BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-68241High confidence

ipv4: route: Prevent rt_bind_exception() from rebinding stale fnhe

Linux · Linux

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.47% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.63-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.159-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.17.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.17.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-68241 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 37 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2025-68241
427 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • kernel-source as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv4: route: Prevent rt_bind_exception() from rebinding stale fnhe The sit driver's packet transmission path calls: sit_tunnel_xmit() -> update_or_create_fnhe(), which lead to fnhe_remove_oldest() being called to delete entries exceeding FNHE_RECLAIM_DEPTH+random. The race window is between fnhe_remove_oldest() selecting fnheX for deletion and the subsequent kfree_rcu(). During this time, the concurrent path's __mkroute_output() -> find_exception() can fetch the soon-to-be-deleted fnheX, and rt_bind_exception() then binds it with a new dst using a dst_hold(). When the original fnheX is freed via RCU, the dst reference remains permanently leaked. CPU 0 CPU 1 __mkroute_output() find_exception() [fnheX] update_or_create_fnhe() fnhe_remove_oldest() [fnheX] rt_bind_exception() [bind dst] RCU callback [fnheX freed, dst leak] This issue manifests as a device reference count leak and a warning in dmesg when unregistering the net device: unregister_netdevice: waiting for sitX to become free. Usage count = N Ido Schimmel provided the simple test validation method [1]. The fix clears 'oldest->fnhe_daddr' before calling fnhe_flush_routes(). Since rt_bind_exception() checks this field, setting it to zero prevents the stale fnhe from being reused and bound to a new dst just before it is freed. [1] ip netns add ns1 ip -n ns1 link set dev lo up ip -n ns1 address add 192.0.2.1/32 dev lo ip -n ns1 link add name dummy1 up type dummy ip -n ns1 route add 192.0.2.2/32 dev dummy1 ip -n ns1 link add name gretap1 up arp off type gretap \ local 192.0.2.1 remote 192.0.2.2 ip -n ns1 route add 198.51.0.0/16 dev gretap1 taskset -c 0 ip netns exec ns1 mausezahn gretap1 \ -A 198.51.100.1 -B 198.51.0.0/16 -t udp -p 1000 -c 0 -q & taskset -c 2 ip netns exec ns1 mausezahn gretap1 \ -A 198.51.100.1 -B 198.51.0.0/16 -t udp -p 1000 -c 0 -q & sleep 10 ip netns pids ns1 | xargs kill ip netns del ns1
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-203655

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv4: route: Prevent rt_bind_exception() from rebinding stale fnhe The sit driver's packet transmission path calls: sit_tunnel_xmit() -> update_or_create_fnhe(), which lead to fnhe_remove_oldest() being called to delete entries exceeding FNHE_RECLAIM_DEPTH+random. The race window is between fnhe_remove_oldest() selecting fnheX for deletion and the subsequent kfree_rcu(). During this time, the concurrent path's __mkroute_output() -> find_exception() can fetch the soon-to-be-deleted fnheX, and rt_bind_exception() then binds it with a new dst using a dst_hold(). When the original fnheX is freed via RCU, the dst reference remains permanently leaked. CPU 0 CPU 1 __mkroute_output() find_exception() [fnheX] update_or_create_fnhe() fnhe_remove_oldest() [fnheX] rt_bind_exception() [bind dst] RCU callback [fnheX freed, dst leak] This issue manifests as a device reference count leak and a warning in dmesg when unregistering the net device: unregister_netdevice: waiting for sitX to become free. Usage count = N Ido Schimmel provided the simple test validation method [1]. The fix clears 'oldest->fnhe_daddr' before calling fnhe_flush_routes(). Since rt_bind_exception() checks this field, setting it to zero prevents the stale fnhe from being reused and bound to a new dst just before it is freed. [1] ip netns add ns1 ip -n ns1 link set dev lo up ip -n ns1 address add 192.0.2.1/32 dev lo ip -n ns1 link add name dummy1 up type dummy ip -n ns1 route add 192.0.2.2/32 dev dummy1 ip -n ns1 link add name gretap1 up arp off type gretap \ local 192.0.2.1 remote 192.0.2.2 ip -n ns1 route add 198.51.0.0/16 dev gretap1 taskset -c 0 ip netns exec ns1 mausezahn gretap1 \ -A 198.51.100.1 -B 198.51.0.0/16 -t udp -p 1000 -c 0 -q & taskset -c 2 ip netns exec ns1 mausezahn gretap1 \ -A 198.51.100.1 -B 198.51.0.0/16 -t udp -p 1000 -c 0 -q & sleep 10 ip netns pids ns1 | xargs kill ip netns del ns1

