BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-68360High confidence

wifi: mt76: wed: use proper wed reference in mt76 wed driver callabacks

Linux · Linux

8.2HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.47% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 21 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.17.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.17.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-205094

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 21 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: mt76: wed: use proper wed reference in mt76 wed driver callabacks MT7996 driver can use both wed and wed_hif2 devices to offload traffic from/to the wireless NIC. In the current codebase we assume to always use the primary wed device in wed callbacks resulting in the following crash if the hw runs wed_hif2 (e.g. 6GHz link). [ 297.455876] Unable to handle kernel read from unreadable memory at virtual address 000000000000080a [ 297.464928] Mem abort info: [ 297.467722] ESR = 0x0000000096000005 [ 297.471461] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 297.476766] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 297.479809] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 297.482940] FSC = 0x05: level 1 translation fault [ 297.487809] Data abort info: [ 297.490679] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000005, ISS2 = 0x00000000 [ 297.496156] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 [ 297.501196] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 [ 297.506500] user pgtable: 4k pages, 39-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000107480000 [ 297.512927] [000000000000080a] pgd=08000001097fb003, p4d=08000001097fb003, pud=08000001097fb003, pmd=0000000000000000 [ 297.523532] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] SMP [ 297.715393] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 45 Comm: kworker/u16:2 Tainted: G O 6.12.50 #0 [ 297.723908] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE [ 297.727384] Hardware name: Banana Pi BPI-R4 (2x SFP+) (DT) [ 297.732857] Workqueue: nf_ft_offload_del nf_flow_rule_route_ipv6 [nf_flow_table] [ 297.740254] pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 297.747205] pc : mt76_wed_offload_disable+0x64/0xa0 [mt76] [ 297.752688] lr : mtk_wed_flow_remove+0x58/0x80 [ 297.757126] sp : ffffffc080fe3ae0 [ 297.760430] x29: ffffffc080fe3ae0 x28: ffffffc080fe3be0 x27: 00000000deadbef7 [ 297.767557] x26: ffffff80c5ebca00 x25: 0000000000000001 x24: ffffff80c85f4c00 [ 297.774683] x23: ffffff80c1875b78 x22: ffffffc080d42cd0 x21: ffffffc080660018 [ 297.781809] x20: ffffff80c6a076d0 x19: ffffff80c6a043c8 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 297.788935] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000001 x15: 0000000000000000 [ 297.796060] x14: 0000000000000019 x13: ffffff80c0ad8ec0 x12: 00000000fa83b2da [ 297.803185] x11: ffffff80c02700c0 x10: ffffff80c0ad8ec0 x9 : ffffff81fef96200 [ 297.810311] x8 : ffffff80c02700c0 x7 : ffffff80c02700d0 x6 : 0000000000000002 [ 297.817435] x5 : 0000000000000400 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000 [ 297.824561] x2 : 0000000000000001 x1 : 0000000000000800 x0 : ffffff80c6a063c8 [ 297.831686] Call trace: [ 297.834123] mt76_wed_offload_disable+0x64/0xa0 [mt76] [ 297.839254] mtk_wed_flow_remove+0x58/0x80 [ 297.843342] mtk_flow_offload_cmd+0x434/0x574 [ 297.847689] mtk_wed_setup_tc_block_cb+0x30/0x40 [ 297.852295] nf_flow_offload_ipv6_hook+0x7f4/0x964 [nf_flow_table] [ 297.858466] nf_flow_rule_route_ipv6+0x438/0x4a4 [nf_flow_table] [ 297.864463] process_one_work+0x174/0x300 [ 297.868465] worker_thread+0x278/0x430 [ 297.872204] kthread+0xd8/0xdc [ 297.875251] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 [ 297.878820] Code: 928b5ae0 8b000273 91400a60 f943fa61 (79401421) [ 297.884901] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Fix the issue detecting the proper wed reference to use running wed callabacks.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: mt76: wed: use proper wed reference in mt76 wed driver callabacks MT7996 driver can use both wed and wed_hif2 devices to offload traffic from/to the wireless NIC. In the current codebase we assume to always use the primary wed device in wed callbacks resulting in the following crash if the hw runs wed_hif2 (e.g. 6GHz link). [ 297.455876] Unable to handle kernel read from unreadable memory at virtual address 000000000000080a [ 297.464928] Mem abort info: [ 297.467722] ESR = 0x0000000096000005 [ 297.471461] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 297.476766] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 297.479809] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 297.482940] FSC = 0x05: level 1 translation fault [ 297.487809] Data abort info: [ 297.490679] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000005, ISS2 = 0x00000000 [ 297.496156] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 [ 297.501196] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 [ 297.506500] user pgtable: 4k pages, 39-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000107480000 [ 297.512927] [000000000000080a] pgd=08000001097fb003, p4d=08000001097fb003, pud=08000001097fb003, pmd=0000000000000000 [ 297.523532] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] SMP [ 297.715393] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 45 Comm: kworker/u16:2 Tainted: G O 6.12.50 #0 [ 297.723908] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE [ 297.727384] Hardware name: Banana Pi BPI-R4 (2x SFP+) (DT) [ 297.732857] Workqueue: nf_ft_offload_del nf_flow_rule_route_ipv6 [nf_flow_table] [ 297.740254] pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 297.747205] pc : mt76_wed_offload_disable+0x64/0xa0 [mt76] [ 297.752688] lr : mtk_wed_flow_remove+0x58/0x80 [ 297.757126] sp : ffffffc080fe3ae0 [ 297.760430] x29: ffffffc080fe3ae0 x28: ffffffc080fe3be0 x27: 00000000deadbef7 [ 297.767557] x26: ffffff80c5ebca00 x25: 0000000000000001 x24: ffffff80c85f4c00 [ 297.774683] x23: ffffff80c1875b78 x22: ffffffc080d42cd0 x21: ffffffc080660018 [ 297.781809] x20: ffffff80c6a076d0 x19: ffffff80c6a043c8 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 297.788935] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000001 x15: 0000000000000000 [ 297.796060] x14: 0000000000000019 x13: ffffff80c0ad8ec0 x12: 00000000fa83b2da [ 297.803185] x11: ffffff80c02700c0 x10: ffffff80c0ad8ec0 x9 : ffffff81fef96200 [ 297.810311] x8 : ffffff80c02700c0 x7 : ffffff80c02700d0 x6 : 0000000000000002 [ 297.817435] x5 : 0000000000000400 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000 [ 297.824561] x2 : 0000000000000001 x1 : 0000000000000800 x0 : ffffff80c6a063c8 [ 297.831686] Call trace: [ 297.834123] mt76_wed_offload_disable+0x64/0xa0 [mt76] [ 297.839254] mtk_wed_flow_remove+0x58/0x80 [ 297.843342] mtk_flow_offload_cmd+0x434/0x574 [ 297.847689] mtk_wed_setup_tc_block_cb+0x30/0x40 [ 297.852295] nf_flow_offload_ipv6_hook+0x7f4/0x964 [nf_flow_table] [ 297.858466] nf_flow_rule_route_ipv6+0x438/0x4a4 [nf_flow_table] [ 297.864463] process_one_work+0x174/0x300 [ 297.868465] worker_thread+0x278/0x430 [ 297.872204] kthread+0xd8/0xdc [ 297.875251] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 [ 297.878820] Code: 928b5ae0 8b000273 91400a60 f943fa61 (79401421) [ 297.884901] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Fix the issue detecting the proper wed reference to use running wed callabacks.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: mt76: wed: use proper wed reference in mt76 wed driver callabacks MT7996 driver can use both wed and wed_hif2 devices to offload traffic from/to the wireless NIC. In the current codebase we assume to always use the primary wed device in wed callbacks resulting in the following crash if the hw runs wed_hif2 (e.g. 6GHz link). [ 297.455876] Unable to handle kernel read from unreadable memory at virtual address 000000000000080a [ 297.464928] Mem abort info: [ 297.467722] ESR = 0x0000000096000005 [ 297.471461] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 297.476766] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 297.479809] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 297.482940] FSC = 0x05: level 1 translation fault [ 297.487809] Data abort info: [ 297.490679] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000005, ISS2 = 0x00000000 [ 297.496156] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 [ 297.501196] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 [ 297.506500] user pgtable: 4k pages, 39-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000107480000 [ 297.512927] [000000000000080a] pgd=08000001097fb003, p4d=08000001097fb003, pud=08000001097fb003, pmd=0000000000000000 [ 297.523532] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] SMP [ 297.715393] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 45 Comm: kworker/u16:2 Tainted: G O 6.12.50 #0 [ 297.723908] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE [ 297.727384] Hardware name: Banana Pi BPI-R4 (2x SFP+) (DT) [ 297.732857] Workqueue: nf_ft_offload_del nf_flow_rule_route_ipv6 [nf_flow_table] [ 297.740254] pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 297.747205] pc : mt76_wed_offload_disable+0x64/0xa0 [mt76] [ 297.752688] lr : mtk_wed_flow_remove+0x58/0x80 [ 297.757126] sp : ffffffc080fe3ae0 [ 297.760430] x29: ffffffc080fe3ae0 x28: ffffffc080fe3be0 x27: 00000000deadbef7 [ 297.767557] x26: ffffff80c5ebca00 x25: 0000000000000001 x24: ffffff80c85f4c00 [ 297.774683] x23: ffffff80c1875b78 x22: ffffffc080d42cd0 x21: ffffffc080660018 [ 297.781809] x20: ffffff80c6a076d0 x19: ffffff80c6a043c8 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 297.788935] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000001 x15: 0000000000000000 [ 297.796060] x14: 0000000000000019 x13: ffffff80c0ad8ec0 x12: 00000000fa83b2da [ 297.803185] x11: ffffff80c02700c0 x10: ffffff80c0ad8ec0 x9 : ffffff81fef96200 [ 297.810311] x8 : ffffff80c02700c0 x7 : ffffff80c02700d0 x6 : 0000000000000002 [ 297.817435] x5 : 0000000000000400 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000 [ 297.824561] x2 : 0000000000000001 x1 : 0000000000000800 x0 : ffffff80c6a063c8 [ 297.831686] Call trace: [ 297.834123] mt76_wed_offload_disable+0x64/0xa0 [mt76] [ 297.839254] mtk_wed_flow_remove+0x58/0x80 [ 297.843342] mtk_flow_offload_cmd+0x434/0x574 [ 297.847689] mtk_wed_setup_tc_block_cb+0x30/0x40 [ 297.852295] nf_flow_offload_ipv6_hook+0x7f4/0x964 [nf_flow_table] [ 297.858466] nf_flow_rule_route_ipv6+0x438/0x4a4 [nf_flow_table] [ 297.864463] process_one_work+0x174/0x300 [ 297.868465] worker_thread+0x278/0x430 [ 297.872204] kthread+0xd8/0xdc [ 297.875251] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 [ 297.878820] Code: 928b5ae0 8b000273 91400a60 f943fa61 (79401421) [ 297.884901] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Fix the issue detecting the proper wed reference to use running wed callabacks.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → vulnerable operation → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.ILowIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedDenial of service
