BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-68337High confidence

jbd2: avoid bug_on in jbd2_journal_get_create_access() when file system corrupted

Linux · Linux

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

20 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-019113 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-019113: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.6
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jbd2: avoid bug_on in jbd2_journal_get_create_access() when file system corrupted There's issue when file system corrupted: ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1289! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 2031 Comm: mkdir Not tainted 6.18.0-rc1-next RIP: 0010:jbd2_journal_get_create_access+0x3b6/0x4d0 RSP: 0018:ffff888117aafa30 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88811a86b000 RCX: ffffffff89a63534 RDX: 1ffff110200ec602 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888100763010 RBP: ffff888100763000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff888100763028 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff88812c432000 R14: ffff88812c608000 R15: ffff888120bfc000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f91d6970c99 CR3: 00000001159c4000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: __ext4_journal_get_create_access+0x42/0x170 ext4_getblk+0x319/0x6f0 ext4_bread+0x11/0x100 ext4_append+0x1e6/0x4a0 ext4_init_new_dir+0x145/0x1d0 ext4_mkdir+0x326/0x920 vfs_mkdir+0x45c/0x740 do_mkdirat+0x234/0x2f0 __x64_sys_mkdir+0xd6/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x5f/0xfa0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e The above issue occurs with us in errors=continue mode when accompanied by storage failures. There have been many inconsistencies in the file system data. In the case of file system data inconsistency, for example, if the block bitmap of a referenced block is not set, it can lead to the situation where a block being committed is allocated and used again. As a result, the following condition will not be satisfied then trigger BUG_ON. Of course, it is entirely possible to construct a problematic image that can trigger this BUG_ON through specific operations. In fact, I have constructed such an image and easily reproduced this issue. Therefore, J_ASSERT() holds true only under ideal conditions, but it may not necessarily be satisfied in exceptional scenarios. Using J_ASSERT() directly in abnormal situations would cause the system to crash, which is clearly not what we want. So here we directly trigger a JBD abort instead of immediately invoking BUG_ON.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-204730