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv4: route: Prevent rt_bind_exception() from rebinding stale fnhe The sit driver's packet transmission path calls: sit_tunnel_xmit() -> update_or_create_fnhe(), which lead to fnhe_remove_oldest() being called to delete entries exceeding FNHE_RECLAIM_DEPTH+random. The race window is between fnhe_remove_oldest() selecting fnheX for deletion and the subsequent kfree_rcu(). During this time, the concurrent path's __mkroute_output() -> find_exception() can fetch the soon-to-be-deleted fnheX, and rt_bind_exception() then binds it with a new dst using a dst_hold(). When the original fnheX is freed via RCU, the dst reference remains permanently leaked. CPU 0 CPU 1 __mkroute_output() find_exception() [fnheX] update_or_create_fnhe() fnhe_remove_oldest() [fnheX] rt_bind_exception() [bind dst] RCU callback [fnheX freed, dst leak] This issue manifests as a device reference count leak and a warning in dmesg when unregistering the net device: unregister_netdevice: waiting for sitX to become free. Usage count = N Ido Schimmel provided the simple test validation method [1]. The fix clears 'oldest->fnhe_daddr' before calling fnhe_flush_routes(). Since rt_bind_exception() checks this field, setting it to zero prevents the stale fnhe from being reused and bound to a new dst just before it is freed. [1] ip netns add ns1 ip -n ns1 link set dev lo up ip -n ns1 address add 192.0.2.1/32 dev lo ip -n ns1 link add name dummy1 up type dummy ip -n ns1 route add 192.0.2.2/32 dev dummy1 ip -n ns1 link add name gretap1 up arp off type gretap \ local 192.0.2.1 remote 192.0.2.2 ip -n ns1 route add 198.51.0.0/16 dev gretap1 taskset -c 0 ip netns exec ns1 mausezahn gretap1 \ -A 198.51.100.1 -B 198.51.0.0/16 -t udp -p 1000 -c 0 -q & taskset -c 2 ip netns exec ns1 mausezahn gretap1 \ -A 198.51.100.1 -B 198.51.0.0/16 -t udp -p 1000 -c 0 -q & sleep 10 ip netns pids ns1 | xargs kill ip netns del ns1

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv4: route: Prevent rt_bind_exception() from rebinding stale fnhe The sit driver's packet transmission path calls: sit_tunnel_xmit() -> update_or_create_fnhe(), which lead to fnhe_remove_oldest() being called to delete entries exceeding FNHE_RECLAIM_DEPTH+random. The race window is between fnhe_remove_oldest() selecting fnheX for deletion and the subsequent kfree_rcu(). During this time, the concurrent path's __mkroute_output() -> find_exception() can fetch the soon-to-be-deleted fnheX, and rt_bind_exception() then binds it with a new dst using a dst_hold(). When the original fnheX is freed via RCU, the dst reference remains permanently leaked. CPU 0 CPU 1 __mkroute_output() find_exception() [fnheX] update_or_create_fnhe() fnhe_remove_oldest() [fnheX] rt_bind_exception() [bind dst] RCU callback [fnheX freed, dst leak] This issue manifests as a device reference count leak and a warning in dmesg when unregistering the net device: unregister_netdevice: waiting for sitX to become free. Usage count = N Ido Schimmel provided the simple test validation method [1]. The fix clears 'oldest->fnhe_daddr' before calling fnhe_flush_routes(). Since rt_bind_exception() checks this field, setting it to zero prevents the stale fnhe from being reused and bound to a new dst just before it is freed. [1] ip netns add ns1 ip -n ns1 link set dev lo up ip -n ns1 address add 192.0.2.1/32 dev lo ip -n ns1 link add name dummy1 up type dummy ip -n ns1 route add 192.0.2.2/32 dev dummy1 ip -n ns1 link add name gretap1 up arp off type gretap \ local 192.0.2.1 remote 192.0.2.2 ip -n ns1 route add 198.51.0.0/16 dev gretap1 taskset -c 0 ip netns exec ns1 mausezahn gretap1 \ -A 198.51.100.1 -B 198.51.0.0/16 -t udp -p 1000 -c 0 -q & taskset -c 2 ip netns exec ns1 mausezahn gretap1 \ -A 198.51.100.1 -B 198.51.0.0/16 -t udp -p 1000 -c 0 -q & sleep 10 ip netns pids ns1 | xargs kill ip netns del ns1

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticated
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2868Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68235 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0545Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0453Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0421Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68234 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68235 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68236 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0397Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68234 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68235 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68236 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0371Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68234 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68235 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68236 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0369Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68234 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68235 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0331Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68234 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68235 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68236 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-68220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68236 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-68220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68236 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0247Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68218 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68235 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0225Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68218 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68235 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68205 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68207 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68208 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68209 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68210 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68210 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68242 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68243 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68247 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68247 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68205 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68207 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68208 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68209 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68210 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68210 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68242 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68243 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68247 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68247 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0170Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68174 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68178 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68178 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68183 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68188 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68190 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68192 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68284 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68285 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68205 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68207 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68208 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68209 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68210 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68210 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68242 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68243 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68247 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68247 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0057Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-68217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68218 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68245 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68246 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68282 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68283 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68283 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68284 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68285 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.15, 5.4.302 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.247 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.197 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.159 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.117 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.59 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.17.9 ≤ 6.17.*, 6.18 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 16 Dec 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-203655
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD not scheduled

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-68241 · cve.blacktree.nl