BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-68340High confidence

team: Move team device type change at the end of team_port_add

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 16 Oct 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.15% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.63-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.162-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.17.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.17.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 23 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-68340 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 42 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2025-68340
424 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • kernel-source as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: team: Move team device type change at the end of team_port_add Attempting to add a port device that is already up will expectedly fail, but not before modifying the team device header_ops. In the case of the syzbot reproducer the gre0 device is already in state UP when it attempts to add it as a port device of team0, this fails but before that header_ops->create of team0 is changed from eth_header to ipgre_header in the call to team_dev_type_check_change. Later when we end up in ipgre_header() struct ip_tunnel* points to nonsense as the private data of the device still holds a struct team. Example sequence of iproute2 commands to reproduce the hang/BUG(): ip link add dev team0 type team ip link add dev gre0 type gre ip link set dev gre0 up ip link set dev gre0 master team0 ip link set dev team0 up ping -I team0 1.1.1.1 Move team_dev_type_check_change down where all other checks have passed as it changes the dev type with no way to restore it in case one of the checks that follow it fail. Also make sure to preserve the origial mtu assignment: - If port_dev is not the same type as dev, dev takes mtu from port_dev - If port_dev is the same type as dev, port_dev takes mtu from dev This is done by adding a conditional before the call to dev_set_mtu to prevent it from assigning port_dev->mtu = dev->mtu and instead letting team_dev_type_check_change assign dev->mtu = port_dev->mtu. The conditional is needed because the patch moves the call to team_dev_type_check_change past dev_set_mtu. Testing: - team device driver in-tree selftests - Add/remove various devices as slaves of team device - syzbot
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-204799

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: team: Move team device type change at the end of team_port_add Attempting to add a port device that is already up will expectedly fail, but not before modifying the team device header_ops. In the case of the syzbot reproducer the gre0 device is already in state UP when it attempts to add it as a port device of team0, this fails but before that header_ops->create of team0 is changed from eth_header to ipgre_header in the call to team_dev_type_check_change. Later when we end up in ipgre_header() struct ip_tunnel* points to nonsense as the private data of the device still holds a struct team. Example sequence of iproute2 commands to reproduce the hang/BUG(): ip link add dev team0 type team ip link add dev gre0 type gre ip link set dev gre0 up ip link set dev gre0 master team0 ip link set dev team0 up ping -I team0 1.1.1.1 Move team_dev_type_check_change down where all other checks have passed as it changes the dev type with no way to restore it in case one of the checks that follow it fail. Also make sure to preserve the origial mtu assignment: - If port_dev is not the same type as dev, dev takes mtu from port_dev - If port_dev is the same type as dev, port_dev takes mtu from dev This is done by adding a conditional before the call to dev_set_mtu to prevent it from assigning port_dev->mtu = dev->mtu and instead letting team_dev_type_check_change assign dev->mtu = port_dev->mtu. The conditional is needed because the patch moves the call to team_dev_type_check_change past dev_set_mtu. Testing: - team device driver in-tree selftests - Add/remove various devices as slaves of team device - syzbot

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
7.8 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: team: Move team device type change at the end of team_port_add Attempting to add a port device that is already up will expectedly fail, but not before modifying the team device header_ops. In the case of the syzbot reproducer the gre0 device is already in state UP when it attempts to add it as a port device of team0, this fails but before that header_ops->create of team0 is changed from eth_header to ipgre_header in the call to team_dev_type_check_change. Later when we end up in ipgre_header() struct ip_tunnel* points to nonsense as the private data of the device still holds a struct team. Example sequence of iproute2 commands to reproduce the hang/BUG(): ip link add dev team0 type team ip link add dev gre0 type gre ip link set dev gre0 up ip link set dev gre0 master team0 ip link set dev team0 up ping -I team0 1.1.1.1 Move team_dev_type_check_change down where all other checks have passed as it changes the dev type with no way to restore it in case one of the checks that follow it fail. Also make sure to preserve the origial mtu assignment: - If port_dev is not the same type as dev, dev takes mtu from port_dev - If port_dev is the same type as dev, port_dev takes mtu from dev This is done by adding a conditional before the call to dev_set_mtu to prevent it from assigning port_dev->mtu = dev->mtu and instead letting team_dev_type_check_change assign dev->mtu = port_dev->mtu. The conditional is needed because the patch moves the call to team_dev_type_check_change past dev_set_mtu. Testing: - team device driver in-tree selftests - Add/remove various devices as slaves of team device - syzbot