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jbd2: avoid bug_on in jbd2_journal_get_create_access() when file system corrupted There's issue when file system corrupted: ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1289! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 2031 Comm: mkdir Not tainted 6.18.0-rc1-next RIP: 0010:jbd2_journal_get_create_access+0x3b6/0x4d0 RSP: 0018:ffff888117aafa30 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88811a86b000 RCX: ffffffff89a63534 RDX: 1ffff110200ec602 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888100763010 RBP: ffff888100763000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff888100763028 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff88812c432000 R14: ffff88812c608000 R15: ffff888120bfc000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f91d6970c99 CR3: 00000001159c4000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: <TASK> __ext4_journal_get_create_access+0x42/0x170 ext4_getblk+0x319/0x6f0 ext4_bread+0x11/0x100 ext4_append+0x1e6/0x4a0 ext4_init_new_dir+0x145/0x1d0 ext4_mkdir+0x326/0x920 vfs_mkdir+0x45c/0x740 do_mkdirat+0x234/0x2f0 __x64_sys_mkdir+0xd6/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x5f/0xfa0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e The above issue occurs with us in errors=continue mode when accompanied by storage failures. There have been many inconsistencies in the file system data. In the case of file system data inconsistency, for example, if the block bitmap of a referenced block is not set, it can lead to the situation where a block being committed is allocated and used again. As a result, the following condition will not be satisfied then trigger BUG_ON. Of course, it is entirely possible to construct a problematic image that can trigger this BUG_ON through specific operations. In fact, I have constructed such an image and easily reproduced this issue. Therefore, J_ASSERT() holds true only under ideal conditions, but it may not necessarily be satisfied in exceptional scenarios. Using J_ASSERT() directly in abnormal situations would cause the system to crash, which is clearly not what we want. So here we directly trigger a JBD abort instead of immediately invoking BUG_ON.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
7.5 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jbd2: avoid bug_on in jbd2_journal_get_create_access() when file system corrupted There's issue when file system corrupted: ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1289! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 2031 Comm: mkdir Not tainted 6.18.0-rc1-next RIP: 0010:jbd2_journal_get_create_access+0x3b6/0x4d0 RSP: 0018:ffff888117aafa30 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88811a86b000 RCX: ffffffff89a63534 RDX: 1ffff110200ec602 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888100763010 RBP: ffff888100763000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff888100763028 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff88812c432000 R14: ffff88812c608000 R15: ffff888120bfc000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f91d6970c99 CR3: 00000001159c4000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: <TASK> __ext4_journal_get_create_access+0x42/0x170 ext4_getblk+0x319/0x6f0 ext4_bread+0x11/0x100 ext4_append+0x1e6/0x4a0 ext4_init_new_dir+0x145/0x1d0 ext4_mkdir+0x326/0x920 vfs_mkdir+0x45c/0x740 do_mkdirat+0x234/0x2f0 __x64_sys_mkdir+0xd6/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x5f/0xfa0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e The above issue occurs with us in errors=continue mode when accompanied by storage failures. There have been many inconsistencies in the file system data. In the case of file system data inconsistency, for example, if the block bitmap of a referenced block is not set, it can lead to the situation where a block being committed is allocated and used again. As a result, the following condition will not be satisfied then trigger BUG_ON. Of course, it is entirely possible to construct a problematic image that can trigger this BUG_ON through specific operations. In fact, I have constructed such an image and easily reproduced this issue. Therefore, J_ASSERT() holds true only under ideal conditions, but it may not necessarily be satisfied in exceptional scenarios. Using J_ASSERT() directly in abnormal situations would cause the system to crash, which is clearly not what we want. So here we directly trigger a JBD abort instead of immediately invoking BUG_ON.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jbd2: avoid bug_on in jbd2_journal_get_create_access() when file system corrupted There's issue when file system corrupted: ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1289! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 2031 Comm: mkdir Not tainted 6.18.0-rc1-next RIP: 0010:jbd2_journal_get_create_access+0x3b6/0x4d0 RSP: 0018:ffff888117aafa30 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88811a86b000 RCX: ffffffff89a63534 RDX: 1ffff110200ec602 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888100763010 RBP: ffff888100763000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff888100763028 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff88812c432000 R14: ffff88812c608000 R15: ffff888120bfc000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f91d6970c99 CR3: 00000001159c4000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: <TASK> __ext4_journal_get_create_access+0x42/0x170 ext4_getblk+0x319/0x6f0 ext4_bread+0x11/0x100 ext4_append+0x1e6/0x4a0 ext4_init_new_dir+0x145/0x1d0 ext4_mkdir+0x326/0x920 vfs_mkdir+0x45c/0x740 do_mkdirat+0x234/0x2f0 __x64_sys_mkdir+0xd6/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x5f/0xfa0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e The above issue occurs with us in errors=continue mode when accompanied by storage failures. There have been many inconsistencies in the file system data. In the case of file system data inconsistency, for example, if the block bitmap of a referenced block is not set, it can lead to the situation where a block being committed is allocated and used again. As a result, the following condition will not be satisfied then trigger BUG_ON. Of course, it is entirely possible to construct a problematic image that can trigger this BUG_ON through specific operations. In fact, I have constructed such an image and easily reproduced this issue. Therefore, J_ASSERT() holds true only under ideal conditions, but it may not necessarily be satisfied in exceptional scenarios. Using J_ASSERT() directly in abnormal situations would cause the system to crash, which is clearly not what we want. So here we directly trigger a JBD abort instead of immediately invoking BUG_ON.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jbd2: avoid bug_on in jbd2_journal_get_create_access() when file system corrupted There's issue when file system corrupted: ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1289! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 2031 Comm: mkdir Not tainted 6.18.0-rc1-next RIP: 0010:jbd2_journal_get_create_access+0x3b6/0x4d0 RSP: 0018:ffff888117aafa30 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88811a86b000 RCX: ffffffff89a63534 RDX: 1ffff110200ec602 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888100763010 RBP: ffff888100763000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff888100763028 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff88812c432000 R14: ffff88812c608000 R15: ffff888120bfc000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f91d6970c99 CR3: 00000001159c4000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: <TASK> __ext4_journal_get_create_access+0x42/0x170 ext4_getblk+0x319/0x6f0 ext4_bread+0x11/0x100 ext4_append+0x1e6/0x4a0 ext4_init_new_dir+0x145/0x1d0 ext4_mkdir+0x326/0x920 vfs_mkdir+0x45c/0x740 do_mkdirat+0x234/0x2f0 __x64_sys_mkdir+0xd6/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x5f/0xfa0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e The above issue occurs with us in errors=continue mode when accompanied by storage failures. There have been many inconsistencies in the file system data. In the case of file system data inconsistency, for example, if the block bitmap of a referenced block is not set, it can lead to the situation where a block being committed is allocated and used again. As a result, the following condition will not be satisfied then trigger BUG_ON. Of course, it is entirely possible to construct a problematic image that can trigger this BUG_ON through specific operations. In fact, I have constructed such an image and easily reproduced this issue. Therefore, J_ASSERT() holds true only under ideal conditions, but it may not necessarily be satisfied in exceptional scenarios. Using J_ASSERT() directly in abnormal situations would cause the system to crash, which is clearly not what we want. So here we directly trigger a JBD abort instead of immediately invoking BUG_ON.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → vulnerable operation → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedDenial of service
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-204730Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jbd2: avoid bug_on in jbd2_journal_get_create_access() when file system corrupted There's issue when file system corrupted: ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1289! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 2031 Comm: mkdir Not tainted 6.18.0-rc1-next RIP: 0010:jbd2_journal_get_create_access+0x3b6/0x4d0 RSP: 0018:ffff888117aafa30 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88811a86b000 RCX: ffffffff89a63534 RDX: 1ffff110200ec602 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff888100763010 RBP: ffff888100763000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff888100763028 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff88812c432000 R14: ffff88812c608000 R15: ffff888120bfc000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f91d6970c99 CR3: 00000001159c4000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: <TASK> __ext4_journal_get_create_access+0x42/0x170 ext4_getblk+0x319/0x6f0 ext4_bread+0x11/0x100 ext4_append+0x1e6/0x4a0 ext4_init_new_dir+0x145/0x1d0 ext4_mkdir+0x326/0x920 vfs_mkdir+0x45c/0x740 do_mkdirat+0x234/0x2f0 __x64_sys_mkdir+0xd6/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x5f/0xfa0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e The above issue occurs with us in errors=continue mode when accompanied by storage failures. There have been many inconsistencies in the file system data. In the case of file system data inconsistency, for example, if the block bitmap of a referenced block is not set, it can lead to the situation where a block being committed is allocated and used again. As a result, the following condition will not be satisfied then trigger BUG_ON. Of course, it is entirely possible to construct a problematic image that can trigger this BUG_ON through specific operations. In fact, I have constructed such an image and easily reproduced this issue. Therefore, J_ASSERT() holds true only under ideal conditions, but it may not necessarily be satisfied in exceptional scenarios. Using J_ASSERT() directly in abnormal situations would cause the system to crash, which is clearly not what we want. So here we directly trigger a JBD abort instead of immediately invoking BUG_ON.

