Evidence used
- No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
- EPSS is 0.20% for the current model date.
BlackTreeCVE Intelligencediscourse · discourse
Official source article: GitHub GHSA-7P47-8M82-M2VF ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.
Low technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.
Low technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.
Patch availableDiscourse is an open-source community discussion platform. Versions 3.5.0 and below are vulnerable to XSS attacks through parsing and rendering of chat channel titles and chat thread titles via the quote message functionality when using the rich text editor. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.1.
Discourse is an open-source community discussion platform. Versions 3.5.0 and below are vulnerable to XSS attacks through parsing and rendering of chat channel titles and chat thread titles via the quote message functionality when using the rich text editor. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.1.
The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special characters such as <, >, and & that could be interpreted as web-scripting elements when they are sent to a downstream component that processes web pages.
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
Discourse is an open-source community discussion platform. Versions 3.5.0 and below are vulnerable to XSS attacks through parsing and rendering of chat channel titles and chat thread titles via the quote message functionality when using the rich text editor. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.1.
The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special characters such as <, >, and & that could be interpreted as web-scripting elements when they are sent to a downstream component that processes web pages.
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.
CWE-80: Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS). The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special characters such as <, >, and & that could be interpreted as web-scripting elements when they are sent to a downstream component that processes web pages.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:NCommon Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Published 1 Oct 2025 · Last source change 1 Oct 2025, 19:24 UTC · CWE-80 · Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS)
Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.
No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.