0x17e/0x200 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0xfd0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7fa5627cbc5e Code: 4d 89 d8 e8 14 bd 00 00 4c 8b 5d f8 41 8b 93 08 03 00 00 59 5e 48 83 f8 fc 74 11 c9 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 8b 45 10 0f 05 <c9> c3 83 e2 39 83 fa 08 75 e7 e8 13 ff ff ff 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa RSP: 002b:00007fff1fe14700 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000005 RCX: 00007fa5627cbc5e RDX: 0000000000001f9c RSI: 00007fff1fe16984 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 00007fff1fe14710 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007fff1fe16920 R13: 0000000000002000 R14: 0000000000001f9c R15: 0000000000001f9c The packet scheduler could attempt a reinjection after receiving an MP_FAIL and before the infinite map has been transmitted, causing a deadlock since MPTCP needs to do the reinjection atomically from WRT fallback. Address the issue explicitly avoiding the reinjection in the critical scenario. Note that this is the only fallback critical section that could potentially send packets and hit the double-lock.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Locking → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-667 ↗

CWE-667: Improper Locking. The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-667
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0119Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260121Security Bulletin 21 Jan 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 21 Jan 2026, published on 21 January 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0787Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71130 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71130 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0545Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71130 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0522Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71130 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0495Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71130 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0453Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71124 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71130 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0369Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71130 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71137 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0329Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68374 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71071 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71182 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71184 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71184 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71185 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71188 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71189 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71190 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0247Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71130 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71137 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0167Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71130 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71137 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0166Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71122 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71123 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71123 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71127 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71129 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71130 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71130 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71131 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71131 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71132 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71132 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71134 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71134 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-008653LinuxのLinux Kernelにおけるリソースのロックに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました:mptcpに関するフォールバック時の再注入中に発生するデッドロックを回避しました。Jakubがフォールバック時にMPTCPのデッドロックを報告しました:WARNINGとして、再帰的なロック検出の可能性があります。6.18.0-rc7-virtme #1 非汚染環境にて、mptcp_connect/20858がロックを取得しようとしましたが、既にロックを保持していました。デバッグに役立つその他の情報では、安全でないロックシナリオの可能性が示されており、ロックの入れ子表記の欠如がデッドロックの原因である可能性があります。mptcp_connect/20858は3つのロックを保持しており、スタックバックトレースも示されています。パケットスケジューラがMP_FAILを受け取った場合に無限マップが送信される前に再注入を試みることがあります。このため、MPTCPはフォールバックからの再注入を原子操作で行う必要があり、その過程でデッドロックが発生します。この問題には、重要なシナリオでの再注入を回避することで明示的に対処しました。なお、これは二重ロックが発生する可能性がある唯一のフォールバックのクリティカルセクションです。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 5586518bec27666c747cd52aabb62d485686d0bf < 0107442e82c0f8d6010e07e6030741c59c520d6e, 75a4c9ab8a7af0d76b31ccd1188ed178c38b35d2 < 252892d5a6a2f163ce18f32716e46fa4da7d4e79, 54999dea879fecb761225e28f274b40662918c30 < 0ca9fb4335e726dab4f23b3bfe87271d8f005f41, f8a1d9b18c5efc76784f5a326e905f641f839894 < 50f47c02be419bf0a3ae94c118addf67beef359f, f8a1d9b18c5efc76784f5a326e905f641f839894 < ffb8c27b0539dd90262d1021488e7817fae57c42, 1d82a8fe6ee4afdc92f4e8808c9dad2a6095bbc5, 6.1.149 < 6.1.160, 6.6.101 < 6.6.120, 6.12.40 < 6.12.64, 6.15.8 < 6.16, 6.16
Fixed
Linux: < 6.16, 6.1.160 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.120 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.64 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.3 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 14 Jan 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC · CWE-667 · Improper Locking

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-2478
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-71126 · cve.blacktree.nl