BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-68206High confidence

netfilter: nft_ct: add seqadj extension for natted connections

Linux · Linux

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.69% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

24 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 20 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.12.69-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.170-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.17.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.17.9-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinuxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-awsAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azureAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-fdeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcpAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gkeopAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-ibmAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidiaAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-lowlatencyAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-tegraAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oracleAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspiAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-xilinxAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

3 current
CVE-2025-68206 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 42 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2025-68206
399 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • kernel-source as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-default-extra as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6
  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_ct: add seqadj extension for natted connections Sequence adjustment may be required for FTP traffic with PASV/EPSV modes. due to need to re-write packet payload (IP, port) on the ftp control connection. This can require changes to the TCP length and expected seq / ack_seq. The easiest way to reproduce this issue is with PASV mode. Example ruleset: table inet ftp_nat { ct helper ftp_helper { type "ftp" protocol tcp l3proto inet } chain prerouting { type filter hook prerouting priority 0; policy accept; tcp dport 21 ct state new ct helper set "ftp_helper" } } table ip nat { chain prerouting { type nat hook prerouting priority -100; policy accept; tcp dport 21 dnat ip prefix to ip daddr map { 192.168.100.1 : 192.168.13.2/32 } } chain postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority 100 ; policy accept; tcp sport 21 snat ip prefix to ip saddr map { 192.168.13.2 : 192.168.100.1/32 } } } Note that the ftp helper gets assigned *after* the dnat setup. The inverse (nat after helper assign) is handled by an existing check in nf_nat_setup_info() and will not show the problem. Topoloy: +-------------------+ +----------------------------------+ | FTP: 192.168.13.2 | | NAT: 192.168.13.3, 192.168.100.1 | +-------------------+ +----------------------------------+ | +-----------------------+ | Client: 192.168.100.2 | +-----------------------+ ftp nat changes do not work as expected in this case: Connected to 192.168.100.1. [..] ftp> epsv EPSV/EPRT on IPv4 off. ftp> ls 227 Entering passive mode (192,168,100,1,209,129). 421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection. Kernel logs: Missing nfct_seqadj_ext_add() setup call WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c:41 [..] __nf_nat_mangle_tcp_packet+0x100/0x160 [nf_nat] nf_nat_ftp+0x142/0x280 [nf_nat_ftp] help+0x4d1/0x880 [nf_conntrack_ftp] nf_confirm+0x122/0x2e0 [nf_conntrack] nf_hook_slow+0x3c/0xb0 .. Fix this by adding the required extension when a conntrack helper is assigned to a connection that has a nat binding.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
SSA-019113 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-019113: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.6
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.6
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.6
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_ct: add seqadj extension for natted connections Sequence adjustment may be required for FTP traffic with PASV/EPSV modes. due to need to re-write packet payload (IP, port) on the ftp control connection. This can require changes to the TCP length and expected seq / ack_seq. The easiest way to reproduce this issue is with PASV mode. Example ruleset: table inet ftp_nat { ct helper ftp_helper { type "ftp" protocol tcp l3proto inet } chain prerouting { type filter hook prerouting priority 0; policy accept; tcp dport 21 ct state new ct helper set "ftp_helper" } } table ip nat { chain prerouting { type nat hook prerouting priority -100; policy accept; tcp dport 21 dnat ip prefix to ip daddr map { 192.168.100.1 : 192.168.13.2/32 } } chain postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority 100 ; policy accept; tcp sport 21 snat ip prefix to ip saddr map { 192.168.13.2 : 192.168.100.1/32 } } } Note that the ftp helper gets assigned *after* the dnat setup. The inverse (nat after helper assign) is handled by an existing check in nf_nat_setup_info() and will not show the problem. Topoloy: +-------------------+ +----------------------------------+ | FTP: 192.168.13.2 | | NAT: 192.168.13.3, 192.168.100.1 | +-------------------+ +----------------------------------+ | +-----------------------+ | Client: 192.168.100.2 | +-----------------------+ ftp nat changes do not work as expected in this case: Connected to 192.168.100.1. [..] ftp> epsv EPSV/EPRT on IPv4 off. ftp> ls 227 Entering passive mode (192,168,100,1,209,129). 421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection. Kernel logs: Missing nfct_seqadj_ext_add() setup call WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c:41 [..] __nf_nat_mangle_tcp_packet+0x100/0x160 [nf_nat] nf_nat_ftp+0x142/0x280 [nf_nat_ftp] help+0x4d1/0x880 [nf_conntrack_ftp] nf_confirm+0x122/0x2e0 [nf_conntrack] nf_hook_slow+0x3c/0xb0 .. Fix this by adding the required extension when a conntrack helper is assigned to a connection that has a nat binding.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
SSA-082556 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 7 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-082556: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0) >= V3.1.5
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0) >= V3.1.5
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_ct: add seqadj extension for natted connections Sequence adjustment may be required for FTP traffic with PASV/EPSV modes. due to need to re-write packet payload (IP, port) on the ftp control connection. This can require changes to the TCP length and expected seq / ack_seq. The easiest way to reproduce this issue is with PASV mode. Example ruleset: table inet ftp_nat { ct helper ftp_helper { type "ftp" protocol tcp l3proto inet } chain prerouting { type filter hook prerouting priority 0; policy accept; tcp dport 21 ct state new ct helper set "ftp_helper" } } table ip nat { chain prerouting { type nat hook prerouting priority -100; policy accept; tcp dport 21 dnat ip prefix to ip daddr map { 192.168.100.1 : 192.168.13.2/32 } } chain postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority 100 ; policy accept; tcp sport 21 snat ip prefix to ip saddr map { 192.168.13.2 : 192.168.100.1/32 } } } Note that the ftp helper gets assigned *after* the dnat setup. The inverse (nat after helper assign) is handled by an existing check in nf_nat_setup_info() and will not show the problem. Topoloy: +-------------------+ +----------------------------------+ | FTP: 192.168.13.2 | | NAT: 192.168.13.3, 192.168.100.1 | +-------------------+ +----------------------------------+ | +-----------------------+ | Client: 192.168.100.2 | +-----------------------+ ftp nat changes do not work as expected in this case: Connected to 192.168.100.1. [..] ftp> epsv EPSV/EPRT on IPv4 off. ftp> ls 227 Entering passive mode (192,168,100,1,209,129). 421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection. Kernel logs: Missing nfct_seqadj_ext_add() setup call WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c:41 [..] __nf_nat_mangle_tcp_packet+0x100/0x160 [nf_nat] nf_nat_ftp+0x142/0x280 [nf_nat_ftp] help+0x4d1/0x880 [nf_conntrack_ftp] nf_confirm+0x122/0x2e0 [nf_conntrack] nf_hook_slow+0x3c/0xb0 .. Fix this by adding the required extension when a conntrack helper is assigned to a connection that has a nat binding.
Remediation
Limit access to the interactive shell of the additional GNU/Linux subssytem to trusted personnel only.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-203690