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: team: Move team device type change at the end of team_port_add Attempting to add a port device that is already up will expectedly fail, but not before modifying the team device header_ops. In the case of the syzbot reproducer the gre0 device is already in state UP when it attempts to add it as a port device of team0, this fails but before that header_ops->create of team0 is changed from eth_header to ipgre_header in the call to team_dev_type_check_change. Later when we end up in ipgre_header() struct ip_tunnel* points to nonsense as the private data of the device still holds a struct team. Example sequence of iproute2 commands to reproduce the hang/BUG(): ip link add dev team0 type team ip link add dev gre0 type gre ip link set dev gre0 up ip link set dev gre0 master team0 ip link set dev team0 up ping -I team0 1.1.1.1 Move team_dev_type_check_change down where all other checks have passed as it changes the dev type with no way to restore it in case one of the checks that follow it fail. Also make sure to preserve the origial mtu assignment: - If port_dev is not the same type as dev, dev takes mtu from port_dev - If port_dev is the same type as dev, port_dev takes mtu from dev This is done by adding a conditional before the call to dev_set_mtu to prevent it from assigning port_dev->mtu = dev->mtu and instead letting team_dev_type_check_change assign dev->mtu = port_dev->mtu. The conditional is needed because the patch moves the call to team_dev_type_check_change past dev_set_mtu. Testing: - team device driver in-tree selftests - Add/remove various devices as slaves of team device - syzbot

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: team: Move team device type change at the end of team_port_add Attempting to add a port device that is already up will expectedly fail, but not before modifying the team device header_ops. In the case of the syzbot reproducer the gre0 device is already in state UP when it attempts to add it as a port device of team0, this fails but before that header_ops->create of team0 is changed from eth_header to ipgre_header in the call to team_dev_type_check_change. Later when we end up in ipgre_header() struct ip_tunnel* points to nonsense as the private data of the device still holds a struct team. Example sequence of iproute2 commands to reproduce the hang/BUG(): ip link add dev team0 type team ip link add dev gre0 type gre ip link set dev gre0 up ip link set dev gre0 master team0 ip link set dev team0 up ping -I team0 1.1.1.1 Move team_dev_type_check_change down where all other checks have passed as it changes the dev type with no way to restore it in case one of the checks that follow it fail. Also make sure to preserve the origial mtu assignment: - If port_dev is not the same type as dev, dev takes mtu from port_dev - If port_dev is the same type as dev, port_dev takes mtu from dev This is done by adding a conditional before the call to dev_set_mtu to prevent it from assigning port_dev->mtu = dev->mtu and instead letting team_dev_type_check_change assign dev->mtu = port_dev->mtu. The conditional is needed because the patch moves the call to team_dev_type_check_change past dev_set_mtu. Testing: - team device driver in-tree selftests - Add/remove various devices as slaves of team device - syzbot

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-204799Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: team: Move team device type change at the end of team_port_add Attempting to add a port device that is already up will expectedly fail, but not before modifying the team device header_ops. In the case of the syzbot reproducer the gre0 device is already in state UP when it attempts to add it as a port device of team0, this fails but before that header_ops->create of team0 is changed from eth_header to ipgre_header in the call to team_dev_type_check_change. Later when we end up in ipgre_header() struct ip_tunnel* points to nonsense as the private data of the device still holds a struct team. Example sequence of iproute2 commands to reproduce the hang/BUG(): ip link add dev team0 type team ip link add dev gre0 type gre ip link set dev gre0 up ip link set dev gre0 master team0 ip link set dev team0 up ping -I team0 1.1.1.1 Move team_dev_type_check_change down where all other checks have passed as it changes the dev type with no way to restore it in case one of the checks that follow it fail. Also make sure to preserve the origial mtu assignment: - If port_dev is not the same type as dev, dev takes mtu from port_dev - If port_dev is the same type as dev, port_dev takes mtu from dev This is done by adding a conditional before the call to dev_set_mtu to prevent it from assigning port_dev->mtu = dev->mtu and instead letting team_dev_type_check_change assign dev->mtu = port_dev->mtu. The conditional is needed because the patch moves the call to team_dev_type_check_change past dev_set_mtu. Testing: - team device driver in-tree selftests - Add/remove various devices as slaves of team device - syzbot

