BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2025-71078High confidence

powerpc/64s/slb: Fix SLB multihit issue during SLB preload

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

20 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-71078 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: powerpc/64s/slb: Fix SLB multihit issue during SLB preload
198 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-extra as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
Summary
A Segment Lookaside Buffer (SLB) multi-hit error vulnerability was found in the Linux kernel's PowerPC 64-bit hash MMU implementation. When a process migrates between CPUs without triggering switch_mmu_context() (because prev and next mm_struct are the same), the hardware SLB and software preload cache can become desynchronized. This leads to duplicate SLB entries when the evicted entry is later reloaded, triggering a fatal SLB multi-hit machine check exception.
Remediation
Fix deferred
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-2265

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: powerpc/64s/slb: Fix SLB multihit issue during SLB preload On systems using the hash MMU, there is a software SLB preload cache that mirrors the entries loaded into the hardware SLB buffer. This preload cache is subject to periodic eviction — typically after every 256 context switches — to remove old entry. To optimize performance, the kernel skips switch_mmu_context() in switch_mm_irqs_off() when the prev and next mm_struct are the same. However, on hash MMU systems, this can lead to inconsistencies between the hardware SLB and the software preload cache. If an SLB entry for a process is evicted from the software cache on one CPU, and the same process later runs on another CPU without executing switch_mmu_context(), the hardware SLB may retain stale entries. If the kernel then attempts to reload that entry, it can trigger an SLB multi-hit error. The following timeline shows how stale SLB entries are created and can cause a multi-hit error when a process moves between CPUs without a MMU context switch. CPU 0 CPU 1 ----- ----- Process P exec swapper/1 load_elf_binary begin_new_exc activate_mm switch_mm_irqs_off switch_mmu_context switch_slb /* * This invalidates all * the entries in the HW * and setup the new HW * SLB entries as per the * preload cache. */ context_switch sched_migrate_task migrates process P to cpu-1 Process swapper/0 context switch (to process P) (uses mm_struct of Process P) switch_mm_irqs_off() switch_slb load_slb++ /* * load_slb becomes 0 here * and we evict an entry from * the preload cache with * preload_age(). We still * keep HW SLB and preload * cache in sync, that is * because all HW SLB entries * anyways gets evicted in * switch_slb during SLBIA. * We then only add those * entries back in HW SLB, * which are currently * present in preload_cache * (after eviction). */ load_elf_binary continues... setup_new_exec() slb_setup_new_exec() sched_switch event sched_migrate_task migrates process P to cpu-0 context_switch from swapper/0 to Process P switch_mm_irqs_off() /* * Since both prev and next mm struct are same we don't call * switch_mmu_context(). This will cause the HW SLB and SW preload * cache to go out of sync in preload_new_slb_context. Because there * was an SLB entry which was evicted from both HW and preload cache * on cpu-1. Now later in preload_new_slb_context(), when we will try * to add the same preload entry again, we will add this to the SW * preload cache and then will add it to the HW SLB. Since on cpu-0 * this entry was never invalidated, hence adding this entry to the HW * SLB will cause a SLB multi-hit error. */ load_elf_binary cont ---truncated---

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: powerpc/64s/slb: Fix SLB multihit issue during SLB preload On systems using the hash MMU, there is a software SLB preload cache that mirrors the entries loaded into the hardware SLB buffer. This preload cache is subject to periodic eviction — typically after every 256 context switches — to remove old entry. To optimize performance, the kernel skips switch_mmu_context() in switch_mm_irqs_off() when the prev and next mm_struct are the same. However, on hash MMU systems, this can lead to inconsistencies between the hardware SLB and the software preload cache. If an SLB entry for a process is evicted from the software cache on one CPU, and the same process later runs on another CPU without executing switch_mmu_context(), the hardware SLB may retain stale entries. If the kernel then attempts to reload that entry, it can trigger an SLB multi-hit error. The following timeline shows how stale SLB entries are created and can cause a multi-hit error when a process moves between CPUs without a MMU context switch. CPU 0 CPU 1 ----- ----- Process P exec swapper/1 load_elf_binary begin_new_exc activate_mm switch_mm_irqs_off switch_mmu_context switch_slb /* * This invalidates all * the entries in the HW * and setup the new HW * SLB entries as per the * preload cache. */ context_switch sched_migrate_task migrates process P to cpu-1 Process swapper/0 context switch (to process P) (uses mm_struct of Process P) switch_mm_irqs_off() switch_slb load_slb++ /* * load_slb becomes 0 here * and we evict an entry from * the preload cache with * preload_age(). We still * keep HW SLB and preload * cache in sync, that is * because all HW SLB entries * anyways gets evicted in * switch_slb during SLBIA. * We then only add those * entries back in HW SLB, * which are currently * present in preload_cache * (after eviction). */ load_elf_binary continues... setup_new_exec() slb_setup_new_exec() sched_switch event sched_migrate_task migrates process P to cpu-0 context_switch from swapper/0 to Process P switch_mm_irqs_off() /* * Since both prev and next mm struct are same we don't call * switch_mmu_context(). This will cause the HW SLB and SW preload * cache to go out of sync in preload_new_slb_context. Because there * was an SLB entry which was evicted from both HW and preload cache * on cpu-1. Now later in preload_new_slb_context(), when we will try * to add the same preload entry again, we will add this to the SW * preload cache and then will add it to the HW SLB. Since on cpu-0 * this entry was never invalidated, hence adding this entry to the HW * SLB will cause a SLB multi-hit error. */ load_elf_binary cont ---truncated---