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_ct: add seqadj extension for natted connections Sequence adjustment may be required for FTP traffic with PASV/EPSV modes. due to need to re-write packet payload (IP, port) on the ftp control connection. This can require changes to the TCP length and expected seq / ack_seq. The easiest way to reproduce this issue is with PASV mode. Example ruleset: table inet ftp_nat { ct helper ftp_helper { type "ftp" protocol tcp l3proto inet } chain prerouting { type filter hook prerouting priority 0; policy accept; tcp dport 21 ct state new ct helper set "ftp_helper" } } table ip nat { chain prerouting { type nat hook prerouting priority -100; policy accept; tcp dport 21 dnat ip prefix to ip daddr map { 192.168.100.1 : 192.168.13.2/32 } } chain postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority 100 ; policy accept; tcp sport 21 snat ip prefix to ip saddr map { 192.168.13.2 : 192.168.100.1/32 } } } Note that the ftp helper gets assigned *after* the dnat setup. The inverse (nat after helper assign) is handled by an existing check in nf_nat_setup_info() and will not show the problem. Topoloy: +-------------------+ +----------------------------------+ | FTP: 192.168.13.2 | <-> | NAT: 192.168.13.3, 192.168.100.1 | +-------------------+ +----------------------------------+ | +-----------------------+ | Client: 192.168.100.2 | +-----------------------+ ftp nat changes do not work as expected in this case: Connected to 192.168.100.1. [..] ftp> epsv EPSV/EPRT on IPv4 off. ftp> ls 227 Entering passive mode (192,168,100,1,209,129). 421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection. Kernel logs: Missing nfct_seqadj_ext_add() setup call WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c:41 [..] __nf_nat_mangle_tcp_packet+0x100/0x160 [nf_nat] nf_nat_ftp+0x142/0x280 [nf_nat_ftp] help+0x4d1/0x880 [nf_conntrack_ftp] nf_confirm+0x122/0x2e0 [nf_conntrack] nf_hook_slow+0x3c/0xb0 .. Fix this by adding the required extension when a conntrack helper is assigned to a connection that has a nat binding.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
7.5 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 30 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_ct: add seqadj extension for natted connections Sequence adjustment may be required for FTP traffic with PASV/EPSV modes. due to need to re-write packet payload (IP, port) on the ftp control connection. This can require changes to the TCP length and expected seq / ack_seq. The easiest way to reproduce this issue is with PASV mode. Example ruleset: table inet ftp_nat { ct helper ftp_helper { type "ftp" protocol tcp l3proto inet } chain prerouting { type filter hook prerouting priority 0; policy accept; tcp dport 21 ct state new ct helper set "ftp_helper" } } table ip nat { chain prerouting { type nat hook prerouting priority -100; policy accept; tcp dport 21 dnat ip prefix to ip daddr map { 192.168.100.1 : 192.168.13.2/32 } } chain postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority 100 ; policy accept; tcp sport 21 snat ip prefix to ip saddr map { 192.168.13.2 : 192.168.100.1/32 } } } Note that the ftp helper gets assigned *after* the dnat setup. The inverse (nat after helper assign) is handled by an existing check in nf_nat_setup_info() and will not show the problem. Topoloy: +-------------------+ +----------------------------------+ | FTP: 192.168.13.2 | <-> | NAT: 192.168.13.3, 192.168.100.1 | +-------------------+ +----------------------------------+ | +-----------------------+ | Client: 192.168.100.2 | +-----------------------+ ftp nat changes do not work as expected in this case: Connected to 192.168.100.1. [..] ftp> epsv EPSV/EPRT on IPv4 off. ftp> ls 227 Entering passive mode (192,168,100,1,209,129). 421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection. Kernel logs: Missing nfct_seqadj_ext_add() setup call WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c:41 [..] __nf_nat_mangle_tcp_packet+0x100/0x160 [nf_nat] nf_nat_ftp+0x142/0x280 [nf_nat_ftp] help+0x4d1/0x880 [nf_conntrack_ftp] nf_confirm+0x122/0x2e0 [nf_conntrack] nf_hook_slow+0x3c/0xb0 .. Fix this by adding the required extension when a conntrack helper is assigned to a connection that has a nat binding.