BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2025-59472High confidence

A denial of service vulnerability exists in Next.js versions with Partial Prerendering (PPR) enabled when running in minimal mode

vercel · next

Official source article: GitHub GHSA-5F7Q-JPQC-WP7H ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

5.9MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Fix not verified
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.42% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs vercel next and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Open-source package ranges32 source-attributed ranges

These OSV and GitHub advisory ranges apply only to the named package and ecosystem. A listed fixed version is not a universal product patch or proof that an update is installed.

Ecosystem and packageAffected rangeFirst fixed versionEvidence
npmnext>= 16.0.0-beta.0, < 16.1.516.1.5GitHub advisory ↗upstream repository advisory · 8 Apr 2026
npmnext>= 15.6.0-canary.0, < 15.6.0-canary.6115.6.0-canary.61GitHub advisory ↗upstream repository advisory · 8 Apr 2026
npmnext>= 15.0.0-canary.0, <= 15.0.0-canary.205Not statedGitHub advisory ↗upstream repository advisory · 8 Apr 2026
npmnext>= 15.0.1-canary.0, <= 15.0.1-canary.3Not statedGitHub advisory ↗upstream repository advisory · 8 Apr 2026
npmnext>= 15.0.2-canary.0, <= 15.0.2-canary.11Not statedGitHub advisory ↗upstream repository advisory · 8 Apr 2026
npmnext>= 15.0.3-canary.0, <= 15.0.3-canary.9Not statedGitHub advisory ↗upstream repository advisory · 8 Apr 2026
npmnext>= 15.0.4-canary.0, <= 15.0.4-canary.52Not statedGitHub advisory ↗upstream repository advisory · 8 Apr 2026
npmnext>= 15.1.1-canary.0, <= 15.1.1-canary.27Not statedGitHub advisory ↗upstream repository advisory · 8 Apr 2026
npmnext>= 15.2.0-canary.0, <= 15.2.0-canary.77Not statedGitHub advisory ↗upstream repository advisory · 8 Apr 2026
npmnext>= 15.2.1-canary.0, <= 15.2.1-canary.6Not statedGitHub advisory ↗upstream repository advisory · 8 Apr 2026
npmnext>= 15.2.2-canary.0, <= 15.2.2-canary.7Not statedGitHub advisory ↗upstream repository advisory · 8 Apr 2026
npmnext>= 15.3.0-canary.0, <= 15.3.0-canary.46Not statedGitHub advisory ↗upstream repository advisory · 8 Apr 2026
npmnext>= 15.3.1-canary.0, <= 15.3.1-canary.15Not statedGitHub advisory ↗upstream repository advisory · 8 Apr 2026
npmnext>= 15.4.0-canary.0, <= 15.4.0-canary.130Not statedGitHub advisory ↗upstream repository advisory · 8 Apr 2026
npmnext>= 15.4.2-canary.0, <= 15.4.2-canary.56Not statedGitHub advisory ↗upstream repository advisory · 8 Apr 2026
npmnext>= 15.5.1-canary.0, <= 15.5.1-canary.39Not statedGitHub advisory ↗upstream repository advisory · 8 Apr 2026
npmnextSEMVER: introduced 16.0.0-beta.0; fixed 16.1.516.1.5OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
npmnextSEMVER: introduced 15.0.0-canary.0; last affected 15.0.0-canary.205Not statedOSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
npmnextSEMVER: introduced 15.0.1-canary.0; last affected 15.0.1-canary.3Not statedOSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
npmnextSEMVER: introduced 15.0.2-canary.0; last affected 15.0.2-canary.11Not statedOSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
npmnextSEMVER: introduced 15.0.3-canary.0; last affected 15.0.3-canary.9Not statedOSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
npmnextSEMVER: introduced 15.0.4-canary.0; last affected 15.0.4-canary.52Not statedOSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
npmnextSEMVER: introduced 15.1.1-canary.0; last affected 15.1.1-canary.27Not statedOSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
npmnextSEMVER: introduced 15.2.0-canary.0; last affected 15.2.0-canary.77Not statedOSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
npmnextSEMVER: introduced 15.2.1-canary.0; last affected 15.2.1-canary.6Not statedOSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
npmnextSEMVER: introduced 15.2.2-canary.0; last affected 15.2.2-canary.7Not statedOSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
npmnextSEMVER: introduced 15.3.0-canary.0; last affected 15.3.0-canary.46Not statedOSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
npmnextSEMVER: introduced 15.3.1-canary.0; last affected 15.3.1-canary.15Not statedOSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
npmnextSEMVER: introduced 15.4.0-canary.0; last affected 15.4.0-canary.130Not statedOSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
npmnextSEMVER: introduced 15.4.2-canary.0; last affected 15.4.2-canary.56Not statedOSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
npmnextSEMVER: introduced 15.5.1-canary.0; last affected 15.5.1-canary.39Not statedOSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
npmnextSEMVER: introduced 15.6.0-canary.0; fixed 15.6.0-canary.6115.6.0-canary.61OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-206333

