BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2025-68775High confidence

net/handshake: duplicate handshake cancellations leak socket

Linux · Linux

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 204 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.53% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 204 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.69-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-68775 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: net/handshake: duplicate handshake cancellations leak socket
184 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-core as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-debug-modules-extra as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • kernel-64k-devel-matched as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
Summary
A race condition flaw was found in the Linux kernel's network handshake subsystem. When duplicate handshake cancellation requests arrive for the same TLS handshake (such as during SUNRPC/NFS TLS negotiation timeouts), the code fails to detect the duplicate and incorrectly manipulates the socket reference count, leading to a refcount underflow and potential socket resource leak.
Remediation
Fix deferred
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-2318

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 204 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/handshake: duplicate handshake cancellations leak socket When a handshake request is cancelled it is removed from the handshake_net->hn_requests list, but it is still present in the handshake_rhashtbl until it is destroyed. If a second cancellation request arrives for the same handshake request, then remove_pending() will return false... and assuming HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED isn't set in req->hr_flags, we'll continue processing through the out_true label, where we put another reference on the sock and a refcount underflow occurs. This can happen for example if a handshake times out - particularly if the SUNRPC client sends the AUTH_TLS probe to the server but doesn't follow it up with the ClientHello due to a problem with tlshd. When the timeout is hit on the server, the server will send a FIN, which triggers a cancellation request via xs_reset_transport(). When the timeout is hit on the client, another cancellation request happens via xs_tls_handshake_sync(). Add a test_and_set_bit(HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED) in the pending cancel path so duplicate cancels can be detected.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/handshake: duplicate handshake cancellations leak socket When a handshake request is cancelled it is removed from the handshake_net->hn_requests list, but it is still present in the handshake_rhashtbl until it is destroyed. If a second cancellation request arrives for the same handshake request, then remove_pending() will return false... and assuming HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED isn't set in req->hr_flags, we'll continue processing through the out_true label, where we put another reference on the sock and a refcount underflow occurs. This can happen for example if a handshake times out - particularly if the SUNRPC client sends the AUTH_TLS probe to the server but doesn't follow it up with the ClientHello due to a problem with tlshd. When the timeout is hit on the server, the server will send a FIN, which triggers a cancellation request via xs_reset_transport(). When the timeout is hit on the client, another cancellation request happens via xs_tls_handshake_sync(). Add a test_and_set_bit(HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED) in the pending cancel path so duplicate cancels can be detected.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/handshake: duplicate handshake cancellations leak socket When a handshake request is cancelled it is removed from the handshake_net->hn_requests list, but it is still present in the handshake_rhashtbl until it is destroyed. If a second cancellation request arrives for the same handshake request, then remove_pending() will return false... and assuming HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED isn't set in req->hr_flags, we'll continue processing through the out_true label, where we put another reference on the sock and a refcount underflow occurs. This can happen for example if a handshake times out - particularly if the SUNRPC client sends the AUTH_TLS probe to the server but doesn't follow it up with the ClientHello due to a problem with tlshd. When the timeout is hit on the server, the server will send a FIN, which triggers a cancellation request via xs_reset_transport(). When the timeout is hit on the client, another cancellation request happens via xs_tls_handshake_sync(). Add a test_and_set_bit(HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED) in the pending cancel path so duplicate cancels can be detected.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticated
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0086Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260114Security Bulletin 14 Jan 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 14 Jan 2026, published on 14 January 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0787Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68769 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68774 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68774 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68769 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68774 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68774 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0545Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68769 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68774 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68774 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0522Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68769 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68774 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68774 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0495Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68769 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68774 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68774 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0453Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68769 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68774 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68774 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0369Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68759 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0247Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68759 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68784 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0225Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68759 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0170Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68768 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68768 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68774 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68774 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68788 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68789 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0166Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-68765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68767 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68769 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68770 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68771 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68772 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68773 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68774 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68774 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68776 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68777 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68780 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68781 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68782 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68782 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 6.4, 6.6.120 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.64 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.3 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 13 Jan 2026 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-2318
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD not scheduled

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-68775 · cve.blacktree.nl