BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2025-68756High confidence

block: Use RCU in blk_mq_[un]quiesce_tagset() instead of set->tag_list_lock

Linux · Linux

…UnscoredAssess manually
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

No CVSS base score is available from the CNA, CISA ADP or NIST. Absence of a score is not evidence of low risk; review the vendor advisory, affected exposure and exploit evidence. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityUnscoredOperational priority:Needs assessment, manual assessment needed.unscored

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.19% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Manual assessmentRemediation target: Manual assessment

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.63-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.17.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.17.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2026-0883

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

No CVSS base score is available from the CNA, CISA ADP or NIST. Absence of a score is not evidence of low risk; review the vendor advisory, affected exposure and exploit evidence. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: block: Use RCU in blk_mq_[un]quiesce_tagset() instead of set->tag_list_lock blk_mq_{add,del}_queue_tag_set() functions add and remove queues from tagset, the functions make sure that tagset and queues are marked as shared when two or more queues are attached to the same tagset. Initially a tagset starts as unshared and when the number of added queues reaches two, blk_mq_add_queue_tag_set() marks it as shared along with all the queues attached to it. When the number of attached queues drops to 1 blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set() need to mark both the tagset and the remaining queues as unshared. Both functions need to freeze current queues in tagset before setting on unsetting BLK_MQ_F_TAG_QUEUE_SHARED flag. While doing so, both functions hold set->tag_list_lock mutex, which makes sense as we do not want queues to be added or deleted in the process. This used to work fine until commit 98d81f0df70c ("nvme: use blk_mq_[un]quiesce_tagset") made the nvme driver quiesce tagset instead of quiscing individual queues. blk_mq_quiesce_tagset() does the job and quiesce the queues in set->tag_list while holding set->tag_list_lock also. This results in deadlock between two threads with these stacktraces: __schedule+0x47c/0xbb0 ? timerqueue_add+0x66/0xb0 schedule+0x1c/0xa0 schedule_preempt_disabled+0xa/0x10 __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x271/0x600 blk_mq_quiesce_tagset+0x25/0xc0 nvme_dev_disable+0x9c/0x250 nvme_timeout+0x1fc/0x520 blk_mq_handle_expired+0x5c/0x90 bt_iter+0x7e/0x90 blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter+0x27e/0x550 ? __blk_mq_complete_request_remote+0x10/0x10 ? __blk_mq_complete_request_remote+0x10/0x10 ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x1c0/0x210 blk_mq_timeout_work+0x12d/0x170 process_one_work+0x12e/0x2d0 worker_thread+0x288/0x3a0 ? rescuer_thread+0x480/0x480 kthread+0xb8/0xe0 ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50 ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 __schedule+0x47c/0xbb0 ? xas_find+0x161/0x1a0 schedule+0x1c/0xa0 blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait+0x3d/0x70 ? destroy_sched_domains_rcu+0x30/0x30 blk_mq_update_tag_set_shared+0x44/0x80 blk_mq_exit_queue+0x141/0x150 del_gendisk+0x25a/0x2d0 nvme_ns_remove+0xc9/0x170 nvme_remove_namespaces+0xc7/0x100 nvme_remove+0x62/0x150 pci_device_remove+0x23/0x60 device_release_driver_internal+0x159/0x200 unbind_store+0x99/0xa0 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x112/0x1e0 vfs_write+0x2b1/0x3d0 ksys_write+0x4e/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 The top stacktrace is showing nvme_timeout() called to handle nvme command timeout. timeout handler is trying to disable the controller and as a first step, it needs to blk_mq_quiesce_tagset() to tell blk-mq not to call queue callback handlers. The thread is stuck waiting for set->tag_list_lock as it tries to walk the queues in set->tag_list. The lock is held by the second thread in the bottom stack which is waiting for one of queues to be frozen. The queue usage counter will drop to zero after nvme_timeout() finishes, and this will not happen because the thread will wait for this mutex forever. Given that [un]quiescing queue is an operation that does not need to sleep, update blk_mq_[un]quiesce_tagset() to use RCU instead of taking set->tag_list_lock, update blk_mq_{add,del}_queue_tag_set() to use RCU safe list operations. Also, delete INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->tag_set_list) in blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set() because we can not re-initialize it while the list is being traversed under RCU. The deleted queue will not be added/deleted to/from a tagset and it will be freed in blk_free_queue() after the end of RCU grace period.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: block: Use RCU in blk_mq_[un]quiesce_tagset() instead of set->tag_list_lock blk_mq_{add,del}_queue_tag_set() functions add and remove queues from tagset, the functions make sure that tagset and queues are marked as shared when two or more queues are attached to the same tagset. Initially a tagset starts as unshared and when the number of added queues reaches two, blk_mq_add_queue_tag_set() marks it as shared along with all the queues attached to it. When the number of attached queues drops to 1 blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set() need to mark both the tagset and the remaining queues as unshared. Both functions need to freeze current queues in tagset before setting on unsetting BLK_MQ_F_TAG_QUEUE_SHARED flag. While doing so, both functions hold set->tag_list_lock mutex, which makes sense as we do not want queues to be added or deleted in the process. This used to work fine until commit 98d81f0df70c ("nvme: use blk_mq_[un]quiesce_tagset") made the nvme driver quiesce tagset instead of quiscing individual queues. blk_mq_quiesce_tagset() does the job and quiesce the queues in set->tag_list while holding set->tag_list_lock also. This results in deadlock between two threads with these stacktraces: __schedule+0x47c/0xbb0 ? timerqueue_add+0x66/0xb0 schedule+0x1c/0xa0 schedule_preempt_disabled+0xa/0x10 __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x271/0x600 blk_mq_quiesce_tagset+0x25/0xc0 nvme_dev_disable+0x9c/0x250 nvme_timeout+0x1fc/0x520 blk_mq_handle_expired+0x5c/0x90 bt_iter+0x7e/0x90 blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter+0x27e/0x550 ? __blk_mq_complete_request_remote+0x10/0x10 ? __blk_mq_complete_request_remote+0x10/0x10 ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x1c0/0x210 blk_mq_timeout_work+0x12d/0x170 process_one_work+0x12e/0x2d0 worker_thread+0x288/0x3a0 ? rescuer_thread+0x480/0x480 kthread+0xb8/0xe0 ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50 ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 __schedule+0x47c/0xbb0 ? xas_find+0x161/0x1a0 schedule+0x1c/0xa0 blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait+0x3d/0x70 ? destroy_sched_domains_rcu+0x30/0x30 blk_mq_update_tag_set_shared+0x44/0x80 blk_mq_exit_queue+0x141/0x150 