BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-68259High confidence

KVM: SVM: Don't skip unrelated instruction if INT3/INTO is replaced

Linux · Linux

…UnscoredAssess manually
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

No CVSS base score is available from the CNA, CISA ADP or NIST. Absence of a score is not evidence of low risk; review the vendor advisory, affected exposure and exploit evidence. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityUnscoredOperational priority:Needs assessment, manual assessment needed.unscored

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.19% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Manual assessmentRemediation target: Manual assessment

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.63-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.162-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.17.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.17.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-68259 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 45 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2025-68259
62 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP6
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP6
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP6
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP6
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP6
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Development Tools 15 SP6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: SVM: Don't skip unrelated instruction if INT3/INTO is replaced When re-injecting a soft interrupt from an INT3, INT0, or (select) INTn instruction, discard the exception and retry the instruction if the code stream is changed (e.g. by a different vCPU) between when the CPU executes the instruction and when KVM decodes the instruction to get the next RIP. As effectively predicted by commit 6ef88d6e36c2 ("KVM: SVM: Re-inject INT3/INTO instead of retrying the instruction"), failure to verify that the correct INTn instruction was decoded can effectively clobber guest state due to decoding the wrong instruction and thus specifying the wrong next RIP. The bug most often manifests as "Oops: int3" panics on static branch checks in Linux guests. Enabling or disabling a static branch in Linux uses the kernel's "text poke" code patching mechanism. To modify code while other CPUs may be executing that code, Linux (temporarily) replaces the first byte of the original instruction with an int3 (opcode 0xcc), then patches in the new code stream except for the first byte, and finally replaces the int3 with the first byte of the new code stream. If a CPU hits the int3, i.e. executes the code while it's being modified, then the guest kernel must look up the RIP to determine how to handle the #BP, e.g. by emulating the new instruction. If the RIP is incorrect, then this lookup fails and the guest kernel panics. The bug reproduces almost instantly by hacking the guest kernel to repeatedly check a static branch[1] while running a drgn script[2] on the host to constantly swap out the memory containing the guest's TSS. [1]: https://gist.github.com/osandov/44d17c51c28c0ac998ea0334edf90b5a [2]: https://gist.github.com/osandov/10e45e45afa29b11e0c7209247afc00b
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-203736

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

No CVSS base score is available from the CNA, CISA ADP or NIST. Absence of a score is not evidence of low risk; review the vendor advisory, affected exposure and exploit evidence. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: SVM: Don't skip unrelated instruction if INT3/INTO is replaced When re-injecting a soft interrupt from an INT3, INT0, or (select) INTn instruction, discard the exception and retry the instruction if the code stream is changed (e.g. by a different vCPU) between when the CPU executes the instruction and when KVM decodes the instruction to get the next RIP. As effectively predicted by commit 6ef88d6e36c2 ("KVM: SVM: Re-inject INT3/INTO instead of retrying the instruction"), failure to verify that the correct INTn instruction was decoded can effectively clobber guest state due to decoding the wrong instruction and thus specifying the wrong next RIP. The bug most often manifests as "Oops: int3" panics on static branch checks in Linux guests. Enabling or disabling a static branch in Linux uses the kernel's "text poke" code patching mechanism. To modify code while other CPUs may be executing that code, Linux (temporarily) replaces the first byte of the original instruction with an int3 (opcode 0xcc), then patches in the new code stream except for the first byte, and finally replaces the int3 with the first byte of the new code stream. If a CPU hits the int3, i.e. executes the code while it's being modified, then the guest kernel must look up the RIP to determine how to handle the #BP, e.g. by emulating the new instruction. If the RIP is incorrect, then this lookup fails and the guest kernel panics. The bug reproduces almost instantly by hacking the guest kernel to repeatedly check a static branch[1] while running a drgn script[2] on the host to constantly swap out the memory containing the guest's TSS. [1]: https://gist.github.com/osandov/44d17c51c28c0ac998ea0334edf90b5a [2]: https://gist.github.com/osandov/10e45e45afa29b11e0c7209247afc00b

