Evidence used
- No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
- The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
- EPSS is 0.82% for the current model date.
BlackTreeCVE IntelligenceApache Software Foundation · Apache CXF
Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
These OSV and GitHub advisory ranges apply only to the named package and ecosystem. A listed fixed version is not a universal product patch or proof that an update is installed.
| Ecosystem and package | Affected range | First fixed version | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mavenorg.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-transports-jms | ECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; fixed 3.6.8 | 3.6.8 | OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026 |
| Mavenorg.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-transports-jms | ECOSYSTEM: introduced 4.0.0; fixed 4.0.9 | 4.0.9 | OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026 |
| Mavenorg.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-transports-jms | ECOSYSTEM: introduced 4.1.0; fixed 4.1.3 | 4.1.3 | OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026 |
| mavenorg.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-transports-jms | < 3.6.8 | 3.6.8 | GitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 23 Jan 2026 |
| mavenorg.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-transports-jms | >= 4.0.0, < 4.0.9 | 4.0.9 | GitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 23 Jan 2026 |
| mavenorg.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-transports-jms | >= 4.1.0, < 4.1.3 | 4.1.3 | GitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 23 Jan 2026 |
Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.
The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.
Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
Patch availableIf untrusted users are allowed to configure JMS for Apache CXF, previously they could use RMI or LDAP URLs, potentially leading to code execution capabilities. This interface is now restricted to reject those protocols, removing this possibility. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 3.6.8, 4.0.9 or 4.1.3, which fix this issue.
If untrusted users are allowed to configure JMS for Apache CXF, previously they could use RMI or LDAP URLs, potentially leading to code execution capabilities. This interface is now restricted to reject those protocols, removing this possibility. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 3.6.8, 4.0.9 or 4.1.3, which fix this issue.
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
If untrusted users are allowed to configure JMS for Apache CXF, previously they could use RMI or LDAP URLs, potentially leading to code execution capabilities. This interface is now restricted to reject those protocols, removing this possibility. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 3.6.8, 4.0.9 or 4.1.3, which fix this issue.
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.
CWE-20: Improper Input Validation. The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HCommon Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Published 8 Aug 2025 · Last source change 26 Feb 2026, 17:49 UTC · CWE-20 · Improper Input Validation
Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.