BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2025-47148High confidence

BIG-IP APM and SSL Orchestrator vulnerability

F5 · BIG-IP

Official source article: F5 K000148816 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

7.1HighCVSS 4.0
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Mitigation available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.39% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Apply the linked authoritative mitigation while planning the permanent fix.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs F5 BIG-IP and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Recheck the vendor advisory before scheduling a change because no verified fixed version is currently retained.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-34655

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Mitigation available
01

What, why and how

When the BIG-IP system is configured as both a Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) service provider (SP) and Identity Provider (IdP), with single logout (SLO) enabled on an access policy, undisclosed requests can cause an increase in memory resource utilization.  Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.

What

When the BIG-IP system is configured as both a Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) service provider (SP) and Identity Provider (IdP), with single logout (SLO) enabled on an access policy, undisclosed requests can cause an increase in memory resource utilization.  Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.

Why

The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

When the BIG-IP system is configured as both a Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) service provider (SP) and Identity Provider (IdP), with single logout (SLO) enabled on an access policy, undisclosed requests can cause an increase in memory resource utilization.  Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.

Why

The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Resource Shutdown or Release → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Not a CVSS 4.0 base metric
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-404 ↗

CWE-404: Improper Resource Shutdown or Release. The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 4.0: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.ATNoneAttack requirements: No additional deployment or execution condition is required.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.VCNoneVulnerable-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.VINoneVulnerable-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.VAHighVulnerable-system availability: A successful attack can cause a major loss.SCNoneSubsequent-system confidentiality: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SINoneSubsequent-system integrity: No direct loss is represented by this metric.SALowSubsequent-system availability: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkCWE-404
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2310F5 BIG-IP und F5OS: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in F5 BIG-IP und F5 F5OS ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsmechanismen zu umgehen, seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand (DoS) herbeizuführen, einen Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriff (XSS) durchzuführen und Informationen offenzulegen oder zu manipulieren, sowie um Code auszuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2308F5 BIG-IP: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in F5 BIG-IP ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20251022Security Bulletin 22 Oct 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 22 Oct 2025, published on 22 October 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0886Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits F5

Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges, un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données. Solutions Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité F5 K000156572 du 15 octobre 2025 https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000156572 Référence CVE CVE-2025-29481 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29481 Référence CVE CVE-2025-41430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-41430 Référence CVE CVE-2025-46706 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-46706 Référence CVE CVE-2025-47148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47148 Référence CVE CVE-2025-47150 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47150 Référence CVE CVE-2025-48008 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48008 Référence CVE CVE-2025-53474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53474 Référence CVE CVE-2025-53521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53521 Référence CVE CVE-2025-53856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53856 Référence CVE CVE-2025-53860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53860 Référence CVE CVE-2025-53868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53868 Référence CVE CVE-2025-54479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-016990F5 Networks の BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) および BIG-IP SSL Orchestrator におけるリソースの不適切なシャットダウンおよびリリースに関する脆弱性

F5 Networks の BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) および BIG-IP SSL Orchestrator には、リソースの不適切なシャットダウンおよびリリースに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-6618F5 제품 보안 업데이트 권고

- 2.1.0 | 2.1.0 EHF-1 | | CVE-2025-58096 | BIG-IP (all modules) | 17.5.0 - 17.5.1 17.1.0 - 17.1.2 16.1.0 - 16.1.6 15.1.0 - 15.1.10 | 17.5.1.3 17.1.3 16.1.6.1 15.1.10.8 | | CVE-2025-61935 | BIG-IP Advanced WAF/ASM | 17.5.0 17.1.0 - 17.1.2 15.1.0 - 15.1.10 | 17.5.1 17.1.3 15.1.10.8 | | CVE-2025-59778 | F5OS-C | 1.8.0 - 1.8.1 1.6.0 - 1.6.2 | 1.8.2 1.6.4 | | CVE-2025-59481 | BIG-IP (all modules) | 17.5.0 - 17.5.1 17.1.0 - 17.1.2 16.1.0 - 16.1.6 15.1.0 - 15.1.10 | 17.5.1.3 17.1.3 16.1.6.1 15.1.10.8 | | CVE-2025-61958 | BIG-IP (all modules) | 17.5.0 - 17.5.1 17.1.0 - 17.1.2 16.1.0 - 16.1.6 15.1.0 - 15.1.10 | 17.5.1.1 17.1.3 16.1.6.1 15.1.10.8 | | CVE-2025-47148 | BIG-IP APM, APM with SWG, SSL Orchestrator, SSL Orchestrator with SWG | 17.5.0 17.1.0 - 17.1.2 16.1.0 - 16.1.6 15.1.0 - 15.1.10 | 17.5.1 17.1.3 16.1.6.1 15.1.10.8 | | CVE-2025-47150 | F5OS-A | 1.8.0 - 1.8.1 1.5.1 - 1.5.2 | 1.8.3 1.5.3 | | CVE-2025-47150 | F5OS-C | 1.6.0 - 1.6.2 | 1.8.0 1.6.4 | | CVE-2025-55670 | BIG-IP Next SPK | 1.7.0 - 1.9.2 | None | | CVE-2025-55670 | BIG-IP Next CNF | 1.1.0 - 1.4.1 | None | | CVE-2025-55670 | BIG-IP Next for Kubernetes | 2.0.0 | 2.1.0 | | CVE-2025-54805 | BIG-IP Next SPK | 1.7.0 - 1.9.2 | 2.0.0 | | CVE-2025-54805 | BIG-IP Next CNF | 1.1.0 - 1.4.1 | 2.0.0 | | CVE-2025-54805 | BIG-IP Next for Kubernetes

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2025-0319Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in F5 Networks BIG-IP, F5OS en NGINX App Protect WAF

Configuring the BIG-IP system as both a SAML service provider and Identity Provider with single logout enabled can cause increased memory usage due to undisclosed requests, particularly on unsupported software versions.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Mitigation available
Affected
BIG-IP: 17.5.0 < 17.5.1, 17.1.0 < 17.1.3, 16.1.0 < 16.1.6.1, 15.1.0 < 15.1.10.8
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
F5 Networks heeft updates uitgebracht om de kwetsbaarheden te verhelpen. Zie bijgevoegde referenties voor meer informatie. Aanvullend op bovengenoemd beveiligingsadvies heeft F5 Networks een websitebericht gepubliceerd over een beveiligingsincident op hun systemen. F5 Networks adviseert klanten hierin de laatste beveiligingsupdates zo snel mogelijk te installeren. Daarnaast heeft F5 Networks detectie- en hardeningmaatregelen gedeeld, en adviseert het bedrijf deze maatregelen in te zetten. Lees het websitebericht voor meer informatie. **UPDATE 27/01/2026** F5 heeft een update geplaatst op de website betreffende CVE-2025-53521. Het NCSC heeft waargenomen dat er misbruik is gemaakt van deze kwetsbaarheid.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 15 Oct 2025 · Last source change 26 Feb 2026, 16:57 UTC · CWE-404 · Improper Resource Shutdown or Release

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-34655
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Mitigation available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Mitigation available
    NCSC-NL ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2025-47148 · cve.blacktree.nl