BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2025-71105High confidence

f2fs: use global inline_xattr_slab instead of per-sb slab cache

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.14% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.69-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.162-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-2505

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: use global inline_xattr_slab instead of per-sb slab cache As Hong Yun reported in mailing list: loop7: detected capacity change from 0 to 131072 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kmem_cache of name 'f2fs_xattr_entry-7:7' already exists WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 24426 at mm/slab_common.c:110 kmem_cache_sanity_check mm/slab_common.c:109 [inline] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 24426 at mm/slab_common.c:110 __kmem_cache_create_args+0xa6/0x320 mm/slab_common.c:307 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 24426 Comm: syz.7.1370 Not tainted 6.17.0-rc4 #1 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:kmem_cache_sanity_check mm/slab_common.c:109 [inline] RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_create_args+0xa6/0x320 mm/slab_common.c:307 Call Trace:  __kmem_cache_create include/linux/slab.h:353 [inline]  f2fs_kmem_cache_create fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2943 [inline]  f2fs_init_xattr_caches+0xa5/0xe0 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:843  f2fs_fill_super+0x1645/0x2620 fs/f2fs/super.c:4918  get_tree_bdev_flags+0x1fb/0x260 fs/super.c:1692  vfs_get_tree+0x43/0x140 fs/super.c:1815  do_new_mount+0x201/0x550 fs/namespace.c:3808  do_mount fs/namespace.c:4136 [inline]  __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:4347 [inline]  __se_sys_mount+0x298/0x2f0 fs/namespace.c:4324  do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]  do_syscall_64+0x8e/0x3a0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e The bug can be reproduced w/ below scripts: - mount /dev/vdb /mnt1 - mount /dev/vdc /mnt2 - umount /mnt1 - mounnt /dev/vdb /mnt1 The reason is if we created two slab caches, named f2fs_xattr_entry-7:3 and f2fs_xattr_entry-7:7, and they have the same slab size. Actually, slab system will only create one slab cache core structure which has slab name of "f2fs_xattr_entry-7:3", and two slab caches share the same structure and cache address. So, if we destroy f2fs_xattr_entry-7:3 cache w/ cache address, it will decrease reference count of slab cache, rather than release slab cache entirely, since there is one more user has referenced the cache. Then, if we try to create slab cache w/ name "f2fs_xattr_entry-7:3" again, slab system will find that there is existed cache which has the same name and trigger the warning. Let's changes to use global inline_xattr_slab instead of per-sb slab cache for fixing.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: use global inline_xattr_slab instead of per-sb slab cache As Hong Yun reported in mailing list: loop7: detected capacity change from 0 to 131072 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kmem_cache of name 'f2fs_xattr_entry-7:7' already exists WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 24426 at mm/slab_common.c:110 kmem_cache_sanity_check mm/slab_common.c:109 [inline] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 24426 at mm/slab_common.c:110 __kmem_cache_create_args+0xa6/0x320 mm/slab_common.c:307 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 24426 Comm: syz.7.1370 Not tainted 6.17.0-rc4 #1 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:kmem_cache_sanity_check mm/slab_common.c:109 [inline] RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_create_args+0xa6/0x320 mm/slab_common.c:307 Call Trace:  __kmem_cache_create include/linux/slab.h:353 [inline]  f2fs_kmem_cache_create fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2943 [inline]  f2fs_init_xattr_caches+0xa5/0xe0 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:843  f2fs_fill_super+0x1645/0x2620 fs/f2fs/super.c:4918  get_tree_bdev_flags+0x1fb/0x260 fs/super.c:1692  vfs_get_tree+0x43/0x140 fs/super.c:1815  do_new_mount+0x201/0x550 fs/namespace.c:3808  do_mount fs/namespace.c:4136 [inline]  __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:4347 [inline]  __se_sys_mount+0x298/0x2f0 fs/namespace.c:4324  do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]  do_syscall_64+0x8e/0x3a0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e The bug can be reproduced w/ below scripts: - mount /dev/vdb /mnt1 - mount /dev/vdc /mnt2 - umount /mnt1 - mounnt /dev/vdb /mnt1 The reason is if we created two slab caches, named f2fs_xattr_entry-7:3 and f2fs_xattr_entry-7:7, and they have the same slab size. Actually, slab system will only create one slab cache core structure which has slab name of "f2fs_xattr_entry-7:3", and two slab caches share the same structure and cache address. So, if we destroy f2fs_xattr_entry-7:3 cache w/ cache address, it will decrease reference count of slab cache, rather than release slab cache entirely, since there is one more user has referenced the cache. Then, if we try to create slab cache w/ name "f2fs_xattr_entry-7:3" again, slab system will find that there is existed cache which has the same name and trigger the warning. Let's changes to use global inline_xattr_slab instead of per-sb slab cache for fixing.