BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2025-68818High confidence

scsi: Revert "scsi: qla2xxx: Perform lockless command completion in abort path"

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-019113 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

8.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 271 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.29% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 271 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.69-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.162-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
SSA-019113 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-019113: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.6
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: Revert "scsi: qla2xxx: Perform lockless command completion in abort path" This reverts commit 0367076b0817d5c75dfb83001ce7ce5c64d803a9. The commit being reverted added code to __qla2x00_abort_all_cmds() to call sp->done() without holding a spinlock. But unlike the older code below it, this new code failed to check sp->cmd_type and just assumed TYPE_SRB, which results in a jump to an invalid pointer in target-mode with TYPE_TGT_CMD: qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-d034:8: qla24xx_do_nack_work create sess success 0000000009f7a79b qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-5003:8: ISP System Error - mbx1=1ff5h mbx2=10h mbx3=0h mbx4=0h mbx5=191h mbx6=0h mbx7=0h. qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-d01e:8: -> fwdump no buffer qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-f03a:8: qla_target(0): System error async event 0x8002 occurred qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-00af:8: Performing ISP error recovery - ha=0000000058183fda. BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0010 [#1] SMP CPU: 2 PID: 9446 Comm: qla2xxx_8_dpc Tainted: G O 6.1.133 #1 Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/X11SPL-F, BIOS 4.2 12/15/2023 RIP: 0010:0x0 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0xffffffffffffffd6. RSP: 0018:ffffc90001f93dc8 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: 0000000000000282 RBX: 0000000000000355 RCX: ffff88810d16a000 RDX: ffff88810dbadaa8 RSI: 0000000000080000 RDI: ffff888169dc38c0 RBP: ffff888169dc38c0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000045 R10: ffffffffa034bdf0 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88810800bb40 R13: 0000000000001aa8 R14: ffff888100136610 R15: ffff8881070f7400 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88bf80080000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffffffffffffd6 CR3: 000000010c8ff006 CR4: 00000000003706e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: ? __die+0x4d/0x8b ? page_fault_oops+0x91/0x180 ? trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x38/0x1a0 ? exc_page_fault+0x391/0x5e0 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 __qla2x00_abort_all_cmds+0xcb/0x3e0 [qla2xxx_scst] qla2x00_abort_all_cmds+0x50/0x70 [qla2xxx_scst] qla2x00_abort_isp_cleanup+0x3b7/0x4b0 [qla2xxx_scst] qla2x00_abort_isp+0xfd/0x860 [qla2xxx_scst] qla2x00_do_dpc+0x581/0xa40 [qla2xxx_scst] kthread+0xa8/0xd0 Then commit 4475afa2646d ("scsi: qla2xxx: Complete command early within lock") added the spinlock back, because not having the lock caused a race and a crash. But qla2x00_abort_srb() in the switch below already checks for qla2x00_chip_is_down() and handles it the same way, so the code above the switch is now redundant and still buggy in target-mode. Remove it.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
CVE-2025-68818 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: scsi: Revert "scsi: qla2xxx: Perform lockless command completion in abort path"
246 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-extra as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
Summary
A NULL pointer dereference flaw was found in the QLogic Fibre Channel HBA driver (qla2xxx) in the Linux kernel. During ISP error recovery, the abort path incorrectly assumes all command types are TYPE_SRB. When operating in SCSI target mode with TYPE_TGT_CMD commands, this results in calling a NULL function pointer, causing a kernel crash.
