Evidence used
- No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
- Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
- EPSS is 0.13% for the current model date.
BlackTreeCVE IntelligenceUnknown · Unknown
Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.
Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.
Fix not verifiedReolink Video Doorbell WiFi DB_566128M5MP_W performs insufficient validation of firmware update signatures. This allows attackers to load malicious firmware images, resulting in arbitrary code execution with root privileges. NOTE: this is disputed by the Supplier because the integrity of updates is instead assured via a "private encryption algorithm" and other "tamper-proof verification."
Reolink Video Doorbell WiFi DB_566128M5MP_W performs insufficient validation of firmware update signatures. This allows attackers to load malicious firmware images, resulting in arbitrary code execution with root privileges. NOTE: this is disputed by the Supplier because the integrity of updates is instead assured via a "private encryption algorithm" and other "tamper-proof verification."
Untrusted input reaches a command interpreter without sufficient validation or separation from command syntax.
An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with elevated privileges. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.
Reolink Video Doorbell WiFi DB_566128M5MP_W performs insufficient validation of firmware update signatures. This allows attackers to load malicious firmware images, resulting in arbitrary code execution with root privileges. NOTE: this is disputed by the Supplier because the integrity of updates is instead assured via a "private encryption algorithm" and other "tamper-proof verification."
Untrusted input reaches a command interpreter without sufficient validation or separation from command syntax.
An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with elevated privileges. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.
CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection'). The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:NCommon Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Published 16 Oct 2025 · Last source change 21 Oct 2025, 12:50 UTC · CWE-77 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')
Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.
No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.