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: use global inline_xattr_slab instead of per-sb slab cache As Hong Yun reported in mailing list: loop7: detected capacity change from 0 to 131072 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kmem_cache of name 'f2fs_xattr_entry-7:7' already exists WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 24426 at mm/slab_common.c:110 kmem_cache_sanity_check mm/slab_common.c:109 [inline] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 24426 at mm/slab_common.c:110 __kmem_cache_create_args+0xa6/0x320 mm/slab_common.c:307 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 24426 Comm: syz.7.1370 Not tainted 6.17.0-rc4 #1 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:kmem_cache_sanity_check mm/slab_common.c:109 [inline] RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_create_args+0xa6/0x320 mm/slab_common.c:307 Call Trace:  __kmem_cache_create include/linux/slab.h:353 [inline]  f2fs_kmem_cache_create fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2943 [inline]  f2fs_init_xattr_caches+0xa5/0xe0 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:843  f2fs_fill_super+0x1645/0x2620 fs/f2fs/super.c:4918  get_tree_bdev_flags+0x1fb/0x260 fs/super.c:1692  vfs_get_tree+0x43/0x140 fs/super.c:1815  do_new_mount+0x201/0x550 fs/namespace.c:3808  do_mount fs/namespace.c:4136 [inline]  __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:4347 [inline]  __se_sys_mount+0x298/0x2f0 fs/namespace.c:4324  do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]  do_syscall_64+0x8e/0x3a0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e The bug can be reproduced w/ below scripts: - mount /dev/vdb /mnt1 - mount /dev/vdc /mnt2 - umount /mnt1 - mounnt /dev/vdb /mnt1 The reason is if we created two slab caches, named f2fs_xattr_entry-7:3 and f2fs_xattr_entry-7:7, and they have the same slab size. Actually, slab system will only create one slab cache core structure which has slab name of "f2fs_xattr_entry-7:3", and two slab caches share the same structure and cache address. So, if we destroy f2fs_xattr_entry-7:3 cache w/ cache address, it will decrease reference count of slab cache, rather than release slab cache entirely, since there is one more user has referenced the cache. Then, if we try to create slab cache w/ name "f2fs_xattr_entry-7:3" again, slab system will find that there is existed cache which has the same name and trigger the warning. Let's changes to use global inline_xattr_slab instead of per-sb slab cache for fixing.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0119Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260121Security Bulletin 21 Jan 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 21 Jan 2026, published on 21 January 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0787Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0545Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0522Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0495Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0453Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0421Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0397Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0371Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0331Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-71091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-71091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71115 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0167Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-71091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71119 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0166Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-71095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-008674LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。f2fsではper-sbスラブキャッシュの代わりにグローバルなinline_xattr_slabを使用しています。Hong Yun氏がメーリングリストで報告した内容によると、loop7で容量が0から131072に変化したことが検出され、『f2fs_xattr_entry-7:7』という名前のkmem_cacheが既に存在するという警告が発生しました。問題の原因は、同じスラブサイズを持つ二つのスラブキャッシュ(f2fs_xattr_entry-7:3とf2fs_xattr_entry-7:7)を作成すると、スラブシステムが一つのスラブキャッシュコア構造(f2fs_xattr_entry-7:3)だけを生成し、両方のキャッシュが同じ構造体とキャッシュアドレスを共有してしまうことにあります。そのため、f2fs_xattr_entry-7:3キャッシュを破棄すると参照カウントは減少するものの完全には解放されず、再度同名のキャッシュを作成しようとすると既存のキャッシュが見つかり警告が発生します。この問題は、per-sbスラブキャッシュの代わりにグローバルなinline_xattr_slabを使用することで修正されました。脆弱性の再現方法は以下の通りです。/dev/vdbを/mnt1にマウントし、/dev/vdcを/mnt2にマウントします。次に/mnt1をアンマウントし、再度/dev/vdbを/mnt1にマウントしてください。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: a999150f4fe3abbb7efd05411fd5b460be699943 < 93d30fe19660dec6bf1bd3d5c186c1c737b21aa5, a999150f4fe3abbb7efd05411fd5b460be699943 < 474cc3ed37436ddfd63cac8dbffe3b1e219e9100, a999150f4fe3abbb7efd05411fd5b460be699943 < 72ce19dfed162da6e430467333b2da70471d08a4, a999150f4fe3abbb7efd05411fd5b460be699943 < be4c3a3c6c2304a8fcd14095d18d26f0cc4e222a, a999150f4fe3abbb7efd05411fd5b460be699943 < 1eb0b130196bcbc56c5c80c83139fa70c0aa82c5, a999150f4fe3abbb7efd05411fd5b460be699943 < e6d828eae00ec192e18c2ddaa2fd32050a96048a, a999150f4fe3abbb7efd05411fd5b460be699943 < 1f27ef42bb0b7c0740c5616ec577ec188b8a1d05, 5.7
Fixed
Linux: < 5.7, 5.10.248 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.198 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.160 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.120 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.64 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.3 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 14 Jan 2026 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 21:54 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-2505
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-71105 · cve.blacktree.nl