BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-54100High confidence

PowerShell Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Microsoft · Windows 10 Version 1607

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 2.23% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1607 and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-202201

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in Windows PowerShell allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.

What

Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in Windows PowerShell allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.

Why

Untrusted input reaches a command interpreter without sufficient validation or separation from command syntax.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

What

Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in Windows PowerShell allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.

Why

Untrusted input reaches a command interpreter without sufficient validation or separation from command syntax.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') → execute code or commands in the affected security context
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-77 ↗

CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection'). The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
After compromise, an attacker may use built-in shells, scripting engines, scheduled tasks and native network utilities for discovery, persistence or movement. This is a plausible LoTL path, not evidence that it has occurred for every attack.
UnauthenticatedRemote code executionCWE-77
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2781Microsoft Windows: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Microsoft Windows und Microsoft Windows Server ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, Rechte zu eskalieren, vertrauliche Informationen auszulesen oder den Host zum Absturz zu bringen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20251210Security Bulletin 10 Dec 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 10 Dec 2025, published on 10 December 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1092Multiples vulnérabilités dans Microsoft Windows

RSS des menaces et incidents Flux RSS des avis Flux RSS des indicateurs de compromission Flux RSS des durcissement et recommandations Flux RSS des bulletins d'actualité Premier Ministre S.G.D.S.N Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information Paris, le 10 décembre 2025 N° CERTFR-2025-AVI-1092 Affaire suivie par: CERT-FR Avis du CERT-FR Objet: Multiples vulnérabilités dans Microsoft Windows Gestion du document Référence CERTFR-2025-AVI-1092 Titre Multiples vulnérabilités dans Microsoft Windows Date de la première version 10 décembre 2025 Date de la dernière version 10 décembre 2025 Source(s) Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Windows CVE-2025-54100 du 09 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Windows CVE-2025-55233 du 09 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Windows CVE-2025-59516 du 09 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Windows CVE-2025-59517 du 09 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Windows CVE-2025-62221 du 09 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Windows CVE-2025-62454 du 09 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Windows CVE-2025-62455 du 09 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Windows CVE-2025-62456 du 09 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Windows CVE-2025-62457 du 09 décembre 2025 Bulletin de sécurité Microsoft Window

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-022337マイクロソフトの複数の Microsoft Windows 製品におけるリモートでコードを実行される脆弱性

マイクロソフトの Microsoft Windows 10、Windows 11、Windows Server には、PowerShell に不備があるため、リモートでコードを実行される脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-001582日立ディスクアレイシステムにおけるSVP 脆弱性対策について (2025年12月分)

Microsoft製品に対して、以下に示す脆弱性が公開されました。 [脆弱性の内容] PowerShell のリモートでコードが実行される脆弱性 (CVE-2025-54100) Windows Projected File System の特権の昇格の脆弱性 (CVE-2025-55233) Windows Storage VSP ドライバーの特権の昇格の脆弱性 (CVE-2025-59516) Windows Storage VSP ドライバーの特権の昇格の脆弱性 (CVE-2025-59517) Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter ドライバーの特権の昇格の脆弱性 (CVE-2025-62221) Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter ドライバーの特権の昇格の脆弱性 (CVE-2025-62454) Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) の特権の昇格の脆弱性 (CVE-2025-62455) Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter ドライバーの特権の昇格の脆弱性 (CVE-2025-62457) Win32k の特権の昇格の脆弱性 (CVE-2025-62458) Windows Projected File System の特権の昇格の脆弱性 (CVE-2025-62461) Windows Projected File System の特権の昇格の脆弱性 (CVE-2025-62462) DirectX グラフィック カーネルのサービス拒否の脆弱性 (CVE-2025-62463) Windows Projected File System の特権の昇格の脆弱性 (CVE-2025-62464) Windows クライアント側のキャッシュの特権昇格の脆弱性 (CVE-2025-62466) Windows Projected File System の特権の昇格の脆弱性 (CVE-2025-62467) Windows 共通ログ ファイル システム ドライバーの特権の昇格の脆弱性 (CVE-2025-62470) Windows Remote Access Connection Manager の特権の昇格の脆弱性 (CVE-2025-62472) Windows ルーティングとリモート アクセス サービス (RRAS) の情報漏えいの脆弱性 (CVE-2025-62473) Windows Remote Access Connection Manager の特権の昇格の脆弱性 (CVE-2025-62474) Windows ルーティングとリモート アクセス サービス (RRAS) のリモートでコードが実行される脆弱性 (CVE-2025-62549) Windows エクスプローラーの特権の昇格の脆弱性 (CVE-2025-62565) Windows Hyper-V のサービス拒否の脆弱性 (CVE-2025-62567) Windows インストーラーの特権の昇格の脆弱性 (CVE-2025-62571) DirectX グラフィック カーネルの特権の昇格の脆弱性 (CVE-2025-62573) Windows エクスプローラーの特権の昇格の脆弱性 (CVE-2025-64658) Windows シェルの特権の昇格の脆弱性 (CVE-2025-64661) Windows DirectX の情報漏えいの脆弱性 (CVE-2025-64670) Windows Storage VSP ドライバーの特権の昇格の脆弱性 (CVE-2025-64673) SVPは直接ストレージ機能には係わりませんので、万一攻撃者から攻撃された場合であってもストレージとしてのデータの内容およびRead/Write機能に支障はありません。また日立ディスクアレイシステムに蓄積されているデータを読み取られることもありません。

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-6667MS 1월 보안 위협에 따른 정기 보안 업데이트 권고

