BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2025-71109High confidence

MIPS: ftrace: Fix memory corruption when kernel is located beyond 32 bits

Linux · Linux

7.1HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.21% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.69-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-71109 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: Linux kernel: Memory corruption in ftrace due to buffer overflow
274 known not affected

The vendor explicitly states that these products are not affected by this CVE.

  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-extra as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
Summary
A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's ftrace component. This vulnerability occurs because the `UASM_i_LA_mostly` macro can generate more than two instructions, while the ftrace code expects a maximum of two. This mismatch leads to a buffer overflow, corrupting critical system variables and potentially causing the kernel to hang during boot.
Remediation
No remediation text is recorded.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-2504

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: MIPS: ftrace: Fix memory corruption when kernel is located beyond 32 bits Since commit e424054000878 ("MIPS: Tracing: Reduce the overhead of dynamic Function Tracer"), the macro UASM_i_LA_mostly has been used, and this macro can generate more than 2 instructions. At the same time, the code in ftrace assumes that no more than 2 instructions can be generated, which is why it stores them in an int[2] array. However, as previously noted, the macro UASM_i_LA_mostly (and now UASM_i_LA) causes a buffer overflow when _mcount is beyond 32 bits. This leads to corruption of the variables located in the __read_mostly section. This corruption was observed because the variable __cpu_primary_thread_mask was corrupted, causing a hang very early during boot. This fix prevents the corruption by avoiding the generation of instructions if they could exceed 2 instructions in length. Fortunately, insn_la_mcount is only used if the instrumented code is located outside the kernel code section, so dynamic ftrace can still be used, albeit in a more limited scope. This is still preferable to corrupting memory and/or crashing the kernel.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: MIPS: ftrace: Fix memory corruption when kernel is located beyond 32 bits Since commit e424054000878 ("MIPS: Tracing: Reduce the overhead of dynamic Function Tracer"), the macro UASM_i_LA_mostly has been used, and this macro can generate more than 2 instructions. At the same time, the code in ftrace assumes that no more than 2 instructions can be generated, which is why it stores them in an int[2] array. However, as previously noted, the macro UASM_i_LA_mostly (and now UASM_i_LA) causes a buffer overflow when _mcount is beyond 32 bits. This leads to corruption of the variables located in the __read_mostly section. This corruption was observed because the variable __cpu_primary_thread_mask was corrupted, causing a hang very early during boot. This fix prevents the corruption by avoiding the generation of instructions if they could exceed 2 instructions in length. Fortunately, insn_la_mcount is only used if the instrumented code is located outside the kernel code section, so dynamic ftrace can still be used, albeit in a more limited scope. This is still preferable to corrupting memory and/or crashing the kernel.

Why

A bounds error lets data be written beyond the intended memory region, potentially corrupting control data.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: MIPS: ftrace: Fix memory corruption when kernel is located beyond 32 bits Since commit e424054000878 ("MIPS: Tracing: Reduce the overhead of dynamic Function Tracer"), the macro UASM_i_LA_mostly has been used, and this macro can generate more than 2 instructions. At the same time, the code in ftrace assumes that no more than 2 instructions can be generated, which is why it stores them in an int[2] array. However, as previously noted, the macro UASM_i_LA_mostly (and now UASM_i_LA) causes a buffer overflow when _mcount is beyond 32 bits. This leads to corruption of the variables located in the __read_mostly section. This corruption was observed because the variable __cpu_primary_thread_mask was corrupted, causing a hang very early during boot. This fix prevents the corruption by avoiding the generation of instructions if they could exceed 2 instructions in length. Fortunately, insn_la_mcount is only used if the instrumented code is located outside the kernel code section, so dynamic ftrace can still be used, albeit in a more limited scope. This is still preferable to corrupting memory and/or crashing the kernel.

Why

A bounds error lets data be written beyond the intended memory region, potentially corrupting control data.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Out-of-bounds Write → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-787 ↗

CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write. The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Denial of serviceCWE-787
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0119Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260121Security Bulletin 21 Jan 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 21 Jan 2026, published on 21 January 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0787Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0545Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0522Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0495Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0453Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71117 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71117 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-71095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-71095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71115 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0166Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71119 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-008670LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。MIPSのftraceにおいて、カーネルが32ビットを超える位置にある場合に発生するメモリ破損を修正しました。コミットe424054000878("MIPS: Tracing: 動的Function Tracerのオーバーヘッドを削減")以降、マクロUASM_i_LA_mostlyが使用されていますが、このマクロは2命令以上を生成することがあります。同時に、ftrace内のコードは最大2命令しか生成されないことを前提としてint[2]配列に格納していました。しかしながら、前述のようにマクロUASM_i_LA_mostly(および現在のUASM_i_LA)は、_mcountが32ビットを超える場合にバッファオーバーフローを引き起こします。これにより、__read_mostlyセクションにある変数が破損します。この破損は、__cpu_primary_thread_mask変数の破損として現れ、非常に初期のブート時にハングが発生することが観測されました。この修正では、生成される命令が2命令を超える場合には生成を回避することで破損を防止しています。幸いなことに、insn_la_mcountは計測コードがカーネルコードセクション外にある場合にのみ使用されるため、動的ftraceは使用可能ですが、その範囲は限定されます。これはメモリ破損やカーネルクラッシュが起きるよりも望ましい対応です。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: e424054000878d7eb11e44289242886d6e219d22 < e3e33ac2eb69d595079a1a1e444c2fb98efdd42d, e424054000878d7eb11e44289242886d6e219d22 < 7f39b9d0e86ed6236b9a5fb67616ab1f76c4f150, e424054000878d7eb11e44289242886d6e219d22 < 36dac9a3dda1f2bae343191bc16b910c603cac25, 2.6.35
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.35, 6.12.64 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.3 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 14 Jan 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC · CWE-787 · Out-of-bounds Write

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-2504
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-71109 · cve.blacktree.nl