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: powerpc/64s/slb: Fix SLB multihit issue during SLB preload On systems using the hash MMU, there is a software SLB preload cache that mirrors the entries loaded into the hardware SLB buffer. This preload cache is subject to periodic eviction — typically after every 256 context switches — to remove old entry. To optimize performance, the kernel skips switch_mmu_context() in switch_mm_irqs_off() when the prev and next mm_struct are the same. However, on hash MMU systems, this can lead to inconsistencies between the hardware SLB and the software preload cache. If an SLB entry for a process is evicted from the software cache on one CPU, and the same process later runs on another CPU without executing switch_mmu_context(), the hardware SLB may retain stale entries. If the kernel then attempts to reload that entry, it can trigger an SLB multi-hit error. The following timeline shows how stale SLB entries are created and can cause a multi-hit error when a process moves between CPUs without a MMU context switch. CPU 0 CPU 1 ----- ----- Process P exec swapper/1 load_elf_binary begin_new_exc activate_mm switch_mm_irqs_off switch_mmu_context switch_slb /* * This invalidates all * the entries in the HW * and setup the new HW * SLB entries as per the * preload cache. */ context_switch sched_migrate_task migrates process P to cpu-1 Process swapper/0 context switch (to process P) (uses mm_struct of Process P) switch_mm_irqs_off() switch_slb load_slb++ /* * load_slb becomes 0 here * and we evict an entry from * the preload cache with * preload_age(). We still * keep HW SLB and preload * cache in sync, that is * because all HW SLB entries * anyways gets evicted in * switch_slb during SLBIA. * We then only add those * entries back in HW SLB, * which are currently * present in preload_cache * (after eviction). */ load_elf_binary continues... setup_new_exec() slb_setup_new_exec() sched_switch event sched_migrate_task migrates process P to cpu-0 context_switch from swapper/0 to Process P switch_mm_irqs_off() /* * Since both prev and next mm struct are same we don't call * switch_mmu_context(). This will cause the HW SLB and SW preload * cache to go out of sync in preload_new_slb_context. Because there * was an SLB entry which was evicted from both HW and preload cache * on cpu-1. Now later in preload_new_slb_context(), when we will try * to add the same preload entry again, we will add this to the SW * preload cache and then will add it to the HW SLB. Since on cpu-0 * this entry was never invalidated, hence adding this entry to the HW * SLB will cause a SLB multi-hit error. */ load_elf_binary cont ---truncated---

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0086Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260114Security Bulletin 14 Jan 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 14 Jan 2026, published on 14 January 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0787Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71065 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71067 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71068 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71071 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71072 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71065 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71067 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71068 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71071 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71072 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0545Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71065 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71067 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71068 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71071 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71072 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0522Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71065 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71067 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71068 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71071 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71072 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0495Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71068 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71070 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71071 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71072 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71073 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71076 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0453Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-71068 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71070 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71071 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71072 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71073 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71076 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0421Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71068 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0397Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71068 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0371Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71068 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0369Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-70873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-70873 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71071 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0331Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71068 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-71064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71067 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71068 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71073 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71074 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-71064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71067 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71068 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71073 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71074 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0247Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68822 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71073 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71076 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0225Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71076 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0170Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71076 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0167Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-68819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71071 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71086 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0166Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-71067 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71068 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71071 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71072 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71073 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71076 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71080 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71083 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71085 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-008700LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。powerpc/64s/slbにおけるSLBプリロード中のSLBマルチヒット問題です。ハッシュMMUを使用するシステムでは、ハードウェアSLBバッファにロードされたエントリをミラーリングするソフトウェアSLBプリロードキャッシュがあります。このプリロードキャッシュは、古いエントリを削除するために定期的に（通常は256回のコンテキストスイッチごとに）更新されます。パフォーマンス最適化のため、カーネルはprevとnextのmm_structが同じ場合、switch_mm_irqs_off()でswitch_mmu_context()をスキップします。しかし、ハッシュMMUシステム上では、これによりハードウェアSLBとソフトウェアプリロードキャッシュ間で不整合が発生する可能性があります。もしあるCPUでプロセスのSLBエントリがソフトウェアキャッシュからエビクトされ、その後同じプロセスが別のCPUでswitch_mmu_context()を実行せずに動作すると、ハードウェアSLBには古いエントリが残存してしまいます。カーネルがそのエントリを再ロードしようとすると、SLBマルチヒットエラーが発生します。以下のタイムラインは、プロセスがCPU間を移動しMMUコンテキストスイッチなしで動作した場合に、どのように古いSLBエントリが生成されマルチヒットエラーを引き起こすかを示しています。CPU 0ではプロセスPがexecを実行し、新しいMMをアクティベートしてswitch_mmu_context()が呼ばれSLBが切り替えられます。プロセスPはCPU 1に移動され、swapper/0はmm_structを使ってコンテキストスイッチを実施します。load_slb操作によりプリロードキャッシュのエントリがエビクトされても、HW SLBとプリロードキャッシュは同期を保ちます。プロセスPは再びCPU 0に戻されますが、prevとnextのmm_structが同一であるためswitch_mmu_context()は呼ばれません。このためHW SLBとソフトウェアプリロードキャッシュの同期が取れなくなり、CPU 1でエビクトされたSLBエントリがCPU 0では無効化されないまま再びHW SLBに追加されて、SLBマルチヒットエラーを誘発します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 4.20, 5.10.248 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.198 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.160 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.120 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.64 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.4 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 13 Jan 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-2265
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-2265↗Vendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-71078 · cve.blacktree.nl