Microsoft Excel 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Microsoft Office Word | CVE-2025-62555 | Microsoft Word 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Microsoft Office | CVE-2025-62554 | Microsoft Office 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Windows Defender Firewall Service | CVE-2025-62468 | Windows Defender 방화벽 서비스 정보 공개 취약성 | | Host Process for Windows Tasks | CVE-2025-60710 | Host Process for Windows Tasks Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | | Windows High Availability Services | CVE-2025-59184 | 저장소 공간 다이렉트 정보 공개 취약성 | | Windows Kernel | CVE-2025-55683 | Windows 커널 정보 유출 취약성 | | Agentic AI and Visual Studio Code | CVE-2025-55319 | 에이전트 AI 및 Visual Studio Code 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Windows PowerShell | CVE-2025-54100 | PowerShell 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Windows Win32 Kernel Subsystem | CVE-2025-24044 | Windows Win32 커널 하위 시스템 권한 상승 취약성 | | Windows Win32 Kernel Subsystem | CVE-2025-21367 | Windows Win32 커널 하위 시스템 권한 상승 취약성 | | Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) | CVE-2025-14766 | Chromium: CVE-2025-14766 Use after free in WebGPU | | Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) | CVE-2025-14765 | Chromium: CVE-2025-14765 Out of bounds read and write in V8 | | Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) | CVE-2025-14373 | Chromium: CVE-2025-14373 Inappropriate implementation in Toolbar | | Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) | CVE-2025-14372 | Chromium: CVE-2025-14372 Use after free in Password

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-6642Microsoft 제품 보안 업데이트 권고

Windows의 PowerShell에서 발생하는 원격 코드 실행 취약점(CVE-2025-54100) [1][2]

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-6641MS 12월 보안 위협에 따른 정기 보안 업데이트 권고

VSP 드라이버 권한 상승 취약성 | | Copilot | CVE-2025-59286 | Copilot 스푸핑 취약성 | | Copilot | CVE-2025-59272 | Copilot 스푸핑 취약성 | | Copilot | CVE-2025-59252 | M365 Copilot 스푸핑 취약성 | | Microsoft Office SharePoint | CVE-2025-59245 | Microsoft SharePoint Online 권한 상승 취약성 | | Windows Projected File System | CVE-2025-55233 | Windows 예상 파일 시스템 권한 상승 취약성 | | Mariner | CVE-2025-54771 | Grub2: use-after-free in grub_file_close() | | Mariner | CVE-2025-54770 | Grub2: use-after-free in net_set_vlan | | Windows Connected Devices Platform Service | CVE-2025-54114 | Windows Connected Devices Platform Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | | Windows PowerShell | CVE-2025-54100 | PowerShell 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock | CVE-2025-54099 | WinSock용 Windows 보조 기능 드라이버 권한 상승 취약성 | | Mariner | CVE-2025-52881 | runc: LSM labels can be bypassed with malicious config using dummy procfs files | | Mariner | CVE-2025-52565 | container escape due to /dev/console mount and related races | | Software for Open Networking in the Cloud (SONiC) | CVE-2025-49752 | Azure Bastion 권한 상승 취약성 | | Mariner | CVE-2025-47913 | Potential denial of service in golang.org/x/crypto/ssh/agent | | Mariner | CVE-2025-40324 | NFSD: Fix crash in nfsd4_read_release() | | Mariner | CVE-2025-40323 | fbcon: Set fb_display[

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 9 Dec 2025 · Last source change 16 Apr 2026, 14:19 UTC · CWE-77 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-202201
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceOther authority
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. BlackTree coverageBlackTree article coverage changed from no BlackTree article to 1 BlackTree article.
    Before
    no BlackTree article
    After
    1 BlackTree article
    BlackTree editorial ↗
  2. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    10.0.14393.0 < 10.0.14393.8688; 10.0.17763.0 < 10.0.17763.8146; 10.0.19044.0 < 10.0.19044.6691; 10.0.19045.0 < 10.0.19045.6691; 10.0.22631.0 < 10.0.22631.6345; 10.0.26100.0 < 10.0.26100.7462; 10.0.26200.0 < 10.0.26200.7462 · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
    After
    Windows 10 Version 1607: 10.0.14393.0 < 10.0.14393.8688; Windows 10 Version 1809: 10.0.17763.0 < 10.0.17763.8146; Windows 10 Version 21H2: 10.0.19044.0 < 10.0.19044.6691; Windows 10 Version 22H2: 10.0.19045.0 < 10.0.19045.6691; Windows 11 version 22H3: 10.0.22631.0 < 10.0.22631.6345; Windows 11 Version 23H2: 10.0.22631.0 < 10.0.22631.6345; Windows 11 Version 24H2: 10.0.26100.0 < 10.0.26100.7462; Windows 11 Version 25H2: 10.0.26200.0 < 10.0.26200.7462; Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1: 6.1.7601.0 < 6.1.7601.28064; Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation): 6.1.7601.0 < 6.1.7601.28064; Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2: 6.0.6003.0 < 6.0.6003.23666; Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation): 6.0.6003.0 < 6.0.6003.23666; Windows Server 2012: 6.2.9200.0 < 6.2.9200.25815; Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation): 6.2.9200.0 < 6.2.9200.25815; Windows Server 2012 R2: 6.3.9600.0 < 6.3.9600.22920; Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation): 6.3.9600.0 < 6.3.9600.22920; Windows Server 2016: 10.0.14393.0 < 10.0.14393.8688; Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation): 10.0.14393.0 < 10.0.14393.8688; Windows Server 2019: 10.0.17763.0 < 10.0.17763.8146; Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation): 10.0.17763.0 < 10.0.17763.8146; Windows Server 2022: 10.0.20348.0 < 10.0.20348.4529; Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation): 10.0.25398.0 < 10.0.25398.2025; Windows Server 2025: 10.0.26100.0 < 10.0.26100.7462; Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation): 10.0.26100.0 < 10.0.26100.7462 · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-54100 · cve.blacktree.nl