Evidence used
- No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
BlackTreeCVE IntelligenceBSI · GStreamer: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service
BSI has published official national guidance for this CVE while canonical CVE data is pending.
BSI has published official national guidance for this CVE while canonical CVE data is pending.
Fix not verifiedEin Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in GStreamer ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.
Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in GStreamer ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.
The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.
An attacker operating through the affected interface may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.
Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in GStreamer ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.
The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.
An attacker operating through the affected interface may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.
Not available from the selected scoring authority.Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Published 28 Dec 2025 · Last source change 28 Dec 2025, 23:00 UTC · CWE not yet assigned
Missing structured fields: official CVE record, canonical affected-version range, CVSS base score. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.