del_gendisk+0x25a/0x2d0 nvme_ns_remove+0xc9/0x170 nvme_remove_namespaces+0xc7/0x100 nvme_remove+0x62/0x150 pci_device_remove+0x23/0x60 device_release_driver_internal+0x159/0x200 unbind_store+0x99/0xa0 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x112/0x1e0 vfs_write+0x2b1/0x3d0 ksys_write+0x4e/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 The top stacktrace is showing nvme_timeout() called to handle nvme command timeout. timeout handler is trying to disable the controller and as a first step, it needs to blk_mq_quiesce_tagset() to tell blk-mq not to call queue callback handlers. The thread is stuck waiting for set->tag_list_lock as it tries to walk the queues in set->tag_list. The lock is held by the second thread in the bottom stack which is waiting for one of queues to be frozen. The queue usage counter will drop to zero after nvme_timeout() finishes, and this will not happen because the thread will wait for this mutex forever. Given that [un]quiescing queue is an operation that does not need to sleep, update blk_mq_[un]quiesce_tagset() to use RCU instead of taking set->tag_list_lock, update blk_mq_{add,del}_queue_tag_set() to use RCU safe list operations. Also, delete INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->tag_set_list) in blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set() because we can not re-initialize it while the list is being traversed under RCU. The deleted queue will not be added/deleted to/from a tagset and it will be freed in blk_free_queue() after the end of RCU grace period.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through the affected interface may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: block: Use RCU in blk_mq_[un]quiesce_tagset() instead of set->tag_list_lock blk_mq_{add,del}_queue_tag_set() functions add and remove queues from tagset, the functions make sure that tagset and queues are marked as shared when two or more queues are attached to the same tagset. Initially a tagset starts as unshared and when the number of added queues reaches two, blk_mq_add_queue_tag_set() marks it as shared along with all the queues attached to it. When the number of attached queues drops to 1 blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set() need to mark both the tagset and the remaining queues as unshared. Both functions need to freeze current queues in tagset before setting on unsetting BLK_MQ_F_TAG_QUEUE_SHARED flag. While doing so, both functions hold set->tag_list_lock mutex, which makes sense as we do not want queues to be added or deleted in the process. This used to work fine until commit 98d81f0df70c ("nvme: use blk_mq_[un]quiesce_tagset") made the nvme driver quiesce tagset instead of quiscing individual queues. blk_mq_quiesce_tagset() does the job and quiesce the queues in set->tag_list while holding set->tag_list_lock also. This results in deadlock between two threads with these stacktraces: __schedule+0x47c/0xbb0 ? timerqueue_add+0x66/0xb0 schedule+0x1c/0xa0 schedule_preempt_disabled+0xa/0x10 __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x271/0x600 blk_mq_quiesce_tagset+0x25/0xc0 nvme_dev_disable+0x9c/0x250 nvme_timeout+0x1fc/0x520 blk_mq_handle_expired+0x5c/0x90 bt_iter+0x7e/0x90 blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter+0x27e/0x550 ? __blk_mq_complete_request_remote+0x10/0x10 ? __blk_mq_complete_request_remote+0x10/0x10 ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x1c0/0x210 blk_mq_timeout_work+0x12d/0x170 process_one_work+0x12e/0x2d0 worker_thread+0x288/0x3a0 ? rescuer_thread+0x480/0x480 kthread+0xb8/0xe0 ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50 ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 __schedule+0x47c/0xbb0 ? xas_find+0x161/0x1a0 schedule+0x1c/0xa0 blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait+0x3d/0x70 ? destroy_sched_domains_rcu+0x30/0x30 blk_mq_update_tag_set_shared+0x44/0x80 blk_mq_exit_queue+0x141/0x150 del_gendisk+0x25a/0x2d0 nvme_ns_remove+0xc9/0x170 nvme_remove_namespaces+0xc7/0x100 nvme_remove+0x62/0x150 pci_device_remove+0x23/0x60 device_release_driver_internal+0x159/0x200 unbind_store+0x99/0xa0 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x112/0x1e0 vfs_write+0x2b1/0x3d0 ksys_write+0x4e/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 The top stacktrace is showing nvme_timeout() called to handle nvme command timeout. timeout handler is trying to disable the controller and as a first step, it needs to blk_mq_quiesce_tagset() to tell blk-mq not to call queue callback handlers. The thread is stuck waiting for set->tag_list_lock as it tries to walk the queues in set->tag_list. The lock is held by the second thread in the bottom stack which is waiting for one of queues to be frozen. The queue usage counter will drop to zero after nvme_timeout() finishes, and this will not happen because the thread will wait for this mutex forever. Given that [un]quiescing queue is an operation that does not need to sleep, update blk_mq_[un]quiesce_tagset() to use RCU instead of taking set->tag_list_lock, update blk_mq_{add,del}_queue_tag_set() to use RCU safe list operations. Also, delete INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->tag_set_list) in blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set() because we can not re-initialize it while the list is being traversed under RCU. The deleted queue will not be added/deleted to/from a tagset and it will be freed in blk_free_queue() after the end of RCU grace period.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through the affected interface may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
the affected interface → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Unspecified
Privileges required
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
User interaction
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
Attack complexity
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
Security boundary
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
Not available from the selected scoring authority.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0009Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder um nicht spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260107Security Bulletin 07 Jan 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 07 Jan 2026, published on 7 January 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0787Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68733 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68744 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68746 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68749 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68753 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68755 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68755 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68759 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68763 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68733 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68744 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68746 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68753 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68755 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68755 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68759 