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Fix not verified
01

What, why and how

A denial of service vulnerability exists in Next.js versions with Partial Prerendering (PPR) enabled when running in minimal mode. The PPR resume endpoint accepts unauthenticated POST requests with the `Next-Resume: 1` header and processes attacker-controlled postponed state data. Two closely related vulnerabilities allow an attacker to crash the server process through memory exhaustion: 1. **Unbounded request body buffering**: The server buffers the entire POST request body into memory using `Buffer.concat()` without enforcing any size limit, allowing arbitrarily large payloads to exhaust available memory. 2. **Unbounded decompression (zipbomb)**: The resume data cache is decompressed using `inflateSync()` without limiting the decompressed output size. A small compressed payload can expand to hundreds of megabytes or gigabytes, causing memory exhaustion. Both attack vectors result in a fatal V8 out-of-memory error (`FATAL ERROR: Reached heap limit Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memory`) causing the Node.js process to terminate. The zipbomb variant is particularly dangerous as it can bypass reverse proxy request size limits while still causing large memory allocation on the server. To be affected you must have an application running with `experimental.ppr: true` or `cacheComponents: true` configured along with the NEXT_PRIVATE_MINIMAL_MODE=1 environment variable. Strongly consider upgrading to 15.6.0-canary.61 or 16.1.5 to reduce risk and prevent availability issues in Next applications.

What

A denial of service vulnerability exists in Next.js versions with Partial Prerendering (PPR) enabled when running in minimal mode. The PPR resume endpoint accepts unauthenticated POST requests with the `Next-Resume: 1` header and processes attacker-controlled postponed state data. Two closely related vulnerabilities allow an attacker to crash the server process through memory exhaustion: 1. **Unbounded request body buffering**: The server buffers the entire POST request body into memory using `Buffer.concat()` without enforcing any size limit, allowing arbitrarily large payloads to exhaust available memory. 2. **Unbounded decompression (zipbomb)**: The resume data cache is decompressed using `inflateSync()` without limiting the decompressed output size. A small compressed payload can expand to hundreds of megabytes or gigabytes, causing memory exhaustion. Both attack vectors result in a fatal V8 out-of-memory error (`FATAL ERROR: Reached heap limit Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memory`) causing the Node.js process to terminate. The zipbomb variant is particularly dangerous as it can bypass reverse proxy request size limits while still causing large memory allocation on the server. To be affected you must have an application running with `experimental.ppr: true` or `cacheComponents: true` configured along with the NEXT_PRIVATE_MINIMAL_MODE=1 environment variable. Strongly consider upgrading to 15.6.0-canary.61 or 16.1.5 to reduce risk and prevent availability issues in Next applications.

Why

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

A denial of service vulnerability exists in Next.js versions with Partial Prerendering (PPR) enabled when running in minimal mode. The PPR resume endpoint accepts unauthenticated POST requests with the `Next-Resume: 1` header and processes attacker-controlled postponed state data. Two closely related vulnerabilities allow an attacker to crash the server process through memory exhaustion: 1. **Unbounded request body buffering**: The server buffers the entire POST request body into memory using `Buffer.concat()` without enforcing any size limit, allowing arbitrarily large payloads to exhaust available memory. 2. **Unbounded decompression (zipbomb)**: The resume data cache is decompressed using `inflateSync()` without limiting the decompressed output size. A small compressed payload can expand to hundreds of megabytes or gigabytes, causing memory exhaustion. Both attack vectors result in a fatal V8 out-of-memory error (`FATAL ERROR: Reached heap limit Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memory`) causing the Node.js process to terminate. The zipbomb variant is particularly dangerous as it can bypass reverse proxy request size limits while still causing large memory allocation on the server. To be affected you must have an application running with `experimental.ppr: true` or `cacheComponents: true` configured along with the NEXT_PRIVATE_MINIMAL_MODE=1 environment variable. Strongly consider upgrading to 15.6.0-canary.61 or 16.1.5 to reduce risk and prevent availability issues in Next applications.

Why

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Uncontrolled Resource Consumption → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-400 ↗

CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption. The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-400
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0219Vercel Next.js: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Vercel Next.js ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260128Security Bulletin 28 Jan 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 28 Jan 2026, published on 28 January 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0901Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2025-14505 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15284 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15599 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23165 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23165 Référence CVE CVE-2025-47287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47287 Référence CVE CVE-2025-50181 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50181 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59436 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59437 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-62718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6493 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6493 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66221 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66221 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66418 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66418 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-67724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-67724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-67725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-67725 Référence CVE CVE-2025-67726 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0667Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ord?id=CVE-2025-15284 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22870 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-41248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-41248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-41249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-41249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-5187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5187 Référence CVE CVE-2025-53643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53643 Référence CVE CVE-2025-58754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58754 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6176 Référence CVE CVE-2025-62718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-64718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-64718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-64756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-64756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6545 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6547 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6547 Référence CVE CVE-2025-65945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-65945 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66030 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-20

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-004902Vercel, Inc. (旧 Zeit, Inc.)のNext.jsにおけるリソースの枯渇に関する脆弱性

