BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2025-69245High confidence

Reflected XSS in Raytha CMS

Raytha · Raytha

5.1MediumCVSS 4.0
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Fix not verified
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-208715

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Fix not verified
01

What, why and how

Raytha CMS is vulnerable to Reflected XSS via returnUrl parameter in logon functionality. An attacker can craft a malicious URL which, when opened by the authenticated victim, results in arbitrary JavaScript execution in the victim’s browser. This issue was fixed in 1.4.6.

What

Raytha CMS is vulnerable to Reflected XSS via returnUrl parameter in logon functionality. An attacker can craft a malicious URL which, when opened by the authenticated victim, results in arbitrary JavaScript execution in the victim’s browser. This issue was fixed in 1.4.6.

Why

Attacker-controlled content can reach a browser as executable script without sufficient output encoding or sanitisation.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

Raytha CMS is vulnerable to Reflected XSS via returnUrl parameter in logon functionality. An attacker can craft a malicious URL which, when opened by the authenticated victim, results in arbitrary JavaScript execution in the victim’s browser. This issue was fixed in 1.4.6.

Why

Attacker-controlled content can reach a browser as executable script without sufficient output encoding or sanitisation.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Active interaction required
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Not a CVSS 4.0 base metric
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-79

CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting'). The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 4.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.ATNoneAttack requirements: No additional deployment or execution condition is required.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIActiveUser interaction: A user must take a deliberate action for exploitation to succeed.VCNoneVulnerable-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.VINoneVulnerable-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.VANoneVulnerable-system availability: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SCLowSubsequent-system confidentiality: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.SILowSubsequent-system integrity: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.SANoneSubsequent-system availability: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-79
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

CERT Polska · Polish · CVE-2025-69236CERT Polska w social mediach

CERT Polska otrzymał zgłoszenie o podatnościach w oprogramowaniu Raytha i koordynował proces ujawniania informacji. Podatność CVE-2025-15540 : Moduł "Functions" w Raytha CMS umożliwia uprzywilejowanym użytkownikom pisanie niestandardowego kodu w celu dodania funkcjonalności do aplikacji. Ze względu na brak izolacji lub ograniczeń dostępu, kod JavaScript wykonywany za pomocą funkcjonalności "functions" może tworzyć elementy środowiska .NET i wykonywać dowolne operacje w środowisku hostującym aplikację. Podatność CVE-2025-69236 : Oprogramowanie Raytha CMS jest podatne na atak typu Stored XSS w parametrze FieldValues[1].Value w funkcjonalności edycji postów. Umożliwia to uwierzytelnionemu atakującemu z uprawnieniami do edycji postów umieszczenie dowolnego kodu HTML i JS na stronę, który będzie wykonany podczas odwiedzania zedytowanej strony. Podatność CVE-2025-69237 : Oprogramowanie Raytha CMS jest podatne na atak typu Stored XSS w parametrze FieldValues[0].Value w funkcjonalności tworzenia stron. Uwierzytelniony atakujący z uprawnieniami do tworzenia treści może umieścić dowolny kod HTML i JS na stronie, który będzie wykonany podczas odwiedzania zedytowanej strony. Podatność CVE-2025-69238 : Oprogramowanie Raytha CMS jest podatne na atak typu Cross-Site Request Forgery w wielu miejscach w produkcie. Atakujący może stworzyć specjalną stronę, która, po odwiedzeniu przez uwierzytelnioną ofiarę, automatycznie wyśle żądanie POST do endpointu (np. usunięcie danych) bez wymuszania weryfikacji tokenu. Podatność CVE-2025-69239 : Oprogramowanie Raytha CMS jest podatne na atak typu Server-Side Request Forgery w funkcji „Themes - Import from URL”. Umożliwia to atakującemu z wysokimi uprawnieniami podanie adresu URL, na który zostanie przekierowane serwerowe żądanie HTTP. Podatność CVE-2025-69240 : W Raytha CMS istnieje możliwość podszycia się pod nagłówki X-Forwarded-Host lub Host wskazując na domenę kontrolowaną przez atakującego. Atakujący (który zna adres e-mail ofiary) może zmusić serwer do wysłania wiadomości e-mail z linkiem do resetowania hasła wskazującym na domenę ze zmienionego nagłówka. Gdy ofiara kliknie link, przeglądarka wyśle żądanie do domeny atakującego z tokenem w ścieżce, co umożliwia atakującemu przechwycenie tokenu. To pozwala atakującemu zresetować hasło ofiary i przejąć kontrolę nad jej kontem. Podatność CVE-2025-69241 : Oprogramowanie Raytha CMS jest podatne na atak typu Stored XSS w parametrach FirstName i LastName w funkcjonalności edycji profilu. Uwierzytelniony atakujący może umieścić dowolny kod HTML i JS na stronie, który zostanie wykonany podczas odwiedzania zedytowanej strony. Podatność CVE-2025-69242 : Oprogramowanie Raytha CMS jest podatne na atak typu Reflected XSS w parametrze backToListUrl. Atakujący może przygotować złośliwy URL, którego otwarcie przez uwierzytelnioną ofiarę prowadzi do wykonania dowolnego kodu JavaScript w przeglądarce ofiary. Podatność CVE-2025-69243 : Raytha CMS umożliwia enumerację użytkowników w funkcjonalności resetowania hasła. Różnice w komunikatach umożliwiają atakującemu wyznaczenie, czy login jest prawidłowy, co może prowadzić do ataku typu brute-force z wykorzystaniem prawidłowych loginów. Podatność CVE-2025-69245 : Oprogramowanie Raytha CMS jest podatne na atak typu Reflected XSS w parametrze returnUrl w funkcjonalności logowania. Atakujący może stworzyć złośliwy URL, który, gdy zostanie otwarty przez uwierzytelnioną ofiarę, prowadzi do wykonania dowolnego kodu JavaScript w przeglądarce ofiary. Podatność CVE-2025-69246 : Raytha CMS nie posiada żadnego mechanizmu ochrony przed atakami typu brute-force. Umożliwia to atakującemu wysyłanie wielu zautomatyzowanych żądań logowania bez wyzwalania blokady, ograniczenia lub dodatkowych zabezpieczeń. Problem opisany w CVE-2025-69243 został rozwiązany w wersji 1.5.0. Pozostałe problemy zostały rozwiązane w wersji 1.4.6.

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix not verified
Affected
< 1.4.6
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
No verified patch reference is present in the current structured sources. Check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 16 Mar 2026 · Last source change 16 Mar 2026, 13:49 UTC · CWE-79 · Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-208715
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-69245 · cve.blacktree.nl