BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-68736High confidence

landlock: Fix handling of disconnected directories

Linux · Linux

8.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 3 Oct 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.14% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.85-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.18.3-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-68736 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 39 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2025-68736
238 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP6
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP6
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: landlock: Fix handling of disconnected directories Disconnected files or directories can appear when they are visible and opened from a bind mount, but have been renamed or moved from the source of the bind mount in a way that makes them inaccessible from the mount point (i.e. out of scope). Previously, access rights tied to files or directories opened through a disconnected directory were collected by walking the related hierarchy down to the root of the filesystem, without taking into account the mount point because it couldn't be found. This could lead to inconsistent access results, potential access right widening, and hard-to-debug renames, especially since such paths cannot be printed. For a sandboxed task to create a disconnected directory, it needs to have write access (i.e. FS_MAKE_REG, FS_REMOVE_FILE, and FS_REFER) to the underlying source of the bind mount, and read access to the related mount point. Because a sandboxed task cannot acquire more access rights than those defined by its Landlock domain, this could lead to inconsistent access rights due to missing permissions that should be inherited from the mount point hierarchy, while inheriting permissions from the filesystem hierarchy hidden by this mount point instead. Landlock now handles files and directories opened from disconnected directories by taking into account the filesystem hierarchy when the mount point is not found in the hierarchy walk, and also always taking into account the mount point from which these disconnected directories were opened. This ensures that a rename is not allowed if it would widen access rights [1]. The rationale is that, even if disconnected hierarchies might not be visible or accessible to a sandboxed task, relying on the collected access rights from them improves the guarantee that access rights will not be widened during a rename because of the access right comparison between the source and the destination (see LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER). It may look like this would grant more access on disconnected files and directories, but the security policies are always enforced for all the evaluated hierarchies. This new behavior should be less surprising to users and safer from an access control perspective. Remove a wrong WARN_ON_ONCE() canary in collect_domain_accesses() and fix the related comment. Because opened files have their access rights stored in the related file security properties, there is no impact for disconnected or unlinked files.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-205226