Next.jsの部分プリレンダリング(PPR)が有効で、最小モードで動作しているバージョンにおいて、サービス拒否の脆弱性が存在します。PPRのレジュームエンドポイントは、`Next-Resume: 1`ヘッダーを含む認証されていないPOSTリクエストを受け入れ、攻撃者が制御可能な延期状態データを処理します。密接に関連した2つの脆弱性により、攻撃者はメモリ不足によりサーバープロセスをクラッシュさせることが可能です。1. **無制限のリクエストボディバッファリング**:サーバーはPOSTリクエストボディ全体を`Buffer.concat()`を用いてメモリにバッファリングしますが、サイズ制限を設けておらず、任意の大きさのペイロードにより利用可能なメモリを枯渇させる恐れがあります。2. **無制限の解凍(zipbomb)**:レジュームデータキャッシュは`inflateSync()`で解凍されますが、解凍後の出力量に制限がなく、小さな圧縮ペイロードが数百メガバイトやギガバイトに膨張し、メモリ枯渇を引き起こします。両方の攻撃手法は致命的なV8のメモリ不足エラー(`FATAL ERROR: Reached heap limit Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memory`)を引き起こし、Node.jsプロセスを強制終了させます。zipbomb型は特に危険で、リバースプロキシのリクエストサイズ制限を回避しつつ、大きなメモリ割り当てをサーバーで発生させる可能性があります。影響を受けるためには、`experimental.ppr: true`または`cacheComponents: true`が設定され、さらにNEXT_PRIVATE_MINIMAL_MODE=1環境変数が有効である必要があります。リスク軽減およびNextアプリケーションの可用性問題防止のために、15.6.0-canary.61または16.1.5へのアップグレードを強く推奨します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix not verified
Affected
next: 15.0.0-canary.0 < 15.0.0, 15.0.1-canary.0 < 15.0.1, 15.0.2-canary.0 < 15.0.2, 15.0.3-canary.0 < 15.0.3, 15.0.4-canary.0 < 15.0.4, 15.1.0-canary.0 < 15.1.0, 15.1.1-canary.0 < 15.1.1, 15.1.2-canary.0 < 15.1.2, 15.1.3-canary.0 < 15.1.3, 15.1.4-canary.0 < 15.1.4, 15.1.5-canary.0 < 15.1.5, 15.1.6-canary.0 < 15.1.6, 15.1.7-canary.0 < 15.1.7, 15.2.0-canary.0 < 15.2.0, 15.2.1-canary.0 < 15.2.1, 15.2.2-canary.0 < 15.2.2, 15.2.3-canary.0 < 15.2.3, 15.2.4-canary.0 < 15.2.4, 15.2.5-canary.0 < 15.2.5, 15.3.0-canary.0 < 15.3.0, 15.3.1-canary.0 < 15.3.1, 15.3.2-canary.0 < 15.3.2, 15.1.8-canary.0 < 15.1.8, 15.3.3-canary.0 < 15.3.3, 15.4.0-canary.0 < 15.4.0, 15.3.4-canary.0 < 15.3.4, 15.3.5-canary.0 < 15.3.5, 15.4.1-canary.0 < 15.4.1, 15.4.2-canary.0 < 15.4.2, 15.4.3-canary.0 < 15.4.3, 15.4.4-canary.0 < 15.4.4, 15.4.5-canary.0 < 15.4.5, 15.4.6-canary.0 < 15.4.6, 15.4.7-canary.0 < 15.4.7, 15.5.0-canary.0 < 15.5.0, 15.5.1-canary.0 < 15.5.1, 15.5.2-canary.0 < 15.5.2, 15.5.3-canary.0 < 15.5.3, 15.5.4-canary.0 < 15.5.4, 15.5.5-canary.0 < 15.5.5, 15.5.6-canary.0 < 15.5.6, 15.5.7-canary.0 < 15.5.7, 15.4.8-canary.0 < 15.4.8, 15.1.9-canary.0 < 15.1.9, 15.0.5-canary.0 < 15.0.5, 15.3.6-canary.0 < 15.3.6, 15.2.6-canary.0 < 15.2.6, 15.5.8-canary.0 < 15.5.8, 15.4.9-canary.0 < 15.4.9, 15.3.7-canary.0 < 15.3.7, 15.2.7-canary.0 < 15.2.7, 15.1.10-canary.0 < 15.1.10, 15.0.6-canary.0 < 15.0.6, 15.5.9-canary.0 < 15.5.9, 15.4.10-canary.0 < 15.4.10, 15.3.8-canary.0 < 15.3.8, 15.2.8-canary.0 < 15.2.8, 15.1.11-canary.0 < 15.1.11, 15.0.7-canary.0 < 15.0.7, 16.1.0 < 16.1.5
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
No verified patch reference is present in the current structured sources. Check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 26 Jan 2026 · Last source change 27 Jan 2026, 14:54 UTC · CWE-400 · Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-206333
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-59472 · cve.blacktree.nl