BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-68333High confidence

sched_ext: Fix possible deadlock in the deferred_irq_workfn()

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.11% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.69-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.17.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.17.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-204718

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched_ext: Fix possible deadlock in the deferred_irq_workfn() For PREEMPT_RT=y kernels, the deferred_irq_workfn() is executed in the per-cpu irq_work/* task context and not disable-irq, if the rq returned by container_of() is current CPU's rq, the following scenarios may occur: lock(&rq->__lock); <Interrupt> lock(&rq->__lock); This commit use IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD() to replace init_irq_work() to initialize rq->scx.deferred_irq_work, make the deferred_irq_workfn() is always invoked in hard-irq context.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched_ext: Fix possible deadlock in the deferred_irq_workfn() For PREEMPT_RT=y kernels, the deferred_irq_workfn() is executed in the per-cpu irq_work/* task context and not disable-irq, if the rq returned by container_of() is current CPU's rq, the following scenarios may occur: lock(&rq->__lock); <Interrupt> lock(&rq->__lock); This commit use IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD() to replace init_irq_work() to initialize rq->scx.deferred_irq_work, make the deferred_irq_workfn() is always invoked in hard-irq context.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched_ext: Fix possible deadlock in the deferred_irq_workfn() For PREEMPT_RT=y kernels, the deferred_irq_workfn() is executed in the per-cpu irq_work/* task context and not disable-irq, if the rq returned by container_of() is current CPU's rq, the following scenarios may occur: lock(&rq->__lock); <Interrupt> lock(&rq->__lock); This commit use IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD() to replace init_irq_work() to initialize rq->scx.deferred_irq_work, make the deferred_irq_workfn() is always invoked in hard-irq context.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Locking → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-667 ↗

CWE-667: Improper Locking. The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-667
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2914Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht näher beschrieben Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20251224Security Bulletin 24 Dec 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 24 Dec 2025, published on 24 December 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0421Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68324 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68326 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68326 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68329 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68329 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68338 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0397Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68324 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68326 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68326 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68329 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68329 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68338 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0371Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68324 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68326 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68326 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68329 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68329 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68338 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0331Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68324 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68326 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68326 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68329 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68329 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68338 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-68321 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68322 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68324 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68324 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-68321 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68322 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68324 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68324 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68342 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0166Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-68258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68291 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-026158LinuxのLinux Kernelにおけるリソースのロックに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。sched_extのdeferred_irq_workfn()においてデッドロックが発生する可能性がありました。PREEMPT_RT=yカーネルでは、deferred_irq_workfn()がper-cpu irq_workタスクコンテキストで実行され、割り込みが無効化されません。container_of()で取得されるrqが現在のCPUのrqである場合、lock(&rq-__lock); 割り込み lock(&rq-__lock); という状況が発生する可能性があります。このコミットでは、rq-scx.deferred_irq_workの初期化にinit_irq_work()の代わりにIRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD()を使用し、deferred_irq_workfn()が常にハードIRQコンテキストで呼び出されるように修正しました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 5b26f7b920f76b2b9cc398c252a9e35e44bf5bb9 < 541959b2fadb832a7d0ceb95041dc52bdcf6bff7, 5b26f7b920f76b2b9cc398c252a9e35e44bf5bb9 < 600b4379b9a7ba41340d652211fb29699da4c629, 5b26f7b920f76b2b9cc398c252a9e35e44bf5bb9 < a257e974210320ede524f340ffe16bf4bf0dda1e, 6.12
Fixed
Linux: < 6.12, 6.12.68 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.17.12 ≤ 6.17.*, 6.18 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 22 Dec 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 21:51 UTC · CWE-667 · Improper Locking

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-204718
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-68333 · cve.blacktree.nl