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_ct: add seqadj extension for natted connections Sequence adjustment may be required for FTP traffic with PASV/EPSV modes. due to need to re-write packet payload (IP, port) on the ftp control connection. This can require changes to the TCP length and expected seq / ack_seq. The easiest way to reproduce this issue is with PASV mode. Example ruleset: table inet ftp_nat { ct helper ftp_helper { type "ftp" protocol tcp l3proto inet } chain prerouting { type filter hook prerouting priority 0; policy accept; tcp dport 21 ct state new ct helper set "ftp_helper" } } table ip nat { chain prerouting { type nat hook prerouting priority -100; policy accept; tcp dport 21 dnat ip prefix to ip daddr map { 192.168.100.1 : 192.168.13.2/32 } } chain postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority 100 ; policy accept; tcp sport 21 snat ip prefix to ip saddr map { 192.168.13.2 : 192.168.100.1/32 } } } Note that the ftp helper gets assigned *after* the dnat setup. The inverse (nat after helper assign) is handled by an existing check in nf_nat_setup_info() and will not show the problem. Topoloy: +-------------------+ +----------------------------------+ | FTP: 192.168.13.2 | <-> | NAT: 192.168.13.3, 192.168.100.1 | +-------------------+ +----------------------------------+ | +-----------------------+ | Client: 192.168.100.2 | +-----------------------+ ftp nat changes do not work as expected in this case: Connected to 192.168.100.1. [..] ftp> epsv EPSV/EPRT on IPv4 off. ftp> ls 227 Entering passive mode (192,168,100,1,209,129). 421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection. Kernel logs: Missing nfct_seqadj_ext_add() setup call WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c:41 [..] __nf_nat_mangle_tcp_packet+0x100/0x160 [nf_nat] nf_nat_ftp+0x142/0x280 [nf_nat_ftp] help+0x4d1/0x880 [nf_conntrack_ftp] nf_confirm+0x122/0x2e0 [nf_conntrack] nf_hook_slow+0x3c/0xb0 .. Fix this by adding the required extension when a conntrack helper is assigned to a connection that has a nat binding.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_ct: add seqadj extension for natted connections Sequence adjustment may be required for FTP traffic with PASV/EPSV modes. due to need to re-write packet payload (IP, port) on the ftp control connection. This can require changes to the TCP length and expected seq / ack_seq. The easiest way to reproduce this issue is with PASV mode. Example ruleset: table inet ftp_nat { ct helper ftp_helper { type "ftp" protocol tcp l3proto inet } chain prerouting { type filter hook prerouting priority 0; policy accept; tcp dport 21 ct state new ct helper set "ftp_helper" } } table ip nat { chain prerouting { type nat hook prerouting priority -100; policy accept; tcp dport 21 dnat ip prefix to ip daddr map { 192.168.100.1 : 192.168.13.2/32 } } chain postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority 100 ; policy accept; tcp sport 21 snat ip prefix to ip saddr map { 192.168.13.2 : 192.168.100.1/32 } } } Note that the ftp helper gets assigned *after* the dnat setup. The inverse (nat after helper assign) is handled by an existing check in nf_nat_setup_info() and will not show the problem. Topoloy: +-------------------+ +----------------------------------+ | FTP: 192.168.13.2 | <-> | NAT: 192.168.13.3, 192.168.100.1 | +-------------------+ +----------------------------------+ | +-----------------------+ | Client: 192.168.100.2 | +-----------------------+ ftp nat changes do not work as expected in this case: Connected to 192.168.100.1. [..] ftp> epsv EPSV/EPRT on IPv4 off. ftp> ls 227 Entering passive mode (192,168,100,1,209,129). 421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection. Kernel logs: Missing nfct_seqadj_ext_add() setup call WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c:41 [..] __nf_nat_mangle_tcp_packet+0x100/0x160 [nf_nat] nf_nat_ftp+0x142/0x280 [nf_nat_ftp] help+0x4d1/0x880 [nf_conntrack_ftp] nf_confirm+0x122/0x2e0 [nf_conntrack] nf_hook_slow+0x3c/0xb0 .. Fix this by adding the required extension when a conntrack helper is assigned to a connection that has a nat binding.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticated
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-203690Official EUVD mapping

