BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-59233High confidence

Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Microsoft · Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.53% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Microsoft Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-34384

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.

What

Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.

Why

The product allocates or initializes a resource such as a pointer, object, or variable using one type, but it later accesses that resource using a type that is incompatible with the original type.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

What

Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.

Why

The product allocates or initializes a resource such as a pointer, object, or variable using one type, but it later accesses that resource using a type that is incompatible with the original type.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion') → execute code or commands in the affected security context
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-843 ↗

CWE-843: Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion'). The product allocates or initializes a resource such as a pointer, object, or variable using one type, but it later accesses that resource using a type that is incompatible with the original type.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
After compromise, an attacker may use built-in shells, scripting engines, scheduled tasks and native network utilities for discovery, persistence or movement. This is a plausible LoTL path, not evidence that it has occurred for every attack.
UnauthenticatedRemote code executionCWE-843
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2279Microsoft Office Produkte: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Microsoft Office Produkte ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, um Informationen offenzulegen, und um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20251015Security Bulletin 15 Oct 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 15 Oct 2025, published on 15 October 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0878Multiples vulnérabilités dans Microsoft Office

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans Microsoft Office. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et un déni de service.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-017720マイクロソフトの複数の Microsoft 製品におけるリモートでコードを実行される脆弱性

マイクロソフトの複数の Microsoft 製品には、Microsoft Excel に不備があるため、リモートでコードを実行される脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-6605MS 10월 보안 위협에 따른 정기 보안 업데이트 권고

soft Excel 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock | CVE-2025-59242 | WinSock용 Windows 보조 기능 드라이버 권한 상승 취약성 | | Windows Health and Optimized Experiences Service | CVE-2025-59241 | Windows 상태 및 최적화된 환경 권한 상승 취약성 | | Microsoft Office PowerPoint | CVE-2025-59238 | Microsoft PowerPoint 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Microsoft Office SharePoint | CVE-2025-59237 | Microsoft SharePoint 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Microsoft Office Excel | CVE-2025-59236 | Microsoft Excel 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Microsoft Office Excel | CVE-2025-59235 | Microsoft Excel 정보 유출 취약성 | | Microsoft Office | CVE-2025-59234 | Microsoft Office 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Microsoft Office Excel | CVE-2025-59233 | Microsoft Excel 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Microsoft Office Excel | CVE-2025-59232 | Microsoft Excel 정보 유출 취약성 | | Microsoft Office Excel | CVE-2025-59231 | Microsoft Excel 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Windows Remote Access Connection Manager | CVE-2025-59230 | Windows 원격 액세스 연결 관리자 권한 상승 취약성 | | Microsoft Office | CVE-2025-59229 | Microsoft Office 서비스 거부 취약성 | | Microsoft Office SharePoint | CVE-2025-59228 | Microsoft SharePoint 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Microsoft Office | CVE-2025-59227 | Microsoft Office 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Microsoft Office Visio | CVE-2025-59226 | Microsoft Office Visio 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Microsoft Office Excel | CVE-2025-59225 | Microsoft Excel 원격 코드 실행

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2025-0315Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Microsoft Office

Een kwaadwillende kan de kwetsbaarheden misbruiken om een Denial-of-Service te veroorzaken, willekeurige code uit te voeren met rechten van het slachtoffer, of toegang te krijgen tot gevoelige gegevens in de context van het slachtoffer. Voor succesvol misbruik moet de kwaadwillende het slachtoffer misleiden een malafide bestand te openen, of link te volgen. ``` Microsoft Office SharePoint: |----------------|------|-------------------------------------| | CVE-ID | CVSS | Impact | |----------------|------|-------------------------------------| | CVE-2025-59228 | 8.80 | Uitvoeren van willekeurige code | | CVE-2025-59237 | 8.80 | Uitvoeren van willekeurige code | |----------------|------|-------------------------------------| Microsoft Office Word: |----------------|------|-------------------------------------| | CVE-ID | CVSS | Impact | |----------------|------|-------------------------------------| | CVE-2025-59221 | 7.00 | Uitvoeren van willekeurige code | | CVE-2025-59222 | 7.80 | Uitvoeren van willekeurige code | |----------------|------|-------------------------------------| Microsoft Office Visio: |----------------|------|-------------------------------------| | CVE-ID | CVSS | Impact | |----------------|------|-------------------------------------| | CVE-2025-59226 | 7.80 | Uitvoeren van willekeurige code | |----------------|------|-------------------------------------| Microsoft Office PowerPoint: |----------------|------|-------------------------------------| | CVE-ID | CVSS | Impact | |----------------|------|-------------------------------------| | CVE-2025-59238 | 7.80 | Uitvoeren van willekeurige code | |----------------|------|-------------------------------------| Microsoft Office: |----------------|------|-------------------------------------| | CVE-ID | CVSS | Impact | |----------------|------|-------------------------------------| | CVE-2025-59234 | 7.80 | Uitvoeren van willekeurige code | | CVE-2025-59227 | 7.80 | Uitvoeren van willekeurige code | | CVE-2025-59229 | 5.50 | Denial-of-Service | |----------------|------|-------------------------------------| Microsoft Office Excel: |----------------|------|-------------------------------------| | CVE-ID | CVSS | Impact | |----------------|------|-------------------------------------| | CVE-2025-59231 | 7.80 | Uitvoeren van willekeurige code | | CVE-2025-59233 | 7.80 | Uitvoeren van willekeurige code | | CVE-2025-59235 | 7.10 | Toegang tot gevoelige gegevens | | CVE-2025-59236 | 8.40 | Uitvoeren van willekeurige code | | CVE-2025-59243 | 7.80 | Uitvoeren van willekeurige code | | CVE-2025-59223 | 7.80 | Uitvoeren van willekeurige code | | CVE-2025-59224 | 7.80 | Uitvoeren van willekeurige code | | CVE-2025-59225 | 7.80 | Uitvoeren van willekeurige code | | CVE-2025-59232 | 7.10 | Toegang tot gevoelige gegevens | |----------------|------|-------------------------------------| ```

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 14 Oct 2025 · Last source change 26 Feb 2026, 17:47 UTC · CWE-843 · Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-34384
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceOther authority
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-59233 · cve.blacktree.nl