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: landlock: Fix handling of disconnected directories Disconnected files or directories can appear when they are visible and opened from a bind mount, but have been renamed or moved from the source of the bind mount in a way that makes them inaccessible from the mount point (i.e. out of scope). Previously, access rights tied to files or directories opened through a disconnected directory were collected by walking the related hierarchy down to the root of the filesystem, without taking into account the mount point because it couldn't be found. This could lead to inconsistent access results, potential access right widening, and hard-to-debug renames, especially since such paths cannot be printed. For a sandboxed task to create a disconnected directory, it needs to have write access (i.e. FS_MAKE_REG, FS_REMOVE_FILE, and FS_REFER) to the underlying source of the bind mount, and read access to the related mount point. Because a sandboxed task cannot acquire more access rights than those defined by its Landlock domain, this could lead to inconsistent access rights due to missing permissions that should be inherited from the mount point hierarchy, while inheriting permissions from the filesystem hierarchy hidden by this mount point instead. Landlock now handles files and directories opened from disconnected directories by taking into account the filesystem hierarchy when the mount point is not found in the hierarchy walk, and also always taking into account the mount point from which these disconnected directories were opened. This ensures that a rename is not allowed if it would widen access rights [1]. The rationale is that, even if disconnected hierarchies might not be visible or accessible to a sandboxed task, relying on the collected access rights from them improves the guarantee that access rights will not be widened during a rename because of the access right comparison between the source and the destination (see LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER). It may look like this would grant more access on disconnected files and directories, but the security policies are always enforced for all the evaluated hierarchies. This new behavior should be less surprising to users and safer from an access control perspective. Remove a wrong WARN_ON_ONCE() canary in collect_domain_accesses() and fix the related comment. Because opened files have their access rights stored in the related file security properties, there is no impact for disconnected or unlinked files.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
8.8 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: landlock: Fix handling of disconnected directories Disconnected files or directories can appear when they are visible and opened from a bind mount, but have been renamed or moved from the source of the bind mount in a way that makes them inaccessible from the mount point (i.e. out of scope). Previously, access rights tied to files or directories opened through a disconnected directory were collected by walking the related hierarchy down to the root of the filesystem, without taking into account the mount point because it couldn't be found. This could lead to inconsistent access results, potential access right widening, and hard-to-debug renames, especially since such paths cannot be printed. For a sandboxed task to create a disconnected directory, it needs to have write access (i.e. FS_MAKE_REG, FS_REMOVE_FILE, and FS_REFER) to the underlying source of the bind mount, and read access to the related mount point. Because a sandboxed task cannot acquire more access rights than those defined by its Landlock domain, this could lead to inconsistent access rights due to missing permissions that should be inherited from the mount point hierarchy, while inheriting permissions from the filesystem hierarchy hidden by this mount point instead. Landlock now handles files and directories opened from disconnected directories by taking into account the filesystem hierarchy when the mount point is not found in the hierarchy walk, and also always taking into account the mount point from which these disconnected directories were opened. This ensures that a rename is not allowed if it would widen access rights [1]. The rationale is that, even if disconnected hierarchies might not be visible or accessible to a sandboxed task, relying on the collected access rights from them improves the guarantee that access rights will not be widened during a rename because of the access right comparison between the source and the destination (see LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER). It may look like this would grant more access on disconnected files and directories, but the security policies are always enforced for all the evaluated hierarchies. This new behavior should be less surprising to users and safer from an access control perspective. Remove a wrong WARN_ON_ONCE() canary in collect_domain_accesses() and fix the related comment. Because opened files have their access rights stored in the related file security properties, there is no impact for disconnected or unlinked files.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: landlock: Fix handling of disconnected directories Disconnected files or directories can appear when they are visible and opened from a bind mount, but have been renamed or moved from the source of the bind mount in a way that makes them inaccessible from the mount point (i.e. out of scope). Previously, access rights tied to files or directories opened through a disconnected directory were collected by walking the related hierarchy down to the root of the filesystem, without taking into account the mount point because it couldn't be found. This could lead to inconsistent access results, potential access right widening, and hard-to-debug renames, especially since such paths cannot be printed. For a sandboxed task to create a disconnected directory, it needs to have write access (i.e. FS_MAKE_REG, FS_REMOVE_FILE, and FS_REFER) to the underlying source of the bind mount, and read access to the related mount point. Because a sandboxed task cannot acquire more access rights than those defined by its Landlock domain, this could lead to inconsistent access rights due to missing permissions that should be inherited from the mount point hierarchy, while inheriting permissions from the filesystem hierarchy hidden by this mount point instead. Landlock now handles files and directories opened from disconnected directories by taking into account the filesystem hierarchy when the mount point is not found in the hierarchy walk, and also always taking into account the mount point from which these disconnected directories were opened. This ensures that a rename is not allowed if it would widen access rights [1]. The rationale is that, even if disconnected hierarchies might not be visible or accessible to a sandboxed task, relying on the collected access rights from them improves the guarantee that access rights will not be widened during a rename because of the access right comparison between the source and the destination (see LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER). It may look like this would grant more access on disconnected files and directories, but the security policies are always enforced for all the evaluated hierarchies. This new behavior should be less surprising to users and safer from an access control perspective. Remove a wrong WARN_ON_ONCE() canary in collect_domain_accesses() and fix the related comment. Because opened files have their access rights stored in the related file security properties, there is no impact for disconnected or unlinked files.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: landlock: Fix handling of disconnected directories Disconnected files or directories can appear when they are visible and opened from a bind mount, but have been renamed or moved from the source of the bind mount in a way that makes them inaccessible from the mount point (i.e. out of scope). Previously, access rights tied to files or directories opened through a disconnected directory were collected by walking the related hierarchy down to the root of the filesystem, without taking into account the mount point because it couldn't be found. This could lead to inconsistent access results, potential access right widening, and hard-to-debug renames, especially since such paths cannot be printed. For a sandboxed task to create a disconnected directory, it needs to have write access (i.e. FS_MAKE_REG, FS_REMOVE_FILE, and FS_REFER) to the underlying source of the bind mount, and read access to the related mount point. Because a sandboxed task cannot acquire more access rights than those defined by its Landlock domain, this could lead to inconsistent access rights due to missing permissions that should be inherited from the mount point hierarchy, while inheriting permissions from the filesystem hierarchy hidden by this mount point instead. Landlock now handles files and directories opened from disconnected directories by taking into account the filesystem hierarchy when the mount point is not found in the hierarchy walk, and also always taking into account the mount point from which these disconnected directories were opened. This ensures that a rename is not allowed if it would widen access rights [1]. The rationale is that, even if disconnected hierarchies might not be visible or accessible to a sandboxed task, relying on the collected access rights from them improves the guarantee that access rights will not be widened during a rename because of the access right comparison between the source and the destination (see LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER). It may look like this would grant more access on disconnected files and directories, but the security policies are always enforced for all the evaluated hierarchies. This new behavior should be less surprising to users and safer from an access control perspective. Remove a wrong WARN_ON_ONCE() canary in collect_domain_accesses() and fix the related comment. Because opened files have their access rights stored in the related file security properties, there is no impact for disconnected or unlinked files.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Changed: exploitation can affect a different security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SChangedScope: The attack can affect a component governed by a different security authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-205226Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: landlock: Fix handling of disconnected directories Disconnected files or directories can appear when they are visible and opened from a bind mount, but have been renamed or moved from the source of the bind mount in a way that makes them inaccessible from the mount point (i.e. out of scope). Previously, access rights tied to files or directories opened through a disconnected directory were collected by walking the related hierarchy down to the root of the filesystem, without taking into account the mount point because it couldn't be found. This could lead to inconsistent access results, potential access right widening, and hard-to-debug renames, especially since such paths cannot be printed. For a sandboxed task to create a disconnected directory, it needs to have write access (i.e. FS_MAKE_REG, FS_REMOVE_FILE, and FS_REFER) to the underlying source of the bind mount, and read access to the related mount point. Because a sandboxed task cannot acquire more access rights than those defined by its Landlock domain, this could lead to inconsistent access rights due to missing permissions that should be inherited from the mount point hierarchy, while inheriting permissions from the filesystem hierarchy hidden by this mount point instead. Landlock now handles files and directories opened from disconnected directories by taking into account the filesystem hierarchy when the mount point is not found in the hierarchy walk, and also always taking into account the mount point from which these disconnected directories were opened. This ensures that a rename is not allowed if it would widen access rights [1]. The rationale is that, even if disconnected hierarchies might not be visible or accessible to a sandboxed task, relying on the collected access rights from them improves the guarantee that access rights will not be widened during a rename because of the access right comparison between the source and the destination (see LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER). It may look like this would grant more access on disconnected files and directories, but the security policies are always enforced for all the evaluated hierarchies. This new behavior should be less surprising to users and safer from an access control perspective. Remove a wrong WARN_ON_ONCE() canary in collect_domain_accesses() and fix the related comment. Because opened files have their access rights stored in the related file security properties, there is no impact for disconnected or unlinked files.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2929Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20251231Security Bulletin 31 Dec 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 31 Dec 2025, published on 31 December 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1066Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-39764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-54505 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54505 Référence CVE CVE-2025-54518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54518 Référence CVE CVE-2025-62626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62626 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68175 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71203 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71221 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71269 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71287 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71288 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71288 Référence CVE CVE-2026-22981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68175 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68214 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68307 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68358 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71089 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71162 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-54518 Référence CVE CVE-2025-62626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62626 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68175 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68307 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68358 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71160 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71162 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0548Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-40219 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40358 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68175 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71067 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71221 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71265 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71267 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0495Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68378 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68379 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68379 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68380 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68380 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68733 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68744 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68745 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68746 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68753 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68755 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0453Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68379 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68380 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68380 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68733 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68744 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68745 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68746 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68753 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68755 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0369Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68380 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68733 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68735 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68744 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68746 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68750 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68753 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0329Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-38375 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39748 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39964 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68283 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68283 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68285 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68295 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68295 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68374 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68374 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68778 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68785 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71071 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71071 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71113 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71126 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-68378 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68379 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68379 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68733 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68745 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68746 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68755 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68755 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-68378 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68379 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68379 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68733 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68734 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68745 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68746 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68755 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68755 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68757 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68758 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0128Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68353 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68378 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68378 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68380 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68380 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68740 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68742 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68744 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68744 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68746 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68746 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68747 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68747 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68748 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68749 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.13, 6.1.189 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.143 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.80 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.2 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 24 Dec 2025 · Last source change 3 Oct 2026, 10:55 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-205226
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD not scheduled