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_ct: add seqadj extension for natted connections Sequence adjustment may be required for FTP traffic with PASV/EPSV modes. due to need to re-write packet payload (IP, port) on the ftp control connection. This can require changes to the TCP length and expected seq / ack_seq. The easiest way to reproduce this issue is with PASV mode. Example ruleset: table inet ftp_nat { ct helper ftp_helper { type "ftp" protocol tcp l3proto inet } chain prerouting { type filter hook prerouting priority 0; policy accept; tcp dport 21 ct state new ct helper set "ftp_helper" } } table ip nat { chain prerouting { type nat hook prerouting priority -100; policy accept; tcp dport 21 dnat ip prefix to ip daddr map { 192.168.100.1 : 192.168.13.2/32 } } chain postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority 100 ; policy accept; tcp sport 21 snat ip prefix to ip saddr map { 192.168.13.2 : 192.168.100.1/32 } } } Note that the ftp helper gets assigned *after* the dnat setup. The inverse (nat after helper assign) is handled by an existing check in nf_nat_setup_info() and will not show the problem. Topoloy: +-------------------+ +----------------------------------+ | FTP: 192.168.13.2 | <-> | NAT: 192.168.13.3, 192.168.100.1 | +-------------------+ +----------------------------------+ | +-----------------------+ | Client: 192.168.100.2 | +-----------------------+ ftp nat changes do not work as expected in this case: Connected to 192.168.100.1. [..] ftp> epsv EPSV/EPRT on IPv4 off. ftp> ls 227 Entering passive mode (192,168,100,1,209,129). 421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection. Kernel logs: Missing nfct_seqadj_ext_add() setup call WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c:41 [..] __nf_nat_mangle_tcp_packet+0x100/0x160 [nf_nat] nf_nat_ftp+0x142/0x280 [nf_nat_ftp] help+0x4d1/0x880 [nf_conntrack_ftp] nf_confirm+0x122/0x2e0 [nf_conntrack] nf_hook_slow+0x3c/0xb0 .. Fix this by adding the required extension when a conntrack helper is assigned to a connection that has a nat binding.