Official EUVD record
BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2025-2914Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht näher beschrieben Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0880Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

25-38736, CVE-2025-39681, CVE-2025-39691, CVE-2025-39721, CVE-2025-39748, CVE-2025-39756, CVE-2025-39764, CVE-2025-39770, CVE-2025-39773, CVE-2025-39782, CVE-2025-39795, CVE-2025-39826, CVE-2025-39827, CVE-2025-39845, CVE-2025-39866, CVE-2025-39871, CVE-2025-39931, CVE-2025-39953, CVE-2025-39955, CVE-2025-39964, CVE-2025-39977, CVE-2025-39978, CVE-2025-39980, CVE-2025-40022, CVE-2025-40070, CVE-2025-40078, CVE-2025-40080, CVE-2025-40105, CVE-2025-40135, CVE-2025-40149, CVE-2025-40219, CVE-2025-40261, CVE-2025-40300, CVE-2025-61984, CVE-2025-61985, CVE-2025-68206, CVE-2025-68261, CVE-2025-68264, CVE-2025-68265, CVE-2025-68266, CVE-2025-68291, CVE-2025-68337, CVE-2025-68349, CVE-2025-68363, CVE-2025-68371, CVE-2025-68724, CVE-2025-68725, CVE-2025-68742, CVE-2025-68764, CVE-2025-68773, CVE-2025-68776, CVE-2025-68782, CVE-2025-68787, CVE-2025-68788, CVE-2025-68798, CVE-2025-68803, CVE-2025-68814, CVE-2025-68816, CVE-2025-68818, CVE-2025-68820, CVE-2025-71064, CVE-2025-71075, CVE-2025-71079, CVE-2025-71085, CVE-2025-71086, CVE-2025-71088, CVE-2025-71095, CVE-2025-71097, CVE-2025-71098, CVE-2025-71104, CVE-2025-71112, CVE-2025-71113, CVE-2025-71114, CVE-2025-71120, CVE-2025-71123, CVE-2025-71131, CVE-2025-71161, CVE-2025-71162, CVE-2025-71163, CVE-2025-71185, CVE-2025-71186, CVE-2025-71189, CVE-2025

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0787Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68291 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68322 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0545Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68321 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0522Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68291 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0495Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68291 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0453Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68321 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0421Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68328 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68329 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68329 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68338 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68341 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0397Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68328 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68329 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68329 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68338 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68341 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0371Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68328 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68329 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68329 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68338 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68341 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0369Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68313 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68320 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68320 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0331Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68328 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68329 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68329 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68338 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68341 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-68327 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-68327 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0247Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68313 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68320 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68320 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68341 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68348 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0225Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68313 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68320 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68320 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0170Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68296 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68297 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68301 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68303 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68305 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68305 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68312 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68312 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68320 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68320 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68362 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68363 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68365 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68366 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68367 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68367 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68372 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0167Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-68263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68282 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68291 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68362 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0166Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-68263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68291 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6; SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6; SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6; SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6; SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.6
Fixed
< 2.6.19; 5.10.248 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.198 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.160 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.120 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.62 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.17.12 ≤ 6.17.*; 6.18.1 ≤ 6.18.*
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 22 Dec 2025 · Last source change 8 Sept 2026, 08:43 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-204730
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD not scheduled

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-68337 · cve.blacktree.nl