BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2025-68810High confidence

KVM: Disallow toggling KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD on an existing memslot

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.14% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.69-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-68810 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: Kernel: KVM use-after-free due to improper handling of guest memory file descriptor flags
274 known not affected

The vendor explicitly states that these products are not affected by this CVE.

  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-extra as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
Summary
A flaw was found in the Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) in the Linux kernel. A local attacker could exploit a use-after-free vulnerability by improperly disabling the KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD flag on an existing memory slot that was initially bound to a guest memory file descriptor. This improper handling leads to KVM failing to unbind from the guest memory file descriptor instance, which can result in a use-after-free. Successful exploitation could lead to privilege escalation or a denial of service.
Remediation
No remediation text is recorded.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-2304

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: Disallow toggling KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD on an existing memslot Reject attempts to disable KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD on a memslot that was initially created with a guest_memfd binding, as KVM doesn't support toggling KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD on existing memslots. KVM prevents enabling KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD, but doesn't prevent clearing the flag. Failure to reject the new memslot results in a use-after-free due to KVM not unbinding from the guest_memfd instance. Unbinding on a FLAGS_ONLY change is easy enough, and can/will be done as a hardening measure (in anticipation of KVM supporting dirty logging on guest_memfd at some point), but fixing the use-after-free would only address the immediate symptom. ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in kvm_gmem_release+0x362/0x400 [kvm] Write of size 8 at addr ffff8881111ae908 by task repro/745 CPU: 7 UID: 1000 PID: 745 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.18.0-rc6-115d5de2eef3-next-kasan #3 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x51/0x60 print_report+0xcb/0x5c0 kasan_report+0xb4/0xe0 kvm_gmem_release+0x362/0x400 [kvm] __fput+0x2fa/0x9d0 task_work_run+0x12c/0x200 do_exit+0x6ae/0x2100 do_group_exit+0xa8/0x230 __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3a/0x50 x64_sys_call+0x737/0x740 do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x900 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7f581f2eac31 </TASK> Allocated by task 745 on cpu 6 at 9.746971s: kasan_save_stack+0x20/0x40 kasan_save_track+0x13/0x50 __kasan_kmalloc+0x77/0x90 kvm_set_memory_region.part.0+0x652/0x1110 [kvm] kvm_vm_ioctl+0x14b0/0x3290 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x129/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x900 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 Freed by task 745 on cpu 6 at 9.747467s: kasan_save_stack+0x20/0x40 kasan_save_track+0x13/0x50 __kasan_save_free_info+0x37/0x50 __kasan_slab_free+0x3b/0x60 kfree+0xf5/0x440 kvm_set_memslot+0x3c2/0x1160 [kvm] kvm_set_memory_region.part.0+0x86a/0x1110 [kvm] kvm_vm_ioctl+0x14b0/0x3290 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x129/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x900 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: Disallow toggling KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD on an existing memslot Reject attempts to disable KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD on a memslot that was initially created with a guest_memfd binding, as KVM doesn't support toggling KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD on existing memslots. KVM prevents enabling KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD, but doesn't prevent clearing the flag. Failure to reject the new memslot results in a use-after-free due to KVM not unbinding from the guest_memfd instance. Unbinding on a FLAGS_ONLY change is easy enough, and can/will be done as a hardening measure (in anticipation of KVM supporting dirty logging on guest_memfd at some point), but fixing the use-after-free would only address the immediate symptom. ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in kvm_gmem_release+0x362/0x400 [kvm] Write of size 8 at addr ffff8881111ae908 by task repro/745 CPU: 7 UID: 1000 PID: 745 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.18.0-rc6-115d5de2eef3-next-kasan #3 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x51/0x60 print_report+0xcb/0x5c0 kasan_report+0xb4/0xe0 kvm_gmem_release+0x362/0x400 [kvm] __fput+0x2fa/0x9d0 task_work_run+0x12c/0x200 do_exit+0x6ae/0x2100 do_group_exit+0xa8/0x230 __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3a/0x50 x64_sys_call+0x737/0x740 do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x900 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7f581f2eac31 </TASK> Allocated by task 745 on cpu 6 at 9.746971s: kasan_save_stack+0x20/0x40 kasan_save_track+0x13/0x50 __kasan_kmalloc+0x77/0x90 kvm_set_memory_region.part.0+0x652/0x1110 [kvm] kvm_vm_ioctl+0x14b0/0x3290 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x129/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x900 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 Freed by task 745 on cpu 6 at 9.747467s: kasan_save_stack+0x20/0x40 kasan_save_track+0x13/0x50 __kasan_save_free_info+0x37/0x50 __kasan_slab_free+0x3b/0x60 kfree+0xf5/0x440 kvm_set_memslot+0x3c2/0x1160 [kvm] kvm_set_memory_region.part.0+0x86a/0x1110 [kvm] kvm_vm_ioctl+0x14b0/0x3290 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x129/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x900 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: Disallow toggling KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD on an existing memslot Reject attempts to disable KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD on a memslot that was initially created with a guest_memfd binding, as KVM doesn't support toggling KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD on existing memslots. KVM prevents enabling KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD, but doesn't prevent clearing the flag. Failure to reject the new memslot results in a use-after-free due to KVM not unbinding from the guest_memfd instance. Unbinding on a FLAGS_ONLY change is easy enough, and can/will be done as a hardening measure (in anticipation of KVM supporting dirty logging on guest_memfd at some point), but fixing the use-after-free would only address the immediate symptom. ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in kvm_gmem_release+0x362/0x400 [kvm] Write of size 8 at addr ffff8881111ae908 by task repro/745 CPU: 7 UID: 1000 PID: 745 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.18.0-rc6-115d5de2eef3-next-kasan #3 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x51/0x60 print_report+0xcb/0x5c0 kasan_report+0xb4/0xe0 kvm_gmem_release+0x362/0x400 [kvm] __fput+0x2fa/0x9d0 task_work_run+0x12c/0x200 do_exit+0x6ae/0x2100 do_group_exit+0xa8/0x230 __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3a/0x50 x64_sys_call+0x737/0x740 do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x900 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7f581f2eac31 </TASK> Allocated by task 745 on cpu 6 at 9.746971s: kasan_save_stack+0x20/0x40 kasan_save_track+0x13/0x50 __kasan_kmalloc+0x77/0x90 kvm_set_memory_region.part.0+0x652/0x1110 [kvm] kvm_vm_ioctl+0x14b0/0x3290 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x129/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x900 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 Freed by task 745 on cpu 6 at 9.747467s: kasan_save_stack+0x20/0x40 kasan_save_track+0x13/0x50 __kasan_save_free_info+0x37/0x50 __kasan_slab_free+0x3b/0x60 kfree+0xf5/0x440 kvm_set_memslot+0x3c2/0x1160 [kvm] kvm_set_memory_region.part.0+0x86a/0x1110 [kvm] kvm_vm_ioctl+0x14b0/0x3290 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x129/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x900 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0086Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260114Security Bulletin 14 Jan 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 14 Jan 2026, published on 14 January 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0787Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68799 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68800 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68803 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68804 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68806 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68809 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68811 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68799 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68800 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68804 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68806 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68809 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68811 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0545Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68799 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68800 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68803 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68804 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68806 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68809 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68811 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0522Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68799 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68800 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68804 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68806 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68809 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68811 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0495Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68802 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68803 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68804 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68805 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68806 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68807 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68809 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68811 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0453Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68802 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68803 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68804 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68805 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68805 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68806 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68807 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68809 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68811 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0369Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68798 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68800 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68803 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68804 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820 Référence CVE CVE-2025-70873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0329Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-40099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68283 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68283 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68285 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68295 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68295 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68374 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68374 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71071 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71126 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71182 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71184 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0166Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-68799 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68800 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68801 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68802 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68803 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68804 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68806 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68808 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68809 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68811 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: a7800aa80ea4d5356b8474c2302812e9d4926fa6 < 89dbbe6ff323fc34659621a577fe0af913f47386, a7800aa80ea4d5356b8474c2302812e9d4926fa6 < cb51bef465d8ec60a968507330e01020e35dc127, a7800aa80ea4d5356b8474c2302812e9d4926fa6 < 9935df5333aa503a18de5071f53762b65c783c4c, 6.8
Fixed
Linux: < 6.8, 6.12.64 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.3 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 13 Jan 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-2304
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD not scheduled

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-68810 · cve.blacktree.nl