Official EUVD record ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2868Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, die möglicherweise zu einer Denial-of-Service- Bedingung führen oder eine Speicherbeschädigung verursachen können.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39748 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40005 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40016 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40323 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40323 Référence CVE CVE-2025-54505 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54505 Référence CVE CVE-2025-54518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54518 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68307 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68358 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71221 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1093Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39748 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40005 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40016 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40323 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40323 Référence CVE CVE-2025-54505 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54505 Référence CVE CVE-2025-54518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54518 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68307 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68358 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0985Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38710 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39748 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40005 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40016 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40323 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40323 Référence CVE CVE-2025-54505 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54505 Référence CVE CVE-2025-54518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54518 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68307 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68358 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71221 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40323 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40323 Référence CVE CVE-2025-54505 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54505 Référence CVE CVE-2025-54518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54518 Référence CVE CVE-2025-62626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62626 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68175 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68214 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68307 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68358 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-40016 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40323 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40323 Référence CVE CVE-2025-54505 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54505 Référence CVE CVE-2025-54518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54518 Référence CVE CVE-2025-62626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62626 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68175 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68307 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68358 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0880Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

25-38681, CVE-2025-38704, CVE-2025-38721, CVE-2025-38725, CVE-2025-38727, CVE-2025-38732, CVE-2025-38736, CVE-2025-39681, CVE-2025-39691, CVE-2025-39721, CVE-2025-39748, CVE-2025-39756, CVE-2025-39764, CVE-2025-39770, CVE-2025-39773, CVE-2025-39782, CVE-2025-39795, CVE-2025-39826, CVE-2025-39827, CVE-2025-39845, CVE-2025-39866, CVE-2025-39871, CVE-2025-39931, CVE-2025-39953, CVE-2025-39955, CVE-2025-39964, CVE-2025-39977, CVE-2025-39978, CVE-2025-39980, CVE-2025-40022, CVE-2025-40070, CVE-2025-40078, CVE-2025-40080, CVE-2025-40105, CVE-2025-40135, CVE-2025-40149, CVE-2025-40219, CVE-2025-40261, CVE-2025-40300, CVE-2025-61984, CVE-2025-61985, CVE-2025-68206, CVE-2025-68261, CVE-2025-68264, CVE-2025-68265, CVE-2025-68266, CVE-2025-68291, CVE-2025-68337, CVE-2025-68349, CVE-2025-68363, CVE-2025-68371, CVE-2025-68724, CVE-2025-68725, CVE-2025-68742, CVE-2025-68764, CVE-2025-68773, CVE-2025-68776, CVE-2025-68782, CVE-2025-68787, CVE-2025-68788, CVE-2025-68798, CVE-2025-68803, CVE-2025-68814, CVE-2025-68816, CVE-2025-68818, CVE-2025-68820, CVE-2025-71064, CVE-2025-71075, CVE-2025-71079, CVE-2025-71085, CVE-2025-71086, CVE-2025-71088, CVE-2025-71095, CVE-2025-71097, CVE-2025-71098, CVE-2025-71104, CVE-2025-71112, CVE-2025-71113, CVE-2025-71114, CVE-2025-71120, CVE-2025-71123, CVE-2025-71131, CVE-2025

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0787Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38201 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38234 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38591 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38591 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40082 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40164 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0696Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