Remediation
Fix deferred
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-2296

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: Revert "scsi: qla2xxx: Perform lockless command completion in abort path" This reverts commit 0367076b0817d5c75dfb83001ce7ce5c64d803a9. The commit being reverted added code to __qla2x00_abort_all_cmds() to call sp->done() without holding a spinlock. But unlike the older code below it, this new code failed to check sp->cmd_type and just assumed TYPE_SRB, which results in a jump to an invalid pointer in target-mode with TYPE_TGT_CMD: qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-d034:8: qla24xx_do_nack_work create sess success 0000000009f7a79b qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-5003:8: ISP System Error - mbx1=1ff5h mbx2=10h mbx3=0h mbx4=0h mbx5=191h mbx6=0h mbx7=0h. qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-d01e:8: -> fwdump no buffer qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-f03a:8: qla_target(0): System error async event 0x8002 occurred qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-00af:8: Performing ISP error recovery - ha=0000000058183fda. BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0010 [#1] SMP CPU: 2 PID: 9446 Comm: qla2xxx_8_dpc Tainted: G O 6.1.133 #1 Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/X11SPL-F, BIOS 4.2 12/15/2023 RIP: 0010:0x0 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0xffffffffffffffd6. RSP: 0018:ffffc90001f93dc8 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: 0000000000000282 RBX: 0000000000000355 RCX: ffff88810d16a000 RDX: ffff88810dbadaa8 RSI: 0000000000080000 RDI: ffff888169dc38c0 RBP: ffff888169dc38c0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000045 R10: ffffffffa034bdf0 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88810800bb40 R13: 0000000000001aa8 R14: ffff888100136610 R15: ffff8881070f7400 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88bf80080000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffffffffffffd6 CR3: 000000010c8ff006 CR4: 00000000003706e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x4d/0x8b ? page_fault_oops+0x91/0x180 ? trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x38/0x1a0 ? exc_page_fault+0x391/0x5e0 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 __qla2x00_abort_all_cmds+0xcb/0x3e0 [qla2xxx_scst] qla2x00_abort_all_cmds+0x50/0x70 [qla2xxx_scst] qla2x00_abort_isp_cleanup+0x3b7/0x4b0 [qla2xxx_scst] qla2x00_abort_isp+0xfd/0x860 [qla2xxx_scst] qla2x00_do_dpc+0x581/0xa40 [qla2xxx_scst] kthread+0xa8/0xd0 </TASK> Then commit 4475afa2646d ("scsi: qla2xxx: Complete command early within lock") added the spinlock back, because not having the lock caused a race and a crash. But qla2x00_abort_srb() in the switch below already checks for qla2x00_chip_is_down() and handles it the same way, so the code above the switch is now redundant and still buggy in target-mode. Remove it.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
8.8 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 271 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: Revert "scsi: qla2xxx: Perform lockless command completion in abort path" This reverts commit 0367076b0817d5c75dfb83001ce7ce5c64d803a9. The commit being reverted added code to __qla2x00_abort_all_cmds() to call sp->done() without holding a spinlock. But unlike the older code below it, this new code failed to check sp->cmd_type and just assumed TYPE_SRB, which results in a jump to an invalid pointer in target-mode with TYPE_TGT_CMD: qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-d034:8: qla24xx_do_nack_work create sess success 0000000009f7a79b qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-5003:8: ISP System Error - mbx1=1ff5h mbx2=10h mbx3=0h mbx4=0h mbx5=191h mbx6=0h mbx7=0h. qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-d01e:8: -> fwdump no buffer qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-f03a:8: qla_target(0): System error async event 0x8002 occurred qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-00af:8: Performing ISP error recovery - ha=0000000058183fda. BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0010 [#1] SMP CPU: 2 PID: 9446 Comm: qla2xxx_8_dpc Tainted: G O 6.1.133 #1 Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/X11SPL-F, BIOS 4.2 12/15/2023 RIP: 0010:0x0 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0xffffffffffffffd6. RSP: 0018:ffffc90001f93dc8 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: 0000000000000282 RBX: 0000000000000355 RCX: ffff88810d16a000 RDX: ffff88810dbadaa8 RSI: 0000000000080000 RDI: ffff888169dc38c0 RBP: ffff888169dc38c0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000045 R10: ffffffffa034bdf0 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88810800bb40 R13: 0000000000001aa8 R14: ffff888100136610 R15: ffff8881070f7400 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88bf80080000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffffffffffffd6 CR3: 000000010c8ff006 CR4: 00000000003706e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x4d/0x8b ? page_fault_oops+0x91/0x180 ? trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x38/0x1a0 ? exc_page_fault+0x391/0x5e0 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 __qla2x00_abort_all_cmds+0xcb/0x3e0 [qla2xxx_scst] qla2x00_abort_all_cmds+0x50/0x70 [qla2xxx_scst] qla2x00_abort_isp_cleanup+0x3b7/0x4b0 [qla2xxx_scst] qla2x00_abort_isp+0xfd/0x860 [qla2xxx_scst] qla2x00_do_dpc+0x581/0xa40 [qla2xxx_scst] kthread+0xa8/0xd0 </TASK> Then commit 4475afa2646d ("scsi: qla2xxx: Complete command early within lock") added the spinlock back, because not having the lock caused a race and a crash. But qla2x00_abort_srb() in the switch below already checks for qla2x00_chip_is_down() and handles it the same way, so the code above the switch is now redundant and still buggy in target-mode. Remove it.