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: SVM: Don't skip unrelated instruction if INT3/INTO is replaced When re-injecting a soft interrupt from an INT3, INT0, or (select) INTn instruction, discard the exception and retry the instruction if the code stream is changed (e.g. by a different vCPU) between when the CPU executes the instruction and when KVM decodes the instruction to get the next RIP. As effectively predicted by commit 6ef88d6e36c2 ("KVM: SVM: Re-inject INT3/INTO instead of retrying the instruction"), failure to verify that the correct INTn instruction was decoded can effectively clobber guest state due to decoding the wrong instruction and thus specifying the wrong next RIP. The bug most often manifests as "Oops: int3" panics on static branch checks in Linux guests. Enabling or disabling a static branch in Linux uses the kernel's "text poke" code patching mechanism. To modify code while other CPUs may be executing that code, Linux (temporarily) replaces the first byte of the original instruction with an int3 (opcode 0xcc), then patches in the new code stream except for the first byte, and finally replaces the int3 with the first byte of the new code stream. If a CPU hits the int3, i.e. executes the code while it's being modified, then the guest kernel must look up the RIP to determine how to handle the #BP, e.g. by emulating the new instruction. If the RIP is incorrect, then this lookup fails and the guest kernel panics. The bug reproduces almost instantly by hacking the guest kernel to repeatedly check a static branch[1] while running a drgn script[2] on the host to constantly swap out the memory containing the guest's TSS. [1]: https://gist.github.com/osandov/44d17c51c28c0ac998ea0334edf90b5a [2]: https://gist.github.com/osandov/10e45e45afa29b11e0c7209247afc00b

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through the affected interface may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: SVM: Don't skip unrelated instruction if INT3/INTO is replaced When re-injecting a soft interrupt from an INT3, INT0, or (select) INTn instruction, discard the exception and retry the instruction if the code stream is changed (e.g. by a different vCPU) between when the CPU executes the instruction and when KVM decodes the instruction to get the next RIP. As effectively predicted by commit 6ef88d6e36c2 ("KVM: SVM: Re-inject INT3/INTO instead of retrying the instruction"), failure to verify that the correct INTn instruction was decoded can effectively clobber guest state due to decoding the wrong instruction and thus specifying the wrong next RIP. The bug most often manifests as "Oops: int3" panics on static branch checks in Linux guests. Enabling or disabling a static branch in Linux uses the kernel's "text poke" code patching mechanism. To modify code while other CPUs may be executing that code, Linux (temporarily) replaces the first byte of the original instruction with an int3 (opcode 0xcc), then patches in the new code stream except for the first byte, and finally replaces the int3 with the first byte of the new code stream. If a CPU hits the int3, i.e. executes the code while it's being modified, then the guest kernel must look up the RIP to determine how to handle the #BP, e.g. by emulating the new instruction. If the RIP is incorrect, then this lookup fails and the guest kernel panics. The bug reproduces almost instantly by hacking the guest kernel to repeatedly check a static branch[1] while running a drgn script[2] on the host to constantly swap out the memory containing the guest's TSS. [1]: https://gist.github.com/osandov/44d17c51c28c0ac998ea0334edf90b5a [2]: https://gist.github.com/osandov/10e45e45afa29b11e0c7209247afc00b

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through the affected interface may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
the affected interface → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Unspecified
Privileges required
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
User interaction
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
Attack complexity
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
Security boundary
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
Not available from the selected scoring authority.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2868Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0787Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40164 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68291 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68282 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68283 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68283 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0545Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68241 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68282 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68284 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0522Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40164 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68291 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0495Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68291 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0453Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68241 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68282 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68284 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0421Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68281 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0397Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68281 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0371Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68281 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0369Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68283 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68283 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68284 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68285 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68286 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68287 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68289 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0331Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68262 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68281 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0247Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68284 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68285 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68286 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68287 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68289 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68289 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68290 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0225Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68284 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68285 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68286 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68287 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68289 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68289 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68290 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0167Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-40164 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68282 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68291 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0166Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-40325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68291 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68291 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0128Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68242 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68283 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68283 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68284 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68285 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68286 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68287 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68289 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68289 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68290 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0108Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68286 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68287 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68289 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68289 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68290 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68290 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68298 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68298 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68302 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68302 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 16 Dec 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 21:49 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceUnavailable
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-203736
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD not scheduled

Missing structured fields: CVSS base score, CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-68259 · cve.blacktree.nl