BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2025-71102High confidence

scs: fix a wrong parameter in __scs_magic

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.14% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.69-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.162-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-2513

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scs: fix a wrong parameter in __scs_magic __scs_magic() needs a 'void *' variable, but a 'struct task_struct *' is given. 'task_scs(tsk)' is the starting address of the task's shadow call stack, and '__scs_magic(task_scs(tsk))' is the end address of the task's shadow call stack. Here should be '__scs_magic(task_scs(tsk))'. The user-visible effect of this bug is that when CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE is enabled, the shadow call stack usage checking function (scs_check_usage) would scan an incorrect memory range. This could lead 1. **Inaccurate stack usage reporting**: The function would calculate wrong usage statistics for the shadow call stack, potentially showing incorrect value in kmsg. 2. **Potential kernel crash**: If the value of __scs_magic(tsk)is greater than that of __scs_magic(task_scs(tsk)), the for loop may access unmapped memory, potentially causing a kernel panic. However, this scenario is unlikely because task_struct is allocated via the slab allocator (which typically returns lower addresses), while the shadow call stack returned by task_scs(tsk) is allocated via vmalloc(which typically returns higher addresses). However, since this is purely a debugging feature (CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE), normal production systems should be not unaffected. The bug only impacts developers and testers who are actively debugging stack usage with this configuration enabled.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scs: fix a wrong parameter in __scs_magic __scs_magic() needs a 'void *' variable, but a 'struct task_struct *' is given. 'task_scs(tsk)' is the starting address of the task's shadow call stack, and '__scs_magic(task_scs(tsk))' is the end address of the task's shadow call stack. Here should be '__scs_magic(task_scs(tsk))'. The user-visible effect of this bug is that when CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE is enabled, the shadow call stack usage checking function (scs_check_usage) would scan an incorrect memory range. This could lead 1. **Inaccurate stack usage reporting**: The function would calculate wrong usage statistics for the shadow call stack, potentially showing incorrect value in kmsg. 2. **Potential kernel crash**: If the value of __scs_magic(tsk)is greater than that of __scs_magic(task_scs(tsk)), the for loop may access unmapped memory, potentially causing a kernel panic. However, this scenario is unlikely because task_struct is allocated via the slab allocator (which typically returns lower addresses), while the shadow call stack returned by task_scs(tsk) is allocated via vmalloc(which typically returns higher addresses). However, since this is purely a debugging feature (CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE), normal production systems should be not unaffected. The bug only impacts developers and testers who are actively debugging stack usage with this configuration enabled.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scs: fix a wrong parameter in __scs_magic __scs_magic() needs a 'void *' variable, but a 'struct task_struct *' is given. 'task_scs(tsk)' is the starting address of the task's shadow call stack, and '__scs_magic(task_scs(tsk))' is the end address of the task's shadow call stack. Here should be '__scs_magic(task_scs(tsk))'. The user-visible effect of this bug is that when CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE is enabled, the shadow call stack usage checking function (scs_check_usage) would scan an incorrect memory range. This could lead 1. **Inaccurate stack usage reporting**: The function would calculate wrong usage statistics for the shadow call stack, potentially showing incorrect value in kmsg. 2. **Potential kernel crash**: If the value of __scs_magic(tsk)is greater than that of __scs_magic(task_scs(tsk)), the for loop may access unmapped memory, potentially causing a kernel panic. However, this scenario is unlikely because task_struct is allocated via the slab allocator (which typically returns lower addresses), while the shadow call stack returned by task_scs(tsk) is allocated via vmalloc(which typically returns higher addresses). However, since this is purely a debugging feature (CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE), normal production systems should be not unaffected. The bug only impacts developers and testers who are actively debugging stack usage with this configuration enabled.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Denial of service
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0119Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260121Security Bulletin 21 Jan 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 21 Jan 2026, published on 21 January 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0787Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0545Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0522Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0495Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0453Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0421Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0397Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0371Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0331Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-71087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-71087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0167Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-71087 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71088 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71088 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71091 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0166Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-71093 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71095 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71100 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71107 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-008677LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。__scs_magic()はvoid *型の変数を必要としますが、誤ってstruct task_struct *型が渡されていました。task_scs(tsk)はタスクのシャドウコールスタックの開始アドレスであり、__scs_magic(task_scs(tsk))はタスクのシャドウコールスタックの終了アドレスを示します。ここでは正しく__scs_magic(task_scs(tsk))とすべきです。このバグのユーザーが確認できる影響は、CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGEが有効な場合にシャドウコールスタック使用量チェック関数(scs_check_usage)が誤ったメモリ範囲をスキャンすることです。これにより以下の問題が発生します。1. 不正確なスタック使用量報告:関数がシャドウコールスタックの使用統計を誤って計算し、kmsgに誤った値を表示する可能性があります。2. カーネルクラッシュの可能性:__scs_magic(tsk)の値が__scs_magic(task_scs(tsk))より大きい場合、forループがマッピングされていないメモリにアクセスしてカーネルパニックを引き起こす可能性があります。しかし、task_structはslabアロケータを介して割り当てられ(通常は低位アドレスを返します)、task_scs(tsk)が返すシャドウコールスタックはvmallocで割り当てられ(通常は高位アドレスを返します)ため、このシナリオは起こりにくいです。なお、これは純粋にデバッグ用の機能(CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE)の問題であり、通常の本番システムには影響しません。このバグは、この設定を有効にして積極的にスタック使用量をデバッグしている開発者やテスターにのみ影響します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 5bbaf9d1fcb9be696ee9a61636ab6803556c70f2 < 1727e8bd69103a68963a5613a0ddb6d8d37df5d3, 5bbaf9d1fcb9be696ee9a61636ab6803556c70f2 < cfdf6250b63b953b1d8e60814c8ca96c6f9d1c8c, 5bbaf9d1fcb9be696ee9a61636ab6803556c70f2 < 57ba40b001be27786d0570dd292289df748b306b, 5bbaf9d1fcb9be696ee9a61636ab6803556c70f2 < 062774439d442882b44f5eab8c256ad3423ef284, 5bbaf9d1fcb9be696ee9a61636ab6803556c70f2 < 9ef28943471a16e4f9646bc3e8e2de148e7d8d7b, 5bbaf9d1fcb9be696ee9a61636ab6803556c70f2 < a19fb3611e4c06624fc0f83ef19f4fb8d57d4751, 5bbaf9d1fcb9be696ee9a61636ab6803556c70f2 < 08bd4c46d5e63b78e77f2605283874bbe868ab19, 5.8
Fixed
Linux: < 5.8, 5.10.248 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.198 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.160 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.120 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.64 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.3 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 14 Jan 2026 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 21:54 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-2513
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-71102 · cve.blacktree.nl