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: Revert "scsi: qla2xxx: Perform lockless command completion in abort path" This reverts commit 0367076b0817d5c75dfb83001ce7ce5c64d803a9. The commit being reverted added code to __qla2x00_abort_all_cmds() to call sp->done() without holding a spinlock. But unlike the older code below it, this new code failed to check sp->cmd_type and just assumed TYPE_SRB, which results in a jump to an invalid pointer in target-mode with TYPE_TGT_CMD: qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-d034:8: qla24xx_do_nack_work create sess success 0000000009f7a79b qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-5003:8: ISP System Error - mbx1=1ff5h mbx2=10h mbx3=0h mbx4=0h mbx5=191h mbx6=0h mbx7=0h. qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-d01e:8: -> fwdump no buffer qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-f03a:8: qla_target(0): System error async event 0x8002 occurred qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-00af:8: Performing ISP error recovery - ha=0000000058183fda. BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0010 [#1] SMP CPU: 2 PID: 9446 Comm: qla2xxx_8_dpc Tainted: G O 6.1.133 #1 Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/X11SPL-F, BIOS 4.2 12/15/2023 RIP: 0010:0x0 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0xffffffffffffffd6. RSP: 0018:ffffc90001f93dc8 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: 0000000000000282 RBX: 0000000000000355 RCX: ffff88810d16a000 RDX: ffff88810dbadaa8 RSI: 0000000000080000 RDI: ffff888169dc38c0 RBP: ffff888169dc38c0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000045 R10: ffffffffa034bdf0 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88810800bb40 R13: 0000000000001aa8 R14: ffff888100136610 R15: ffff8881070f7400 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88bf80080000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffffffffffffd6 CR3: 000000010c8ff006 CR4: 00000000003706e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x4d/0x8b ? page_fault_oops+0x91/0x180 ? trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x38/0x1a0 ? exc_page_fault+0x391/0x5e0 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 __qla2x00_abort_all_cmds+0xcb/0x3e0 [qla2xxx_scst] qla2x00_abort_all_cmds+0x50/0x70 [qla2xxx_scst] qla2x00_abort_isp_cleanup+0x3b7/0x4b0 [qla2xxx_scst] qla2x00_abort_isp+0xfd/0x860 [qla2xxx_scst] qla2x00_do_dpc+0x581/0xa40 [qla2xxx_scst] kthread+0xa8/0xd0 </TASK> Then commit 4475afa2646d ("scsi: qla2xxx: Complete command early within lock") added the spinlock back, because not having the lock caused a race and a crash. But qla2x00_abort_srb() in the switch below already checks for qla2x00_chip_is_down() and handles it the same way, so the code above the switch is now redundant and still buggy in target-mode. Remove it.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through an adjacent network may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: Revert "scsi: qla2xxx: Perform lockless command completion in abort path" This reverts commit 0367076b0817d5c75dfb83001ce7ce5c64d803a9. The commit being reverted added code to __qla2x00_abort_all_cmds() to call sp->done() without holding a spinlock. But unlike the older code below it, this new code failed to check sp->cmd_type and just assumed TYPE_SRB, which results in a jump to an invalid pointer in target-mode with TYPE_TGT_CMD: qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-d034:8: qla24xx_do_nack_work create sess success 0000000009f7a79b qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-5003:8: ISP System Error - mbx1=1ff5h mbx2=10h mbx3=0h mbx4=0h mbx5=191h mbx6=0h mbx7=0h. qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-d01e:8: -> fwdump no buffer qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-f03a:8: qla_target(0): System error async event 0x8002 occurred qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-00af:8: Performing ISP error recovery - ha=0000000058183fda. BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0010 [#1] SMP CPU: 2 PID: 9446 Comm: qla2xxx_8_dpc Tainted: G O 6.1.133 #1 Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/X11SPL-F, BIOS 4.2 12/15/2023 RIP: 0010:0x0 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0xffffffffffffffd6. RSP: 0018:ffffc90001f93dc8 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: 0000000000000282 RBX: 0000000000000355 RCX: ffff88810d16a000 RDX: ffff88810dbadaa8 RSI: 0000000000080000 RDI: ffff888169dc38c0 RBP: ffff888169dc38c0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000045 