BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-48913High confidence

Apache CXF: Untrusted JMS configuration can lead to RCE

Apache Software Foundation · Apache CXF

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 72 hours

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.82% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Apache Software Foundation Apache CXF and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Open-source package ranges6 source-attributed ranges

These OSV and GitHub advisory ranges apply only to the named package and ecosystem. A listed fixed version is not a universal product patch or proof that an update is installed.

Ecosystem and packageAffected rangeFirst fixed versionEvidence
Mavenorg.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-transports-jmsECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; fixed 3.6.83.6.8OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
Mavenorg.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-transports-jmsECOSYSTEM: introduced 4.0.0; fixed 4.0.94.0.9OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
Mavenorg.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-transports-jmsECOSYSTEM: introduced 4.1.0; fixed 4.1.34.1.3OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
mavenorg.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-transports-jms< 3.6.83.6.8GitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 23 Jan 2026
mavenorg.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-transports-jms>= 4.0.0, < 4.0.94.0.9GitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 23 Jan 2026
mavenorg.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-transports-jms>= 4.1.0, < 4.1.34.1.3GitHub advisory ↗github reviewed aggregator · 23 Jan 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2025-48913 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securityorg.apache.cxf/cxf: CXF JMS Code Execution Vulnerability
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • cxf as a component of Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7
Summary
A flaw was found in org.apache.cxf/cxf, where untrusted users can configure JMS to allow the specification of RMI or LDAP URLs, possibly leading to code execution. This vulnerability allows an attacker to provide malicious protocol URLs during JMS configuration.
Remediation
Before applying this update, ensure all previously released errata relevant to your system have been applied. Also, back up your existing installation, including all applications, configuration files, databases and database settings. For details on how to apply this update, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-23982

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 72 hours

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

If untrusted users are allowed to configure JMS for Apache CXF, previously they could use RMI or LDAP URLs, potentially leading to code execution capabilities. This interface is now restricted to reject those protocols, removing this possibility. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 3.6.8, 4.0.9 or 4.1.3, which fix this issue.

What

If untrusted users are allowed to configure JMS for Apache CXF, previously they could use RMI or LDAP URLs, potentially leading to code execution capabilities. This interface is now restricted to reject those protocols, removing this possibility. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 3.6.8, 4.0.9 or 4.1.3, which fix this issue.

Why

The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

If untrusted users are allowed to configure JMS for Apache CXF, previously they could use RMI or LDAP URLs, potentially leading to code execution capabilities. This interface is now restricted to reject those protocols, removing this possibility. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 3.6.8, 4.0.9 or 4.1.3, which fix this issue.

Why

The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Input Validation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-20 ↗

CWE-20: Improper Input Validation. The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-20
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-3043IBM QRadar SIEM: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM QRadar SIEM ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, um Informationen offenzulegen, um Dateien zu manipulieren, um einen Cross-Site Scripting Angriff durchzuführen und um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-1194Oracle Communications: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Oracle Communications ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0862RealObjects PDFreactor: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in RealObjects PDFreactor ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen, Daten zu manipulieren, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen oder andere, nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0783IBM QRadar SIEM: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM QRadar SIEM ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, um Informationen offenzulegen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, um einen Cross-Site Scripting Angriff durchzuführen, und um Dateien zu manipulieren.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0351Dell NetWorker (Third Party Components): Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell NetWorker ausnutzen, um Angriffe zu starten, die die Integrität, Vertraulichkeit und Verfügbarkeit von Systemen beeinträchtigen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2265SAP Patchday Oktober 2025: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in SAP Software ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Daten zu manipulieren, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen oder andere nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1751Apache CXF: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Codeausführung

