BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-53643High confidence

AIOHTTP is vulnerable to HTTP Request/Response Smuggling through incorrect parsing of chunked trailer sections

aio-libs · aiohttp

Official source article: GitHub GHSA-9548-QRRJ-X5PJ ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

1.7LowCVSS 4.0
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Low technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityLowOperational priority:Low, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.33% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs aio-libs aiohttp and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 2 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcepython-aiohttpAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcepython-aiohttpAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcepython-aiohttpVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.12.15-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcepython-aiohttpVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.3.12.15-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · esm-appspython-aiohttpUnder evaluationCanonical reports that the package might be affected and still needs evaluation or fixing.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Open-source package ranges2 source-attributed ranges

These OSV and GitHub advisory ranges apply only to the named package and ecosystem. A listed fixed version is not a universal product patch or proof that an update is installed.

Ecosystem and packageAffected rangeFirst fixed versionEvidence
PyPIaiohttpECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; fixed 3.12.143.12.14OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
pipaiohttp< 3.12.143.12.14GitHub advisory ↗upstream repository advisory · 15 Jul 2025
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-53643 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securityaiohttp: AIOHTTP HTTP Request/Response Smuggling
14 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • openshift-lightspeed/lightspeed-service-api-rhel9 as a component of OpenShift Lightspeed
  • ansible-automation-platform-24/lightspeed-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2
  • ansible-automation-platform-25/lightspeed-chatbot-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2
  • rhelai1/bootc-amd-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI)
  • rhelai1/bootc-aws-nvidia-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI)
  • rhelai1/bootc-azure-amd-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI)
  • rhelai1/bootc-azure-nvidia-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI)
  • rhelai1/bootc-gcp-nvidia-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI)
  • rhelai1/bootc-intel-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI)
  • rhelai1/bootc-nvidia-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI)
  • rhelai1/instructlab-amd-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI)
  • rhelai1/instructlab-intel-rhel9 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI)
Summary
A request smuggling flaw was found in the aiohttp python library. If a pure Python version of aiohttp is installed, without the usual C extensions, for example, or if AIOHTTP_NO_EXTENSIONS is enabled, an attacker can execute a request smuggling attack to bypass certain firewalls or proxy protections.
Remediation
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-21384

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Low technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to version 3.12.14, the Python parser is vulnerable to a request smuggling vulnerability due to not parsing trailer sections of an HTTP request. If a pure Python version of aiohttp is installed (i.e. without the usual C extensions) or AIOHTTP_NO_EXTENSIONS is enabled, then an attacker may be able to execute a request smuggling attack to bypass certain firewalls or proxy protections. Version 3.12.14 contains a patch for this issue.

What

AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to version 3.12.14, the Python parser is vulnerable to a request smuggling vulnerability due to not parsing trailer sections of an HTTP request. If a pure Python version of aiohttp is installed (i.e. without the usual C extensions) or AIOHTTP_NO_EXTENSIONS is enabled, then an attacker may be able to execute a request smuggling attack to bypass certain firewalls or proxy protections. Version 3.12.14 contains a patch for this issue.

Why

The product acts as an intermediary HTTP agent (such as a proxy or firewall) in the data flow between two entities such as a client and server, but it does not interpret malformed HTTP requests or responses in ways that are consistent with how the messages will be processed by those entities that are at the ultimate destination.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to version 3.12.14, the Python parser is vulnerable to a request smuggling vulnerability due to not parsing trailer sections of an HTTP request. If a pure Python version of aiohttp is installed (i.e. without the usual C extensions) or AIOHTTP_NO_EXTENSIONS is enabled, then an attacker may be able to execute a request smuggling attack to bypass certain firewalls or proxy protections. Version 3.12.14 contains a patch for this issue.

Why

The product acts as an intermediary HTTP agent (such as a proxy or firewall) in the data flow between two entities such as a client and server, but it does not interpret malformed HTTP requests or responses in ways that are consistent with how the messages will be processed by those entities that are at the ultimate destination.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Not a CVSS 4.0 base metric
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-444 ↗

CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling'). The product acts as an intermediary HTTP agent (such as a proxy or firewall) in the data flow between two entities such as a client and server, but it does not interpret malformed HTTP requests or responses in ways that are consistent with how the messages will be processed by those entities that are at the ultimate destination.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 4.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.ATPresentAttack requirements: A particular deployment or execution condition must be present.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.VCNoneVulnerable-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.VILowVulnerable-system integrity: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.VANoneVulnerable-system availability: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SCNoneSubsequent-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SINoneSubsequent-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SANoneSubsequent-system availability: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-444
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-3046IBM Concert: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM Concert ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, um Informationen offenzulegen, um Dateien zu manipulieren, um einen Cross-Site Scripting Angriff durchzuführen, um einen SQL-Injection Angriff durchzuführen und um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0165Oracle Siebel CRM: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Oracle Siebel CRM ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2361Oracle Communications: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Oracle Communications ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1212Oracle Utilities Applications: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Oracle Utilities Applications ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2798Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, schädlichen Code auszuführen oder einen Denial of Service herbeizuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250716Security Bulletin 16 Jul 2025 [922 KB]

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 16 Jul 2025 [922 KB], published on 16 July 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0667Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ord?id=CVE-2025-13465 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14009 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14813 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15284 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15284 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22870 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22870 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252 Référence CVE CVE-2025-41248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-41248 Référence CVE CVE-2025-41249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-41249 Référence CVE CVE-2025-5187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5187 Référence CVE CVE-2025-53643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53643 Référence CVE CVE-2025-58754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58754 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59471 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59472 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6176 Référence CVE CVE-2025-62718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-64718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-64718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-64756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-64756 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0188Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Splunk

ord?id=CVE-2025-15284 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22871 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22874 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22874 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23166 Référence CVE CVE-2025-27210 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27210 Référence CVE CVE-2025-4673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4673 Référence CVE CVE-2025-47906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47906 Référence CVE CVE-2025-47907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47907 Référence CVE CVE-2025-47912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47912 Référence CVE CVE-2025-53643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53643 Référence CVE CVE-2025-58183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58183 Référence CVE CVE-2025-58185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58185 Référence CVE CVE-2025-58186 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58186 Référence CVE CVE-2025-58187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58187 Référence CVE CVE-2025-58188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58188 Référence CVE CVE-2025-58189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58189 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61723 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61723 Référence CVE CVE-2025-61724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ecord?id=CVE-2025-48887 Référence CVE CVE-2025-48956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48956 Référence CVE CVE-2025-4947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4947 Référence CVE CVE-2025-49794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-49794 Référence CVE CVE-2025-49795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-49795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-49796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-49796 Référence CVE CVE-2025-50182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50182 Référence CVE CVE-2025-5025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5025 Référence CVE CVE-2025-52099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-52099 Référence CVE CVE-2025-53643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53643 Référence CVE CVE-2025-54121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54121 Référence CVE CVE-2025-55163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55163 Référence CVE CVE-2025-57809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-57809 Référence CVE CVE-2025-58056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58056 Référence CVE CVE-2025-58057 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58057 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59375 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59375 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59425 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6021 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ecord?id=CVE-2025-53062 Référence CVE CVE-2025-53066 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53066 Référence CVE CVE-2025-53069 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53069 Référence CVE CVE-2025-53101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53101 Référence CVE CVE-2025-5318 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5318 Référence CVE CVE-2025-53367 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53367 Référence CVE CVE-2025-53506 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53506 Référence CVE CVE-2025-5351 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5351 Référence CVE CVE-2025-53547 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53547 Référence CVE CVE-2025-53643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53643 Référence CVE CVE-2025-5372 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5372 Référence CVE CVE-2025-53859 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53859 Référence CVE CVE-2025-53864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53864 Référence CVE CVE-2025-53905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53905 Référence CVE CVE-2025-53906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53906 Référence CVE CVE-2025-54388 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54388 Référence CVE CVE-2025-54410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54410 Référence CVE CVE-2025-54801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-011585aiohttp project の aiohttp における HTTP リクエストスマグリングに関する脆弱性

aiohttp project の aiohttp には、HTTP リクエストスマグリングに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2025-0330Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Oracle Communications producten

Recent vulnerabilities in Oracle Communications Operations Monitor and aiohttp could allow unauthorized access and data manipulation, with significant integrity impacts and request smuggling risks in affected versions.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 14 Jul 2025 · Last source change 15 Jul 2025, 19:50 UTC · CWE-444 · Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-21384
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    < 3.12.14 · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    After
    < 3.12.14 · Fixed: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
Fixed release recorded from official guidance
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-21384↗Red Hat Product Security security advisory↗CVE authority or vendor reference · GitHub GHSA-9548-QRRJ-X5PJ↗Patch or update reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-53643 · cve.blacktree.nl