R10: ffffffffa034bdf0 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88810800bb40 R13: 0000000000001aa8 R14: ffff888100136610 R15: ffff8881070f7400 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88bf80080000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffffffffffffd6 CR3: 000000010c8ff006 CR4: 00000000003706e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x4d/0x8b ? page_fault_oops+0x91/0x180 ? trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x38/0x1a0 ? exc_page_fault+0x391/0x5e0 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 __qla2x00_abort_all_cmds+0xcb/0x3e0 [qla2xxx_scst] qla2x00_abort_all_cmds+0x50/0x70 [qla2xxx_scst] qla2x00_abort_isp_cleanup+0x3b7/0x4b0 [qla2xxx_scst] qla2x00_abort_isp+0xfd/0x860 [qla2xxx_scst] qla2x00_do_dpc+0x581/0xa40 [qla2xxx_scst] kthread+0xa8/0xd0 </TASK> Then commit 4475afa2646d ("scsi: qla2xxx: Complete command early within lock") added the spinlock back, because not having the lock caused a race and a crash. But qla2x00_abort_srb() in the switch below already checks for qla2x00_chip_is_down() and handles it the same way, so the code above the switch is now redundant and still buggy in target-mode. Remove it.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through an adjacent network may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
an adjacent network → vulnerable operation → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Adjacent
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVAdjacentAttack vector: The attacker must be on an adjacent or logically close network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
UnauthenticatedDenial of service
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-2296Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: Revert "scsi: qla2xxx: Perform lockless command completion in abort path" This reverts commit 0367076b0817d5c75dfb83001ce7ce5c64d803a9. The commit being reverted added code to __qla2x00_abort_all_cmds() to call sp->done() without holding a spinlock. But unlike the older code below it, this new code failed to check sp->cmd_type and just assumed TYPE_SRB, which results in a jump to an invalid pointer in target-mode with TYPE_TGT_CMD: qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-d034:8: qla24xx_do_nack_work create sess success 0000000009f7a79b qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-5003:8: ISP System Error - mbx1=1ff5h mbx2=10h mbx3=0h mbx4=0h mbx5=191h mbx6=0h mbx7=0h. qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-d01e:8: -> fwdump no buffer qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-f03a:8: qla_target(0): System error async event 0x8002 occurred qla2xxx [0000:65:00.0]-00af:8: Performing ISP error recovery - ha=0000000058183fda. BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0010 [#1] SMP CPU: 2 PID: 9446 Comm: qla2xxx_8_dpc Tainted: G O 6.1.133 #1 Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/X11SPL-F, BIOS 4.2 12/15/2023 RIP: 0010:0x0 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0xffffffffffffffd6. RSP: 0018:ffffc90001f93dc8 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: 0000000000000282 RBX: 0000000000000355 RCX: ffff88810d16a000 RDX: ffff88810dbadaa8 RSI: 0000000000080000 RDI: ffff888169dc38c0 RBP: ffff888169dc38c0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000045 R10: ffffffffa034bdf0 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88810800bb40 R13: 0000000000001aa8 R14: ffff888100136610 R15: ffff8881070f7400 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88bf80080000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffffffffffffd6 CR3: 000000010c8ff006 CR4: 00000000003706e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x4d/0x8b ? page_fault_oops+0x91/0x180 ? trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x38/0x1a0 ? exc_page_fault+0x391/0x5e0 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 __qla2x00_abort_all_cmds+0xcb/0x3e0 [qla2xxx_scst] qla2x00_abort_all_cmds+0x50/0x70 [qla2xxx_scst] qla2x00_abort_isp_cleanup+0x3b7/0x4b0 [qla2xxx_scst] qla2x00_abort_isp+0xfd/0x860 [qla2xxx_scst] qla2x00_do_dpc+0x581/0xa40 [qla2xxx_scst] kthread+0xa8/0xd0 </TASK> Then commit 4475afa2646d ("scsi: qla2xxx: Complete command early within lock") added the spinlock back, because not having the lock caused a race and a crash. But qla2x00_abort_srb() in the switch below already checks for qla2x00_chip_is_down() and handles it the same way, so the code above the switch is now redundant and still buggy in target-mode. Remove it.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0086Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260114Security Bulletin 14 Jan 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 14 Jan 2026, published on 14 January 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1091Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53995 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38469 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40204 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40213 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40213 Référence CVE CVE-2025-54518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54518 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23204 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23240 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23449 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31431 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31482 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31483 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31542 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0880Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