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68763 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0545Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68733 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68744 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68746 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68753 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68755 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68755 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68759 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68763 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0522Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68733 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68744 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68753 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68755 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68755 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68759 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68763 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0495Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68744 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68745 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68746 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68753 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68755 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68755 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68759 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68763 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0453Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68744 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68745 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68746 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68753 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68755 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68755 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68759 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68763 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68765 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68766 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0421Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68746 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68747 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68748 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68749 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68751 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68752 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68753 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68754 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68755 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68755 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68759 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68760 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68760 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68762 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68762 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68763 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0397Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68746 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68747 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68748 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68749 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68751 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68752 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68753 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68754 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68755 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68755 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68759 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68760 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68760 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68762 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68762 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68763 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0371Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68746 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68747 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68748 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68749 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68751 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68752 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68753 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68754 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68755 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68755 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68759 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68760 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68760 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68762 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68762 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68763 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0331Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68746 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68747 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68748 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68749 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68751 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68752 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68753 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68754 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68755 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68755 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68759 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68760 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68760 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68762 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68762 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68763 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68765 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 98d81f0df70ce6fc48517d938026e3c684b9051a < ca8764c0ea1fb825f17f19704af55e9e02c9f768, 98d81f0df70ce6fc48517d938026e3c684b9051a < 3baeec23a82e7ee9691f434c6ab0ab1387326108, 98d81f0df70ce6fc48517d938026e3c684b9051a < 6e8d363786765a81e35083e0909e076796468edf, 98d81f0df70ce6fc48517d938026e3c684b9051a < ef0cd7b694928573f6569e61c14f5f059253162e, 98d81f0df70ce6fc48517d938026e3c684b9051a < 59e25ef2b413c72da6686d431e7759302cfccafa, 6.2
Fixed
Linux: < 6.2, 6.6.120 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.63 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.17.13 ≤ 6.17.*, 6.18.2 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 5 Jan 2026 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 21:52 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceUnavailable
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2026-0883
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD not scheduled

Missing structured fields: CVSS base score, CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-68756 · cve.blacktree.nl