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2915Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20251224Security Bulletin 24 Dec 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 24 Dec 2025, published on 24 December 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0862Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-38584 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38627 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39929 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39997 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40164 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68201 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68315 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68315 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68823 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23066 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23255 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23310 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23310 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23389 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23389 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23399 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23399 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23442 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0663Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38201 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38591 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38591 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40164 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68358 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68365 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68749 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68803 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0638Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38201 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38591 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38591 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40164 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68358 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68365 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68749 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68803 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68327 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0545Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68327 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0495Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68291 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68353 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0453Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68327 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68353 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0421Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68338 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68341 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0397Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68338 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68341 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0371Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68338 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68341 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0369Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0331Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68338 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68341 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-68330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-68330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0247Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68341 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68348 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0225Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0167Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-68264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68282 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68291 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0166Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-68264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68291 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68357 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0128Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68313 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68317 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68317 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0108Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68308 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68312 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68312 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68313 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68313 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68378 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68378 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68380 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-026157LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、teamポート追加処理の最後にチームデバイスタイプの変更を移動する修正が行われました。これにより、すでに有効なポートデバイスを追加しようとした際に、失敗する前にデバイスタイプが誤って変更される問題が解決されます。具体的には、gre0デバイスをteam0のポートとして追加しようとすると失敗しましたが、その際にheader_opsが不正に変更され、その後ipgre_header関数で無効なポインタ参照が発生していました。修正では、チームデバイスタイプの変更を全てのチェックが成功した後に行い、MTU割り当ても正しく維持するようにしています。この問題はハングやBUG()を引き起こし、iproute2コマンドで再現可能でした。加えて、この修正は複数のデバイスをチームのスレーブとして追加・削除するテストで検証されています。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 3.7, 5.10.259 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.199 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.162 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.123 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.61 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.17.11 ≤ 6.17.*, 6.18 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 23 Dec 2025 · Last source change 16 Oct 2026, 15:09 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-204799
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    kernel-default as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2; kernel-source as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6; kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6; cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3; dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3; gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3; ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP6; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP6; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2; kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2; kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; and 397 more
    After
    kernel-default as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2; kernel-source as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6; kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6; cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3; dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3; gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3; ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP6; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP6; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2; kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2; kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2; kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4; and 394 more
    SUSE Product Security Team ↗
  2. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    1d76efe1577b4323609b1bcbfafa8b731eda071a < f82d1fb65549de241fe312fcb2bcb8e0ad7b424d; 1d76efe1577b4323609b1bcbfafa8b731eda071a < c8b15b0d2eec3b5c7f585e5a53dfc8d36c818283; 1d76efe1577b4323609b1bcbfafa8b731eda071a < a74ab1b532ecc5f9106621a8f75b4c3d04466b35; 1d76efe1577b4323609b1bcbfafa8b731eda071a < e26235840fd961e4ebe5568f11a2a078cf726663; 1d76efe1577b4323609b1bcbfafa8b731eda071a < 4040b5e8963982a00aa821300cb746efc9f2947e; 1d76efe1577b4323609b1bcbfafa8b731eda071a < e3eed4f038214494af62c7d2d64749e5108ce6ca; 1d76efe1577b4323609b1bcbfafa8b731eda071a < 0ae9cfc454ea5ead5f3ddbdfe2e70270d8e2c8ef; 3.7 · Fixed: < 3.7; 5.10.259 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.199 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.162 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.123 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.61 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.17.11 ≤ 6.17.*; 6.18 ≤ *
    After
    Linux: 1d76efe1577b4323609b1bcbfafa8b731eda071a < f82d1fb65549de241fe312fcb2bcb8e0ad7b424d, 1d76efe1577b4323609b1bcbfafa8b731eda071a < c8b15b0d2eec3b5c7f585e5a53dfc8d36c818283, 1d76efe1577b4323609b1bcbfafa8b731eda071a < a74ab1b532ecc5f9106621a8f75b4c3d04466b35, 1d76efe1577b4323609b1bcbfafa8b731eda071a < e26235840fd961e4ebe5568f11a2a078cf726663, 1d76efe1577b4323609b1bcbfafa8b731eda071a < 4040b5e8963982a00aa821300cb746efc9f2947e, 1d76efe1577b4323609b1bcbfafa8b731eda071a < e3eed4f038214494af62c7d2d64749e5108ce6ca, 1d76efe1577b4323609b1bcbfafa8b731eda071a < 0ae9cfc454ea5ead5f3ddbdfe2e70270d8e2c8ef, 3.7 · Fixed: Linux: < 3.7, 5.10.259 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.199 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.162 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.123 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.61 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.17.11 ≤ 6.17.*, 6.18 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-68340 · cve.blacktree.nl