25-39953, CVE-2025-39955, CVE-2025-39964, CVE-2025-39977, CVE-2025-39978, CVE-2025-39980, CVE-2025-40022, CVE-2025-40070, CVE-2025-40078, CVE-2025-40080, CVE-2025-40105, CVE-2025-40135, CVE-2025-40149, CVE-2025-40219, CVE-2025-40261, CVE-2025-40300, CVE-2025-61984, CVE-2025-61985, CVE-2025-68206, CVE-2025-68261, CVE-2025-68264, CVE-2025-68265, CVE-2025-68266, CVE-2025-68291, CVE-2025-68337, CVE-2025-68349, CVE-2025-68363, CVE-2025-68371, CVE-2025-68724, CVE-2025-68725, CVE-2025-68742, CVE-2025-68764, CVE-2025-68773, CVE-2025-68776, CVE-2025-68782, CVE-2025-68787, CVE-2025-68788, CVE-2025-68798, CVE-2025-68803, CVE-2025-68814, CVE-2025-68816, CVE-2025-68818, CVE-2025-68820, CVE-2025-71064, CVE-2025-71075, CVE-2025-71079, CVE-2025-71085, CVE-2025-71086, CVE-2025-71088, CVE-2025-71095, CVE-2025-71097, CVE-2025-71098, CVE-2025-71104, CVE-2025-71112, CVE-2025-71113, CVE-2025-71114, CVE-2025-71120, CVE-2025-71123, CVE-2025-71131, CVE-2025-71161, CVE-2025-71162, CVE-2025-71163, CVE-2025-71185, CVE-2025-71186, CVE-2025-71189, CVE-2025-71190, CVE-2025-71191, CVE-2025-71197, CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71265, CVE-2025-71266, CVE-2025-71267, CVE-2026-3497, CVE-2026-22977, CVE-2026-22979, CVE-2026-22980, CVE-2026-22982, CVE-2026-22992, CVE-2026-22994, CVE-2026-23003, CVE-2026-23005, CVE-2026-23010, CVE-2026-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0787Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68809 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68811 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71065 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68809 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68811 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71065 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71067 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0545Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68809 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68811 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71065 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71067 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0522Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68809 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68811 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71065 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71067 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0520Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges, un déni de service et un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0497Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2024-38542 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38234 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39998 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39998 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40159 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40201 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40253 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40309 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40309 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71120 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71120 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71268 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71269 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0495Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68809 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68811 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68822 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71065 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0453Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68809 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68811 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68822 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68823 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71065 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0421Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68803 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68804 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71068 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0397Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68800 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68803 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68804 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71068 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0371Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68800 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68803 