BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-68223High confidence

drm/radeon: delete radeon_fence_process in is_signaled, no deadlock

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.12% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.63-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.162-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.17.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.17.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-68223 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 50 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2025-68223
433 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • kernel-source as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/radeon: delete radeon_fence_process in is_signaled, no deadlock Delete the attempt to progress the queue when checking if fence is signaled. This avoids deadlock. dma-fence_ops::signaled can be called with the fence lock in unknown state. For radeon, the fence lock is also the wait queue lock. This can cause a self deadlock when signaled() tries to make forward progress on the wait queue. But advancing the queue is unneeded because incorrectly returning false from signaled() is perfectly acceptable. (cherry picked from commit 527ba26e50ec2ca2be9c7c82f3ad42998a75d0db)
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-203673

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 20 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/radeon: delete radeon_fence_process in is_signaled, no deadlock Delete the attempt to progress the queue when checking if fence is signaled. This avoids deadlock. dma-fence_ops::signaled can be called with the fence lock in unknown state. For radeon, the fence lock is also the wait queue lock. This can cause a self deadlock when signaled() tries to make forward progress on the wait queue. But advancing the queue is unneeded because incorrectly returning false from signaled() is perfectly acceptable. (cherry picked from commit 527ba26e50ec2ca2be9c7c82f3ad42998a75d0db)

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/radeon: delete radeon_fence_process in is_signaled, no deadlock Delete the attempt to progress the queue when checking if fence is signaled. This avoids deadlock. dma-fence_ops::signaled can be called with the fence lock in unknown state. For radeon, the fence lock is also the wait queue lock. This can cause a self deadlock when signaled() tries to make forward progress on the wait queue. But advancing the queue is unneeded because incorrectly returning false from signaled() is perfectly acceptable. (cherry picked from commit 527ba26e50ec2ca2be9c7c82f3ad42998a75d0db)

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/radeon: delete radeon_fence_process in is_signaled, no deadlock Delete the attempt to progress the queue when checking if fence is signaled. This avoids deadlock. dma-fence_ops::signaled can be called with the fence lock in unknown state. For radeon, the fence lock is also the wait queue lock. This can cause a self deadlock when signaled() tries to make forward progress on the wait queue. But advancing the queue is unneeded because incorrectly returning false from signaled() is perfectly acceptable. (cherry picked from commit 527ba26e50ec2ca2be9c7c82f3ad42998a75d0db)

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Locking → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-667 ↗

CWE-667: Improper Locking. The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-667
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2868Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1091Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

26/suse-su-20263829-1 Référence CVE CVE-2023-2058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2058 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53995 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21845 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38250 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38469 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38469 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40204 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40213 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40213 Référence CVE CVE-2025-54518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54518 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23204 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23240 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23449 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31431 Référence CVE CVE-2026-31482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68208 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68213 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68213 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68214 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68218 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68219 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68235 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0421Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68213 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68214 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68218 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68219 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68221 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68225 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68228 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0397Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68213 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68214 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68218 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68219 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68221 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68225 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68228 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0371Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68213 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68214 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68218 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68219 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68221 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68225 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68228 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0369Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68201 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68208 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68209 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68218 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68234 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68235 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0331Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68213 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68214 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68218 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68219 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68221 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68225 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68225 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68228 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-68200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68201 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68214 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68219 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68236 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-68200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68201 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68214 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68219 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68231 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68236 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0167Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-39702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39721 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39721 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40110 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40164 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0166Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-40110 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40164 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40170 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40170 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40276 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40276 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0128Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68207 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68208 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68209 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68210 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68210 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68213 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68213 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68235 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68242 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0108Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68201 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68207 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68208 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68209 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68218 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68230 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68233 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68235 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68237 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-026159LinuxのLinux Kernelにおけるリソースのロックに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルのdrm/radeonにおいて、フェンスの状態を確認する際にデッドロックを引き起こす可能性のある処理が修正されました。具体的には、radeon_fence_processの呼び出しを削除し、signaled()関数内で待機キューの進行を試みるのをやめることで自己デッドロックを回避しています。この修正により、フェンスロックの状態が不明な場合でも安全に処理が行われるようになりました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 3.18, 6.1.162 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.123 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.60 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.17.10 ≤ 6.17.*, 6.18 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 16 Dec 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 21:49 UTC · CWE-667 · Improper Locking

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-203673
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-68223 · cve.blacktree.nl