BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2026
CVE-2025-58406High confidence

Lack of HTTP Response Headers

CGM · CGM CLININET

5.3MediumCVSS 4.0
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Fix not verified
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.19% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs CGM CGM CLININET and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-208152

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Fix not verified
01

What, why and how

The CGM CLININET application respond without essential security HTTP headers, exposing users to client‑side attacks such as clickjacking, MIME sniffing, unsafe caching, weak cross‑origin isolation, and missing transport security controls.

What

The CGM CLININET application respond without essential security HTTP headers, exposing users to client‑side attacks such as clickjacking, MIME sniffing, unsafe caching, weak cross‑origin isolation, and missing transport security controls.

Why

The product does not use or incorrectly uses a protection mechanism that provides sufficient defense against directed attacks against the product.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

The CGM CLININET application respond without essential security HTTP headers, exposing users to client‑side attacks such as clickjacking, MIME sniffing, unsafe caching, weak cross‑origin isolation, and missing transport security controls.

Why

The product does not use or incorrectly uses a protection mechanism that provides sufficient defense against directed attacks against the product.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Protection Mechanism Failure → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Passive interaction required
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Not a CVSS 4.0 base metric
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-693 ↗

CWE-693: Protection Mechanism Failure. The product does not use or incorrectly uses a protection mechanism that provides sufficient defense against directed attacks against the product.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 4.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.ATNoneAttack requirements: No additional deployment or execution condition is required.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIPassiveUser interaction: A user must unknowingly interact with the vulnerable system.VCNoneVulnerable-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.VILowVulnerable-system integrity: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.VANoneVulnerable-system availability: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SCNoneSubsequent-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SINoneSubsequent-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SANoneSubsequent-system availability: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-693
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20260304Security Bulletin 4 Mar 2026

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 4 Mar 2026, published on 4 March 2026. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-006496CompuGroup MedicalのCGM CLININETにおける保護メカニズムの不具合に関する脆弱性

CGM CLININETアプリケーションは、重要なセキュリティHTTPヘッダーが欠如しているため、クリックジャッキング、MIMEスニッフィング、安全でないキャッシュ、弱いクロスオリジン分離、およびトランスポートセキュリティ制御の欠落といったクライアント側攻撃からユーザーが被害を受ける可能性があります。

Official advisory ↗
CERT Polska · Polish · CVE-2025-10350CERT Polska w social mediach

CERT Polska otrzymał zgłoszenia o 8 podatnościach w oprogramowaniu CGM CLININET oraz CGM NETRAAD i koordynował proces ujawniania informacji. Podatność CVE-2025-10350 typu SQL Injection w oprogramowaniu CGM NETRAAD w module imageserver , podczas przetwarzania zapytań C-FIND, umożliwia atakującemu podłączonemu do PACS uzyskanie dostępu do bazy danych, w tym do danych przetwarzanych przez oprogramowanie CGM CLININET. Podatność dotyczy CGM NETRAAD z modułem imageserver w wersjach starszych niż 7.9.0. Podatność CVE-2025-30035 : Podatność pozwala na całkowite ominięcie uwierzytelniania w CGM CLININET i dostęp do systemu na dowolnym, aktywnym koncie użytkownika, po podaniu jego nazwy, bez znajomości hasła ani posiadania żadnych dodatkowych danych. Posiadanie ID sesji jest równoznaczne z możliwością jej przejęcia i dostępem do systemu z uprawnieniami tego użytkownika. Podatność CVE-2025-30042 : CGM CLININET posiada zaimplementowaną funkcjonalność logowania przy użyciu karty inteligentnej. Uwierzytelnienie przeprowadzane jest lokalnie po stronie użytkownika, jednak w rzeczywistości przyjmowany jest jedynie numer certyfikatu. W rezultacie do uwierzytelnienia wystarczy samo posiadanie numeru certyfikatu, niezależnie od faktycznej obecności karty inteligentnej lub posiadania klucza prywatnego. Podatność CVE-2025-30044 : W CGM CLININET, w endpointach: /cgi-bin/CliniNET.prd/utils/usrlogstat_simple.pl , /cgi-bin/CliniNET.prd/utils/usrlogstat.pl , /cgi-bin/CliniNET.prd/utils/userlogstat2.pl oraz /cgi-bin/CliniNET.prd/utils/dblogstat.pl parametry nie są wystarczająco normalizowane, co umożliwia wstrzyknięcie kodu. Podatność CVE-2025-30062 : W CGM CLININET, w usłudze CheckUnitCodeAndKey.pl , w funkcji validateOrgUnit , istnieje możliwość wstrzyknięcia polecenia SQL. Podatność CVE-2025-58402 : Aplikacja CGM CLININET wykorzystuje bezpośrednie, sekwencyjne identyfikatory MessageID bez weryfikacji uprawnień użytkownika. Manipulacja parametrem w żądaniu GET umożliwia odczyt wiadomości oraz załączników innych użytkowników. Podatność CVE-2025-58405 : Aplikacja CGM CLININET nie implementuje żadnych mechanizmów zapobiegających atakom typu clickjacking. Nie wykryto nagłówków bezpieczeństwa HTTP ani zabezpieczeń przed pomijaniem ramek opartych na HTML. W rezultacie, atakujący może osadzić aplikację w złośliwie spreparowanej ramce IFRAME i nakłonić użytkowników do wykonania niezamierzonych działań, w tym potencjalnego ominięcia zabezpieczeń CSRF/XSRF. Podatność CVE-2025-58406 : Aplikacja CGM CLININET odpowiada bez niezbędnych nagłówków HTTP zapewniających bezpieczeństwo, narażając użytkowników na ataki po stronie klienta, takie jak clickjacking, podsłuchiwanie MIME, niebezpieczne buforowanie, słaba izolacja między domenami i brak kontroli bezpieczeństwa warstwy transportowej.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix not verified
Affected
CGM CLININET: < 2025.MS3
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
No verified patch reference is present in the current structured sources. Check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 2 Mar 2026 · Last source change 2 Mar 2026, 12:21 UTC · CWE-693 · Protection Mechanism Failure

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-208152
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-58406 · cve.blacktree.nl