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68804 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71068 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0369Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68803 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68804 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-70873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-70873 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71071 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0331Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68800 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68803 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68804 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71068 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-68804 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68806 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68809 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68822 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68972 Référence CVE CVE-2025-69418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-69419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69419 Référence CVE CVE-2025-69420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-68804 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68806 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68809 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68822 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68972 Référence CVE CVE-2025-69418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-69419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69419 Référence CVE CVE-2025-69420 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0167Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-68803 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68804 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68806 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71071 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0166Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-68808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68809 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68811 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68821 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68822 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71065 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71065 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 6.3, 5.10.248 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.198 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.160 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.120 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.64 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.3 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 13 Jan 2026 · Last source change 8 Sept 2026, 08:43 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-2296
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD not scheduled

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    231cfa78ec5badd84a1a2b09465bfad1a926aba1 < b04b3733fff7e94566386b962e4795550fbdfd3d; d6f7377528d2abf338e504126e44439541be8f7d < 50b097d92c99f718831b8b349722bc79f718ba1b; cd0a1804ac5bab2545ac700c8d0fe9ae9284c567 < c5c37a821bd1708f26a9522b4a6f47b9f7a20003; 0367076b0817d5c75dfb83001ce7ce5c64d803a9 < e9e601b7df58ba0c667baf30263331df2c02ffe1; 0367076b0817d5c75dfb83001ce7ce5c64d803a9 < b10ebbfd59a535c8d22f4ede6e8389622ce98dc0; 0367076b0817d5c75dfb83001ce7ce5c64d803a9 < 1c728951bc769b795d377852eae1abddad88635d; 0367076b0817d5c75dfb83001ce7ce5c64d803a9 < b57fbc88715b6d18f379463f48a15b560b087ffe; 9189f20b4c5307c0998682bb522e481b4567a8b8 · Fixed: < 6.3; 5.10.248 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.198 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.160 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.120 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.64 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.3 ≤ 6.18.*; 6.19 ≤ *
    After
    Linux: 231cfa78ec5badd84a1a2b09465bfad1a926aba1 < b04b3733fff7e94566386b962e4795550fbdfd3d, d6f7377528d2abf338e504126e44439541be8f7d < 50b097d92c99f718831b8b349722bc79f718ba1b, cd0a1804ac5bab2545ac700c8d0fe9ae9284c567 < c5c37a821bd1708f26a9522b4a6f47b9f7a20003, 0367076b0817d5c75dfb83001ce7ce5c64d803a9 < e9e601b7df58ba0c667baf30263331df2c02ffe1, 0367076b0817d5c75dfb83001ce7ce5c64d803a9 < b10ebbfd59a535c8d22f4ede6e8389622ce98dc0, 0367076b0817d5c75dfb83001ce7ce5c64d803a9 < 1c728951bc769b795d377852eae1abddad88635d, 0367076b0817d5c75dfb83001ce7ce5c64d803a9 < b57fbc88715b6d18f379463f48a15b560b087ffe, 9189f20b4c5307c0998682bb522e481b4567a8b8, 415d614344a4f1bbddf55d724fc7eb9ef4b39aad, 5.10.177 < 5.10.248, 5.15.105 < 5.15.198, 6.1.22 < 6.1.160, 5.4.240 < 5.5, 6.2.9 < 6.3, 6.3 · Fixed: Linux: < 6.3, 5.10.248 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.198 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.160 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.120 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.64 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.3 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-68818 · cve.blacktree.nl