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Vendor guidanceAuthoritative vendor guidance changed: added remediation: git.kernel.org/4f5cdc82a6c7e22cfd9a92d203cec13a52a3f363; removed remediation: git.kernel.org/fbf718d5afe21057694a0c0223a18b0c7a5960b6.
    Before
    remediation: git.kernel.org/fbf718d5afe21057694a0c0223a18b0c7a5960b6
    After
    remediation: git.kernel.org/4f5cdc82a6c7e22cfd9a92d203cec13a52a3f363
    CNA ↗
  2. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    cb2c7d1a1776057c9a1f48ed1250d85e94d4850d < fbf718d5afe21057694a0c0223a18b0c7a5960b6; cb2c7d1a1776057c9a1f48ed1250d85e94d4850d < 426d5b681b2f3339ff04da39b81d71176dc8c87c; cb2c7d1a1776057c9a1f48ed1250d85e94d4850d < cadb28f8b3fd6908e3051e86158c65c3a8e1c907; cb2c7d1a1776057c9a1f48ed1250d85e94d4850d < 49c9e09d961025b22e61ef9ad56aa1c21b6ce2f1; 5.13 · Fixed: < 5.13; 6.6.143 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.80 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.18.2 ≤ 6.18.*; 6.19 ≤ *
    After
    Linux: cb2c7d1a1776057c9a1f48ed1250d85e94d4850d < 4f5cdc82a6c7e22cfd9a92d203cec13a52a3f363, cb2c7d1a1776057c9a1f48ed1250d85e94d4850d < fbf718d5afe21057694a0c0223a18b0c7a5960b6, cb2c7d1a1776057c9a1f48ed1250d85e94d4850d < 426d5b681b2f3339ff04da39b81d71176dc8c87c, cb2c7d1a1776057c9a1f48ed1250d85e94d4850d < cadb28f8b3fd6908e3051e86158c65c3a8e1c907, cb2c7d1a1776057c9a1f48ed1250d85e94d4850d < 49c9e09d961025b22e61ef9ad56aa1c21b6ce2f1, 5.13 · Fixed: Linux: < 5.13, 6.1.189 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.143 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.80 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.18.2 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-68736 · cve.blacktree.nl