BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-60876High confidence

n/a — Improper Access Control

n/a · n/a

6.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

1 package state
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivebusyboxUnder evaluationCanonical reports that the package might be affected and still needs evaluation or fixing.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-253495 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-253495: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SINEC OS before V4.0
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)
Summary
BusyBox wget thru 1.3.7 accepted raw CR (0x0D)/LF (0x0A) and other C0 control bytes in the HTTP request-target (path/query), allowing the request line to be split and attacker-controlled headers to be injected. To preserve the HTTP/1.1 request-line shape METHOD SP request-target SP HTTP/1.1, a raw space (0x20) in the request-target must also be rejected (clients should use %20).
Remediation
Update to V4.0 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-50804

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

BusyBox wget thru 1.3.7 accepted raw CR (0x0D)/LF (0x0A) and other C0 control bytes in the HTTP request-target (path/query), allowing the request line to be split and attacker-controlled headers to be injected. To preserve the HTTP/1.1 request-line shape METHOD SP request-target SP HTTP/1.1, a raw space (0x20) in the request-target must also be rejected (clients should use %20).

What

BusyBox wget thru 1.3.7 accepted raw CR (0x0D)/LF (0x0A) and other C0 control bytes in the HTTP request-target (path/query), allowing the request line to be split and attacker-controlled headers to be injected. To preserve the HTTP/1.1 request-line shape METHOD SP request-target SP HTTP/1.1, a raw space (0x20) in the request-target must also be rejected (clients should use %20).

Why

The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

BusyBox wget thru 1.3.7 accepted raw CR (0x0D)/LF (0x0A) and other C0 control bytes in the HTTP request-target (path/query), allowing the request line to be split and attacker-controlled headers to be injected. To preserve the HTTP/1.1 request-line shape METHOD SP request-target SP HTTP/1.1, a raw space (0x20) in the request-target must also be rejected (clients should use %20).

Why

The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Reference recorded

A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Access Control → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-284 ↗

CWE-284: Improper Access Control. The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CLowConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ILowIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ANoneAvailability impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-284Public exploit reference
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2912Dell PowerScale OneFS: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell PowerScale OneFS ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, um Informationen offenzulegen, und um Daten zu manipulieren.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-2355Dell integrated Dell Remote Access Controller: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell integrated Dell Remote Access Controller ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service auszulösen, Informationen offenzulegen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen und potentiell Code auszuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2537BusyBox (wget): Schwachstelle ermöglicht Umgehung von Sicherheitsvorkehrungen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in BusyBox (wget) ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ecord?id=CVE-2025-59464 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59465 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59466 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59830 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6069 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-60753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-60753 Référence CVE CVE-2025-60876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-60876 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61661 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61662 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61663 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61664 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61723 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61723 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ord?id=CVE-2025-58189 Référence CVE CVE-2025-5918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5918 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59375 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59375 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59464 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59465 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59466 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59691 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59692 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59692 Référence CVE CVE-2025-60753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-60753 Référence CVE CVE-2025-60876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-60876 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61661 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61662 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61663 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61664 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61723 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61723 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

rg/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5918 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59375 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59375 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59419 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59419 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6020 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6021 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6052 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6069 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-60753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-60753 Référence CVE CVE-2025-60876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-60876 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6141 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6170 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6170 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61723 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61723 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61726 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61726 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0199Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

rg/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5914 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59375 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59375 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59464 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59775 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6020 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6021 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6052 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6052 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6069 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6075 Référence CVE CVE-2025-60876 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-60876 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61594 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61594 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61723 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61723 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61726 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61726 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61727 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61727 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61728 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-023794BusyBoxにおけるアクセス制御に関する脆弱性

BusyBox wget バージョン 1.3.7 までには、HTTP リクエストターゲット（パスやクエリ）内で生の CR（0x0D）や LF（0x0A）、その他の C0 制御バイトを受け入れてしまう問題が存在していました。この問題により、リクエストラインが分割され、攻撃者が制御するヘッダーを挿入できてしまいます。HTTP/1.1 のリクエストライン構造（METHOD SP request-target SP HTTP/1.1）を維持するため、リクエストターゲット内の生のスペース（0x20）も拒否する必要があります（クライアントは %20 を使用すべきです）。

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-6641MS 12월 보안 위협에 따른 정기 보안 업데이트 권고

onsumption when printing error string for host certificate validation in crypto/x509 | | Mariner | CVE-2025-61727 | Improper application of excluded DNS name constraints when verifying wildcard names in crypto/x509 | | Mariner | CVE-2025-61664 | Grub2: missing unregister call for normal_exit command may lead to use-after-free | | Mariner | CVE-2025-61663 | Grub2: missing unregister call for normal commands may lead to use-after-free | | Mariner | CVE-2025-61662 | Grub2: missing unregister call for gettext command may lead to use-after-free | | Mariner | CVE-2025-61661 | Grub2: grub2: out-of-bounds write via malicious usb device | | Mariner | CVE-2025-60876 | BusyBox wget thru 1.3.7 accepted raw CR (0x0D)/LF (0x0A) and other C0 control bytes in the HTTP request-target (path/query), allowing the request line to be split and attacker-controlled headers to be injected. To preserve the HTTP/1.1 request-line shape METHOD SP request-target SP HTTP/1.1, a raw space (0x20) in the request-target must also be rejected (clients should use %20). | | Host Process for Windows Tasks | CVE-2025-60710 | Host Process for Windows Tasks Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | | Mariner | CVE-2025-59777 | NULL pointer dereference vulnerability exists in GNU libmicrohttpd v1.0.2 and earlier. The vulnerability was fix

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
Update to V4.0 or later version
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 10 Nov 2025 · Last source change 2 Jun 2026, 13:00 UTC · CWE-284 · Improper Access Control

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCISA ADP
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-50804
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-50804↗Vendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT↗CISA Vulnrichment SSVC evidence↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Public exploit reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-60876 · cve.blacktree.nl