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2920Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20251231Security Bulletin 31 Dec 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 31 Dec 2025, published on 31 December 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1203Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40168 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40170 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40170 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40203 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40274 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68174 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68304 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68745 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68822 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71073 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71074 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71202 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71289 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71289 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23208 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0421Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68348 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68356 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68358 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68364 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68365 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68366 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68367 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68367 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68369 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0397Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68348 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68356 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68358 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68364 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68366 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68367 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68367 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68369 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68369 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68370 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0371Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68348 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68356 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68358 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68364 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68366 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68367 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68367 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68369 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68369 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68370 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0331Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68348 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68352 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68356 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68358 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68364 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68366 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68367 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68367 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68369 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68369 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68370 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0247Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68348 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68356 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68359 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68359 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68360 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68361 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68365 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68366 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68367 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68367 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68368 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68368 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68372 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 83eafc9251d6d30574b629ac637c56d168fcbdd9 < ab94ecb997fd1bbc501a0116c7aad51556b67c86, 83eafc9251d6d30574b629ac637c56d168fcbdd9 < d582d0e988d696698c94edf097062bb987ae592c, 83eafc9251d6d30574b629ac637c56d168fcbdd9 < 385aab8fccd7a8746b9f1a17f3c1e38498a14bc7, 6.8
Fixed
Linux: < 6.8, 6.17.13 ≤ 6.17.*, 6.18.2 ≤ 6.18.*, 6.19 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 24 Dec 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-205094
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD not scheduled

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-68360 · cve.blacktree.nl