BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-66221High confidence

Werkzeug safe_join() allows Windows special device names

pallets · werkzeug

Official source article: GitHub GHSA-HGF8-39GV-G3F2 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

6.3MediumCVSS 4.0
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.51% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs pallets werkzeug and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcepython-werkzeugNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcepython-werkzeugNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcepython-werkzeugNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcepython-werkzeugNot affectedDebian marks this release not affected (fixed-version marker 0).Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Open-source package ranges2 source-attributed ranges

These OSV and GitHub advisory ranges apply only to the named package and ecosystem. A listed fixed version is not a universal product patch or proof that an update is installed.

Ecosystem and packageAffected rangeFirst fixed versionEvidence
PyPIwerkzeugECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; fixed 3.1.43.1.4OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
pipwerkzeug< 3.1.43.1.4GitHub advisory ↗upstream repository advisory · 2 Dec 2025
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-199893

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. Prior to version 3.1.4, Werkzeug's safe_join function allows path segments with Windows device names. On Windows, there are special device names such as CON, AUX, etc that are implicitly present and readable in every directory. send_from_directory uses safe_join to safely serve files at user-specified paths under a directory. If the application is running on Windows, and the requested path ends with a special device name, the file will be opened successfully, but reading will hang indefinitely. This issue has been patched in version 3.1.4.

What

Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. Prior to version 3.1.4, Werkzeug's safe_join function allows path segments with Windows device names. On Windows, there are special device names such as CON, AUX, etc that are implicitly present and readable in every directory. send_from_directory uses safe_join to safely serve files at user-specified paths under a directory. If the application is running on Windows, and the requested path ends with a special device name, the file will be opened successfully, but reading will hang indefinitely. This issue has been patched in version 3.1.4.

Why

The product constructs pathnames from user input, but it does not handle or incorrectly handles a pathname containing a Windows device name such as AUX or CON. This typically leads to denial of service or an information exposure when the application attempts to process the pathname as a regular file.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. Prior to version 3.1.4, Werkzeug's safe_join function allows path segments with Windows device names. On Windows, there are special device names such as CON, AUX, etc that are implicitly present and readable in every directory. send_from_directory uses safe_join to safely serve files at user-specified paths under a directory. If the application is running on Windows, and the requested path ends with a special device name, the file will be opened successfully, but reading will hang indefinitely. This issue has been patched in version 3.1.4.

Why

The product constructs pathnames from user input, but it does not handle or incorrectly handles a pathname containing a Windows device name such as AUX or CON. This typically leads to denial of service or an information exposure when the application attempts to process the pathname as a regular file.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Handling of Windows Device Names → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Not a CVSS 4.0 base metric
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-67 ↗

CWE-67: Improper Handling of Windows Device Names. The product constructs pathnames from user input, but it does not handle or incorrectly handles a pathname containing a Windows device name such as AUX or CON. This typically leads to denial of service or an information exposure when the application attempts to process the pathname as a regular file.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 4.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.ATPresentAttack requirements: A particular deployment or execution condition must be present.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.VCNoneVulnerable-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.VINoneVulnerable-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.VALowVulnerable-system availability: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.SCNoneSubsequent-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SINoneSubsequent-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SANoneSubsequent-system availability: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-67
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2933Splunk SOAR: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Splunk SOAR ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, um Informationen offenzulegen, um Dateien zu manipulieren, um einen SQL-Injection Angriff durchzuführen, um einen Cross-Site Scripting Angriff durchzuführen, und um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20251203Security Bulletin 03 Dec 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 03 Dec 2025, published on 3 December 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1056Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Splunk

ecord?id=CVE-2025-13465 Référence CVE CVE-2025-13473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13473 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14017 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14550 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14550 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14819 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15599 Référence CVE CVE-2025-53859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6545 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6547 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6547 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66221 Référence CVE CVE-2025-67724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-67724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-67725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-67725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-67726 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-67726 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68428 Référence CVE CVE-2025-69873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69873 Référence CVE CVE-2026-0540 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0540 Référence CVE CVE-2026-1207 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1207 Référence CVE CVE-2026-1285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0901Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ord?id=CVE-2025-23165 Référence CVE CVE-2025-47287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47287 Référence CVE CVE-2025-50181 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50181 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59436 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59437 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-62718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6493 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6493 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66221 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-67724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-67724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-67725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-67725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-67726 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-67726 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68157 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68458 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68470 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0667Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

Record?id=CVE-2025-6176 Référence CVE CVE-2025-62718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-64718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-64718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-64756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-64756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6545 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6547 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6547 Référence CVE CVE-2025-65945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-65945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66030 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66031 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66221 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-67221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-67221 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68741 Référence CVE CVE-2025-69277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69277 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7339 Référence CVE CVE-2026-0846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0556Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2025-61726 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61730 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61731 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61731 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61732 Référence CVE CVE-2025-62813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66034 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66221 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6638 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66516 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66614 Référence CVE CVE-2025-67221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-67221 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0224Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2025-40248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40277 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61140 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61140 Référence CVE CVE-2025-64756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-64756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-65106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-65106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66019 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66019 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66030 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66031 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66031 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66035 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66221 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66412 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66412 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68146 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68285 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68480 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68615 Référence CVE CVE-2025-68664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0109Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ecord?id=CVE-2025-57810 Référence CVE CVE-2025-58056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58056 Référence CVE CVE-2025-58057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58057 Référence CVE CVE-2025-58457 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58457 Référence CVE CVE-2025-58754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58754 Référence CVE CVE-2025-5889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5889 Référence CVE CVE-2025-64720 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-64720 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6493 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6493 Référence CVE CVE-2025-65018 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-65018 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66221 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66293 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66293 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7783 Référence CVE CVE-2025-9086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9086 Référence CVE CVE-2026-21441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21441 Référence CVE CVE-2026-21925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21925 Référence CVE CVE-2026-21945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1064Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Microsoft

2977 du 29 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-13601 du 29 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-64704 du 29 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-64713 du 29 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-66030 du 29 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-66031 du 29 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-66382 du 29 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-58436 du 30 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-61915 du 30 novembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-12638 du 03 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft CVE-2025-66221 du 03 décembre 2025 Une gestion de version détaillée se trouve à la fin de ce document. Risques Atteinte à l'intégrité des données Atteinte à la confidentialité des données Contournement de la politique de sécurité Déni de service à distance Exécution de code arbitraire à distance Non spécifié par l'éditeur Systèmes affectés azl3 cups 2.4.13-1 azl3 expat 2.6.4-2 azl3 fluent-bit 3.1.9-6 azl3 glib versions antérieures à 2.78.6-5 azl3 grub2 2.06-25 azl3 haproxy versions antérieures à 2.9.11-4 azl3 keras 3.3.3-5 azl3 kernel versions antérieures à 6.6.117.1-1 azl3 kubevirt 1.5.0-5 azl3 libpng versions antérieures à 1.6.51-1 azl3 libvirt versions

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-020967Pallets project の Werkzeug における Windows デバイス名の処理に関する脆弱性

Pallets project の Werkzeug には、Windows デバイス名の処理に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
werkzeug: < 3.1.4
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 29 Nov 2025 · Last source change 1 Dec 2025, 15:35 UTC · CWE-67 · Improper Handling of Windows Device Names

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-199893
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-66221 · cve.blacktree.nl