tion Bulletin de sécurité Debian LTS msg00051 du 29 mai 2026 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2026/05/msg00051.html Bulletin de sécurité Debian LTS msg00052 du 29 mai 2026 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2026/05/msg00052.html Référence CVE CVE-2024-56584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56584 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39748 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39748 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40219 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71274 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71274 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71292 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71292 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71304 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23100 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23112 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23227 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23242 Référence CVE CVE-2026-23243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68185 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68190 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68191 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68192 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68194 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68198 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68201 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68208 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68213 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68213 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68214 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68218 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68219 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0547Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2025-39764 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39863 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40005 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40016 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40219 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40358 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71067 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71221 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71265 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71266 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71267 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0548Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-40016 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40147 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40147 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40219 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40242 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40358 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40358 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68175 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68736 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71067 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71152 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71161 Référence CVE CVE-2025-71221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0545Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68168 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68176 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68177 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68185 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68191 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68192 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68194 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0522Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-22022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38022 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38234 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40019 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40164 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0495Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-38125 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38232 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38234 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38234 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38408 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38591 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38591 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40164 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0453Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68168 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68176 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68177 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68185 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68191 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68192 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68194 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68229 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68238 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0369Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68185 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68188 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68190 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68192 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68194 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68195 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68201 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68208 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68209 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68218 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-68190 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68191 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68192 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68193 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68193 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68194 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68196 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68201 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68214 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68219 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-68190 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68191 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68192 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68193 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68193 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68194 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68196 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68196 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68201 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68214 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68214 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68219 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68220 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68220 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0247Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68185 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68188 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68190 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68192 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68194 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68195 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68201 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68208 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68209 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68218 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0225Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68185 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68188 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68190 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68192 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68194 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68195 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68201 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68208 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68209 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68218 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68227 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0227Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68196 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68197 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68198 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68199 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68199 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68201 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68202 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68205 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68207 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68208 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68209 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68210 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68210 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0194Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68196 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68197 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68198 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68199 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68199 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68201 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68202 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68205 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68207 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68208 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68209 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68210 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68210 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0169Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2025-68196 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68197 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68198 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68199 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68199 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68201 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68202 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68205 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68207 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68208 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68209 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68210 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68210 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68239 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68241 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0166Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2025-39872 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40039 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40110 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40149 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40164 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40170 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40170 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40276 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40276 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40325 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68254 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68255 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0128Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68185 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68190 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68192 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68194 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68195 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68197 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68198 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68201 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68202 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68202 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68207 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68208 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68209 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68210 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68210 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68213 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68213 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68215 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0108Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2025-68184 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68185 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68190 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68192 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68194 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68195 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68197 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68201 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68201 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68207 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68208 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68209 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68209 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68218 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68222 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68223 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 4.12, 5.10.253 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.203 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.167 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.130 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.64 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.17.9 ≤ 6.17.*, 6.18 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 16 Dec 2025 · Last source change 8 Sept 2026, 08:43 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-203690
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD not scheduled

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    1a64edf54f55d7956cf5a0d95898bc1f84f9b818 < 83273af0b60c093ba0085c205864d8542e1b1653; 1a64edf54f55d7956cf5a0d95898bc1f84f9b818 < b19492c25eff04852e0cb58f9bb8238b6695ed2d; 1a64edf54f55d7956cf5a0d95898bc1f84f9b818 < 4de80f0dc3868408dd7fe9817e507123c9dd8bb0; 1a64edf54f55d7956cf5a0d95898bc1f84f9b818 < b477ef7fa612fa45b6b3134d90d1eeb09396500a; 1a64edf54f55d7956cf5a0d95898bc1f84f9b818 < 4ab2cd906e4e1a19ddbda6eb532851b0e9cda110; 1a64edf54f55d7956cf5a0d95898bc1f84f9b818 < 2b52d89cbbb0dbe3e948d8d9a91e704316dccfe6; 1a64edf54f55d7956cf5a0d95898bc1f84f9b818 < 90918e3b6404c2a37837b8f11692471b4c512de2; 4.12 · Fixed: < 4.12; 5.10.253 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.203 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.1.167 ≤ 6.1.*; 6.6.130 ≤ 6.6.*; 6.12.64 ≤ 6.12.*; 6.17.9 ≤ 6.17.*; 6.18 ≤ *
    After
    Linux: 1a64edf54f55d7956cf5a0d95898bc1f84f9b818 < 83273af0b60c093ba0085c205864d8542e1b1653, 1a64edf54f55d7956cf5a0d95898bc1f84f9b818 < b19492c25eff04852e0cb58f9bb8238b6695ed2d, 1a64edf54f55d7956cf5a0d95898bc1f84f9b818 < 4de80f0dc3868408dd7fe9817e507123c9dd8bb0, 1a64edf54f55d7956cf5a0d95898bc1f84f9b818 < b477ef7fa612fa45b6b3134d90d1eeb09396500a, 1a64edf54f55d7956cf5a0d95898bc1f84f9b818 < 4ab2cd906e4e1a19ddbda6eb532851b0e9cda110, 1a64edf54f55d7956cf5a0d95898bc1f84f9b818 < 2b52d89cbbb0dbe3e948d8d9a91e704316dccfe6, 1a64edf54f55d7956cf5a0d95898bc1f84f9b818 < 90918e3b6404c2a37837b8f11692471b4c512de2, 4.12 · Fixed: Linux: < 4.12, 5.10.253 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.203 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.167 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.130 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.12.64 ≤ 6.12.*, 6.17.9 ≤ 6.17.*, 6.18 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-68206 · cve.blacktree.nl