Ein entfernter, authentisierter Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in Apache CXF ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250813Security Bulletin 13 Aug 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 13 Aug 2025, published on 13 August 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1094Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2025-13151 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14505 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14505 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14914 Référence CVE CVE-2025-14920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14920 Référence CVE CVE-2025-15599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15599 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40026 Référence CVE CVE-2025-47273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47273 Référence CVE CVE-2025-47279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47279 Référence CVE CVE-2025-47914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47914 Référence CVE CVE-2025-48913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48913 Référence CVE CVE-2025-54410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54410 Référence CVE CVE-2025-58181 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58181 Référence CVE CVE-2025-5889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5889 Référence CVE CVE-2025-6170 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6170 Référence CVE CVE-2025-62718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-64718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-64718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-66168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66168 Référence CVE CVE-2025-69873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0327Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2025-40096 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40135 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40135 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40158 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40170 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40170 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40269 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40271 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40271 Référence CVE CVE-2025-40322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40322 Référence CVE CVE-2025-48068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48068 Référence CVE CVE-2025-48913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48913 Référence CVE CVE-2025-48924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48924 Référence CVE CVE-2025-4897 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4897 Référence CVE CVE-2025-5372 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5372 Référence CVE CVE-2025-53905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53905 Référence CVE CVE-2025-53906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53906 Référence CVE CVE-2025-55173 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55173 Référence CVE CVE-2025-57350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-57350 Référence CVE CVE-2025-57352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1072Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ord?id=CVE-2025-30749 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30754 Référence CVE CVE-2025-30761 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30761 Référence CVE CVE-2025-4447 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4447 Référence CVE CVE-2025-46653 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-46653 Référence CVE CVE-2025-47935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47935 Référence CVE CVE-2025-47944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47944 Référence CVE CVE-2025-48387 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48387 Référence CVE CVE-2025-48795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48795 Référence CVE CVE-2025-48913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48913 Référence CVE CVE-2025-48997 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48997 Référence CVE CVE-2025-50106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50106 Référence CVE CVE-2025-56200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-56200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-57350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-57350 Référence CVE CVE-2025-58754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58754 Référence CVE CVE-2025-5889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5889 Référence CVE CVE-2025-59343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59343 Référence CVE CVE-2025-7338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0867Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits SAP

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits SAP. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-011660Apache Software Foundation の Apache CXF における脆弱性

Apache Software Foundation の Apache CXF には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2026-017115Apache Software FoundationのApache CXFにおける入力確認に関する脆弱性

Apache CXFにおいて、信頼されていないJMS設定がリモートコード実行(RCE)につながる可能性がある問題の修正が不完全であり、別の経路で信頼されていないユーザーがJMS設定を操作できるため、コードが実行されるリスクがあります。ユーザーは、この問題を修正したバージョン4.2.1、4.1.6、または3.6.11にアップグレードすることを推奨します。

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-6611SAP 제품 보안 업데이트 권고

SAP Data Hub Integration Suite 제품에서 발생하는 보안 구성 오류 취약점(CVE-2025-48913) [1][9]

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2025-0323Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in SAP Producten

Recent vulnerabilities in Apache CXF allow untrusted users to configure JMS with RMI or LDAP URLs, leading to potential code execution, with specific versions recommended for upgrade to address these issues.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
cxf as a component of Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7
Fixed
Action
Before applying this update, ensure all previously released errata relevant to your system have been applied. Also, back up your existing installation, including all applications, configuration files, databases and database settings. For details on how to apply this update, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 8 Aug 2025 · Last source change 26 Feb 2026, 17:49 UTC · CWE-20 · Improper Input Validation

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCISA ADP
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-23982
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    4.1.0 < 4.1.3; 4.0.0 < 4.0.9; < 3.6.8 · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
    After
    4.1.0 < 4.1.3; 4.0.0 < 4.0.9; < 3.6.8 · Fixed: Before applying this update, ensure all previously released errata relevant to your system have been applied. Also, back up your existing installation, including all applications, configuration files, databases and database settings. For details on how to apply this update, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  2. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Patch available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Patch available
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-48913 · cve.blacktree.nl