These OSV and GitHub advisory ranges apply only to the named package and ecosystem. A listed fixed version is not a universal product patch or proof that an update is installed.
National CERT insights ?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.
Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.
Official European source
ENISA European Vulnerability Database
Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.
1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier
EUVD-2025-27277
CISA KEV mirrored by ENISA
Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha2, 2.4.8-p2, 2.4.7-p7, 2.4.6-p12, 2.4.5-p14, 2.4.4-p15 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality, and integrity impact to high. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Recorded by ENISA since 24 Oct 2025. Evidence sources: cisa_kev.
ENISA score
9.1 · CVSS 3.1
Advisory evidence
2 linked advisory records
Explicit mitigation evidence
Only statements that explicitly mention a fix, patch, update, workaround or mitigation are shown here.
csaf_ncscnl · NCSC-2025-0284Kwetsbaarheid verholpen in Adobe Commerce en Magento
Recommended actionMitigate now
CISA confirms exploitation in the wild and lists 2025-11-14 as the remediation due date.
Mitigation available
01
What, why and how
Adobe Commerce and Magento Open Source contain an improper input validation vulnerability that could allow an attacker to take over customer accounts through the Commerce REST API.
What
Adobe Commerce and Magento Open Source contain an improper input validation vulnerability that could allow an attacker to take over customer accounts through the Commerce REST API.
Why
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.
How
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
What
Adobe Commerce and Magento Open Source contain an improper input validation vulnerability that could allow an attacker to take over customer accounts through the Commerce REST API.
Why
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.
How
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
02
Exploit reality and attack path
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
Observed exploitation ?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.Confirmed in the wild
CISA added this CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue on 2025-10-24.
Public PoC / exploit material ?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.Reference recorded
A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.
Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Input Validation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness ?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-20: Improper Input Validation. The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.
CVSS vector ?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.ANoneAvailability impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-27277Known-exploited evidence recorded
Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha2, 2.4.8-p2, 2.4.7-p7, 2.4.6-p12, 2.4.5-p14, 2.4.4-p15 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability. A successful attacker can abuse this to achieve session takeover, increasing the confidentiality, and integrity impact to high. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Official EUVD record ↗BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1999Adobe Magento SessionReaper: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Umgehung von Sicherheitsmaßnahmen
Ein Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in Adobe Magento ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen.
Official advisory ↗Canadian Centre for Cyber Security · English · AV25-583Adobe security advisory (AV25-583) - Update 1
On September 9, 2025, Adobe published security advisories to address vulnerabilities in the following products:
Update 1
Official advisory ↗Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250910Security Bulletin 10 SEP 2025
The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 10 SEP 2025, published on 10 September 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0767Vulnérabilité dans les produits Adobe
Une vulnérabilité a été découverte dans les produits Adobe. Elle permet à un attaquant de provoquer un contournement de la politique de sécurité.
Official advisory ↗JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-013659複数のアドビ製品における入力確認に関する脆弱性
アドビの Adobe Commerce、Adobe Commerce B2B、Magento Open Source には、入力確認に関する脆弱性が存在します。
Official advisory ↗KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-6610美 CISA 발표 주요 Exploit 정보공유(Update. 2025-10-24)
Adobe Commerce and Magento Open Source contain an improper input validation vulnerability that could allow an attacker to take over customer accounts through the Commerce REST API.
Official advisory ↗NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2025-0284Kwetsbaarheid verholpen in Adobe Commerce en Magento
De kwetsbaarheid bevindt zich in de wijze waarop invoer wordt gevalideerd in Adobe Commerce en Magento. Deze kwetsbaarheid stelt aanvallers in staat om sessieovername-aanvallen uit te voeren zonder enige interactie van de gebruiker, wat de vertrouwelijkheid en integriteit van gebruikerssessies kan compromitteren.
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Status ?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
The Cyber Centre encourages users and administrators to review the provided web links and apply the necessary updates.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04
Evidence and provenance
Published 9 Sept 2025 · Last source change 24 Oct 2025, 22:20 UTC · CWE-20 · Improper Input Validation
CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source ?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-27277
Product sourceCISA KEV
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched
Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.